numam-dpdk/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst

3690 lines
126 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

.. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
Copyright 2016 6WIND S.A.
Copyright 2016 Mellanox Technologies, Ltd
Generic flow API (rte_flow)
===========================
Overview
--------
This API provides a generic means to configure hardware to match specific
ingress or egress traffic, alter its fate and query related counters
according to any number of user-defined rules.
It is named *rte_flow* after the prefix used for all its symbols, and is
defined in ``rte_flow.h``.
- Matching can be performed on packet data (protocol headers, payload) and
properties (e.g. associated physical port, virtual device function ID).
- Possible operations include dropping traffic, diverting it to specific
queues, to virtual/physical device functions or ports, performing tunnel
offloads, adding marks and so on.
Flow rule
---------
Description
~~~~~~~~~~~
A flow rule is the combination of attributes with a matching pattern and a
list of actions. Flow rules form the basis of this API.
Flow rules can have several distinct actions (such as counting,
encapsulating, decapsulating before redirecting packets to a particular
queue, etc.), instead of relying on several rules to achieve this and having
applications deal with hardware implementation details regarding their
order.
Support for different priority levels on a rule basis is provided, for
example in order to force a more specific rule to come before a more generic
one for packets matched by both. However hardware support for more than a
single priority level cannot be guaranteed. When supported, the number of
available priority levels is usually low, which is why they can also be
implemented in software by PMDs (e.g. missing priority levels may be
emulated by reordering rules).
In order to remain as hardware-agnostic as possible, by default all rules
are considered to have the same priority, which means that the order between
overlapping rules (when a packet is matched by several filters) is
undefined.
PMDs may refuse to create overlapping rules at a given priority level when
they can be detected (e.g. if a pattern matches an existing filter).
Thus predictable results for a given priority level can only be achieved
with non-overlapping rules, using perfect matching on all protocol layers.
Flow rules can also be grouped, the flow rule priority is specific to the
group they belong to. All flow rules in a given group are thus processed within
the context of that group. Groups are not linked by default, so the logical
hierarchy of groups must be explicitly defined by flow rules themselves in each
group using the JUMP action to define the next group to redirect too. Only flow
rules defined in the default group 0 are guarantee to be matched against, this
makes group 0 the origin of any group hierarchy defined by an application.
Support for multiple actions per rule may be implemented internally on top
of non-default hardware priorities, as a result both features may not be
simultaneously available to applications.
Considering that allowed pattern/actions combinations cannot be known in
advance and would result in an impractically large number of capabilities to
expose, a method is provided to validate a given rule from the current
device configuration state.
This enables applications to check if the rule types they need is supported
at initialization time, before starting their data path. This method can be
used anytime, its only requirement being that the resources needed by a rule
should exist (e.g. a target RX queue should be configured first).
Each defined rule is associated with an opaque handle managed by the PMD,
applications are responsible for keeping it. These can be used for queries
and rules management, such as retrieving counters or other data and
destroying them.
To avoid resource leaks on the PMD side, handles must be explicitly
destroyed by the application before releasing associated resources such as
queues and ports.
The following sections cover:
- **Attributes** (represented by ``struct rte_flow_attr``): properties of a
flow rule such as its direction (ingress or egress) and priority.
- **Pattern item** (represented by ``struct rte_flow_item``): part of a
matching pattern that either matches specific packet data or traffic
properties. It can also describe properties of the pattern itself, such as
inverted matching.
- **Matching pattern**: traffic properties to look for, a combination of any
number of items.
- **Actions** (represented by ``struct rte_flow_action``): operations to
perform whenever a packet is matched by a pattern.
Attributes
~~~~~~~~~~
Attribute: Group
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Flow rules can be grouped by assigning them a common group number. Groups
allow a logical hierarchy of flow rule groups (tables) to be defined. These
groups can be supported virtually in the PMD or in the physical device.
Group 0 is the default group and this is the only group which flows are
guarantee to matched against, all subsequent groups can only be reached by
way of the JUMP action from a matched flow rule.
Although optional, applications are encouraged to group similar rules as
much as possible to fully take advantage of hardware capabilities
(e.g. optimized matching) and work around limitations (e.g. a single pattern
type possibly allowed in a given group), while being aware that the groups
hierarchies must be programmed explicitly.
Note that support for more than a single group is not guaranteed.
Attribute: Priority
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
A priority level can be assigned to a flow rule, lower values
denote higher priority, with 0 as the maximum.
Priority levels are arbitrary and up to the application, they do
not need to be contiguous nor start from 0, however the maximum number
varies between devices and may be affected by existing flow rules.
A flow which matches multiple rules in the same group will always matched by
the rule with the highest priority in that group.
If a packet is matched by several rules of a given group for a given
priority level, the outcome is undefined. It can take any path, may be
duplicated or even cause unrecoverable errors.
Note that support for more than a single priority level is not guaranteed.
Attribute: Traffic direction
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Flow rule patterns apply to inbound and/or outbound traffic.
In the context of this API, **ingress** and **egress** respectively stand
for **inbound** and **outbound** based on the standpoint of the application
creating a flow rule.
There are no exceptions to this definition.
Several pattern items and actions are valid and can be used in both
directions. At least one direction must be specified.
Specifying both directions at once for a given rule is not recommended but
may be valid in a few cases (e.g. shared counters).
Attribute: Transfer
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Instead of simply matching the properties of traffic as it would appear on a
given DPDK port ID, enabling this attribute transfers a flow rule to the
lowest possible level of any device endpoints found in the pattern.
When supported, this effectively enables an application to reroute traffic
not necessarily intended for it (e.g. coming from or addressed to different
physical ports, VFs or applications) at the device level.
It complements the behavior of some pattern items such as `Item: PHY_PORT`_
and is meaningless without them.
When transferring flow rules, **ingress** and **egress** attributes
(`Attribute: Traffic direction`_) keep their original meaning, as if
processing traffic emitted or received by the application.
Pattern item
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pattern items fall in two categories:
- Matching protocol headers and packet data, usually associated with a
specification structure. These must be stacked in the same order as the
protocol layers to match inside packets, starting from the lowest.
- Matching meta-data or affecting pattern processing, often without a
specification structure. Since they do not match packet contents, their
position in the list is usually not relevant.
Item specification structures are used to match specific values among
protocol fields (or item properties). Documentation describes for each item
whether they are associated with one and their type name if so.
Up to three structures of the same type can be set for a given item:
- ``spec``: values to match (e.g. a given IPv4 address).
- ``last``: upper bound for an inclusive range with corresponding fields in
``spec``.
- ``mask``: bit-mask applied to both ``spec`` and ``last`` whose purpose is
to distinguish the values to take into account and/or partially mask them
out (e.g. in order to match an IPv4 address prefix).
Usage restrictions and expected behavior:
- Setting either ``mask`` or ``last`` without ``spec`` is an error.
- Field values in ``last`` which are either 0 or equal to the corresponding
values in ``spec`` are ignored; they do not generate a range. Nonzero
values lower than those in ``spec`` are not supported.
- Setting ``spec`` and optionally ``last`` without ``mask`` causes the PMD
to use the default mask defined for that item (defined as
``rte_flow_item_{name}_mask`` constants).
- Not setting any of them (assuming item type allows it) is equivalent to
providing an empty (zeroed) ``mask`` for broad (nonspecific) matching.
- ``mask`` is a simple bit-mask applied before interpreting the contents of
``spec`` and ``last``, which may yield unexpected results if not used
carefully. For example, if for an IPv4 address field, ``spec`` provides
*10.1.2.3*, ``last`` provides *10.3.4.5* and ``mask`` provides
*255.255.0.0*, the effective range becomes *10.1.0.0* to *10.3.255.255*.
Example of an item specification matching an Ethernet header:
.. _table_rte_flow_pattern_item_example:
.. table:: Ethernet item
+----------+----------+-----------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+=======================+
| ``spec`` | ``src`` | ``00:00:01:02:03:04`` |
| +----------+-----------------------+
| | ``dst`` | ``00:00:2a:66:00:01`` |
| +----------+-----------------------+
| | ``type`` | ``0x22aa`` |
+----------+----------+-----------------------+
| ``last`` | unspecified |
+----------+----------+-----------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``src`` | ``00:00:ff:ff:ff:00`` |
| +----------+-----------------------+
| | ``dst`` | ``00:00:00:00:00:ff`` |
| +----------+-----------------------+
| | ``type`` | ``0x0000`` |
+----------+----------+-----------------------+
Non-masked bits stand for any value (shown as ``?`` below), Ethernet headers
with the following properties are thus matched:
- ``src``: ``??:??:01:02:03:??``
- ``dst``: ``??:??:??:??:??:01``
- ``type``: ``0x????``
Matching pattern
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A pattern is formed by stacking items starting from the lowest protocol
layer to match. This stacking restriction does not apply to meta items which
can be placed anywhere in the stack without affecting the meaning of the
resulting pattern.
Patterns are terminated by END items.
Examples:
.. _table_rte_flow_tcpv4_as_l4:
.. table:: TCPv4 as L4
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | TCP |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+----------+
|
.. _table_rte_flow_tcpv6_in_vxlan:
.. table:: TCPv6 in VXLAN
+-------+------------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+============+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+------------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+------------+
| 2 | UDP |
+-------+------------+
| 3 | VXLAN |
+-------+------------+
| 4 | Ethernet |
+-------+------------+
| 5 | IPv6 |
+-------+------------+
| 6 | TCP |
+-------+------------+
| 7 | END |
+-------+------------+
|
.. _table_rte_flow_tcpv4_as_l4_meta:
.. table:: TCPv4 as L4 with meta items
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | VOID |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | VOID |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 4 | TCP |
+-------+----------+
| 5 | VOID |
+-------+----------+
| 6 | VOID |
+-------+----------+
| 7 | END |
+-------+----------+
The above example shows how meta items do not affect packet data matching
items, as long as those remain stacked properly. The resulting matching
pattern is identical to "TCPv4 as L4".
