699 lines
25 KiB
HTML
699 lines
25 KiB
HTML
<html>
|
|
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>GCC Bugs</title>
|
|
</head>
|
|
|
|
<body>
|
|
<h1>GCC Bugs</h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>The latest version of this document is always available at
|
|
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html">http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
|
|
|
<h2>Table of Contents</h2>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="#report">Reporting Bugs</a>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="#need">What we need</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#dontwant">What we DON'T want</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#where">Where to post it</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#detailed">Detailed bug reporting instructions</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#gnat">Detailed bug reporting instructions for GNAT</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li><a href="#manage">Managing Bugs (GNATS and the test-suite)</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#known">Frequently Reported Bugs in GCC</a>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="#general">General</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#fortran">Fortran</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#c">C</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#cplusplus">C++</a>
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li><a href="#updating">Common problems updating from G++ 2.95 to
|
|
G++ 3.0</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#nonbugs">Non-bugs</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#missing">Missing features</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#parsing">Parse errors for "simple" code</a></li>
|
|
<li><a href="#-O3">Optimization at <code>-O3</code> takes a
|
|
very long time</a></li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
|
|
|
<h1><a name="report">Reporting Bugs</a></h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>Our preferred way of receiving bugs is via the
|
|
<a href="gnats.html">GCC GNATS bug reporting system</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Before you report a bug, please check the
|
|
<a href="#known">list of well-known bugs</a> and, <strong>if possible
|
|
in any way, try a current development snapshot</strong>.
|
|
If you want to report a bug with versions of GCC before 3.1 we strongly
|
|
recommend upgrading to the current release first.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Before reporting that GCC compiles your code incorrectly, please
|
|
compile it with <code>gcc -Wall</code> and see whether this shows
|
|
anything wrong with your code that could be the cause instead of a bug
|
|
in GCC.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h2>Summarized bug reporting instructions</h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>After this summary, you'll find detailed bug reporting
|
|
instructions, that explain how to obtain some of the information
|
|
requested in this summary.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="need">What we need</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
Please include in your bug report all of the following items, the first
|
|
three of which can be obtained from the output of <code>gcc -v</code>:
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>the exact version of GCC;</li>
|
|
<li>the system type;</li>
|
|
<li>the options given when GCC was configured/built;</li>
|
|
<li>the complete command line that triggers the bug;</li>
|
|
<li>the compiler output (error messages, warnings, etc.); and</li>
|
|
<li>the <em>preprocessed</em> file (<code>*.i*</code>) that triggers the
|
|
bug, generated by adding <code>-save-temps</code> to the complete
|
|
compilation command, or, in the case of a bug report for the GNAT front end,
|
|
a complete set of source files (see below).</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="dontwant">What we do <strong>not</strong> want</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>A source file that <code>#include</code>s header files that are left
|
|
out of the bug report (see above)</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>That source file and a collection of header files.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>An attached archive (tar, zip, shar, whatever) containing all
|
|
(or some :-) of the above.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>A code snippet that won't cause the compiler to produce the
|
|
exact output mentioned in the bug report (e.g., a snippet with just
|
|
a few lines around the one that <b>apparently</b> triggers the bug,
|
|
with some pieces replaced with ellipses or comments for extra
|
|
obfuscation :-)</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>The location (URL) of the package that failed to build (we won't
|
|
download it, anyway, since you've already given us what we need to
|
|
duplicate the bug, haven't you? :-)</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>An error that occurs only some of the times a certain file is
|
|
compiled, such that retrying a sufficient number of times results in
|
|
a successful compilation; this is a symptom of a hardware problem,
|
|
not of a compiler bug (sorry)</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>E-mail messages that complement previous, incomplete bug
|
|
reports. Post a new, self-contained, full bug report instead, if
|
|
possible as a follow-up to the original bug report</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Assembly files (<code>*.s</code>) produced by the compiler, or any
|
|
binary files, such as object files, executables or core files</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Duplicate bug reports, or reports of bugs already fixed in the
|
|
development tree, especially those that have already been reported
|
|
as fixed last week :-)</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Bugs in the assembler, the linker or the C library. These are
|
|
separate projects, with separate mailing lists and different bug
|
|
reporting procedures</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Bugs in releases or snapshots of GCC not issued by the GNU
|
|
Project. Report them to whoever provided you with the release</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Questions about the correctness or the expected behavior of
|
|
certain constructs that are not GCC extensions. Ask them in forums
|
|
dedicated to the discussion of the programming language</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="where">Where to post it</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
<p>Please submit your bug report directly to the
|
|
<a href="gnats.html">GCC GNATS bug database</a>.
