1362 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
1362 lines
52 KiB
Plaintext
@c Copyright (C) 1988, 1989, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998,
|
|
@c 1999, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
|
@c This is part of the GCC manual.
|
|
@c For copying conditions, see the file gcc.texi.
|
|
|
|
@node Trouble
|
|
@chapter Known Causes of Trouble with GCC
|
|
@cindex bugs, known
|
|
@cindex installation trouble
|
|
@cindex known causes of trouble
|
|
|
|
This section describes known problems that affect users of GCC@. Most
|
|
of these are not GCC bugs per se---if they were, we would fix them.
|
|
But the result for a user may be like the result of a bug.
|
|
|
|
Some of these problems are due to bugs in other software, some are
|
|
missing features that are too much work to add, and some are places
|
|
where people's opinions differ as to what is best.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Actual Bugs:: Bugs we will fix later.
|
|
* Cross-Compiler Problems:: Common problems of cross compiling with GCC.
|
|
* Interoperation:: Problems using GCC with other compilers,
|
|
and with certain linkers, assemblers and debuggers.
|
|
* External Bugs:: Problems compiling certain programs.
|
|
* Incompatibilities:: GCC is incompatible with traditional C.
|
|
* Fixed Headers:: GCC uses corrected versions of system header files.
|
|
This is necessary, but doesn't always work smoothly.
|
|
* Standard Libraries:: GCC uses the system C library, which might not be
|
|
compliant with the ISO C standard.
|
|
* Disappointments:: Regrettable things we can't change, but not quite bugs.
|
|
* C++ Misunderstandings:: Common misunderstandings with GNU C++.
|
|
* Protoize Caveats:: Things to watch out for when using @code{protoize}.
|
|
* Non-bugs:: Things we think are right, but some others disagree.
|
|
* Warnings and Errors:: Which problems in your code get warnings,
|
|
and which get errors.
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Actual Bugs
|
|
@section Actual Bugs We Haven't Fixed Yet
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
The @code{fixincludes} script interacts badly with automounters; if the
|
|
directory of system header files is automounted, it tends to be
|
|
unmounted while @code{fixincludes} is running. This would seem to be a
|
|
bug in the automounter. We don't know any good way to work around it.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The @code{fixproto} script will sometimes add prototypes for the
|
|
@code{sigsetjmp} and @code{siglongjmp} functions that reference the
|
|
@code{jmp_buf} type before that type is defined. To work around this,
|
|
edit the offending file and place the typedef in front of the
|
|
prototypes.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@opindex pedantic-errors
|
|
When @option{-pedantic-errors} is specified, GCC will incorrectly give
|
|
an error message when a function name is specified in an expression
|
|
involving the comma operator.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Cross-Compiler Problems
|
|
@section Cross-Compiler Problems
|
|
|
|
You may run into problems with cross compilation on certain machines,
|
|
for several reasons.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
Cross compilation can run into trouble for certain machines because
|
|
some target machines' assemblers require floating point numbers to be
|
|
written as @emph{integer} constants in certain contexts.
|
|
|
|
The compiler writes these integer constants by examining the floating
|
|
point value as an integer and printing that integer, because this is
|
|
simple to write and independent of the details of the floating point
|
|
representation. But this does not work if the compiler is running on
|
|
a different machine with an incompatible floating point format, or
|
|
even a different byte-ordering.
|
|
|
|
In addition, correct constant folding of floating point values
|
|
requires representing them in the target machine's format.
|
|
(The C standard does not quite require this, but in practice
|
|
it is the only way to win.)
|
|
|
|
It is now possible to overcome these problems by defining macros such
|
|
as @code{REAL_VALUE_TYPE}. But doing so is a substantial amount of
|
|
work for each target machine.
|
|
@xref{Cross-compilation,,Cross Compilation and Floating Point,
|
|
gccint, GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) Internals}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
At present, the program @file{mips-tfile} which adds debug
|
|
support to object files on MIPS systems does not work in a cross
|
|
compile environment.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Interoperation
|
|
@section Interoperation
|
|
|
|
This section lists various difficulties encountered in using GCC
|
|
together with other compilers or with the assemblers, linkers,
|
|
libraries and debuggers on certain systems.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
On many platforms, GCC supports a different ABI for C++ than do other
|
|
compilers, so the object files compiled by GCC cannot be used with object
|
|
files generated by another C++ compiler.
|
|
|
|
An area where the difference is most apparent is name mangling. The use
|
|
of different name mangling is intentional, to protect you from more subtle
|
|
problems.
|
|
Compilers differ as to many internal details of C++ implementation,
|
|
including: how class instances are laid out, how multiple inheritance is
|
|
implemented, and how virtual function calls are handled. If the name
|
|
encoding were made the same, your programs would link against libraries
|
|
provided from other compilers---but the programs would then crash when
|
|
run. Incompatible libraries are then detected at link time, rather than
|
|
at run time.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Older GDB versions sometimes fail to read the output of GCC version
|
|
2. If you have trouble, get GDB version 4.4 or later.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@cindex DBX
|
|
DBX rejects some files produced by GCC, though it accepts similar
|
|
constructs in output from PCC@. Until someone can supply a coherent
|
|
description of what is valid DBX input and what is not, there is
|
|
nothing I can do about these problems. You are on your own.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The GNU assembler (GAS) does not support PIC@. To generate PIC code, you
|
|
must use some other assembler, such as @file{/bin/as}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On some BSD systems, including some versions of Ultrix, use of profiling
|
|
causes static variable destructors (currently used only in C++) not to
|
|
be run.
|
|
|
|
@ignore
|
|
@cindex @code{vfork}, for the Sun-4
|
|
@item
|
|
There is a bug in @code{vfork} on the Sun-4 which causes the registers
|
|
of the child process to clobber those of the parent. Because of this,
|
|
programs that call @code{vfork} are likely to lose when compiled
|
|
optimized with GCC when the child code alters registers which contain
|
|
C variables in the parent. This affects variables which are live in the
|
|
parent across the call to @code{vfork}.
|
|
|
|
If you encounter this, you can work around the problem by declaring
|
|
variables @code{volatile} in the function that calls @code{vfork}, until
|
|
the problem goes away, or by not declaring them @code{register} and not
|
|
using @option{-O} for those source files.
|
|
@end ignore
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On some SGI systems, when you use @option{-lgl_s} as an option,
|
|
it gets translated magically to @samp{-lgl_s -lX11_s -lc_s}.
|
|
Naturally, this does not happen when you use GCC@.
|
|
You must specify all three options explicitly.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On a SPARC, GCC aligns all values of type @code{double} on an 8-byte
|
|
boundary, and it expects every @code{double} to be so aligned. The Sun
|
|
compiler usually gives @code{double} values 8-byte alignment, with one
|
|
exception: function arguments of type @code{double} may not be aligned.
