freebsd-skq/usr.bin/patch/tests/unified_patch_test.sh
Kyle Evans 50dacbf6c2 patch(1): give /dev/null patches special treatment
We have a bad habit of duplicating contents of files that are sourced from
/dev/null and applied more than once... take the more sane (in most ways)
GNU route and complain if the file exists and offer reversal options.

This still falls short a little bit as selecting "don't reverse, apply
anyway" will still give you duplicated file contents. There's probably other
issues as well, but awareness is the first step to happiness.

MFC after:	2 weeks
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21535
2019-11-04 03:07:01 +00:00

153 lines
5.3 KiB
Bash
Executable File

#
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-FreeBSD
#
# Copyright (c) 2019 Kyle Evans <kevans@FreeBSD.org>
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
# are met:
# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
# notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
# documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
#
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
# ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
# IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
# ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
# FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
# DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
# OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
# HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
# LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
# OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
# SUCH DAMAGE.
#
# $FreeBSD$
atf_test_case basic
basic_body()
{
printf "a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng\nh\ni\n" > foo_full
printf "a\nb\nc\n" > foo_start
printf "g\nh\ni\n" > foo_end
printf "d\ne\nf\n" > foo_middle
diff -u foo_start foo_full > foo_start2full.diff
diff -u foo_end foo_full > foo_end2full.diff
diff -u foo_middle foo_full > foo_mid2full.diff
# Check lengths... each should have all 9 lines + 3 line header
atf_check -o inline:"12" -x \
"cat foo_start2full.diff | wc -l | tr -d '[:space:]'"
atf_check -o inline:"12" -x \
"cat foo_end2full.diff | wc -l | tr -d '[:space:]'"
atf_check -o inline:"12" -x \
"cat foo_mid2full.diff | wc -l | tr -d '[:space:]'"
# Apply the patch! Should succeed
atf_check -o ignore patch foo_start foo_start2full.diff \
-o foo_start2full
atf_check -o ignore patch foo_end foo_end2full.diff \
-o foo_end2full
atf_check -o ignore patch foo_middle foo_mid2full.diff \
-o foo_mid2full
# And these should all produce equivalent to the original full
atf_check -o ignore diff foo_start2full foo_full
atf_check -o ignore diff foo_end2full foo_full
atf_check -o ignore diff foo_mid2full foo_full
}
atf_test_case limited_ctx
limited_ctx_head()
{
atf_set "descr" "Verify correct behavior with limited context (PR 74127)"
}
limited_ctx_body()
{
# First; PR74127-repro.diff should not have applied, but it instead
# assumed a match and added the modified line at the offset specified...
atf_check -s not-exit:0 -o ignore -e ignore patch -o _.out \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127.in" \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127-repro.diff"
# Let's extend that and make sure a similarly ill-contexted diff does
# not apply even with the correct line number
atf_check -s not-exit:0 -o ignore -e ignore patch -o _.out \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127.in" \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127-line.diff"
# Correct line number and correct old line should always work
atf_check -o ignore -e ignore patch -o _.out \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127.in" \
"$(atf_get_srcdir)/PR74127-good.diff"
}
atf_test_case file_creation
file_creation_body()
{
echo "x" > foo
diff -u /dev/null foo > foo.diff
rm foo
atf_check -x "patch -s < foo.diff"
atf_check -o ignore stat foo
}
# This test is motivated by long-standing bugs that occasionally slip by in
# commits. If a file is created by a diff, patch(1) will happily duplicate the
# contents as many times as you apply the diff. It should instead detect that
# a source of /dev/null creates the file, so it shouldn't exist. Furthermore,
# the reverse of creation is deletion -- hence the next test, which ensures that
# the file is removed if it's empty once the patch is reversed. The size checks
# are scattered throughout to make sure that we didn't get some kind of false
# error, and the first size check is merely a sanity check that should be
# trivially true as this is executed in a sandbox.
atf_test_case file_nodupe
file_nodupe_body()
{
echo "x" > foo
diff -u /dev/null foo > foo.diff
atf_check -o inline:"2\n" stat -f "%z" foo
atf_check -s not-exit:0 -o ignore -x "patch -Ns < foo.diff"
atf_check -o inline:"2\n" stat -f "%z" foo
atf_check -s not-exit:0 -o ignore -x "patch -fs < foo.diff"
atf_check -o inline:"2\n" stat -f "%z" foo
}
atf_test_case file_removal
file_removal_body()
{
echo "x" > foo
diff -u /dev/null foo > foo.diff
# Check that the file is removed completely if it was sourced from
# /dev/null
atf_check -x "patch -Rs < foo.diff"
atf_check -s not-exit:0 -e ignore stat foo
# But if it had been modified, we'll only remove the portion that the
# patch would have created. This makes us compatible with GNU patch's
# behavior, at least. Whether that is the sane action or not is a
# question for further study, and then this comment may be removed.
printf "x\ny\n" > foo
atf_check -x "patch -Rs < foo.diff"
atf_check -o inline:"y\n" cat foo
}
atf_init_test_cases()
{
atf_add_test_case basic
atf_add_test_case limited_ctx
atf_add_test_case file_creation
atf_add_test_case file_nodupe
atf_add_test_case file_removal
}