Peter Wemm
2f9267ec23
Move the "- 1" into the RQB_FFS(mask) macro itself so that
...
implementations can provide a base zero ffs function if they wish.
This changes
#define RQB_FFS(mask) (ffs64(mask))
foo = RQB_FFS(mask) - 1;
to
#define RQB_FFS(mask) (ffs64(mask) - 1)
foo = RQB_FFS(mask);
On some platforms we can get the "- 1" for free, eg: those that use the
C code for ffs64().
Reviewed by: jake (in principle)
2002-06-20 06:21:20 +00:00
..
2001-11-02 18:05:43 +00:00
2001-11-02 18:05:43 +00:00
2001-04-21 21:44:39 +00:00
2002-05-10 02:21:05 +00:00
2002-03-23 02:01:27 +00:00
2002-05-17 05:45:39 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-02-27 17:16:18 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-04-01 23:51:23 +00:00
2002-04-01 23:51:23 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-05-30 08:32:18 +00:00
2002-04-12 15:56:45 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2001-09-12 08:38:13 +00:00
2001-02-02 10:20:30 +00:00
2001-12-20 23:48:31 +00:00
2001-06-01 13:23:28 +00:00
2000-10-27 07:07:24 +00:00
2001-11-02 18:05:43 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2001-12-18 00:27:18 +00:00
2002-05-14 20:35:29 +00:00
2001-12-11 23:33:44 +00:00
2001-12-11 23:33:44 +00:00
2002-04-29 07:43:16 +00:00
2002-03-27 05:39:23 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2002-03-16 00:25:53 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2001-03-30 22:04:08 +00:00
2002-06-20 06:21:20 +00:00
2000-10-06 11:53:32 +00:00
2002-02-17 17:40:34 +00:00
2002-02-17 17:40:34 +00:00
2001-08-13 22:41:15 +00:00
2002-05-10 02:02:54 +00:00
2002-03-20 18:58:47 +00:00
2001-12-09 19:12:07 +00:00
2002-01-10 02:36:30 +00:00
2002-05-10 02:02:54 +00:00
2001-09-12 08:38:13 +00:00