.. _table_rte_flow_udpv6_anywhere:
.. table:: UDPv6 anywhere
+-------+------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+======+
| 0 | IPv6 |
+-------+------+
| 1 | UDP |
+-------+------+
| 2 | END |
+-------+------+
If supported by the PMD, omitting one or several protocol layers at the
bottom of the stack as in the above example (missing an Ethernet
specification) enables looking up anywhere in packets.
It is unspecified whether the payload of supported encapsulations
(e.g. VXLAN payload) is matched by such a pattern, which may apply to inner,
outer or both packets.
.. _table_rte_flow_invalid_l3:
.. table:: Invalid, missing L3
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | UDP |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | END |
+-------+----------+
The above pattern is invalid due to a missing L3 specification between L2
(Ethernet) and L4 (UDP). Doing so is only allowed at the bottom and at the
top of the stack.
Meta item types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
They match meta-data or affect pattern processing instead of matching packet
data directly, most of them do not need a specification structure. This
particularity allows them to be specified anywhere in the stack without
causing any side effect.
Item: ``END``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
End marker for item lists. Prevents further processing of items, thereby
ending the pattern.
- Its numeric value is 0 for convenience.
- PMD support is mandatory.
- ``spec``, ``last`` and ``mask`` are ignored.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_end:
.. table:: END
+----------+---------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+=========+
| ``spec`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``last`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``mask`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
Item: ``VOID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Used as a placeholder for convenience. It is ignored and simply discarded by
PMDs.
- PMD support is mandatory.
- ``spec``, ``last`` and ``mask`` are ignored.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_void:
.. table:: VOID
+----------+---------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+=========+
| ``spec`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``last`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``mask`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
One usage example for this type is generating rules that share a common
prefix quickly without reallocating memory, only by updating item types:
.. _table_rte_flow_item_void_example:
.. table:: TCP, UDP or ICMP as L4
+-------+--------------------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+====================+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+--------------------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+------+------+------+
| 2 | UDP | VOID | VOID |
+-------+------+------+------+
| 3 | VOID | TCP | VOID |
+-------+------+------+------+
| 4 | VOID | VOID | ICMP |
+-------+------+------+------+
| 5 | END |
+-------+--------------------+
Item: ``INVERT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Inverted matching, i.e. process packets that do not match the pattern.
- ``spec``, ``last`` and ``mask`` are ignored.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_invert:
.. table:: INVERT
+----------+---------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+=========+
| ``spec`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``last`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
| ``mask`` | ignored |
+----------+---------+
Usage example, matching non-TCPv4 packets only:
.. _table_rte_flow_item_invert_example:
.. table:: Anything but TCPv4
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | INVERT |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | TCP |
+-------+----------+
| 4 | END |
+-------+----------+
Item: ``PF``
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches traffic originating from (ingress) or going to (egress) the physical
function of the current device.
If supported, should work even if the physical function is not managed by
the application and thus not associated with a DPDK port ID.
- Can be combined with any number of `Item: VF`_ to match both PF and VF
traffic.
- ``spec``, ``last`` and ``mask`` must not be set.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_pf:
.. table:: PF
+----------+-------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+=======+
| ``spec`` | unset |
+----------+-------+
| ``last`` | unset |
+----------+-------+
| ``mask`` | unset |
+----------+-------+
Item: ``VF``
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches traffic originating from (ingress) or going to (egress) a given
virtual function of the current device.
If supported, should work even if the virtual function is not managed by the
application and thus not associated with a DPDK port ID.
Note this pattern item does not match VF representors traffic which, as
separate entities, should be addressed through their own DPDK port IDs.
- Can be specified multiple times to match traffic addressed to several VF
IDs.
- Can be combined with a PF item to match both PF and VF traffic.
- Default ``mask`` matches any VF ID.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_vf:
.. table:: VF
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+===========================+
| ``spec`` | ``id`` | destination VF ID |
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``id`` | upper range value |
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``id`` | zeroed to match any VF ID |
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
Item: ``PHY_PORT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches traffic originating from (ingress) or going to (egress) a physical
port of the underlying device.
The first PHY_PORT item overrides the physical port normally associated with
the specified DPDK input port (port_id). This item can be provided several
times to match additional physical ports.
Note that physical ports are not necessarily tied to DPDK input ports
(port_id) when those are not under DPDK control. Possible values are
specific to each device, they are not necessarily indexed from zero and may
not be contiguous.
As a device property, the list of allowed values as well as the value
associated with a port_id should be retrieved by other means.
- Default ``mask`` matches any port index.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_phy_port:
.. table:: PHY_PORT
+----------+-----------+--------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+===========+================================+
| ``spec`` | ``index`` | physical port index |
+----------+-----------+--------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``index`` | upper range value |
+----------+-----------+--------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``index`` | zeroed to match any port index |
+----------+-----------+--------------------------------+
Item: ``PORT_ID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches traffic originating from (ingress) or going to (egress) a given DPDK
port ID.
Normally only supported if the port ID in question is known by the
underlying PMD and related to the device the flow rule is created against.
This must not be confused with `Item: PHY_PORT`_ which refers to the
physical port of a device, whereas `Item: PORT_ID`_ refers to a ``struct
rte_eth_dev`` object on the application side (also known as "port
representor" depending on the kind of underlying device).
- Default ``mask`` matches the specified DPDK port ID.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_port_id:
.. table:: PORT_ID
+----------+----------+-----------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+=============================+
| ``spec`` | ``id`` | DPDK port ID |
+----------+----------+-----------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``id`` | upper range value |
+----------+----------+-----------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``id`` | zeroed to match any port ID |
+----------+----------+-----------------------------+
Item: ``MARK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an arbitrary integer value which was set using the ``MARK`` action in
a previously matched rule.
This item can only specified once as a match criteria as the ``MARK`` action can
only be specified once in a flow action.
Note the value of MARK field is arbitrary and application defined.
Depending on the underlying implementation the MARK item may be supported on
the physical device, with virtual groups in the PMD or not at all.
- Default ``mask`` matches any integer value.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_mark:
.. table:: MARK
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+===========================+
| ``spec`` | ``id`` | integer value |
+----------+--------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``id`` | upper range value |
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``id`` | zeroed to match any value |
+----------+----------+---------------------------+
ethdev: add flow tag A tag is a transient data which can be used during flow match. This can be used to store match result from a previous table so that the same pattern need not be matched again on the next table. Even if outer header is decapsulated on the previous match, the match result can be kept. Some device expose internal registers of its flow processing pipeline and those registers are quite useful for stateful connection tracking as it keeps status of flow matching. Multiple tags are supported by specifying index. Example testpmd commands are: flow create 0 ingress pattern ... / end actions set_tag index 2 value 0xaa00bb mask 0xffff00ff / set_tag index 3 value 0x123456 mask 0xffffff / vxlan_decap / jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress pattern ... / end actions set_tag index 2 value 0xcc00 mask 0xff00 / set_tag index 3 value 0x123456 mask 0xffffff / vxlan_decap / jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern tag index is 2 value spec 0xaa00bb value mask 0xffff00ff / eth ... / end actions ... jump group 2 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern tag index is 2 value spec 0xcc00 value mask 0xff00 / tag index is 3 value spec 0x123456 value mask 0xffffff / eth ... / end actions ... / end flow create 0 ingress group 2 pattern tag index is 3 value spec 0x123456 value mask 0xffffff / eth ... / end actions ... / end Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-10-27 18:42:28 +00:00
Item: ``TAG``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches tag item set by other flows. Multiple tags are supported by specifying
``index``.