|
|
Only if this is not possible, mail all information to
|
|
<a href="mailto:bug-gcc@gnu.org">bug-gcc@gnu.org</a> or
|
|
<a href="mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org">gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The GCC lists have message size limits (200 kbytes) and bug reports
|
|
over those limits will currently be bounced. If your bug is larger
|
|
than that, please post it using the <a href="gnats.html">GCC GNATS bug
|
|
database</a>.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="detailed">Detailed bug reporting instructions</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>Please refer to the <a href="#gnat">next section</a> when reporting
|
|
bugs in GNAT, the Ada compiler.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>In general, all the information we need can be obtained by
|
|
collecting the command line below, as well as its output and the
|
|
preprocessed file it generates.</p>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><code>gcc -v -save-temps <i>all-your-options
|
|
source-file</i></code></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p>Typically the preprocessed file (extension <code>.i</code> for C or
|
|
<code>.ii</code> for C++) will be large, so please compress the
|
|
resulting file with one of the popular compression programs such as
|
|
bzip2, gzip, zip or compress (in
|
|
decreasing order of preference). Use maximum compression
|
|
(<code>-9</code>) if available. Please include the compressed
|
|
preprocessor output in your bug report, even if the source code is
|
|
freely available elsewhere; it makes the job of our volunteer testers
|
|
much easier.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The <b>only</b> excuses to not send us the preprocessed sources are
|
|
(i) if you've found a bug in the preprocessor, or (ii) if you've
|
|
reduced the testcase to a small file that doesn't include any
|
|
other file. If you can't post the preprocessed sources because
|
|
they're proprietary code, then try to create a small file that
|
|
triggers the same problem.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Since we're supposed to be able to re-create the assembly output
|
|
(extension <code>.s</code>), you usually should not include
|
|
it in the bug report, although you may want to post parts of it to
|
|
point out assembly code you consider to be wrong.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Whether to use MIME attachments or <code>uuencode</code> is up to
|
|
you. In any case, make sure the compiler command line, version and
|
|
error output are in plain text, so that we don't have to decode the
|
|
bug report in order to tell who should take care of it. A meaningful
|
|
subject indicating language and platform also helps.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Please avoid posting an archive (.tar, .shar or .zip); we generally
|
|
need just a single file to reproduce the bug (the .i/.ii preprocessed
|
|
file), and, by storing it in an archive, you're just making our
|
|
volunteers' jobs harder. Only when your bug report requires multiple
|
|
source files to be reproduced should you use an archive. In any case,
|
|
make sure the compiler version, error message, etc, are included in
|
|
the body of your bug report as plain text, even if needlessly
|
|
duplicated as part of an archive.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you fail to supply enough information for a bug report to be
|
|
reproduced, someone will probably ask you to post additional
|
|
information (or just ignore your bug report, if they're in a bad day,
|
|
so try to get it right on the first posting :-). In this case, please
|
|
post the additional information to the bug reporting mailing list, not
|
|
just to the person who requested it, unless explicitly told so. If
|
|
possible, please include in this follow-up all the information you had
|
|
supplied in the incomplete bug report (including the preprocessor
|
|
output), so that the new bug report is self-contained.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="gnat">Detailed bug reporting instructions for GNAT</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>See the <a href="#detailed">previous section</a> for bug reporting
|
|
instructions for GCC language implementations other than Ada.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>Bug reports have to contain at least the following information in
|
|
order to be useful:</p>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
<li>the exact version of GCC, as shown by "<code>gcc -v</code>";</li>
|
|
<li>the system type;</li>
|
|
<li>the options when GCC was configured/built;</li>
|
|
<li>the exact command line passed to the <code>gcc</code> program
|
|
triggering the bug
|
|
(not just the flags passed to <code>gnatmake</code>, but
|
|
<code>gnatmake</code> prints the parameters it passed to <code>gcc</code>)</li>
|
|
<li>a collection of source files for reproducing the bug,
|
|
preferably a minimal set (see below);</li>
|
|
<li>a description of the expected behavior;</li>
|
|
<li>a description of actual behavior.</li>
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<p>If your code depends on additional source files (usually package
|
|
specifications), submit the source code for these compilation units in
|
|
a single file that is acceptable input to <code>gnatchop</code>,
|
|
i.e. contains no non-Ada text. If the compilation terminated
|
|
normally, you can usually obtain a list of dependencies using the
|
|
"<code>gnatls -d <i>main_unit</i></code>" command, where
|
|
<code><i>main_unit</i></code> is the file name of the main compilation
|
|
unit (which is also passed to <code>gcc</code>).</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you report a bug which causes the compiler to print a bug box,
|
|
include that bug box in your report, and do not forget to send all the
|
|
source files listed after the bug box along with your report.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you use <code>gnatprep</code>, be sure to send in preprocessed
|
|
sources (unless you have to report a bug in <code>gnatprep</code>).</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>When you have checked that your report meets these criteria, please
|
|
submit it accoding to our <a href="#where">generic instructions</a>.
