Revise documentation of UDP performance issues based on recent
experiments. Fixes Issue #55 (at least to the extent that it's not really an iperf3 issue).
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b16244baa
commit
e4e22a58a7
15
README.md
15
README.md
@ -121,12 +121,17 @@ variables.
|
||||
Known Issues
|
||||
------------
|
||||
|
||||
* UDP performance: iperf2/iperf3 both only are only about 50% as fast
|
||||
as nuttcp in UDP mode. We are looking into this, but in the meantime,
|
||||
if you want to get UDP above 5Gbps, we recommend using nuttcp instead
|
||||
(http://www.nuttcp.net/).
|
||||
* UDP performance: Some problems have been noticed with iperf3 on the
|
||||
ESnet 100G testbed at high UDP rates (above 10Gbps). The symptom is
|
||||
that on any particular run of iperf3 the receiver reports a loss rate
|
||||
of about 20%, regardless of the -b option used on the client side.
|
||||
This problem appears not to be iperf3-specific, and may be due to the
|
||||
placement of the iperf3 process on a CPU and its relation to the
|
||||
inbound NIC. In some cases this problem can be mitigated by an
|
||||
appropriate use of the CPU affinity (-A) option. (Issue #55)
|
||||
|
||||
* The -Z flag sometimes hangs on OSX.
|
||||
* The -Z flag sometimes causes the iperf3 client to hang on OSX.
|
||||
(Issue #129)
|
||||
|
||||
* On OpenBSD, the server seems to require a "-4" argument, implying
|
||||
that it can only be used with IPv4.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user