- Default ``mask`` matches the specified tag value and index.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_tag:
.. table:: TAG
+----------+----------+----------------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+===========+=======================================+
| ``spec`` | ``data`` | 32 bit flow tag value |
| +-----------+---------------------------------------+
| | ``index`` | index of flow tag |
+----------+-----------+---------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``data`` | upper range value |
| +-----------+---------------------------------------+
| | ``index`` | field is ignored |
+----------+-----------+---------------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``data`` | bit-mask applies to "spec" and "last" |
| +-----------+---------------------------------------+
| | ``index`` | field is ignored |
+----------+-----------+---------------------------------------+
ethdev: extend flow metadata Currently, metadata can be set on egress path via mbuf tx_metadata field with PKT_TX_METADATA flag and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META matches metadata. This patch extends the metadata feature usability. 1) RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META When supporting multiple tables, Tx metadata can also be set by a rule and matched by another rule. This new action allows metadata to be set as a result of flow match. 2) Metadata on ingress There's also need to support metadata on ingress. Metadata can be set by SET_META action and matched by META item like Tx. The final value set by the action will be delivered to application via metadata dynamic field of mbuf which can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior to use SET_META action. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. If application is going to engage the metadata feature it registers the metadata dynamic fields, then PMD checks the metadata field availability and handles the appropriate fields in datapath. For loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to the other path depending on hardware capability. MARK and METADATA look similar and might operate in similar way, but not interacting. Initially, there were proposed two metadata related actions: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK These actions set the special flag in the packet metadata, MARK action stores some specified value in the metadata storage, and, on the packet receiving PMD puts the flag and value to the mbuf and applications can see the packet was threated inside flow engine according to the appropriate RTE flow(s). MARK and FLAG are like some kind of gateway to transfer some per-packet information from the flow engine to the application via receiving datapath. Also, there is the item of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK provided. It allows us to extend the flow match pattern with the capability to match the metadata values set by MARK/FLAG actions on other flows. From the datapath point of view, the MARK and FLAG are related to the receiving side only. It would useful to have the same gateway on the transmitting side and there was the feature of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META was proposed. The application can fill the field in mbuf and this value will be transferred to some field in the packet metadata inside the flow engine. It did not matter whether these metadata fields are shared because of MARK and META items belonged to different domains (receiving and transmitting) and could be vendor-specific. So far, so good, DPDK proposes some entities to control metadata inside the flow engine and gateways to exchange these values on a per-packet basis via datapaths. As we can see, the MARK and META means are not symmetric, there is absent action which would allow us to set META value on the transmitting path. So, the action of type: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META was proposed. The next, applications raise the new requirements for packet metadata. The flow ngines are getting more complex, internal switches are introduced, multiple ports might be supported within the same flow engine namespace. From the DPDK points of view, it means the packets might be sent on one eth_dev port and received on the other one, and the packet path inside the flow engine entirely belongs to the same hardware device. The simplest example is SR-IOV with PF, VFs and the representors. And there is a brilliant opportunity to provide some out-of-band channel to transfer some extra data from one port to another one, besides the packet data itself. And applications would like to use this opportunity. It is supposed for application to use trials (with rte_flow_validate) to detect which metadata features (FLAG, MARK, META) actually supported by PMD and underlying hardware. It might depend on PMD configuration, system software, hardware settings, etc., and should be detected in run time. Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:30 +00:00
Item: ``META``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches 32 bit metadata item set.
On egress, metadata can be set either by mbuf metadata field with
ethdev: move egress metadata to dynamic field The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is safe to share this dynamic field with ingress metadata. The shared dynamic field contains either egress (if application going to transmit mbuf with tx_burst) or ingress (if mbuf is received with rx_burst) metadata and can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_TX_DYNF_METADATA/PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior accessing the data. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA offload and configuration flag is removed. The metadata support in PMDs is engaged on dynamic field registration. Metadata feature is getting complex. We might have some set of actions and items that might be supported by PMDs in multiple combinations, the supported values and masks are the subjects to query by perfroming trials (with rte_flow_validate). [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62040/ Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:31 +00:00
PKT_TX_DYNF_METADATA flag or ``SET_META`` action. On ingress, ``SET_META``
ethdev: extend flow metadata Currently, metadata can be set on egress path via mbuf tx_metadata field with PKT_TX_METADATA flag and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META matches metadata. This patch extends the metadata feature usability. 1) RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META When supporting multiple tables, Tx metadata can also be set by a rule and matched by another rule. This new action allows metadata to be set as a result of flow match. 2) Metadata on ingress There's also need to support metadata on ingress. Metadata can be set by SET_META action and matched by META item like Tx. The final value set by the action will be delivered to application via metadata dynamic field of mbuf which can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior to use SET_META action. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. If application is going to engage the metadata feature it registers the metadata dynamic fields, then PMD checks the metadata field availability and handles the appropriate fields in datapath. For loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to the other path depending on hardware capability. MARK and METADATA look similar and might operate in similar way, but not interacting. Initially, there were proposed two metadata related actions: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK These actions set the special flag in the packet metadata, MARK action stores some specified value in the metadata storage, and, on the packet receiving PMD puts the flag and value to the mbuf and applications can see the packet was threated inside flow engine according to the appropriate RTE flow(s). MARK and FLAG are like some kind of gateway to transfer some per-packet information from the flow engine to the application via receiving datapath. Also, there is the item of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK provided. It allows us to extend the flow match pattern with the capability to match the metadata values set by MARK/FLAG actions on other flows. From the datapath point of view, the MARK and FLAG are related to the receiving side only. It would useful to have the same gateway on the transmitting side and there was the feature of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META was proposed. The application can fill the field in mbuf and this value will be transferred to some field in the packet metadata inside the flow engine. It did not matter whether these metadata fields are shared because of MARK and META items belonged to different domains (receiving and transmitting) and could be vendor-specific. So far, so good, DPDK proposes some entities to control metadata inside the flow engine and gateways to exchange these values on a per-packet basis via datapaths. As we can see, the MARK and META means are not symmetric, there is absent action which would allow us to set META value on the transmitting path. So, the action of type: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META was proposed. The next, applications raise the new requirements for packet metadata. The flow ngines are getting more complex, internal switches are introduced, multiple ports might be supported within the same flow engine namespace. From the DPDK points of view, it means the packets might be sent on one eth_dev port and received on the other one, and the packet path inside the flow engine entirely belongs to the same hardware device. The simplest example is SR-IOV with PF, VFs and the representors. And there is a brilliant opportunity to provide some out-of-band channel to transfer some extra data from one port to another one, besides the packet data itself. And applications would like to use this opportunity. It is supposed for application to use trials (with rte_flow_validate) to detect which metadata features (FLAG, MARK, META) actually supported by PMD and underlying hardware. It might depend on PMD configuration, system software, hardware settings, etc., and should be detected in run time. Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:30 +00:00
action sets metadata for a packet and the metadata will be reported via
``metadata`` dynamic field of ``rte_mbuf`` with PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag.
- Default ``mask`` matches the specified Rx metadata value.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_meta:
.. table:: META
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+=======================================+
| ``spec`` | ``data`` | 32 bit metadata value |
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``data`` | upper range value |
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``data`` | bit-mask applies to "spec" and "last" |
+----------+----------+---------------------------------------+
Data matching item types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Most of these are basically protocol header definitions with associated
bit-masks. They must be specified (stacked) from lowest to highest protocol
layer to form a matching pattern.
The following list is not exhaustive, new protocols will be added in the
future.
Item: ``ANY``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches any protocol in place of the current layer, a single ANY may also
stand for several protocol layers.
This is usually specified as the first pattern item when looking for a
protocol anywhere in a packet.
- Default ``mask`` stands for any number of layers.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_any:
.. table:: ANY
+----------+----------+--------------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==========+======================================+
| ``spec`` | ``num`` | number of layers covered |
+----------+----------+--------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``num`` | upper range value |
+----------+----------+--------------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``num`` | zeroed to cover any number of layers |
+----------+----------+--------------------------------------+
Example for VXLAN TCP payload matching regardless of outer L3 (IPv4 or IPv6)
and L4 (UDP) both matched by the first ANY specification, and inner L3 (IPv4
or IPv6) matched by the second ANY specification:
.. _table_rte_flow_item_any_example:
.. table:: TCP in VXLAN with wildcards
+-------+------+----------+----------+-------+
| Index | Item | Field | Subfield | Value |
+=======+======+==========+==========+=======+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+------+----------+----------+-------+
| 1 | ANY | ``spec`` | ``num`` | 2 |
+-------+------+----------+----------+-------+
| 2 | VXLAN |
+-------+------------------------------------+
| 3 | Ethernet |
+-------+------+----------+----------+-------+
| 4 | ANY | ``spec`` | ``num`` | 1 |
+-------+------+----------+----------+-------+
| 5 | TCP |
+-------+------------------------------------+
| 6 | END |
+-------+------------------------------------+
Item: ``RAW``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a byte string of a given length at a given offset.
Offset is either absolute (using the start of the packet) or relative to the
end of the previous matched item in the stack, in which case negative values
are allowed.
If search is enabled, offset is used as the starting point. The search area
can be delimited by setting limit to a nonzero value, which is the maximum
number of bytes after offset where the pattern may start.
Matching a zero-length pattern is allowed, doing so resets the relative
offset for subsequent items.
- This type does not support ranges (``last`` field).
- Default ``mask`` matches all fields exactly.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_raw:
.. table:: RAW
+----------+--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+==============+=================================================+
| ``spec`` | ``relative`` | look for pattern after the previous item |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``search`` | search pattern from offset (see also ``limit``) |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``reserved`` | reserved, must be set to zero |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``offset`` | absolute or relative offset for ``pattern`` |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``limit`` | search area limit for start of ``pattern`` |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``length`` | ``pattern`` length |
| +--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| | ``pattern`` | byte string to look for |
+----------+--------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | if specified, either all 0 or with the same values as ``spec`` |
+----------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | bit-mask applied to ``spec`` values with usual behavior |
+----------+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Example pattern looking for several strings at various offsets of a UDP
payload, using combined RAW items:
.. _table_rte_flow_item_raw_example:
.. table:: UDP payload matching
+-------+------+----------+--------------+-------+
| Index | Item | Field | Subfield | Value |
+=======+======+==========+==============+=======+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------------------------------------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------------------------------------+
| 2 | UDP |
+-------+------+----------+--------------+-------+
| 3 | RAW | ``spec`` | ``relative`` | 1 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``search`` | 1 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``offset`` | 10 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``limit`` | 0 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``length`` | 3 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``pattern`` | "foo" |
+-------+------+----------+--------------+-------+
| 4 | RAW | ``spec`` | ``relative`` | 1 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``search`` | 0 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``offset`` | 20 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``limit`` | 0 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``length`` | 3 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``pattern`` | "bar" |
+-------+------+----------+--------------+-------+
| 5 | RAW | ``spec`` | ``relative`` | 1 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``search`` | 0 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``offset`` | -29 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``limit`` | 0 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``length`` | 3 |
| | | +--------------+-------+
| | | | ``pattern`` | "baz" |
+-------+------+----------+--------------+-------+
| 6 | END |
+-------+----------------------------------------+
This translates to:
- Locate "foo" at least 10 bytes deep inside UDP payload.