|
|
(If you use a mailing list for reporting, please include an
|
|
"<code>[Ada]</code>" tag in the subject.)</p>
|
|
|
|
<h1><a name="manage">Managing Bugs (GNATS and the test-suite)</a></h1>
|
|
|
|
<p>This section contains information mostly intended for GCC
|
|
contributors.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you find a bug, but you are not fixing it (yet):</p>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>Create a (minimal) test-case.</li>
|
|
<li>Add the test-case to our test-suite, marking it as XFAIL unless
|
|
the bug is a regression.</li>
|
|
<li>Add a bug report referencing the test-case to GNATS.</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you fix a bug for which there is already a GNATS entry:</p>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>Remove the XFAIL on the test-case.</li>
|
|
<li>Close the bug report in GNATS.</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
<p>If you find a bug, and you are fixing it right then:</p>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>Create a (minimal) test-case.</li>
|
|
<li>Add the test-case to our test-suite, marking it as PASS.</li>
|
|
<li>Check in your fixes.</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
|
|
|
<h1><a name="known">Frequently Reported Bugs in GCC</a></h1>
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="fortran">Fortran</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>Fortran bugs are documented in the G77 manual rather than
|
|
explicitly listed here. Please see
|
|
<a href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77/Trouble.html">Known Causes of
|
|
Trouble with GNU Fortran</a> in the G77 manual.</p>
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="c">C</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>The following are not bugs in the C compiler, but are reported
|
|
often enough to warrant a mention here.</p>
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
<dt>Cannot initialize a static variable with <code>stdin</code>.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>This has nothing to do with GCC, but people ask us about it a
|
|
lot. Code like this:</p>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote><pre>
|
|
#include <stdio.h>
|
|
|
|
FILE *yyin = stdin;
|
|
</pre></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p>will not compile with GNU libc (GNU/Linux libc6), because
|
|
<code>stdin</code> is not a constant. This was done deliberately, to make
|
|
it easier to maintain binary compatibility when the type <code>FILE</code>
|
|
needs to be changed. It is surprising for people used to traditional Unix
|
|
C libraries, but it is permitted by the C standard.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>This construct commonly occurs in code generated by old versions of
|
|
lex or yacc. We suggest you try regenerating the parser with a
|
|
current version of flex or bison, respectively. In your own code, the
|
|
appropriate fix is to move the initialization to the beginning of
|
|
main.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>There is a common misconception that the GCC developers are
|
|
responsible for GNU libc. These are in fact two entirely separate
|
|
projects; please check the
|
|
<a href="http://www.gnu.org/software/glibc/">GNU libc web pages</a>
|
|
for details.
|
|
</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Cannot use preprocessor directive in macro arguments.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>Let me guess... you wrote code that looks something like this:</p>
|
|
<blockquote><pre>
|
|
memcpy(dest, src,
|
|
#ifdef PLATFORM1
|
|
12
|
|
#else
|
|
24
|
|
#endif
|
|
);
|
|
</pre></blockquote>
|
|
<p>and you got a whole pile of error messages:</p>
|
|
<blockquote><code>
|
|
|
|
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within
|
|
macro arg<br />
|
|
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within
|
|
macro arg<br />
|
|
test.c:11: warning: preprocessing directive not recognized within
|
|
macro arg<br />
|
|
test.c: In function `foo':<br />
|
|
test.c:6: undefined or invalid # directive<br />
|
|
test.c:8: undefined or invalid # directive<br />
|
|
test.c:9: parse error before `24'<br />
|
|
test.c:10: undefined or invalid # directive<br />
|
|
test.c:11: parse error before `#'<br />
|
|
</code></blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<p><strong>Update:</strong> As of GCC 3.2 this kind of construct is
|
|
always accepted and CPP will probably do what you expect, but see the
|
|
manual for detailed semantics.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>However, versions of GCC prior to 3.2 did not allow you to put
|
|
<code>#ifdef</code> (or any other directive) inside the arguments of a
|
|
macro. Your C library's <code><string.h></code> happens to
|
|
define <code>memcpy</code> as a macro - this is perfectly legitimate.