|
|
|
|
As a result, if a function compiled with Sun CC takes the address of an
|
|
argument of type @code{double} and passes this pointer of type
|
|
@code{double *} to a function compiled with GCC, dereferencing the
|
|
pointer may cause a fatal signal.
|
|
|
|
One way to solve this problem is to compile your entire program with GCC@.
|
|
Another solution is to modify the function that is compiled with
|
|
Sun CC to copy the argument into a local variable; local variables
|
|
are always properly aligned. A third solution is to modify the function
|
|
that uses the pointer to dereference it via the following function
|
|
@code{access_double} instead of directly with @samp{*}:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
inline double
|
|
access_double (double *unaligned_ptr)
|
|
@{
|
|
union d2i @{ double d; int i[2]; @};
|
|
|
|
union d2i *p = (union d2i *) unaligned_ptr;
|
|
union d2i u;
|
|
|
|
u.i[0] = p->i[0];
|
|
u.i[1] = p->i[1];
|
|
|
|
return u.d;
|
|
@}
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
Storing into the pointer can be done likewise with the same union.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On Solaris, the @code{malloc} function in the @file{libmalloc.a} library
|
|
may allocate memory that is only 4 byte aligned. Since GCC on the
|
|
SPARC assumes that doubles are 8 byte aligned, this may result in a
|
|
fatal signal if doubles are stored in memory allocated by the
|
|
@file{libmalloc.a} library.
|
|
|
|
The solution is to not use the @file{libmalloc.a} library. Use instead
|
|
@code{malloc} and related functions from @file{libc.a}; they do not have
|
|
this problem.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Sun forgot to include a static version of @file{libdl.a} with some
|
|
versions of SunOS (mainly 4.1). This results in undefined symbols when
|
|
linking static binaries (that is, if you use @option{-static}). If you
|
|
see undefined symbols @code{_dlclose}, @code{_dlsym} or @code{_dlopen}
|
|
when linking, compile and link against the file
|
|
@file{mit/util/misc/dlsym.c} from the MIT version of X windows.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The 128-bit long double format that the SPARC port supports currently
|
|
works by using the architecturally defined quad-word floating point
|
|
instructions. Since there is no hardware that supports these
|
|
instructions they must be emulated by the operating system. Long
|
|
doubles do not work in Sun OS versions 4.0.3 and earlier, because the
|
|
kernel emulator uses an obsolete and incompatible format. Long doubles
|
|
do not work in Sun OS version 4.1.1 due to a problem in a Sun library.
|
|
Long doubles do work on Sun OS versions 4.1.2 and higher, but GCC
|
|
does not enable them by default. Long doubles appear to work in Sun OS
|
|
5.x (Solaris 2.x).
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On HP-UX version 9.01 on the HP PA, the HP compiler @code{cc} does not
|
|
compile GCC correctly. We do not yet know why. However, GCC
|
|
compiled on earlier HP-UX versions works properly on HP-UX 9.01 and can
|
|
compile itself properly on 9.01.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On the HP PA machine, ADB sometimes fails to work on functions compiled
|
|
with GCC@. Specifically, it fails to work on functions that use
|
|
@code{alloca} or variable-size arrays. This is because GCC doesn't
|
|
generate HP-UX unwind descriptors for such functions. It may even be
|
|
impossible to generate them.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Debugging (@option{-g}) is not supported on the HP PA machine, unless you use
|
|
the preliminary GNU tools.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Taking the address of a label may generate errors from the HP-UX
|
|
PA assembler. GAS for the PA does not have this problem.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Using floating point parameters for indirect calls to static functions
|
|
will not work when using the HP assembler. There simply is no way for GCC
|
|
to specify what registers hold arguments for static functions when using
|
|
the HP assembler. GAS for the PA does not have this problem.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
In extremely rare cases involving some very large functions you may
|
|
receive errors from the HP linker complaining about an out of bounds
|
|
unconditional branch offset. This used to occur more often in previous
|
|
versions of GCC, but is now exceptionally rare. If you should run
|
|
into it, you can work around by making your function smaller.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC compiled code sometimes emits warnings from the HP-UX assembler of
|
|
the form:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
(warning) Use of GR3 when
|
|
frame >= 8192 may cause conflict.
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
These warnings are harmless and can be safely ignored.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On the IBM RS/6000, compiling code of the form
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
extern int foo;
|
|
|
|
@dots{} foo @dots{}
|
|
|
|
static int foo;
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
will cause the linker to report an undefined symbol @code{foo}.
|
|
Although this behavior differs from most other systems, it is not a
|
|
bug because redefining an @code{extern} variable as @code{static}
|
|
is undefined in ISO C@.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
In extremely rare cases involving some very large functions you may
|
|
receive errors from the AIX Assembler complaining about a displacement
|
|
that is too large. If you should run into it, you can work around by
|
|
making your function smaller.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
The @file{libstdc++.a} library in GCC relies on the SVR4 dynamic
|
|
linker semantics which merges global symbols between libraries and
|
|
applications, especially necessary for C++ streams functionality.
|
|
This is not the default behavior of AIX shared libraries and dynamic
|
|
linking. @file{libstdc++.a} is built on AIX with ``runtime-linking''
|
|
enabled so that symbol merging can occur. To utilize this feature,
|
|
the application linked with @file{libstdc++.a} must include the
|
|
@option{-Wl,-brtl} flag on the link line. G++ cannot impose this
|
|
because this option may interfere with the semantics of the user
|
|
program and users may not always use @samp{g++} to link his or her
|
|
application. Applications are not required to use the
|
|
@option{-Wl,-brtl} flag on the link line---the rest of the
|
|
@file{libstdc++.a} library which is not dependent on the symbol
|
|
merging semantics will continue to function correctly.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
An application can interpose its own definition of functions for
|
|
functions invoked by @file{libstdc++.a} with ``runtime-linking''
|
|
enabled on AIX. To accomplish this the application must be linked
|
|
with ``runtime-linking'' option and the functions explicitly must be
|
|
exported by the application (@option{-Wl,-brtl,-bE:exportfile}).