- Locate "bar" after "foo" plus 20 bytes.
- Locate "baz" after "bar" minus 29 bytes.
Such a packet may be represented as follows (not to scale)::
0 >= 10 B == 20 B
| |<--------->| |<--------->|
| | | | |
|-----|------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----------|-----|------|
| ETH | IPv4 | UDP | ... | baz | foo | ......... | bar | .... |
|-----|------|-----|-----|-----|-----|-----------|-----|------|
| |
|<--------------------------->|
== 29 B
Note that matching subsequent pattern items would resume after "baz", not
"bar" since matching is always performed after the previous item of the
stack.
Item: ``ETH``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an Ethernet header.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
The ``type`` field either stands for "EtherType" or "TPID" when followed by
so-called layer 2.5 pattern items such as ``RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VLAN``. In
the latter case, ``type`` refers to that of the outer header, with the inner
EtherType/TPID provided by the subsequent pattern item. This is the same
order as on the wire.
If the ``type`` field contains a TPID value, then only tagged packets with the
specified TPID will match the pattern.
The field ``has_vlan`` can be used to match any type of tagged packets,
instead of using the ``type`` field.
If the ``type`` and ``has_vlan`` fields are not specified, then both tagged
and untagged packets will match the pattern.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``dst``: destination MAC.
- ``src``: source MAC.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``type``: EtherType or TPID.
- ``has_vlan``: packet header contains at least one VLAN.
- Default ``mask`` matches destination and source addresses only.
Item: ``VLAN``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an 802.1Q/ad VLAN tag.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
The corresponding standard outer EtherType (TPID) values are
net: add rte prefix to ether defines Add 'RTE_' prefix to defines: - rename ETHER_ADDR_LEN as RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN. - rename ETHER_TYPE_LEN as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_LEN. - rename ETHER_CRC_LEN as RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN. - rename ETHER_HDR_LEN as RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN. - rename ETHER_MIN_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN. - rename ETHER_MAX_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN. - rename ETHER_MTU as RTE_ETHER_MTU. - rename ETHER_MAX_VLAN_FRAME_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_VLAN_FRAME_LEN. - rename ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID as RTE_ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID. - rename ETHER_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_LEN. - rename ETHER_MIN_MTU as RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU. - rename ETHER_LOCAL_ADMIN_ADDR as RTE_ETHER_LOCAL_ADMIN_ADDR. - rename ETHER_GROUP_ADDR as RTE_ETHER_GROUP_ADDR. - rename ETHER_TYPE_IPv4 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPv4. - rename ETHER_TYPE_IPv6 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPv6. - rename ETHER_TYPE_ARP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_ARP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_VLAN as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN. - rename ETHER_TYPE_RARP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_RARP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_QINQ as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_QINQ. - rename ETHER_TYPE_ETAG as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_ETAG. - rename ETHER_TYPE_1588 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_1588. - rename ETHER_TYPE_SLOW as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_SLOW. - rename ETHER_TYPE_TEB as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_TEB. - rename ETHER_TYPE_LLDP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_LLDP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_MPLS as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_MPLS. - rename ETHER_TYPE_MPLSM as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_MPLSM. - rename ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN as RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN. - rename ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE as RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV4 as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV4. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV6 as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV6. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_ETH as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_ETH. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_NSH as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_NSH. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_MPLS as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_MPLS. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_GBP as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_GBP. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_VBNG as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_VBNG. - rename ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN as RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN. Do not update the command line library to avoid adding a dependency to librte_net. Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
2019-05-21 16:13:05 +00:00
``RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN`` or ``RTE_ETHER_TYPE_QINQ``. It can be overridden by the
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
preceding pattern item.
If a ``VLAN`` item is present in the pattern, then only tagged packets will
match the pattern.
The field ``has_more_vlan`` can be used to match any type of tagged packets,
instead of using the ``inner_type field``.
If the ``inner_type`` and ``has_more_vlan`` fields are not specified,
then any tagged packets will match the pattern.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``tci``: tag control information.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``inner_type``: inner EtherType or TPID.
- ``has_more_vlan``: packet header contains at least one more VLAN, after this VLAN.
- Default ``mask`` matches the VID part of TCI only (lower 12 bits).
Item: ``IPV4``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an IPv4 header.
Note: IPv4 options are handled by dedicated pattern items.
- ``hdr``: IPv4 header definition (``rte_ip.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches source and destination addresses only.
Item: ``IPV6``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an IPv6 header.
ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Using the current implementation of DPDK, an application cannot match on IPv6 packets, based on the existing extension headers, in a simple way. Field 'Next Header' in IPv6 header indicates type of the first extension header only. Following extension headers can't be identified by inspecting the IPv6 header. As a result, the existence or absence of specific extension headers can't be used for packet matching. For example, fragmented IPv6 packets contain a dedicated extension header (which is implemented in a later patch of this series). Non-fragmented packets don't contain the fragment extension header. For an application to match on non-fragmented IPv6 packets, the current implementation doesn't provide a suitable solution. Matching on the Next Header field is not sufficient, since additional extension headers might be present in the same packet. To match on fragmented IPv6 packets, the same difficulty exists. This patch implements the update as detailed in RFC [1]. A set of additional values will be added to IPv6 header struct. These values will indicate the existence of every defined extension header type, providing simple means for identification of existing extensions in the packet header. Continuing the above example, fragmented packets can be identified using the specific value indicating existence of fragment extension header. To match on non-fragmented IPv6 packets, need to use has_frag_ext 0. To match on fragmented IPv6 packets, need to use has_frag_ext 1. To match on any IPv6 packets, the has_frag_ext field should not be specified for match. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2020-10-14 16:35:47 +00:00
Dedicated flags indicate if header contains specific extension headers.
To match on packets containing a specific extension header, an application
should match on the dedicated flag set to 1.
To match on packets not containing a specific extension header, an application
should match on the dedicated flag clear to 0.
In case application doesn't care about the existence of a specific extension
header, it should not specify the dedicated flag for matching.
- ``hdr``: IPv6 header definition (``rte_ip.h``).
ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Using the current implementation of DPDK, an application cannot match on IPv6 packets, based on the existing extension headers, in a simple way. Field 'Next Header' in IPv6 header indicates type of the first extension header only. Following extension headers can't be identified by inspecting the IPv6 header. As a result, the existence or absence of specific extension headers can't be used for packet matching. For example, fragmented IPv6 packets contain a dedicated extension header (which is implemented in a later patch of this series). Non-fragmented packets don't contain the fragment extension header. For an application to match on non-fragmented IPv6 packets, the current implementation doesn't provide a suitable solution. Matching on the Next Header field is not sufficient, since additional extension headers might be present in the same packet. To match on fragmented IPv6 packets, the same difficulty exists. This patch implements the update as detailed in RFC [1]. A set of additional values will be added to IPv6 header struct. These values will indicate the existence of every defined extension header type, providing simple means for identification of existing extensions in the packet header. Continuing the above example, fragmented packets can be identified using the specific value indicating existence of fragment extension header. To match on non-fragmented IPv6 packets, need to use has_frag_ext 0. To match on fragmented IPv6 packets, need to use has_frag_ext 1. To match on any IPv6 packets, the has_frag_ext field should not be specified for match. [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-August/177257.html Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2020-10-14 16:35:47 +00:00
- ``has_hop_ext``: header contains Hop-by-Hop Options extension header.
- ``has_route_ext``: header contains Routing extension header.
- ``has_frag_ext``: header contains Fragment extension header.
- ``has_auth_ext``: header contains Authentication extension header.
- ``has_esp_ext``: header contains Encapsulation Security Payload extension header.
- ``has_dest_ext``: header contains Destination Options extension header.
- ``has_mobil_ext``: header contains Mobility extension header.
- ``has_hip_ext``: header contains Host Identity Protocol extension header.
- ``has_shim6_ext``: header contains Shim6 Protocol extension header.
- Default ``mask`` matches ``hdr`` source and destination addresses only.
Item: ``ICMP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ICMP header.
- ``hdr``: ICMP header definition (``rte_icmp.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches ICMP type and code only.
Item: ``UDP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a UDP header.
- ``hdr``: UDP header definition (``rte_udp.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches source and destination ports only.
Item: ``TCP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a TCP header.
- ``hdr``: TCP header definition (``rte_tcp.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches source and destination ports only.
Item: ``SCTP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a SCTP header.
- ``hdr``: SCTP header definition (``rte_sctp.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches source and destination ports only.
Item: ``VXLAN``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a VXLAN header (RFC 7348).
- ``flags``: normally 0x08 (I flag).
- ``rsvd0``: reserved, normally 0x000000.
- ``vni``: VXLAN network identifier.
- ``rsvd1``: reserved, normally 0x00.
- Default ``mask`` matches VNI only.