|
|
The code therefore would not compile.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>This kind of code is not portable. It is "undefined behavior"
|
|
according to the C standard; that means different compilers will do
|
|
different things with it. It is always possible to rewrite code which
|
|
uses conditionals inside macros so that it doesn't. You could write
|
|
the above example</p>
|
|
<blockquote><pre>
|
|
#ifdef PLATFORM1
|
|
memcpy(dest, src, 12);
|
|
#else
|
|
memcpy(dest, src, 24);
|
|
#endif
|
|
</pre></blockquote>
|
|
<p>This is a bit more typing, but I personally think it's better style
|
|
in addition to being more portable.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>In recent versions of glibc, <code>printf</code> is among the
|
|
functions which are implemented as macros.</p></dd>
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
<hr />
|
|
|
|
<h2><a name="cplusplus">C++</a></h2>
|
|
|
|
<p>This is the list of bugs (and non-bugs) in g++ (aka GNU C++) that
|
|
are reported very often, but not yet fixed. While it is certainly
|
|
better to fix bugs instead of documenting them, this document might
|
|
save people the effort of writing a bug report when the bug is already
|
|
well-known. <a href="#report">How to report bugs</a> tells you how to
|
|
report a bug.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>There are many reasons why reported bugs don't get fixed. It might
|
|
be difficult to fix, or fixing it might break compatibility. Often,
|
|
reports get a low priority when there is a simple work-around. In
|
|
particular, bugs caused by invalid C++ code have a simple work-around,
|
|
<em>fix the code</em>. Now that there is an agreed ISO/ANSI standard
|
|
for C++, the compiler has a definitive document to adhere to. Earlier
|
|
versions might have accepted source code that is <em>no longer</em>
|
|
C++. This means that code which might have `worked' in a previous
|
|
version, is now rejected. You should update your code to be C++.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>You should try to use the latest stable release of the GNU C++
|
|
compiler.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="updating">Common problems updating from G++ 2.95 to G++
|
|
3.0</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
<p>G++ 3.0 conforms much closer to the ISO C++ standard (available at
|
|
<a href="http://www.ncits.org/cplusplus.htm">http://www.ncits.org/cplusplus.htm</a>).</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>We have also implemented some of the core and library defect reports
|
|
(available at
|
|
<a href="http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html">http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html</a>
|
|
&
|
|
<a href="http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html">
|
|
http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html</a>
|
|
respectively).</p>
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>The ABI has changed. This means that both class layout and name
|
|
mangling is different. You <em>must</em> recompile all c++ libraries (if
|
|
you don't you will get link errors).</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>The standard library is much more conformant, and uses the
|
|
<code>std::</code> namespace.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li><code>std::</code> is now a real namespace, not an alias for
|
|
<code>::</code>.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>The standard header files for the c library don't end with
|
|
<code>.h</code>, but begin with <code>c</code> (i.e.
|
|
<code><cstdlib></code> rather than <code><stdlib.h></code>).
|
|
The <code>.h</code> names are still available, but are deprecated.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li><code><strstream></code> is deprecated, use
|
|
<code><sstream></code> instead.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li><code>streambuf::seekoff</code> &
|
|
<code>streambuf::seekpos</code> are private, instead use
|
|
<code>streambuf::pubseekoff</code> &
|
|
<code>streambuf::pubseekpos</code> respectively.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>If <code>std::operator << (std::ostream &, long long)</code>
|
|
doesn't exist, you need to recompile libstdc++ with
|
|
<code>--enable-long-long</code>.</li>
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
This means you may get lots of errors about things like
|
|
<code>strcmp</code> not being found. You've most likely forgotton to
|
|
tell the compiler to look in the <code>std::</code> namespace. There are
|
|
several ways to do this,
|
|
|
|
<ul>
|
|
|
|
<li>Say, <code>std::strcmp</code> at the call. This is the most explicit
|
|
way of saying what you mean.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Say, <code>using std::strcmp;</code> somewhere before the call. You
|
|
will need to do this for each function or type you wish to use from the
|
|
standard library.</li>
|
|
|
|
<li>Say, <code>using namespace std;</code> somewhere before the call.