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
AIX on the RS/6000 provides support (NLS) for environments outside of
|
|
the United States. Compilers and assemblers use NLS to support
|
|
locale-specific representations of various objects including
|
|
floating-point numbers (@samp{.} vs @samp{,} for separating decimal
|
|
fractions). There have been problems reported where the library linked
|
|
with GCC does not produce the same floating-point formats that the
|
|
assembler accepts. If you have this problem, set the @env{LANG}
|
|
environment variable to @samp{C} or @samp{En_US}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@opindex fdollars-in-identifiers
|
|
Even if you specify @option{-fdollars-in-identifiers},
|
|
you cannot successfully use @samp{$} in identifiers on the RS/6000 due
|
|
to a restriction in the IBM assembler. GAS supports these
|
|
identifiers.
|
|
|
|
@cindex VAX calling convention
|
|
@cindex Ultrix calling convention
|
|
@item
|
|
@opindex fcall-saved
|
|
On Ultrix, the Fortran compiler expects registers 2 through 5 to be saved
|
|
by function calls. However, the C compiler uses conventions compatible
|
|
with BSD Unix: registers 2 through 5 may be clobbered by function calls.
|
|
|
|
GCC uses the same convention as the Ultrix C compiler. You can use
|
|
these options to produce code compatible with the Fortran compiler:
|
|
|
|
@smallexample
|
|
-fcall-saved-r2 -fcall-saved-r3 -fcall-saved-r4 -fcall-saved-r5
|
|
@end smallexample
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On the Alpha, you may get assembler errors about invalid syntax as a
|
|
result of floating point constants. This is due to a bug in the C
|
|
library functions @code{ecvt}, @code{fcvt} and @code{gcvt}. Given valid
|
|
floating point numbers, they sometimes print @samp{NaN}.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node External Bugs
|
|
@section Problems Compiling Certain Programs
|
|
|
|
@c prevent bad page break with this line
|
|
Certain programs have problems compiling.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
Parse errors may occur compiling X11 on a Decstation running Ultrix 4.2
|
|
because of problems in DEC's versions of the X11 header files
|
|
@file{X11/Xlib.h} and @file{X11/Xutil.h}. People recommend adding
|
|
@option{-I/usr/include/mit} to use the MIT versions of the header files,
|
|
or fixing the header files by adding this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
#ifdef __STDC__
|
|
#define NeedFunctionPrototypes 0
|
|
#endif
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On various 386 Unix systems derived from System V, including SCO, ISC,
|
|
and ESIX, you may get error messages about running out of virtual memory
|
|
while compiling certain programs.
|
|
|
|
You can prevent this problem by linking GCC with the GNU malloc
|
|
(which thus replaces the malloc that comes with the system). GNU malloc
|
|
is available as a separate package, and also in the file
|
|
@file{src/gmalloc.c} in the GNU Emacs 19 distribution.
|
|
|
|
If you have installed GNU malloc as a separate library package, use this
|
|
option when you relink GCC:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
MALLOC=/usr/local/lib/libgmalloc.a
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, if you have compiled @file{gmalloc.c} from Emacs 19, copy
|
|
the object file to @file{gmalloc.o} and use this option when you relink
|
|
GCC:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
MALLOC=gmalloc.o
|
|
@end example
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Incompatibilities
|
|
@section Incompatibilities of GCC
|
|
@cindex incompatibilities of GCC
|
|
@opindex traditional
|
|
|
|
There are several noteworthy incompatibilities between GNU C and K&R
|
|
(non-ISO) versions of C@.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@cindex string constants
|
|
@cindex read-only strings
|
|
@cindex shared strings
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC normally makes string constants read-only. If several
|
|
identical-looking string constants are used, GCC stores only one
|
|
copy of the string.
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{mktemp}, and constant strings
|
|
One consequence is that you cannot call @code{mktemp} with a string
|
|
constant argument. The function @code{mktemp} always alters the
|
|
string its argument points to.
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{sscanf}, and constant strings
|
|
@cindex @code{fscanf}, and constant strings
|
|
@cindex @code{scanf}, and constant strings
|
|
Another consequence is that @code{sscanf} does not work on some systems
|
|
when passed a string constant as its format control string or input.
|
|
This is because @code{sscanf} incorrectly tries to write into the string
|
|
constant. Likewise @code{fscanf} and @code{scanf}.
|
|
|
|
@opindex fwritable-strings
|
|
The best solution to these problems is to change the program to use
|
|
@code{char}-array variables with initialization strings for these
|
|
purposes instead of string constants. But if this is not possible,
|
|
you can use the @option{-fwritable-strings} flag, which directs GCC
|
|
to handle string constants the same way most C compilers do.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@code{-2147483648} is positive.
|
|
|
|
This is because 2147483648 cannot fit in the type @code{int}, so
|
|
(following the ISO C rules) its data type is @code{unsigned long int}.
|
|
Negating this value yields 2147483648 again.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC does not substitute macro arguments when they appear inside of
|
|
string constants. For example, the following macro in GCC
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
#define foo(a) "a"
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
will produce output @code{"a"} regardless of what the argument @var{a} is.
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{setjmp} incompatibilities
|
|
@cindex @code{longjmp} incompatibilities
|
|
@item
|
|
When you use @code{setjmp} and @code{longjmp}, the only automatic
|
|
variables guaranteed to remain valid are those declared
|
|
@code{volatile}. This is a consequence of automatic register
|
|
allocation. Consider this function:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
jmp_buf j;
|
|
|
|
foo ()
|
|
@{
|
|
int a, b;
|
|
|
|
a = fun1 ();
|
|
if (setjmp (j))
|
|
return a;
|
|
|
|
a = fun2 ();
|
|
/* @r{@code{longjmp (j)} may occur in @code{fun3}.} */
|
|
return a + fun3 ();
|
|
@}
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Here @code{a} may or may not be restored to its first value when the
|
|
@code{longjmp} occurs. If @code{a} is allocated in a register, then
|
|
its first value is restored; otherwise, it keeps the last value stored
|
|
in it.
|
|
|
|
@opindex W
|
|
If you use the @option{-W} option with the @option{-O} option, you will
|
|
get a warning when GCC thinks such a problem might be possible.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Programs that use preprocessing directives in the middle of macro
|
|
arguments do not work with GCC@. For example, a program like this
|
|
will not work:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
@group
|
|
foobar (
|
|
#define luser
|
|
hack)
|
|
@end group
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
ISO C does not permit such a construct.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
K&R compilers allow comments to cross over an inclusion boundary
|
|
(i.e.@: started in an include file and ended in the including file). I think
|
|
this would be quite ugly and can't imagine it could be needed.
|
|
|
|
@cindex external declaration scope
|
|
@cindex scope of external declarations
|
|
@cindex declaration scope
|
|
@item
|
|
Declarations of external variables and functions within a block apply
|
|
only to the block containing the declaration. In other words, they
|
|
have the same scope as any other declaration in the same place.
|
|
|
|
In some other C compilers, a @code{extern} declaration affects all the
|
|
rest of the file even if it happens within a block.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
In traditional C, you can combine @code{long}, etc., with a typedef name,
|
|
as shown here:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
typedef int foo;
|
|
typedef long foo bar;
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
In ISO C, this is not allowed: @code{long} and other type modifiers
|
|
require an explicit @code{int}.
