The horrific GENRAND construction bent over backwards to construct 64-bit
signed integers from the 31-bit output of random(3) for about 20 numbers per
test. Reproducibility wasn't a goal: random(3) was seeded with
srandomdev(3). Speed is not a factor for generating 20 integers with
arc4random(3). Range is not a factor: all uses did not bound the range
beyond that of the full [INT64_MIN, INT64_MAX]. Just use arc4random(3).
Reported by: Coverity
CIDs: 1404809, 1404817, 1404838, 1404840 and about 6x other
identical reports of dubious code relating to the
construction
d71e0db25b