7aa807c3cb
In order to ensure that changing the frag6 code does not change behaviour or break code a set of test cases were implemented. Like some other test cases these use Scapy to generate packets and possibly wait for expected answers. In most cases we do check the global and per interface (netstat) statistics output using the libxo output and grep to validate fields and numbers. This is a bit hackish but we currently have no better way to match a selected number of stats only (we have to ignore some of the ND6 variables; otherwise we could use the entire list). Test cases include atomic fragments, single fragments, multi-fragments, and try to cover most error cases in the code currently. In addition vnet teardown is tested to not panic. A separate set (not in-tree currently) of probes were used in order to make sure that the test cases actually test what they should. The "sniffer" code was copied and adjusted from the netpfil version as we sometimes will not get packets or have longer timeouts to deal with. Sponsored by: Netflix |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
etc | ||
freebsd_test_suite | ||
sys | ||
Kyuafile | ||
Makefile | ||
Makefile.depend | ||
Makefile.inc0 | ||
README |
src/tests: The FreeBSD test suite ================================= To run the FreeBSD test suite: (1) Make sure that kyua is installed: pkg install kyua (2) To run the tests: kyua test -k /usr/tests/Kyuafile (3) To see the test results: kyua report For further information on using the test suite, read tests(7): man tests Description of FreeBSD test suite ================================= The build of the test suite is organized in the following manner: * The build of all test artifacts is protected by the MK_TESTS knob. The user can disable these with the WITHOUT_TESTS setting in src.conf(5). * The goal for /usr/tests/ (the installed test programs) is to follow the same hierarchy as /usr/src/ wherever possible, which in turn drives several of the design decisions described below. This simplifies the discoverability of tests. We want a mapping such as: /usr/src/bin/cp/ -> /usr/tests/bin/cp/ /usr/src/lib/libc/ -> /usr/tests/lib/libc/ /usr/src/usr.bin/cut/ -> /usr/tests/usr.bin/cut/ ... and many more ... * Test programs for specific utilities and libraries are located next to the source code of such programs. For example, the tests for the src/lib/libcrypt/ library live in src/lib/libcrypt/tests/. The tests/ subdirectory is optional and should, in general, be avoided. * The src/tests/ hierarchy (this directory) provides generic test infrastructure and glue code to join all test programs together into a single test suite definition. * The src/tests/ hierarchy also includes cross-functional test programs: i.e. test programs that cover more than a single utility or library and thus don't fit anywhere else in the tree. Consider this to follow the same rationale as src/share/man/: this directory contains generic manual pages while the manual pages that are specific to individual tools or libraries live next to the source code. In order to keep the src/tests/ hierarchy decoupled from the actual test programs being installed --which is a worthy goal because it simplifies the addition of new test programs and simplifies the maintenance of the tree-- the top-level Kyuafile does not know which subdirectories may exist upfront. Instead, such Kyuafile automatically detects, at run-time, which */Kyuafile files exist and uses those directly. Similarly, every directory in src/ that wants to install a Kyuafile to just recurse into other subdirectories reuses this Kyuafile with auto-discovery features. As an example, take a look at src/lib/tests/ whose sole purpose is to install a Kyuafile into /usr/tests/lib/. The goal in this specific case is for /usr/tests/lib/ to be generated entirely from src/lib/. -- $FreeBSD$