|
|
|
|
@cindex typedef names as function parameters
|
|
@item
|
|
PCC allows typedef names to be used as function parameters.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Traditional C allows the following erroneous pair of declarations to
|
|
appear together in a given scope:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
typedef int foo;
|
|
typedef foo foo;
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC treats all characters of identifiers as significant. According to
|
|
K&R-1 (2.2), ``No more than the first eight characters are significant,
|
|
although more may be used.''. Also according to K&R-1 (2.2), ``An
|
|
identifier is a sequence of letters and digits; the first character must
|
|
be a letter. The underscore _ counts as a letter.'', but GCC also
|
|
allows dollar signs in identifiers.
|
|
|
|
@cindex whitespace
|
|
@item
|
|
PCC allows whitespace in the middle of compound assignment operators
|
|
such as @samp{+=}. GCC, following the ISO standard, does not
|
|
allow this.
|
|
|
|
@cindex apostrophes
|
|
@cindex '
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC complains about unterminated character constants inside of
|
|
preprocessing conditionals that fail. Some programs have English
|
|
comments enclosed in conditionals that are guaranteed to fail; if these
|
|
comments contain apostrophes, GCC will probably report an error. For
|
|
example, this code would produce an error:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
#if 0
|
|
You can't expect this to work.
|
|
#endif
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
The best solution to such a problem is to put the text into an actual
|
|
C comment delimited by @samp{/*@dots{}*/}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Many user programs contain the declaration @samp{long time ();}. In the
|
|
past, the system header files on many systems did not actually declare
|
|
@code{time}, so it did not matter what type your program declared it to
|
|
return. But in systems with ISO C headers, @code{time} is declared to
|
|
return @code{time_t}, and if that is not the same as @code{long}, then
|
|
@samp{long time ();} is erroneous.
|
|
|
|
The solution is to change your program to use appropriate system headers
|
|
(@code{<time.h>} on systems with ISO C headers) and not to declare
|
|
@code{time} if the system header files declare it, or failing that to
|
|
use @code{time_t} as the return type of @code{time}.
|
|
|
|
@cindex @code{float} as function value type
|
|
@item
|
|
When compiling functions that return @code{float}, PCC converts it to
|
|
a double. GCC actually returns a @code{float}. If you are concerned
|
|
with PCC compatibility, you should declare your functions to return
|
|
@code{double}; you might as well say what you mean.
|
|
|
|
@cindex structures
|
|
@cindex unions
|
|
@item
|
|
When compiling functions that return structures or unions, GCC
|
|
output code normally uses a method different from that used on most
|
|
versions of Unix. As a result, code compiled with GCC cannot call
|
|
a structure-returning function compiled with PCC, and vice versa.
|
|
|
|
The method used by GCC is as follows: a structure or union which is
|
|
1, 2, 4 or 8 bytes long is returned like a scalar. A structure or union
|
|
with any other size is stored into an address supplied by the caller
|
|
(usually in a special, fixed register, but on some machines it is passed
|
|
on the stack). The machine-description macros @code{STRUCT_VALUE} and
|
|
@code{STRUCT_INCOMING_VALUE} tell GCC where to pass this address.
|
|
|
|
By contrast, PCC on most target machines returns structures and unions
|
|
of any size by copying the data into an area of static storage, and then
|
|
returning the address of that storage as if it were a pointer value.
|
|
The caller must copy the data from that memory area to the place where
|
|
the value is wanted. GCC does not use this method because it is
|
|
slower and nonreentrant.
|
|
|
|
On some newer machines, PCC uses a reentrant convention for all
|
|
structure and union returning. GCC on most of these machines uses a
|
|
compatible convention when returning structures and unions in memory,
|
|
but still returns small structures and unions in registers.
|
|
|
|
@opindex fpcc-struct-return
|
|
You can tell GCC to use a compatible convention for all structure and
|
|
union returning with the option @option{-fpcc-struct-return}.
|
|
|
|
@cindex preprocessing tokens
|
|
@cindex preprocessing numbers
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC complains about program fragments such as @samp{0x74ae-0x4000}
|
|
which appear to be two hexadecimal constants separated by the minus
|
|
operator. Actually, this string is a single @dfn{preprocessing token}.
|
|
Each such token must correspond to one token in C@. Since this does not,
|
|
GCC prints an error message. Although it may appear obvious that what
|
|
is meant is an operator and two values, the ISO C standard specifically
|
|
requires that this be treated as erroneous.
|
|
|
|
A @dfn{preprocessing token} is a @dfn{preprocessing number} if it
|
|
begins with a digit and is followed by letters, underscores, digits,
|
|
periods and @samp{e+}, @samp{e-}, @samp{E+}, @samp{E-}, @samp{p+},
|
|
@samp{p-}, @samp{P+}, or @samp{P-} character sequences. (In strict C89
|
|
mode, the sequences @samp{p+}, @samp{p-}, @samp{P+} and @samp{P-} cannot
|
|
appear in preprocessing numbers.)
|
|
|
|
To make the above program fragment valid, place whitespace in front of
|
|
the minus sign. This whitespace will end the preprocessing number.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Fixed Headers
|
|
@section Fixed Header Files
|
|
|
|
GCC needs to install corrected versions of some system header files.
|
|
This is because most target systems have some header files that won't
|
|
work with GCC unless they are changed. Some have bugs, some are
|
|
incompatible with ISO C, and some depend on special features of other
|
|
compilers.
|
|
|
|
Installing GCC automatically creates and installs the fixed header
|
|
files, by running a program called @code{fixincludes} (or for certain
|
|
targets an alternative such as @code{fixinc.svr4}). Normally, you
|
|
don't need to pay attention to this. But there are cases where it
|
|
doesn't do the right thing automatically.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
If you update the system's header files, such as by installing a new
|
|
system version, the fixed header files of GCC are not automatically
|
|
updated. The easiest way to update them is to reinstall GCC@. (If
|
|
you want to be clever, look in the makefile and you can find a
|
|
shortcut.)
