all other threads to suicide, problem is execve() could be failed, and
a failed execve() would change threaded process to unthreaded, this side
effect is unexpected.
The new code introduces a new single threading mode SINGLE_BOUNDARY, in
the mode, all threads should suspend themself at user boundary except
the singler. we can not use SINGLE_NO_EXIT because we want to start from
a clean state if execve() is successful, suspending other threads at unknown
point and later resuming them from there and forcing them to exit at user
boundary may cause the process to start from a dirty state. If execve() is
successful, current thread upgrades to SINGLE_EXIT mode and forces other
threads to suicide at user boundary, otherwise, other threads will be resumed
and their interrupted syscall will be restarted.
Reviewed by: julian
793ea9317e