back to the original single nanosleep() implementation. This is POSIX and
Unix98 (aka single-unix spec v2) compliant behavior. If a program sets
alarm(2) or an interval timer (setitimer(2)) without a SIGALRM handler
being active, sleep(3) will no longer absorb it, and the program will get
what it asked for..... :-]
The original reason for this in the first place (apache) doesn't seem to
need it anymore, according to Andrey.
Reviewed by: ache, bde
9f375c3252