rwatson
b8fd2dd0fd
r222015 introduced a new assertion that the size of a fixed-length sbuf
...
buffer is greater than 1. This triggered panics in at least one spot in
the kernel (the MAC Framework) which passes non-negative, rather than >1
buffer sizes based on the size of a user buffer passed into a system
call. While 0-size buffers aren't particularly useful, they also aren't
strictly incorrect, so loosen the assertion.
Discussed with: phk (fears I might be EDOOFUS but willing to go along)
Spotted by: pho + stress2
Approved by: re (kib)
2011-08-19 08:29:10 +00:00
..
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-08-09 21:01:36 +00:00
2011-08-14 00:20:37 +00:00
2011-08-12 20:09:38 +00:00
2011-08-13 21:35:22 +00:00
2011-08-18 22:51:30 +00:00
2011-08-18 22:51:30 +00:00
2011-08-17 13:02:50 +00:00
2011-06-07 01:28:12 +00:00
2011-08-18 16:07:41 +00:00
2011-08-16 20:13:17 +00:00
2011-07-17 20:35:30 +00:00
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-08-09 21:01:36 +00:00
2011-05-09 18:53:13 +00:00
2011-08-19 08:29:10 +00:00
2011-07-16 08:05:49 +00:00
2011-08-13 17:17:04 +00:00
2011-08-15 07:32:44 +00:00
2011-08-08 05:25:51 +00:00
2011-08-16 09:07:59 +00:00
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-08-16 21:04:18 +00:00
2011-08-03 20:21:00 +00:00
2011-06-28 11:57:25 +00:00
2011-06-29 15:17:29 +00:00
2011-08-09 15:29:58 +00:00
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-05-22 01:07:54 +00:00
2011-08-16 20:07:47 +00:00
2011-08-16 20:07:47 +00:00
2011-08-07 20:16:46 +00:00
2011-07-30 01:06:12 +00:00
2011-08-14 00:20:37 +00:00
2011-06-19 22:08:55 +00:00
2011-08-16 20:07:47 +00:00
2011-08-09 21:01:36 +00:00
2011-08-18 23:08:52 +00:00
2011-06-26 18:25:10 +00:00
2011-03-31 21:33:33 +00:00
2011-08-15 07:32:44 +00:00
2011-08-11 12:30:23 +00:00
2011-07-16 14:05:34 +00:00
2011-06-11 04:59:01 +00:00
2011-06-10 20:51:41 +00:00