David E. O'Brien
b003da7938
Give a more reasonable CPU time to the threads which are using scheduler
...
activation (i.e., applications are using libpthread). This is because
SCHED_ULE sometimes puts P_SA processes into ksq_next unnecessarily.
Which doesn't give fair amount of CPU time to processes which are
using scheduler-activation-based threads when other (semi-)CPU-intensive,
non-P_SA processes are running.
Further work will no doubt be done by jeffr at a later date.
Submitted by: Taku YAMAMOTO <taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp>
Reviewed by: rwatson, freebsd-current@
2004-03-21 18:53:29 +00:00
..
2004-03-20 21:06:20 +00:00
2004-03-20 21:06:20 +00:00
2004-03-20 20:41:40 +00:00
2004-03-14 09:43:15 +00:00
2004-02-28 12:59:56 +00:00
2004-02-21 21:32:15 +00:00
2004-03-21 01:22:24 +00:00
2004-03-21 05:10:34 +00:00
2004-03-18 17:46:27 +00:00
2004-01-27 18:57:21 +00:00
2004-02-29 09:55:32 +00:00
2004-03-21 18:16:49 +00:00
2004-03-14 23:28:12 +00:00
2004-03-18 07:17:10 +00:00
2004-03-11 18:02:36 +00:00
2004-03-17 17:50:55 +00:00
2004-03-20 20:41:40 +00:00
2004-03-21 01:41:29 +00:00
2004-03-17 17:50:55 +00:00
2004-03-11 16:33:11 +00:00
2004-03-21 18:53:29 +00:00
2004-03-12 21:45:33 +00:00
2004-03-20 22:41:52 +00:00
2004-03-21 17:27:41 +00:00
2004-03-16 19:25:55 +00:00
2004-03-21 03:28:08 +00:00
2004-03-12 21:45:33 +00:00
2004-03-18 12:34:14 +00:00
2004-03-21 18:51:26 +00:00
2004-03-10 04:56:54 +00:00
2004-02-16 17:09:53 +00:00
2004-03-01 03:14:23 +00:00
2004-01-25 17:18:12 +00:00
2004-03-01 03:14:23 +00:00
2004-03-14 02:06:28 +00:00
2004-03-01 03:14:23 +00:00
2004-03-11 18:02:36 +00:00
2004-03-17 21:10:20 +00:00
2004-03-14 06:21:56 +00:00
2004-03-05 22:42:17 +00:00
2004-03-17 17:50:55 +00:00
2004-03-17 17:50:55 +00:00
2004-03-19 23:20:23 +00:00
2004-02-03 22:27:03 +00:00
2004-03-20 20:41:40 +00:00
2004-03-14 06:21:56 +00:00
2004-02-29 15:33:56 +00:00
2004-03-20 20:41:40 +00:00
2004-03-20 20:41:40 +00:00
2004-02-05 22:51:16 +00:00
2004-03-16 22:06:32 +00:00
2004-03-18 20:58:51 +00:00
2004-01-17 03:28:27 +00:00