Item: ``E_TAG``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an IEEE 802.1BR E-Tag header.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
The corresponding standard outer EtherType (TPID) value is
net: add rte prefix to ether defines Add 'RTE_' prefix to defines: - rename ETHER_ADDR_LEN as RTE_ETHER_ADDR_LEN. - rename ETHER_TYPE_LEN as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_LEN. - rename ETHER_CRC_LEN as RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN. - rename ETHER_HDR_LEN as RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN. - rename ETHER_MIN_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN. - rename ETHER_MAX_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_LEN. - rename ETHER_MTU as RTE_ETHER_MTU. - rename ETHER_MAX_VLAN_FRAME_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_VLAN_FRAME_LEN. - rename ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID as RTE_ETHER_MAX_VLAN_ID. - rename ETHER_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_LEN as RTE_ETHER_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_LEN. - rename ETHER_MIN_MTU as RTE_ETHER_MIN_MTU. - rename ETHER_LOCAL_ADMIN_ADDR as RTE_ETHER_LOCAL_ADMIN_ADDR. - rename ETHER_GROUP_ADDR as RTE_ETHER_GROUP_ADDR. - rename ETHER_TYPE_IPv4 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPv4. - rename ETHER_TYPE_IPv6 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_IPv6. - rename ETHER_TYPE_ARP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_ARP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_VLAN as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_VLAN. - rename ETHER_TYPE_RARP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_RARP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_QINQ as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_QINQ. - rename ETHER_TYPE_ETAG as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_ETAG. - rename ETHER_TYPE_1588 as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_1588. - rename ETHER_TYPE_SLOW as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_SLOW. - rename ETHER_TYPE_TEB as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_TEB. - rename ETHER_TYPE_LLDP as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_LLDP. - rename ETHER_TYPE_MPLS as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_MPLS. - rename ETHER_TYPE_MPLSM as RTE_ETHER_TYPE_MPLSM. - rename ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN as RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_HLEN. - rename ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE as RTE_ETHER_ADDR_FMT_SIZE. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV4 as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV4. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV6 as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_IPV6. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_ETH as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_ETH. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_NSH as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_NSH. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_MPLS as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_MPLS. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_GBP as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_GBP. - rename VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_VBNG as RTE_VXLAN_GPE_TYPE_VBNG. - rename ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN as RTE_ETHER_VXLAN_GPE_HLEN. Do not update the command line library to avoid adding a dependency to librte_net. Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
2019-05-21 16:13:05 +00:00
``RTE_ETHER_TYPE_ETAG``. It can be overridden by the preceding pattern item.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``epcp_edei_in_ecid_b``: E-Tag control information (E-TCI), E-PCP (3b),
E-DEI (1b), ingress E-CID base (12b).
- ``rsvd_grp_ecid_b``: reserved (2b), GRP (2b), E-CID base (12b).
- ``in_ecid_e``: ingress E-CID ext.
- ``ecid_e``: E-CID ext.
ethdev: fix TPID handling in flow API TPID handling in rte_flow VLAN and E_TAG pattern item definitions is not consistent with the normal stacking order of pattern items, which is confusing to applications. Problem is that when followed by one of these layers, the EtherType field of the preceding layer keeps its "inner" definition, and the "outer" TPID is provided by the subsequent layer, the reverse of how a packet looks like on the wire: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN EtherType = B | B DATA ] rte_flow: [ ETH EtherType = B | VLAN TPID = A | B DATA ] Worse, when QinQ is involved, the stacking order of VLAN layers is unspecified. It is unclear whether it should be reversed (innermost to outermost) as well given TPID applies to the previous layer: Wire: [ ETH TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN EtherType = C | C DATA ] rte_flow 1: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = B | VLAN TPID = A | C DATA ] rte_flow 2: [ ETH EtherType = C | VLAN TPID = A | VLAN TPID = B | C DATA ] While specifying EtherType/TPID is hopefully rarely necessary, the stacking order in case of QinQ and the lack of documentation remain an issue. This patch replaces TPID in the VLAN pattern item with an inner EtherType/TPID as is usually done everywhere else (e.g. struct vlan_hdr), clarifies documentation and updates all relevant code. It breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_copy() - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_query() - rte_flow_validate() Summary of changes for PMDs that implement ETH, VLAN or E_TAG pattern items: - bnxt: EtherType matching is supported with and without VLAN, but TPID matching is not and triggers an error. - e1000: EtherType matching is only supported with the ETHERTYPE filter, which does not support VLAN matching, therefore no impact. - enic: same as bnxt. - i40e: same as bnxt with existing FDIR limitations on allowed EtherType values. The remaining filter types (VXLAN, NVGRE, QINQ) do not support EtherType matching. - ixgbe: same as e1000, with additional minor change to rely on the new E-Tag macro definition. - mlx4: EtherType/TPID matching is not supported, no impact. - mlx5: same as bnxt. - mvpp2: same as bnxt. - sfc: same as bnxt. - tap: same as bnxt. Fixes: b1a4b4cbc0a8 ("ethdev: introduce generic flow API") Fixes: 99e7003831c3 ("net/ixgbe: parse L2 tunnel filter") Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:56 +00:00
- ``inner_type``: inner EtherType or TPID.
- Default ``mask`` simultaneously matches GRP and E-CID base.
Item: ``NVGRE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a NVGRE header (RFC 7637).
- ``c_k_s_rsvd0_ver``: checksum (1b), undefined (1b), key bit (1b),
sequence number (1b), reserved 0 (9b), version (3b). This field must have
value 0x2000 according to RFC 7637.
- ``protocol``: protocol type (0x6558).
- ``tni``: virtual subnet ID.
- ``flow_id``: flow ID.
- Default ``mask`` matches TNI only.
Item: ``MPLS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a MPLS header.
- ``label_tc_s_ttl``: label, TC, Bottom of Stack and TTL.
- Default ``mask`` matches label only.
Item: ``GRE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a GRE header.
- ``c_rsvd0_ver``: checksum, reserved 0 and version.
- ``protocol``: protocol type.
- Default ``mask`` matches protocol only.
Item: ``GRE_KEY``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a GRE key field.
This should be preceded by item ``GRE``.
- Value to be matched is a big-endian 32 bit integer.
- When this item present it implicitly match K bit in default mask as "1"
Item: ``FUZZY``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Fuzzy pattern match, expect faster than default.
This is for device that support fuzzy match option. Usually a fuzzy match is
fast but the cost is accuracy. i.e. Signature Match only match pattern's hash
value, but it is possible two different patterns have the same hash value.
Matching accuracy level can be configured by threshold. Driver can divide the
range of threshold and map to different accuracy levels that device support.
Threshold 0 means perfect match (no fuzziness), while threshold 0xffffffff
means fuzziest match.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_fuzzy:
.. table:: FUZZY
+----------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Subfield | Value |
+==========+===============+==================================================+
| ``spec`` | ``threshold`` | 0 as perfect match, 0xffffffff as fuzziest match |
+----------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
| ``last`` | ``threshold`` | upper range value |
+----------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
| ``mask`` | ``threshold`` | bit-mask apply to "spec" and "last" |
+----------+---------------+--------------------------------------------------+
Usage example, fuzzy match a TCPv4 packets:
.. _table_rte_flow_item_fuzzy_example:
.. table:: Fuzzy matching
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | FUZZY |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | TCP |
+-------+----------+
| 4 | END |
+-------+----------+
Item: ``GTP``, ``GTPC``, ``GTPU``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a GTPv1 header.
Note: GTP, GTPC and GTPU use the same structure. GTPC and GTPU item
are defined for a user-friendly API when creating GTP-C and GTP-U
flow rules.
- ``v_pt_rsv_flags``: version (3b), protocol type (1b), reserved (1b),
extension header flag (1b), sequence number flag (1b), N-PDU number
flag (1b).
- ``msg_type``: message type.
- ``msg_len``: message length.
- ``teid``: tunnel endpoint identifier.
- Default ``mask`` matches teid only.
Item: ``ESP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ESP header.
- ``hdr``: ESP header definition (``rte_esp.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches SPI only.
Item: ``GENEVE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a GENEVE header.
- ``ver_opt_len_o_c_rsvd0``: version (2b), length of the options fields (6b),
OAM packet (1b), critical options present (1b), reserved 0 (6b).
- ``protocol``: protocol type.
- ``vni``: virtual network identifier.
- ``rsvd1``: reserved, normally 0x00.
- Default ``mask`` matches VNI only.
Item: ``VXLAN-GPE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a VXLAN-GPE header (draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-05).
- ``flags``: normally 0x0C (I and P flags).
- ``rsvd0``: reserved, normally 0x0000.
- ``protocol``: protocol type.
- ``vni``: VXLAN network identifier.
- ``rsvd1``: reserved, normally 0x00.
- Default ``mask`` matches VNI only.
Item: ``ARP_ETH_IPV4``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ARP header for Ethernet/IPv4.
- ``hdr``: hardware type, normally 1.
- ``pro``: protocol type, normally 0x0800.
- ``hln``: hardware address length, normally 6.
- ``pln``: protocol address length, normally 4.
- ``op``: opcode (1 for request, 2 for reply).
- ``sha``: sender hardware address.
- ``spa``: sender IPv4 address.
- ``tha``: target hardware address.
- ``tpa``: target IPv4 address.
- Default ``mask`` matches SHA, SPA, THA and TPA.
Item: ``IPV6_EXT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches the presence of any IPv6 extension header.
- ``next_hdr``: next header.
- Default ``mask`` matches ``next_hdr``.
Normally preceded by any of:
- `Item: IPV6`_
- `Item: IPV6_EXT`_
Item: ``IPV6_FRAG_EXT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches the presence of IPv6 fragment extension header.
- ``hdr``: IPv6 fragment extension header definition (``rte_ip.h``).
Normally preceded by any of:
- `Item: IPV6`_
- `Item: IPV6_EXT`_
Item: ``ICMP6``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches any ICMPv6 header.
- ``type``: ICMPv6 type.
- ``code``: ICMPv6 code.
- ``checksum``: ICMPv6 checksum.
- Default ``mask`` matches ``type`` and ``code``.
Item: ``ICMP6_ND_NS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ICMPv6 neighbor discovery solicitation.
- ``type``: ICMPv6 type, normally 135.
- ``code``: ICMPv6 code, normally 0.