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On some systems, in particular SunOS 4, header file directories contain
|
|
machine-specific symbolic links in certain places. This makes it
|
|
possible to share most of the header files among hosts running the
|
|
same version of SunOS 4 on different machine models.
|
|
|
|
The programs that fix the header files do not understand this special
|
|
way of using symbolic links; therefore, the directory of fixed header
|
|
files is good only for the machine model used to build it.
|
|
|
|
In SunOS 4, only programs that look inside the kernel will notice the
|
|
difference between machine models. Therefore, for most purposes, you
|
|
need not be concerned about this.
|
|
|
|
It is possible to make separate sets of fixed header files for the
|
|
different machine models, and arrange a structure of symbolic links so
|
|
as to use the proper set, but you'll have to do this by hand.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On Lynxos, GCC by default does not fix the header files. This is
|
|
because bugs in the shell cause the @code{fixincludes} script to fail.
|
|
|
|
This means you will encounter problems due to bugs in the system header
|
|
files. It may be no comfort that they aren't GCC's fault, but it
|
|
does mean that there's nothing for us to do about them.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Standard Libraries
|
|
@section Standard Libraries
|
|
|
|
@opindex Wall
|
|
GCC by itself attempts to be a conforming freestanding implementation.
|
|
@xref{Standards,,Language Standards Supported by GCC}, for details of
|
|
what this means. Beyond the library facilities required of such an
|
|
implementation, the rest of the C library is supplied by the vendor of
|
|
the operating system. If that C library doesn't conform to the C
|
|
standards, then your programs might get warnings (especially when using
|
|
@option{-Wall}) that you don't expect.
|
|
|
|
For example, the @code{sprintf} function on SunOS 4.1.3 returns
|
|
@code{char *} while the C standard says that @code{sprintf} returns an
|
|
@code{int}. The @code{fixincludes} program could make the prototype for
|
|
this function match the Standard, but that would be wrong, since the
|
|
function will still return @code{char *}.
|
|
|
|
If you need a Standard compliant library, then you need to find one, as
|
|
GCC does not provide one. The GNU C library (called @code{glibc})
|
|
provides ISO C, POSIX, BSD, SystemV and X/Open compatibility for
|
|
GNU/Linux and HURD-based GNU systems; no recent version of it supports
|
|
other systems, though some very old versions did. Version 2.2 of the
|
|
GNU C library includes nearly complete C99 support. You could also ask
|
|
your operating system vendor if newer libraries are available.
|
|
|
|
@node Disappointments
|
|
@section Disappointments and Misunderstandings
|
|
|
|
These problems are perhaps regrettable, but we don't know any practical
|
|
way around them.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
Certain local variables aren't recognized by debuggers when you compile
|
|
with optimization.
|
|
|
|
This occurs because sometimes GCC optimizes the variable out of
|
|
existence. There is no way to tell the debugger how to compute the
|
|
value such a variable ``would have had'', and it is not clear that would
|
|
be desirable anyway. So GCC simply does not mention the eliminated
|
|
variable when it writes debugging information.
|
|
|
|
You have to expect a certain amount of disagreement between the
|
|
executable and your source code, when you use optimization.
|
|
|
|
@cindex conflicting types
|
|
@cindex scope of declaration
|
|
@item
|
|
Users often think it is a bug when GCC reports an error for code
|
|
like this:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
int foo (struct mumble *);
|
|
|
|
struct mumble @{ @dots{} @};
|
|
|
|
int foo (struct mumble *x)
|
|
@{ @dots{} @}
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
This code really is erroneous, because the scope of @code{struct
|
|
mumble} in the prototype is limited to the argument list containing it.
|
|
It does not refer to the @code{struct mumble} defined with file scope
|
|
immediately below---they are two unrelated types with similar names in
|
|
different scopes.
|
|
|
|
But in the definition of @code{foo}, the file-scope type is used
|
|
because that is available to be inherited. Thus, the definition and
|
|
the prototype do not match, and you get an error.
|
|
|
|
This behavior may seem silly, but it's what the ISO standard specifies.
|
|
It is easy enough for you to make your code work by moving the
|
|
definition of @code{struct mumble} above the prototype. It's not worth
|
|
being incompatible with ISO C just to avoid an error for the example
|
|
shown above.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Accesses to bit-fields even in volatile objects works by accessing larger
|
|
objects, such as a byte or a word. You cannot rely on what size of
|
|
object is accessed in order to read or write the bit-field; it may even
|
|
vary for a given bit-field according to the precise usage.
|
|
|
|
If you care about controlling the amount of memory that is accessed, use
|
|
volatile but do not use bit-fields.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
GCC comes with shell scripts to fix certain known problems in system
|
|
header files. They install corrected copies of various header files in
|
|
a special directory where only GCC will normally look for them. The
|
|
scripts adapt to various systems by searching all the system header
|
|
files for the problem cases that we know about.
|
|
|
|
If new system header files are installed, nothing automatically arranges
|
|
to update the corrected header files. You will have to reinstall GCC
|
|
to fix the new header files. More specifically, go to the build
|
|
directory and delete the files @file{stmp-fixinc} and
|
|
@file{stmp-headers}, and the subdirectory @code{include}; then do
|
|
@samp{make install} again.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@cindex floating point precision
|
|
On 68000 and x86 systems, for instance, you can get paradoxical results
|
|
if you test the precise values of floating point numbers. For example,
|
|
you can find that a floating point value which is not a NaN is not equal
|
|
to itself. This results from the fact that the floating point registers
|
|
hold a few more bits of precision than fit in a @code{double} in memory.
|
|
Compiled code moves values between memory and floating point registers
|
|
at its convenience, and moving them into memory truncates them.
|
|
|
|
@opindex ffloat-store
|
|
You can partially avoid this problem by using the @option{-ffloat-store}
|
|
option (@pxref{Optimize Options}).
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On AIX and other platforms without weak symbol support, templates
|
|
need to be instantiated explicitly and symbols for static members
|
|
of templates will not be generated.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
On AIX, GCC scans object files and library archives for static
|
|
constructors and destructors when linking an application before the
|
|
linker prunes unreferenced symbols. This is necessary to prevent the
|
|
AIX linker from mistakenly assuming that static constructor or
|
|
destructor are unused and removing them before the scanning can occur.
|
|
All static constructors and destructors found will be referenced even
|
|
though the modules in which they occur may not be used by the program.
|
|
This may lead to both increased executable size and unexpected symbol
|
|
references.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node C++ Misunderstandings
|
|
@section Common Misunderstandings with GNU C++
|
|
|
|
@cindex misunderstandings in C++
|
|
@cindex surprises in C++
|
|
@cindex C++ misunderstandings
|
|
C++ is a complex language and an evolving one, and its standard
|
|
definition (the ISO C++ standard) was only recently completed. As a
|
|
result, your C++ compiler may occasionally surprise you, even when its
|
|
behavior is correct. This section discusses some areas that frequently
|
|
give rise to questions of this sort.
