Note: there was a merge conflict resolved by me.
illumos/illumos-gate@43297f973a43297f973ahttps://www.illumos.org/issues/3821
We recently had nodes with some of the latest zfs bits panic on us in a
rollback-heavy environment. The following is from my preliminary analysis:
Let's look at where we died:
> $C
ffffff01ea6b9a10 taskq_dispatch+0x3a(0, fffffffff7d20450, ffffff5551dea920, 1)
ffffff01ea6b9a60 zil_clean+0xce(ffffff4b7106c080, 7e0f1)
ffffff01ea6b9aa0 dsl_pool_sync_done+0x47(ffffff4313065680, 7e0f1)
ffffff01ea6b9b70 spa_sync+0x55f(ffffff4310c1d040, 7e0f1)
ffffff01ea6b9c20 txg_sync_thread+0x20f(ffffff4313065680)
ffffff01ea6b9c30 thread_start+8()
If we dig in we can find that this dataset corresponds to a zone:
> ffffff4b7106c080::print zilog_t zl_os->os_dsl_dataset->ds_dir->dd_myname
zl_os->os_dsl_dataset->ds_dir->dd_myname = [ "8ffce16a-13c2-4efa-a233-
9e378e89877b" ]
Okay so we have a null taskq pointer. That only happens during the calls to
zil_open and zil_close. If we poke around we can see that we're actually in
midst of a rollback:
> ::pgrep zfs | ::printf "0x%x %s\\n" proc_t . p_user.u_psargs
0xffffff43262800a0 zfs rollback zones/15714eb6-f5ea-469f-ac6d-
4b8ab06213c2@marlin_init
0xffffff54e22a1028 zfs rollback zones/8ffce16a-13c2-4efa-a233-
9e378e89877b@marlin_init
0xffffff4362f3a058 zfs rollback zones/0ddb8e49-ca7e-42e1-8fdc-
4ac4ba8fe9f8@marlin_init
0xffffff5748e8d020 zfs rollback zones/426357b5-832d-4430-953e-
10cd45ff8e9f@marlin_init
0xffffff436b867008 zfs rollback zones/8f36bf37-8a9c-4a44-995c-
6d1b2751e6f5@marlin_init
0xffffff4381ad4090 zfs rollback zones/6c8eca18-fbd6-46dd-ac24-
2ed45cd0da70@marlin_init
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
MFC after: 3 weeks
0451d4e97b