- ``checksum``: ICMPv6 checksum.
- ``reserved``: reserved, normally 0.
- ``target_addr``: target address.
- Default ``mask`` matches target address only.
Item: ``ICMP6_ND_NA``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ICMPv6 neighbor discovery advertisement.
- ``type``: ICMPv6 type, normally 136.
- ``code``: ICMPv6 code, normally 0.
- ``checksum``: ICMPv6 checksum.
- ``rso_reserved``: route flag (1b), solicited flag (1b), override flag
(1b), reserved (29b).
- ``target_addr``: target address.
- Default ``mask`` matches target address only.
Item: ``ICMP6_ND_OPT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches the presence of any ICMPv6 neighbor discovery option.
- ``type``: ND option type.
- ``length``: ND option length.
- Default ``mask`` matches type only.
Normally preceded by any of:
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_NA`_
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_NS`_
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_OPT`_
Item: ``ICMP6_ND_OPT_SLA_ETH``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ICMPv6 neighbor discovery source Ethernet link-layer address
option.
- ``type``: ND option type, normally 1.
- ``length``: ND option length, normally 1.
- ``sla``: source Ethernet LLA.
- Default ``mask`` matches source link-layer address only.
Normally preceded by any of:
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_NA`_
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_OPT`_
Item: ``ICMP6_ND_OPT_TLA_ETH``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an ICMPv6 neighbor discovery target Ethernet link-layer address
option.
- ``type``: ND option type, normally 2.
- ``length``: ND option length, normally 1.
- ``tla``: target Ethernet LLA.
- Default ``mask`` matches target link-layer address only.
Normally preceded by any of:
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_NS`_
- `Item: ICMP6_ND_OPT`_
Item: ``META``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches an application specific 32 bit metadata item.
- Default ``mask`` matches the specified metadata value.
Item: ``GTP_PSC``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a GTP PDU extension header with type 0x85.
- ``pdu_type``: PDU type.
- ``qfi``: QoS flow identifier.
- Default ``mask`` matches QFI only.
Item: ``PPPOES``, ``PPPOED``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a PPPoE header.
- ``version_type``: version (4b), type (4b).
- ``code``: message type.
- ``session_id``: session identifier.
- ``length``: payload length.
Item: ``PPPOE_PROTO_ID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a PPPoE session protocol identifier.
- ``proto_id``: PPP protocol identifier.
- Default ``mask`` matches proto_id only.
Item: ``NSH``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a network service header (RFC 8300).
- ``version``: normally 0x0 (2 bits).
- ``oam_pkt``: indicate oam packet (1 bit).
- ``reserved``: reserved bit (1 bit).
- ``ttl``: maximum SFF hopes (6 bits).
- ``length``: total length in 4 bytes words (6 bits).
- ``reserved1``: reserved1 bits (4 bits).
- ``mdtype``: ndicates format of NSH header (4 bits).
- ``next_proto``: indicates protocol type of encap data (8 bits).
- ``spi``: service path identifier (3 bytes).
- ``sindex``: service index (1 byte).
- Default ``mask`` matches mdtype, next_proto, spi, sindex.
Item: ``IGMP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a Internet Group Management Protocol (RFC 2236).
- ``type``: IGMP message type (Query/Report).
- ``max_resp_time``: max time allowed before sending report.
- ``checksum``: checksum, 1s complement of whole IGMP message.
- ``group_addr``: group address, for Query value will be 0.
- Default ``mask`` matches group_addr.
Item: ``AH``
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a IP Authentication Header (RFC 4302).
- ``next_hdr``: next payload after AH.
- ``payload_len``: total length of AH in 4B words.
- ``reserved``: reserved bits.
- ``spi``: security parameters index.
- ``seq_num``: counter value increased by 1 on each packet sent.
- Default ``mask`` matches spi.
Item: ``HIGIG2``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a HIGIG2 header field. It is layer 2.5 protocol and used in
Broadcom switches.
- Default ``mask`` matches classification and vlan.
Item: ``L2TPV3OIP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a L2TPv3 over IP header.
- ``session_id``: L2TPv3 over IP session identifier.
- Default ``mask`` matches session_id only.
Item: ``PFCP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a PFCP Header.
- ``s_field``: S field.
- ``msg_type``: message type.
- ``msg_len``: message length.
- ``seid``: session endpoint identifier.
- Default ``mask`` matches s_field and seid.
Item: ``ECPRI``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a eCPRI header.
- ``hdr``: eCPRI header definition (``rte_ecpri.h``).
- Default ``mask`` matches nothing, for all eCPRI messages.
ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules Currently, DPDK application can offload the checksum check, and report it in the mbuf. However, as more and more applications are offloading some or all logic and action to the HW, there is a need to check the packet integrity so the right decision can be taken. The application logic can be positive meaning if the packet is valid jump / do actions, or negative if packet is not valid jump to SW / do actions (like drop) and add default flow (match all in low priority) that will direct the miss packet to the miss path. Since currently rte_flow works in positive way the assumption is that the positive way will be the common way in this case also. When thinking what is the best API to implement such feature, we need to consider the following (in no specific order): 1. API breakage. 2. Simplicity. 3. Performance. 4. HW capabilities. 5. rte_flow limitation. 6. Flexibility. First option: Add integrity flags to each of the items. For example add checksum_ok to IPv4 item. Pros: 1. No new rte_flow item. 2. Simple in the way that on each item the app can see what checks are available. Cons: 1. API breakage. 2. Increase number of flows, since app can't add global rule and must have dedicated flow for each of the flow combinations, for example matching on ICMP traffic or UDP/TCP traffic with IPv4 / IPv6 will result in 5 flows. Second option: dedicated item Pros: 1. No API breakage, and there will be no for some time due to having extra space. (by using bits) 2. Just one flow to support the ICMP or UDP/TCP traffic with IPv4 / IPv6. 3. Simplicity application can just look at one place to see all possible checks. 4. Allow future support for more tests. Cons: 1. New item, that holds number of fields from different items. For starter the following bits are suggested: 1. packet_ok - means that all HW checks depending on packet layer have passed. This may mean that in some HW such flow should be split to number of flows or fail. 2. l2_ok - all check for layer 2 have passed. 3. l3_ok - all check for layer 3 have passed. If packet doesn't have L3 layer this check should fail. 4. l4_ok - all check for layer 4 have passed. If packet doesn't have L4 layer this check should fail. 5. l2_crc_ok - the layer 2 CRC is O.K. 6. ipv4_csum_ok - IPv4 checksum is O.K. It is possible that the IPv4 checksum will be O.K. but the l3_ok will be 0. It is not possible that checksum will be 0 and the l3_ok will be 1. 7. l4_csum_ok - layer 4 checksum is O.K. 8. l3_len_OK - check that the reported layer 3 length is smaller than the frame length. Example of usage: 1. Check packets from all possible layers for integrity. flow create integrity spec packet_ok = 1 mask packet_ok = 1 ..... 2. Check only packet with layer 4 (UDP / TCP) flow create integrity spec l3_ok = 1, l4_ok = 1 mask l3_ok = 1 l4_ok = 1 Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 12:44:30 +00:00
Item: ``PACKET_INTEGRITY_CHECKS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches packet integrity.
For some devices application needs to enable integration checks in HW
before using this item.
- ``level``: the encapsulation level that should be checked:
- ``level == 0`` means the default PMD mode (can be inner most / outermost).
- ``level == 1`` means outermost header.
- ``level > 1`` means inner header. See also RSS level.
- ``packet_ok``: All HW packet integrity checks have passed based on the
topmost network layer. For example, for ICMP packet the topmost network
layer is L3 and for TCP or UDP packet the topmost network layer is L4.
- ``l2_ok``: all layer 2 HW integrity checks passed.
- ``l3_ok``: all layer 3 HW integrity checks passed.
- ``l4_ok``: all layer 4 HW integrity checks passed.
- ``l2_crc_ok``: layer 2 CRC check passed.
- ``ipv4_csum_ok``: IPv4 checksum check passed.
- ``l4_csum_ok``: layer 4 checksum check passed.
- ``l3_len_ok``: the layer 3 length is smaller than the frame length.
ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item This commit introduces the conntrack action and item. Usually the HW offloading is stateless. For some stateful offloading like a TCP connection, HW module will help provide the ability of a full offloading w/o SW participation after the connection was established. The basic usage is that in the first flow rule the application should add the conntrack action and jump to the next flow table. In the following flow rule(s) of the next table, the application should use the conntrack item to match on the result. A TCP connection has two directions traffic. To set a conntrack action context correctly, the information of packets from both directions are required. The conntrack action should be created on one ethdev port and supply the peer ethdev port as a parameter to the action. After context created, it could only be used between these two ethdev ports (dual-port mode) or a single port. The application should modify the action via the API "rte_action_handle_update" only when before using it to create a flow rule with conntrack for the opposite direction. This will help the driver to recognize the direction of the flow to be created, especially in the single-port mode, in which case the traffic from both directions will go through the same ethdev port if the application works as an "forwarding engine" but not an end point. There is no need to call the update interface if the subsequent flow rules have nothing to be changed. Query will be supported via "rte_action_handle_query" interface, about the current packets information and connection status. The fields query capabilities depends on the HW. For the packets received during the conntrack setup, it is suggested to re-inject the packets in order to make sure the conntrack module works correctly without missing any packet. Only the valid packets should pass the conntrack, packets with invalid TCP information, like out of window, or with invalid header, like malformed, should not pass. Naming and definition: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/uapi/linux/ netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/netfilter/ nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c Other reference: https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec01/invitedtalks/rooij.pdf Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 17:51:30 +00:00
Item: ``CONNTRACK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Matches a conntrack state after conntrack action.