|
|
This is the quick-but-dirty fix. This brings the <em>whole</em> of the
|
|
<code>std::</code> namespace into scope. <em>Never</em> do this in a
|
|
header file, as you will be forcing users of your header file to do the
|
|
same.</li>
|
|
|
|
</ul>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="abi">ABI bugs</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
<p>3.0 had a new ABI, which affected class layout, function mangling and
|
|
calling conventions. We had intended it to be complete, unfortunately
|
|
some issues came to light, too late to fix in the 3.0 series.
|
|
The ABI should not change in dot releases, so we addressed most issues
|
|
in GCC 3.1.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Covariant return types</dt>
|
|
|
|
<dd>We do not implement non-trivial covariant returns. We also generate
|
|
incorrect virtual function tables for trivial covariance. Although
|
|
trivial covariance will work, it is incompatible with the ABI. GNATS PR
|
|
3706 tracks this problem.</dd>
|
|
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="nonbugs">Non-bugs</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
<p>Here are some features that have been reported as bugs, but are
|
|
not.</p>
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Nested classes can access private types of the containing
|
|
class.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>G++ now implements type access control on member types. Defect
|
|
report 45 clarifies that nested classes are members of the class they
|
|
are nested in, and so are granted access to private members of that
|
|
class.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Classes in exception specifiers must be complete types.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>[15.4]/1 tells you that you cannot have an incomplete type, or
|
|
pointer to incomplete (other than <code><i>cv</i> void *</code>) in
|
|
an exception specification.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>G++ emits two copies of constructors and destructors.</dt>
|
|
|
|
<dd><p>In general there are <em>three</em> types of constructors (and
|
|
destructors).</p>
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>The complete object constructor/destructor.</li>
|
|
<li>The base object constructor/destructor.</li>
|
|
<li>The allocating destructor/deallocating destructor.</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
<p>The first two are different, when virtual base classes are involved.
|
|
In some cases we can do better, and this is logged in GNATS.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Exceptions don't work in multithreaded applications.</dt>
|
|
|
|
<dd><p>You need to rebuild g++ and libstdc++ with
|
|
<code>--enable-threads</code>. Remember, c++ exceptions are not like
|
|
hardware interrupts. You cannot throw an exception in one thread and
|
|
catch it in another. You cannot throw an exception from a signal
|
|
handler, and catch it in the main thread.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Global destructors are not run in the correct order.</dt>
|
|
|
|
<dd><p>Global destructors should be run in the reverse order of their
|
|
constructors <em>completing</em>. In most cases this is the same as
|
|
the reverse order of constructors <em>starting</em>, but sometimes it
|
|
is different, and that is important. You need to compile and link your
|
|
programs with <code>--use-cxa-atexit</code>. We have not turned this
|
|
switch on by default, as it requires a <code>cxa</code> aware runtime
|
|
library (<code>libc</code>, <code>glibc</code>, or
|
|
equivalent).</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Problems with floating point computations.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>In a number of cases, GCC appears to perform floating point
|
|
computations incorrectly. For example, the program</p>
|
|
<blockquote><code>
|
|
#include <iostream><br />
|
|
<br />
|
|
int main() {<br />
|
|
<br />
|
|
double min = 0.0;<br />
|
|
double max = 0.5;<br />
|
|
double width = 0.01;<br />
|
|
std::cout << (int)(((max - min) / width) - 1) <<
|
|
std::endl;<br />
|
|
<br />
|
|
}<br />
|
|
</code></blockquote>
|
|
<p>might print 50 on some systems and optimization levels, and 51 on
|
|
others.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>The is the result of <em>rounding</em>: The computer cannot
|
|
represent all real numbers exactly, so it has to use
|
|
approximations. When computing with approximation, the computer needs
|
|
to round to the nearest representable number.</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>This is not a bug in the compiler, but an inherent limitation of
|
|
the float and double types. Please study
|
|
<a href="http://www.validlab.com/goldberg/paper.ps">this paper</a>
|
|
for more information.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Templates, scoping, and digraphs.</dt>
|
|
|
|
<dd><p>If you have a class in global namespace, say named
|
|
<code>X</code>, and want to give it as a template argument to some
|
|
other class, say <code>std::vector</code>, then this here fails with a
|
|
parser error: <code>std::vector<::X></code>.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The reason is that the standard mandates that the sequence
|
|
<code><:</code> is treated as if it were the token
|
|
<code>[</code>, and the parser then reports a parse error before the
|
|
character <code>:</code> (by which it means the second
|
|
colon). There are several such combinations of characters, and
|
|
they are called <em>digraphs</em>.