|
|
|
|
@menu
|
|
* Static Definitions:: Static member declarations are not definitions
|
|
* Temporaries:: Temporaries may vanish before you expect
|
|
* Copy Assignment:: Copy Assignment operators copy virtual bases twice
|
|
@end menu
|
|
|
|
@node Static Definitions
|
|
@subsection Declare @emph{and} Define Static Members
|
|
|
|
@cindex C++ static data, declaring and defining
|
|
@cindex static data in C++, declaring and defining
|
|
@cindex declaring static data in C++
|
|
@cindex defining static data in C++
|
|
When a class has static data members, it is not enough to @emph{declare}
|
|
the static member; you must also @emph{define} it. For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
class Foo
|
|
@{
|
|
@dots{}
|
|
void method();
|
|
static int bar;
|
|
@};
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
This declaration only establishes that the class @code{Foo} has an
|
|
@code{int} named @code{Foo::bar}, and a member function named
|
|
@code{Foo::method}. But you still need to define @emph{both}
|
|
@code{method} and @code{bar} elsewhere. According to the ISO
|
|
standard, you must supply an initializer in one (and only one) source
|
|
file, such as:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
int Foo::bar = 0;
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
Other C++ compilers may not correctly implement the standard behavior.
|
|
As a result, when you switch to @command{g++} from one of these compilers,
|
|
you may discover that a program that appeared to work correctly in fact
|
|
does not conform to the standard: @command{g++} reports as undefined
|
|
symbols any static data members that lack definitions.
|
|
|
|
@node Temporaries
|
|
@subsection Temporaries May Vanish Before You Expect
|
|
|
|
@cindex temporaries, lifetime of
|
|
@cindex portions of temporary objects, pointers to
|
|
It is dangerous to use pointers or references to @emph{portions} of a
|
|
temporary object. The compiler may very well delete the object before
|
|
you expect it to, leaving a pointer to garbage. The most common place
|
|
where this problem crops up is in classes like string classes,
|
|
especially ones that define a conversion function to type @code{char *}
|
|
or @code{const char *}---which is one reason why the standard
|
|
@code{string} class requires you to call the @code{c_str} member
|
|
function. However, any class that returns a pointer to some internal
|
|
structure is potentially subject to this problem.
|
|
|
|
For example, a program may use a function @code{strfunc} that returns
|
|
@code{string} objects, and another function @code{charfunc} that
|
|
operates on pointers to @code{char}:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
string strfunc ();
|
|
void charfunc (const char *);
|
|
|
|
void
|
|
f ()
|
|
@{
|
|
const char *p = strfunc().c_str();
|
|
@dots{}
|
|
charfunc (p);
|
|
@dots{}
|
|
charfunc (p);
|
|
@}
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@noindent
|
|
In this situation, it may seem reasonable to save a pointer to the C
|
|
string returned by the @code{c_str} member function and use that rather
|
|
than call @code{c_str} repeatedly. However, the temporary string
|
|
created by the call to @code{strfunc} is destroyed after @code{p} is
|
|
initialized, at which point @code{p} is left pointing to freed memory.
|
|
|
|
Code like this may run successfully under some other compilers,
|
|
particularly obsolete cfront-based compilers that delete temporaries
|
|
along with normal local variables. However, the GNU C++ behavior is
|
|
standard-conforming, so if your program depends on late destruction of
|
|
temporaries it is not portable.
|
|
|
|
The safe way to write such code is to give the temporary a name, which
|
|
forces it to remain until the end of the scope of the name. For
|
|
example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
string& tmp = strfunc ();
|
|
charfunc (tmp.c_str ());
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
@node Copy Assignment
|
|
@subsection Implicit Copy-Assignment for Virtual Bases
|
|
|
|
When a base class is virtual, only one subobject of the base class
|
|
belongs to each full object. Also, the constructors and destructors are
|
|
invoked only once, and called from the most-derived class. However, such
|
|
objects behave unspecified when being assigned. For example:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
struct Base@{
|
|
char *name;
|
|
Base(char *n) : name(strdup(n))@{@}
|
|
Base& operator= (const Base& other)@{
|
|
free (name);
|
|
name = strdup (other.name);
|
|
@}
|
|
@};
|
|
|
|
struct A:virtual Base@{
|
|
int val;
|
|
A():Base("A")@{@}
|
|
@};
|
|
|
|
struct B:virtual Base@{
|
|
int bval;
|
|
B():Base("B")@{@}
|
|
@};
|
|
|
|
struct Derived:public A, public B@{
|
|
Derived():Base("Derived")@{@}
|
|
@};
|
|
|
|
void func(Derived &d1, Derived &d2)
|
|
@{
|
|
d1 = d2;
|
|
@}
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
The C++ standard specifies that @samp{Base::Base} is only called once
|
|
when constructing or copy-constructing a Derived object. It is
|
|
unspecified whether @samp{Base::operator=} is called more than once when
|
|
the implicit copy-assignment for Derived objects is invoked (as it is
|
|
inside @samp{func} in the example).
|
|
|
|
g++ implements the ``intuitive'' algorithm for copy-assignment: assign all
|
|
direct bases, then assign all members. In that algorithm, the virtual
|
|
base subobject can be encountered many times. In the example, copying
|
|
proceeds in the following order: @samp{val}, @samp{name} (via
|
|
@code{strdup}), @samp{bval}, and @samp{name} again.
|
|
|
|
If application code relies on copy-assignment, a user-defined
|
|
copy-assignment operator removes any uncertainties. With such an
|
|
operator, the application can define whether and how the virtual base
|
|
subobject is assigned.
|
|
|
|
@node Protoize Caveats
|
|
@section Caveats of using @command{protoize}
|
|
|
|
The conversion programs @command{protoize} and @command{unprotoize} can
|
|
sometimes change a source file in a way that won't work unless you
|
|
rearrange it.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
@command{protoize} can insert references to a type name or type tag before
|
|
the definition, or in a file where they are not defined.
|
|
|
|
If this happens, compiler error messages should show you where the new
|
|
references are, so fixing the file by hand is straightforward.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
There are some C constructs which @command{protoize} cannot figure out.
|
|
For example, it can't determine argument types for declaring a
|
|
pointer-to-function variable; this you must do by hand. @command{protoize}
|
|
inserts a comment containing @samp{???} each time it finds such a
|
|
variable; so you can find all such variables by searching for this
|
|
string. ISO C does not require declaring the argument types of
|
|
pointer-to-function types.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Using @command{unprotoize} can easily introduce bugs. If the program
|
|
relied on prototypes to bring about conversion of arguments, these
|
|
conversions will not take place in the program without prototypes.
|
|
One case in which you can be sure @command{unprotoize} is safe is when
|
|
you are removing prototypes that were made with @command{protoize}; if
|
|
the program worked before without any prototypes, it will work again
|
|
without them.
|
|
|
|
@opindex Wconversion
|
|
You can find all the places where this problem might occur by compiling
|
|
the program with the @option{-Wconversion} option. It prints a warning
|
|
whenever an argument is converted.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Both conversion programs can be confused if there are macro calls in and
|
|
around the text to be converted. In other words, the standard syntax
|
|
for a declaration or definition must not result from expanding a macro.
