[x86] Fix a really subtle miscompile due to a somewhat glaring bug in
EFLAGS copy lowering.
If you have a branch of LLVM, you may want to cherrypick this. It is
extremely unlikely to hit this case empirically, but it will likely
manifest as an "impossible" branch being taken somewhere, and will be
... very hard to debug.
Hitting this requires complex conditions living across complex
control flow combined with some interesting memory (non-stack)
initialized with the results of a comparison. Also, because you have
to arrange for an EFLAGS copy to be in *just* the right place, almost
anything you do to the code will hide the bug. I was unable to reduce
anything remotely resembling a "good" test case from the place where
I hit it, and so instead I have constructed synthetic MIR testing
that directly exercises the bug in question (as well as the good
behavior for completeness).
The issue is that we would mistakenly assume any SETcc with a valid
condition and an initial operand that was a register and a virtual
register at that to be a register *defining* SETcc...
It isn't though....
This would in turn cause us to test some other bizarre register,
typically the base pointer of some memory. Now, testing this register
and using that to branch on doesn't make any sense. It even fails the
machine verifier (if you are running it) due to the wrong register
class. But it will make it through LLVM, assemble, and it *looks*
fine... But wow do you get a very unsual and surprising branch taken
in your actual code.
The fix is to actually check what kind of SETcc instruction we're
dealing with. Because there are a bunch of them, I just test the
may-store bit in the instruction. I've also added an assert for
sanity that ensure we are, in fact, *defining* the register operand.
=D
Noticed by: kib
MFC after: 1 week
56b9b447a3