- ``flags``: conntrack packet state flags.
- Default ``mask`` matches all state bits.
Actions
~~~~~~~
Each possible action is represented by a type.
An action can have an associated configuration object.
Several actions combined in a list can be assigned
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
to a flow rule and are performed in order.
They fall in three categories:
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
- Actions that modify the fate of matching traffic, for instance by dropping
or assigning it a specific destination.
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
- Actions that modify matching traffic contents or its properties. This
includes adding/removing encapsulation, encryption, compression and marks.
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
- Actions related to the flow rule itself, such as updating counters or
making it non-terminating.
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
Flow rules being terminating by default, not specifying any action of the
fate kind results in undefined behavior. This applies to both ingress and
egress.
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
PASSTHRU, when supported, makes a flow rule non-terminating.
Like matching patterns, action lists are terminated by END items.
Example of action that redirects packets to queue index 10:
.. _table_rte_flow_action_example:
.. table:: Queue action
+-----------+-------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+=======+
| ``index`` | 10 |
+-----------+-------+
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
Actions are performed in list order:
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
.. _table_rte_flow_count_then_drop:
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
.. table:: Count then drop
+-------+--------+
| Index | Action |
+=======+========+
| 0 | COUNT |
+-------+--------+
| 1 | DROP |
+-------+--------+
| 2 | END |
+-------+--------+
|
.. _table_rte_flow_mark_count_redirect:
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
.. table:: Mark, count then redirect
+-------+--------+------------+-------+
| Index | Action | Field | Value |
+=======+========+============+=======+
| 0 | MARK | ``mark`` | 0x2a |
+-------+--------+------------+-------+
| 1 | COUNT | ``shared`` | 0 |
| | +------------+-------+
| | | ``id`` | 0 |
+-------+--------+------------+-------+
| 2 | QUEUE | ``queue`` | 10 |
+-------+--------+------------+-------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+-----------------------------+
|
.. _table_rte_flow_redirect_queue_5:
.. table:: Redirect to queue 5
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| Index | Action | Field | Value |
+=======+========+===========+=======+
| 0 | DROP |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 1 | QUEUE | ``queue`` | 5 |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 2 | END |
+-------+----------------------------+
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
In the above example, while DROP and QUEUE must be performed in order, both
have to happen before reaching END. Only QUEUE has a visible effect.
Note that such a list may be thought as ambiguous and rejected on that
basis.
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
.. _table_rte_flow_redirect_queue_5_3:
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
.. table:: Redirect to queues 5 and 3
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| Index | Action | Field | Value |
+=======+========+===========+=======+
| 0 | QUEUE | ``queue`` | 5 |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 1 | VOID |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 2 | QUEUE | ``queue`` | 3 |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+----------------------------+
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
As previously described, all actions must be taken into account. This
effectively duplicates traffic to both queues. The above example also shows
that VOID is ignored.
Action types
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Common action types are described in this section. Like pattern item types,
this list is not exhaustive as new actions will be added in the future.
Action: ``END``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
End marker for action lists. Prevents further processing of actions, thereby
ending the list.
- Its numeric value is 0 for convenience.
- PMD support is mandatory.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_end:
.. table:: END
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``VOID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Used as a placeholder for convenience. It is ignored and simply discarded by
PMDs.
- PMD support is mandatory.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_void:
.. table:: VOID
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``PASSTHRU``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ethdev: alter behavior of flow API actions This patch makes the following changes to flow rule actions: - List order now matters, they are redefined as performed first to last instead of "all simultaneously". - Repeated actions are now supported (e.g. specifying QUEUE multiple times now duplicates traffic among them). Previously only the last action of any given kind was taken into account. - No more distinction between terminating/non-terminating/meta actions. Flow rules themselves are now defined as always terminating unless a PASSTHRU action is specified. These changes alter the behavior of flow rules in corner cases in order to prepare the flow API for actions that modify traffic contents or properties (e.g. encapsulation, compression) and for which order matter when combined. Previously one would have to do so through multiple flow rules by combining PASSTRHU with priority levels, however this proved overly complex to implement at the PMD level, hence this simpler approach. This breaks ABI compatibility for the following public functions: - rte_flow_create() - rte_flow_validate() PMDs with rte_flow support are modified accordingly: - bnxt: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions and does not support PASSTHRU. - e1000: no change, same as bnxt. - enic: modified to forbid redundant actions, no support for default drop. - failsafe: no change needed. - i40e: no change, implementation already forbids multiple actions. - ixgbe: same as i40e. - mlx4: modified to forbid multiple fate-deciding actions and drop when unspecified. - mlx5: same as mlx4, with other redundant actions also forbidden. - sfc: same as mlx4. - tap: implementation already complies with the new behavior except for the default pass-through modified as a default drop. Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-04-25 15:27:46 +00:00
Leaves traffic up for additional processing by subsequent flow rules; makes
a flow rule non-terminating.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_passthru:
.. table:: PASSTHRU
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Example to copy a packet to a queue and continue processing by subsequent
flow rules:
.. _table_rte_flow_action_passthru_example:
.. table:: Copy to queue 8
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| Index | Action | Field | Value |
+=======+========+===========+=======+
| 0 | PASSTHRU |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 1 | QUEUE | ``queue`` | 8 |
+-------+--------+-----------+-------+
| 2 | END |
+-------+----------------------------+
Action: ``JUMP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Redirects packets to a group on the current device.
In a hierarchy of groups, which can be used to represent physical or logical
flow group/tables on the device, this action redirects the matched flow to
the specified group on that device.
If a matched flow is redirected to a table which doesn't contain a matching
rule for that flow then the behavior is undefined and the resulting behavior
is up to the specific device. Best practice when using groups would be define
a default flow rule for each group which a defines the default actions in that
group so a consistent behavior is defined.
Defining an action for matched flow in a group to jump to a group which is
higher in the group hierarchy may not be supported by physical devices,
depending on how groups are mapped to the physical devices. In the
definitions of jump actions, applications should be aware that it may be
possible to define flow rules which trigger an undefined behavior causing
flows to loop between groups.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_jump:
.. table:: JUMP
+-----------+------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+==============================+
| ``group`` | Group to redirect packets to |
+-----------+------------------------------+
Action: ``MARK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Attaches an integer value to packets and sets ``PKT_RX_FDIR`` and
``PKT_RX_FDIR_ID`` mbuf flags.
This value is arbitrary and application-defined. Maximum allowed value
depends on the underlying implementation. It is returned in the
``hash.fdir.hi`` mbuf field.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_mark:
.. table:: MARK
+--------+--------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+========+======================================+
| ``id`` | integer value to return with packets |
+--------+--------------------------------------+
Action: ``FLAG``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Flags packets. Similar to `Action: MARK`_ without a specific value; only
sets the ``PKT_RX_FDIR`` mbuf flag.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_flag:
.. table:: FLAG
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``QUEUE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Assigns packets to a given queue index.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_queue:
.. table:: QUEUE
+-----------+--------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+====================+
| ``index`` | queue index to use |
+-----------+--------------------+
Action: ``DROP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Drop packets.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_drop:
.. table:: DROP
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``COUNT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adds a counter action to a matched flow.
If more than one count action is specified in a single flow rule, then each
action must specify a unique id.
Counters can be retrieved and reset through ``rte_flow_query()``, see
``struct rte_flow_query_count``.
The shared flag indicates whether the counter is unique to the flow rule the
action is specified with, or whether it is a shared counter.
For a count action with the shared flag set, then a global device
namespace is assumed for the counter id, so that any matched flow rules using
a count action with the same counter id on the same port will contribute to
that counter.
For ports within the same switch domain then the counter id namespace extends
to all ports within that switch domain.
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
The shared flag is DEPRECATED and ``INDIRECT`` ``COUNT`` action should be used
to make shared counters.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_count:
.. table:: COUNT
+------------+---------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+============+=================================+
| ``shared`` | DEPRECATED, shared counter flag |
+------------+---------------------------------+
| ``id`` | counter id |
+------------+---------------------------------+
Query structure to retrieve and reset flow rule counters:
.. _table_rte_flow_query_count:
.. table:: COUNT query
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
| Field | I/O | Value |
+===============+=====+===================================+
| ``reset`` | in | reset counter after query |
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
| ``hits_set`` | out | ``hits`` field is set |
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
| ``bytes_set`` | out | ``bytes`` field is set |
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
| ``hits`` | out | number of hits for this rule |
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
| ``bytes`` | out | number of bytes through this rule |
+---------------+-----+-----------------------------------+
Action: ``RSS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Similar to QUEUE, except RSS is additionally performed on packets to spread
them among several queues according to the provided parameters.
Unlike global RSS settings used by other DPDK APIs, unsetting the ``types``
field does not disable RSS in a flow rule. Doing so instead requests safe
unspecified "best-effort" settings from the underlying PMD, which depending
on the flow rule, may result in anything ranging from empty (single queue)
to all-inclusive RSS.
If non-applicable for matching packets RSS types are requested,
these RSS types are simply ignored. For example, it happens if:
- Hashing of both TCP and UDP ports is requested
(only one can be present in a packet).
- Requested RSS types contradict to flow rule pattern
(e.g. pattern has UDP item, but RSS types contain TCP).
If requested RSS hash types are not supported by the Ethernet device at all
(not reported in ``dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads``),
the flow creation will fail.
Note: RSS hash result is stored in the ``hash.rss`` mbuf field which
overlaps ``hash.fdir.lo``. Since `Action: MARK`_ sets the ``hash.fdir.hi``
field only, both can be requested simultaneously.