|
|
This problem is inherent in the design of C and cannot be fixed. If
|
|
only a few functions have confusing macro calls, you can easily convert
|
|
them manually.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@command{protoize} cannot get the argument types for a function whose
|
|
definition was not actually compiled due to preprocessing conditionals.
|
|
When this happens, @command{protoize} changes nothing in regard to such
|
|
a function. @command{protoize} tries to detect such instances and warn
|
|
about them.
|
|
|
|
You can generally work around this problem by using @command{protoize} step
|
|
by step, each time specifying a different set of @option{-D} options for
|
|
compilation, until all of the functions have been converted. There is
|
|
no automatic way to verify that you have got them all, however.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Confusion may result if there is an occasion to convert a function
|
|
declaration or definition in a region of source code where there is more
|
|
than one formal parameter list present. Thus, attempts to convert code
|
|
containing multiple (conditionally compiled) versions of a single
|
|
function header (in the same vicinity) may not produce the desired (or
|
|
expected) results.
|
|
|
|
If you plan on converting source files which contain such code, it is
|
|
recommended that you first make sure that each conditionally compiled
|
|
region of source code which contains an alternative function header also
|
|
contains at least one additional follower token (past the final right
|
|
parenthesis of the function header). This should circumvent the
|
|
problem.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@command{unprotoize} can become confused when trying to convert a function
|
|
definition or declaration which contains a declaration for a
|
|
pointer-to-function formal argument which has the same name as the
|
|
function being defined or declared. We recommend you avoid such choices
|
|
of formal parameter names.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
You might also want to correct some of the indentation by hand and break
|
|
long lines. (The conversion programs don't write lines longer than
|
|
eighty characters in any case.)
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Non-bugs
|
|
@section Certain Changes We Don't Want to Make
|
|
|
|
This section lists changes that people frequently request, but which
|
|
we do not make because we think GCC is better without them.
|
|
|
|
@itemize @bullet
|
|
@item
|
|
Checking the number and type of arguments to a function which has an
|
|
old-fashioned definition and no prototype.
|
|
|
|
Such a feature would work only occasionally---only for calls that appear
|
|
in the same file as the called function, following the definition. The
|
|
only way to check all calls reliably is to add a prototype for the
|
|
function. But adding a prototype eliminates the motivation for this
|
|
feature. So the feature is not worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Warning about using an expression whose type is signed as a shift count.
|
|
|
|
Shift count operands are probably signed more often than unsigned.
|
|
Warning about this would cause far more annoyance than good.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Warning about assigning a signed value to an unsigned variable.
|
|
|
|
Such assignments must be very common; warning about them would cause
|
|
more annoyance than good.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Warning when a non-void function value is ignored.
|
|
|
|
Coming as I do from a Lisp background, I balk at the idea that there is
|
|
something dangerous about discarding a value. There are functions that
|
|
return values which some callers may find useful; it makes no sense to
|
|
clutter the program with a cast to @code{void} whenever the value isn't
|
|
useful.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@opindex fshort-enums
|
|
Making @option{-fshort-enums} the default.
|
|
|
|
This would cause storage layout to be incompatible with most other C
|
|
compilers. And it doesn't seem very important, given that you can get
|
|
the same result in other ways. The case where it matters most is when
|
|
the enumeration-valued object is inside a structure, and in that case
|
|
you can specify a field width explicitly.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Making bit-fields unsigned by default on particular machines where ``the
|
|
ABI standard'' says to do so.
|
|
|
|
The ISO C standard leaves it up to the implementation whether a bit-field
|
|
declared plain @code{int} is signed or not. This in effect creates two
|
|
alternative dialects of C@.
|
|
|
|
@opindex fsigned-bitfields
|
|
@opindex funsigned-bitfields
|
|
The GNU C compiler supports both dialects; you can specify the signed
|
|
dialect with @option{-fsigned-bitfields} and the unsigned dialect with
|
|
@option{-funsigned-bitfields}. However, this leaves open the question of
|
|
which dialect to use by default.
|
|
|
|
Currently, the preferred dialect makes plain bit-fields signed, because
|
|
this is simplest. Since @code{int} is the same as @code{signed int} in
|
|
every other context, it is cleanest for them to be the same in bit-fields
|
|
as well.
|
|
|
|
Some computer manufacturers have published Application Binary Interface
|
|
standards which specify that plain bit-fields should be unsigned. It is
|
|
a mistake, however, to say anything about this issue in an ABI@. This is
|
|
because the handling of plain bit-fields distinguishes two dialects of C@.
|
|
Both dialects are meaningful on every type of machine. Whether a
|
|
particular object file was compiled using signed bit-fields or unsigned
|
|
is of no concern to other object files, even if they access the same
|
|
bit-fields in the same data structures.
|
|
|
|
A given program is written in one or the other of these two dialects.
|
|
The program stands a chance to work on most any machine if it is
|
|
compiled with the proper dialect. It is unlikely to work at all if
|
|
compiled with the wrong dialect.
|
|
|
|
Many users appreciate the GNU C compiler because it provides an
|
|
environment that is uniform across machines. These users would be
|
|
inconvenienced if the compiler treated plain bit-fields differently on
|
|
certain machines.
|
|
|
|
Occasionally users write programs intended only for a particular machine
|
|
type. On these occasions, the users would benefit if the GNU C compiler
|
|
were to support by default the same dialect as the other compilers on
|
|
that machine. But such applications are rare. And users writing a
|
|
program to run on more than one type of machine cannot possibly benefit
|
|
from this kind of compatibility.
|
|
|
|
This is why GCC does and will treat plain bit-fields in the same
|
|
fashion on all types of machines (by default).
|
|
|
|
There are some arguments for making bit-fields unsigned by default on all
|
|
machines. If, for example, this becomes a universal de facto standard,
|
|
it would make sense for GCC to go along with it. This is something
|
|
to be considered in the future.
|
|
|
|
(Of course, users strongly concerned about portability should indicate
|
|
explicitly in each bit-field whether it is signed or not. In this way,
|
|
they write programs which have the same meaning in both C dialects.)
