Bruce Evans
5182dcbec2
Rearrange the inner loop of scanc() to get better code on i*86's
...
(on an i486, 10 cycles (+ cache misses) instead of 15). The
change should be a no-op if the compiler is any good. The best
possible i*86 code for the same algorithm is only 1 more cycle
faster on i486's so I don't want to bother implementing an
assembler version.
scanc() is a bottleneck for OPOST processing. It is naturally
about 4 times as slow as bcopy() on 32-bit systems.
1995-07-11 18:50:47 +00:00
..
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-05-30 05:51:47 +00:00
1995-05-30 08:16:23 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-03-16 18:17:34 +00:00
1995-03-17 06:15:40 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-03-23 07:02:14 +00:00
1995-05-30 08:16:23 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-05-30 08:16:23 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-05-30 08:16:23 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-03-17 06:15:40 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-07-11 18:50:47 +00:00
1995-03-17 06:15:40 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-02-27 09:16:04 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1995-05-30 05:51:47 +00:00
1994-10-25 14:57:57 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00
1994-08-02 07:55:43 +00:00