markm bedd05ccec The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's. ... Assembler macros are tidied up and made as similar as sanely possible. The macros are translated into C (__inline static) functions for lint. Declaration orders are made the same. Declarations are all ISOfied and tidied up. Comment contents have gratuitous diffs removed. The net result is a bunch of crt1.c's that are 90% the same. It may be possible to now encapsulate the differences in one MD header, and have only one MI crt1.c file (although the macros to do this may be ugly). Helpful comments by: obrien, bde Alpha tested by: des i386-elf tested by: markm		2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
..
alpha	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
amd64	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
common	Fix the copyright dates.	2002-05-07 18:07:43 +00:00
i386	Do not use __progname directly (except in [gs]etprogname(3)).	2002-03-29 22:43:43 +00:00
i386-elf	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
ia64	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
powerpc	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00
sparc64	The main reason for this is to reduce diffs between all the crt1.c's.	2002-07-16 12:28:50 +00:00