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@opindex ansi
|
|
@opindex std
|
|
Undefining @code{__STDC__} when @option{-ansi} is not used.
|
|
|
|
Currently, GCC defines @code{__STDC__} unconditionally. This provides
|
|
good results in practice.
|
|
|
|
Programmers normally use conditionals on @code{__STDC__} to ask whether
|
|
it is safe to use certain features of ISO C, such as function
|
|
prototypes or ISO token concatenation. Since plain @command{gcc} supports
|
|
all the features of ISO C, the correct answer to these questions is
|
|
``yes''.
|
|
|
|
Some users try to use @code{__STDC__} to check for the availability of
|
|
certain library facilities. This is actually incorrect usage in an ISO
|
|
C program, because the ISO C standard says that a conforming
|
|
freestanding implementation should define @code{__STDC__} even though it
|
|
does not have the library facilities. @samp{gcc -ansi -pedantic} is a
|
|
conforming freestanding implementation, and it is therefore required to
|
|
define @code{__STDC__}, even though it does not come with an ISO C
|
|
library.
|
|
|
|
Sometimes people say that defining @code{__STDC__} in a compiler that
|
|
does not completely conform to the ISO C standard somehow violates the
|
|
standard. This is illogical. The standard is a standard for compilers
|
|
that claim to support ISO C, such as @samp{gcc -ansi}---not for other
|
|
compilers such as plain @command{gcc}. Whatever the ISO C standard says
|
|
is relevant to the design of plain @command{gcc} without @option{-ansi} only
|
|
for pragmatic reasons, not as a requirement.
|
|
|
|
GCC normally defines @code{__STDC__} to be 1, and in addition
|
|
defines @code{__STRICT_ANSI__} if you specify the @option{-ansi} option,
|
|
or a @option{-std} option for strict conformance to some version of ISO C@.
|
|
On some hosts, system include files use a different convention, where
|
|
@code{__STDC__} is normally 0, but is 1 if the user specifies strict
|
|
conformance to the C Standard. GCC follows the host convention when
|
|
processing system include files, but when processing user files it follows
|
|
the usual GNU C convention.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Undefining @code{__STDC__} in C++.
|
|
|
|
Programs written to compile with C++-to-C translators get the
|
|
value of @code{__STDC__} that goes with the C compiler that is
|
|
subsequently used. These programs must test @code{__STDC__}
|
|
to determine what kind of C preprocessor that compiler uses:
|
|
whether they should concatenate tokens in the ISO C fashion
|
|
or in the traditional fashion.
|
|
|
|
These programs work properly with GNU C++ if @code{__STDC__} is defined.
|
|
They would not work otherwise.
|
|
|
|
In addition, many header files are written to provide prototypes in ISO
|
|
C but not in traditional C@. Many of these header files can work without
|
|
change in C++ provided @code{__STDC__} is defined. If @code{__STDC__}
|
|
is not defined, they will all fail, and will all need to be changed to
|
|
test explicitly for C++ as well.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Deleting ``empty'' loops.
|
|
|
|
Historically, GCC has not deleted ``empty'' loops under the
|
|
assumption that the most likely reason you would put one in a program is
|
|
to have a delay, so deleting them will not make real programs run any
|
|
faster.
|
|
|
|
However, the rationale here is that optimization of a nonempty loop
|
|
cannot produce an empty one, which holds for C but is not always the
|
|
case for C++.
|
|
|
|
@opindex funroll-loops
|
|
Moreover, with @option{-funroll-loops} small ``empty'' loops are already
|
|
removed, so the current behavior is both sub-optimal and inconsistent
|
|
and will change in the future.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Making side effects happen in the same order as in some other compiler.
|
|
|
|
@cindex side effects, order of evaluation
|
|
@cindex order of evaluation, side effects
|
|
It is never safe to depend on the order of evaluation of side effects.
|
|
For example, a function call like this may very well behave differently
|
|
from one compiler to another:
|
|
|
|
@example
|
|
void func (int, int);
|
|
|
|
int i = 2;
|
|
func (i++, i++);
|
|
@end example
|
|
|
|
There is no guarantee (in either the C or the C++ standard language
|
|
definitions) that the increments will be evaluated in any particular
|
|
order. Either increment might happen first. @code{func} might get the
|
|
arguments @samp{2, 3}, or it might get @samp{3, 2}, or even @samp{2, 2}.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Not allowing structures with volatile fields in registers.
|
|
|
|
Strictly speaking, there is no prohibition in the ISO C standard
|
|
against allowing structures with volatile fields in registers, but
|
|
it does not seem to make any sense and is probably not what you wanted
|
|
to do. So the compiler will give an error message in this case.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
Making certain warnings into errors by default.
|
|
|
|
Some ISO C testsuites report failure when the compiler does not produce
|
|
an error message for a certain program.
|
|
|
|
@opindex pedantic-errors
|
|
ISO C requires a ``diagnostic'' message for certain kinds of invalid
|
|
programs, but a warning is defined by GCC to count as a diagnostic. If
|
|
GCC produces a warning but not an error, that is correct ISO C support.
|
|
If test suites call this ``failure'', they should be run with the GCC
|
|
option @option{-pedantic-errors}, which will turn these warnings into
|
|
errors.
|
|
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
@node Warnings and Errors
|
|
@section Warning Messages and Error Messages
|
|
|
|
@cindex error messages
|
|
@cindex warnings vs errors
|
|
@cindex messages, warning and error
|
|
The GNU compiler can produce two kinds of diagnostics: errors and
|
|
warnings. Each kind has a different purpose:
|
|
|
|
@itemize @w{}
|
|
@item
|
|
@dfn{Errors} report problems that make it impossible to compile your
|
|
program. GCC reports errors with the source file name and line
|
|
number where the problem is apparent.
|
|
|
|
@item
|
|
@dfn{Warnings} report other unusual conditions in your code that
|
|
@emph{may} indicate a problem, although compilation can (and does)
|
|
proceed. Warning messages also report the source file name and line
|
|
number, but include the text @samp{warning:} to distinguish them
|
|
from error messages.
|
|
@end itemize
|
|
|
|
Warnings may indicate danger points where you should check to make sure
|
|
that your program really does what you intend; or the use of obsolete
|
|
features; or the use of nonstandard features of GNU C or C++. Many
|
|
warnings are issued only if you ask for them, with one of the @option{-W}
|
|
options (for instance, @option{-Wall} requests a variety of useful
|
|
warnings).
|
|
|
|
@opindex pedantic
|
|
@opindex pedantic-errors
|
|
GCC always tries to compile your program if possible; it never
|
|
gratuitously rejects a program whose meaning is clear merely because
|
|
(for instance) it fails to conform to a standard. In some cases,
|
|
however, the C and C++ standards specify that certain extensions are
|
|
forbidden, and a diagnostic @emph{must} be issued by a conforming
|
|
compiler. The @option{-pedantic} option tells GCC to issue warnings in
|
|
such cases; @option{-pedantic-errors} says to make them errors instead.
|
|
This does not mean that @emph{all} non-ISO constructs get warnings
|
|
or errors.
|
|
|
|
@xref{Warning Options,,Options to Request or Suppress Warnings}, for
|
|
more detail on these and related command-line options.
|