|
|
</p>
|
|
|
|
<p>
|
|
The simplest way to avoid this is to write <code>std::vector<
|
|
::X></code>, i.e. place a space between the opening angle bracket
|
|
and the scope operator.
|
|
</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="missing">Missing features</a></h3>
|
|
<p>We know some things are missing from G++.</p>
|
|
|
|
<dl>
|
|
|
|
<dt>The <code>export</code> keyword is not implemented.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>Most C++ compilers (G++ included) do not yet implement
|
|
<code>export</code>, which is necessary for separate compilation of
|
|
template declarations and definitions. Without <code>export</code>, a
|
|
template definition must be in scope to be used. The obvious
|
|
workaround is simply to place all definitions in the header
|
|
itself. Alternatively, the compilation unit containing template
|
|
definitions may be included from the header.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
<dt>Two stage lookup in templates is not implemented.</dt>
|
|
<dd><p>[14.6] specifies how names are looked up inside a template. G++
|
|
does not do this correctly, but for most templates this will not be
|
|
noticeable.</p></dd>
|
|
|
|
</dl>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="parsing">Parse errors for "simple" code</a></h3>
|
|
|
|
Up to and including GCC 3.0, the compiler will give "parse error" for
|
|
seemingly simple code, such as
|
|
|
|
<pre>
|
|
struct A{
|
|
A();
|
|
A(int);
|
|
void func();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct B{
|
|
B(A);
|
|
B(A,A);
|
|
void func();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void foo(){
|
|
B b(A(),A(1)); //Variable b, initialized with two temporaries
|
|
B(A(2)).func(); //B temporary, initialized with A temporary
|
|
}
|
|
</pre>
|
|
The problem is that GCC starts to parse the declaration of
|
|
<code>b</code> as a function <code>b</code> returning <code>B</code>,
|
|
taking a function returning <code>A</code> as an argument. When it
|
|
sees the 1, it is too late. The work-around in these cases is to add
|
|
additional parentheses around the expressions that are mistaken as
|
|
declarations:
|
|
<pre>
|
|
(B(A(2))).func();
|
|
</pre>
|
|
Sometimes, even that is not enough; to show the compiler that this
|
|
should be really an expression, a comma operator with a dummy argument
|
|
can be used:
|
|
<pre>
|
|
B b((0,A()),A(1));
|
|
</pre>
|
|
<p>
|
|
Another example is the parse error for the <code>return</code>
|
|
statement in</p>
|
|
<pre>
|
|
struct A{};
|
|
|
|
struct B{
|
|
A a;
|
|
A f1(bool);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
A B::f1(bool b)
|
|
{
|
|
if (b)
|
|
return (A());
|
|
return a;
|
|
}
|
|
</pre>
|
|
<p>The problem is that the compiler interprets <code>A()</code> as a
|
|
function (taking no arguments, returning <code>A</code>), and
|
|
<code>(A()</code>) as a cast - with a missing expression, hence the
|
|
parse error. The work-around is to omit the parentheses:</p>
|
|
<pre>
|
|
if (b)
|
|
return A();
|
|
</pre>
|
|
<p>This problem occurs in a number of variants; in <code>throw</code>
|
|
statements, people also frequently put the object in parentheses. The
|
|
exact error also somewhat varies with the compiler version. The
|
|
work-arounds proposed do not change the semantics of the program at
|
|
all; they make them perhaps less readable.</p>
|
|
|
|
<h3><a name="-O3">Optimization at <code>-O3</code> takes a
|
|
very long time</a></h3>
|
|
<p>At <code>-O3</code>, all functions are candidates for inlining. The
|
|
heuristic used has some deficiencies which show up when allowed such
|
|
freedom. This is g++ specific, as it has an earlier inliner than
|
|
gcc.</p>
|
|
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html>
|