Also, regarding packet encapsulation ``level``:
- ``0`` requests the default behavior. Depending on the packet type, it can
mean outermost, innermost, anything in between or even no RSS.
It basically stands for the innermost encapsulation level RSS can be
performed on according to PMD and device capabilities.
- ``1`` requests RSS to be performed on the outermost packet encapsulation
level.
- ``2`` and subsequent values request RSS to be performed on the specified
inner packet encapsulation level, from outermost to innermost (lower to
higher values).
Values other than ``0`` are not necessarily supported.
Requesting a specific RSS level on unrecognized traffic results in undefined
behavior. For predictable results, it is recommended to make the flow rule
pattern match packet headers up to the requested encapsulation level so that
only matching traffic goes through.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_rss:
.. table:: RSS
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+=============================================+
| ``func`` | RSS hash function to apply |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``level`` | encapsulation level for ``types`` |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``types`` | specific RSS hash types (see ``ETH_RSS_*``) |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``key_len`` | hash key length in bytes |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``queue_num`` | number of entries in ``queue`` |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``key`` | hash key |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
| ``queue`` | queue indices to use |
+---------------+---------------------------------------------+
Action: ``PF``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Directs matching traffic to the physical function (PF) of the current
device.
See `Item: PF`_.
- No configurable properties.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_pf:
.. table:: PF
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``VF``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Directs matching traffic to a given virtual function of the current device.
Packets matched by a VF pattern item can be redirected to their original VF
ID instead of the specified one. This parameter may not be available and is
not guaranteed to work properly if the VF part is matched by a prior flow
rule or if packets are not addressed to a VF in the first place.
See `Item: VF`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_vf:
.. table:: VF
+--------------+--------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+================================+
| ``original`` | use original VF ID if possible |
+--------------+--------------------------------+
| ``id`` | VF ID |
+--------------+--------------------------------+
Action: ``PHY_PORT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Directs matching traffic to a given physical port index of the underlying
device.
See `Item: PHY_PORT`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_phy_port:
.. table:: PHY_PORT
+--------------+-------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+=====================================+
| ``original`` | use original port index if possible |
+--------------+-------------------------------------+
| ``index`` | physical port index |
+--------------+-------------------------------------+
Action: ``PORT_ID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Directs matching traffic to a given DPDK port ID.
See `Item: PORT_ID`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_port_id:
.. table:: PORT_ID
+--------------+---------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+=======================================+
| ``original`` | use original DPDK port ID if possible |
+--------------+---------------------------------------+
| ``id`` | DPDK port ID |
+--------------+---------------------------------------+
Action: ``METER``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Applies a stage of metering and policing.
The metering and policing (MTR) object has to be first created using the
rte_mtr_create() API function. The ID of the MTR object is specified as
action parameter. More than one flow can use the same MTR object through
the meter action. The MTR object can be further updated or queried using
the rte_mtr* API.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_meter:
.. table:: METER
+--------------+---------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+===============+
| ``mtr_id`` | MTR object ID |
+--------------+---------------+
Action: ``SECURITY``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Perform the security action on flows matched by the pattern items
according to the configuration of the security session.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows. For INLINE_CRYPTO, the
security protocol headers and IV are fully provided by the application as
specified in the flow pattern. The payload of matching packets is
encrypted on egress, and decrypted and authenticated on ingress.
For INLINE_PROTOCOL, the security protocol is fully offloaded to HW,
providing full encapsulation and decapsulation of packets in security
protocols. The flow pattern specifies both the outer security header fields
and the inner packet fields. The security session specified in the action
must match the pattern parameters.
The security session specified in the action must be created on the same
port as the flow action that is being specified.
The ingress/egress flow attribute should match that specified in the
security session if the security session supports the definition of the
direction.
Multiple flows can be configured to use the same security session.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_security:
.. table:: SECURITY
+----------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+======================+======================================+
| ``security_session`` | security session to apply |
+----------------------+--------------------------------------+
The following is an example of configuring IPsec inline using the
INLINE_CRYPTO security session:
The encryption algorithm, keys and salt are part of the opaque
``rte_security_session``. The SA is identified according to the IP and ESP
fields in the pattern items.
.. _table_rte_flow_item_esp_inline_example:
.. table:: IPsec inline crypto flow pattern items.
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | ESP |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+----------+
.. _table_rte_flow_action_esp_inline_example:
.. table:: IPsec inline flow actions.
+-------+----------+
| Index | Action |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | SECURITY |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | END |
+-------+----------+
Action: ``OF_SET_MPLS_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_SET_MPLS_TTL`` ("MPLS TTL") as defined by the `OpenFlow
Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_set_mpls_ttl:
.. table:: OF_SET_MPLS_TTL
+--------------+----------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+==========+
| ``mpls_ttl`` | MPLS TTL |
+--------------+----------+
Action: ``OF_DEC_MPLS_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_DEC_MPLS_TTL`` ("decrement MPLS TTL") as defined by the
`OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_dec_mpls_ttl:
.. table:: OF_DEC_MPLS_TTL
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``OF_SET_NW_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_SET_NW_TTL`` ("IP TTL") as defined by the `OpenFlow
Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_set_nw_ttl:
.. table:: OF_SET_NW_TTL
+------------+--------+
| Field | Value |
+============+========+
| ``nw_ttl`` | IP TTL |
+------------+--------+
Action: ``OF_DEC_NW_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_DEC_NW_TTL`` ("decrement IP TTL") as defined by the
`OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_dec_nw_ttl:
.. table:: OF_DEC_NW_TTL
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``OF_COPY_TTL_OUT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_COPY_TTL_OUT`` ("copy TTL "outwards" -- from
next-to-outermost to outermost") as defined by the `OpenFlow Switch
Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_copy_ttl_out:
.. table:: OF_COPY_TTL_OUT
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``OF_COPY_TTL_IN``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_COPY_TTL_IN`` ("copy TTL "inwards" -- from outermost to
next-to-outermost") as defined by the `OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_copy_ttl_in:
.. table:: OF_COPY_TTL_IN
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``OF_POP_VLAN``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_POP_VLAN`` ("pop the outer VLAN tag") as defined
by the `OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_pop_vlan:
.. table:: OF_POP_VLAN
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``OF_PUSH_VLAN``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_PUSH_VLAN`` ("push a new VLAN tag") as defined by the
`OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_push_vlan:
.. table:: OF_PUSH_VLAN
+---------------+-----------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+===========+
| ``ethertype`` | EtherType |
+---------------+-----------+
Action: ``OF_SET_VLAN_VID``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_SET_VLAN_VID`` ("set the 802.1q VLAN id") as defined by
the `OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_set_vlan_vid:
.. table:: OF_SET_VLAN_VID
+--------------+---------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+=========+
| ``vlan_vid`` | VLAN id |
+--------------+---------+
Action: ``OF_SET_VLAN_PCP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_SET_LAN_PCP`` ("set the 802.1q priority") as defined by
the `OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_set_vlan_pcp:
.. table:: OF_SET_VLAN_PCP
+--------------+---------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+===============+
| ``vlan_pcp`` | VLAN priority |
+--------------+---------------+
Action: ``OF_POP_MPLS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_POP_MPLS`` ("pop the outer MPLS tag") as defined by the
`OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_pop_mpls:
.. table:: OF_POP_MPLS
+---------------+-----------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+===========+
| ``ethertype`` | EtherType |
+---------------+-----------+
Action: ``OF_PUSH_MPLS``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Implements ``OFPAT_PUSH_MPLS`` ("push a new MPLS tag") as defined by the
`OpenFlow Switch Specification`_.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_of_push_mpls:
.. table:: OF_PUSH_MPLS
+---------------+-----------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+===========+
| ``ethertype`` | EtherType |
+---------------+-----------+
Action: ``VXLAN_ENCAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Performs a VXLAN encapsulation action by encapsulating the matched flow in the
VXLAN tunnel as defined in the``rte_flow_action_vxlan_encap`` flow items
definition.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows. The flow definition specified
in the ``rte_flow_action_tunnel_encap`` action structure must define a valid
VLXAN network overlay which conforms with RFC 7348 (Virtual eXtensible Local
Area Network (VXLAN): A Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks
over Layer 3 Networks). The pattern must be terminated with the
RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END item type.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_vxlan_encap:
.. table:: VXLAN_ENCAP
+----------------+-------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+================+=====================================+
| ``definition`` | Tunnel end-point overlay definition |
+----------------+-------------------------------------+
.. _table_rte_flow_action_vxlan_encap_example:
.. table:: IPv4 VxLAN flow pattern example.
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | UDP |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | VXLAN |
+-------+----------+
| 4 | END |
+-------+----------+
Action: ``VXLAN_DECAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Performs a decapsulation action by stripping all headers of the VXLAN tunnel
network overlay from the matched flow.
The flow items pattern defined for the flow rule with which a ``VXLAN_DECAP``
action is specified, must define a valid VXLAN tunnel as per RFC7348. If the
flow pattern does not specify a valid VXLAN tunnel then a
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error should be returned.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows.
Action: ``NVGRE_ENCAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Performs a NVGRE encapsulation action by encapsulating the matched flow in the
NVGRE tunnel as defined in the``rte_flow_action_tunnel_encap`` flow item
definition.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows. The flow definition specified
in the ``rte_flow_action_tunnel_encap`` action structure must defined a valid
NVGRE network overlay which conforms with RFC 7637 (NVGRE: Network
Virtualization Using Generic Routing Encapsulation). The pattern must be
terminated with the RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_END item type.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_nvgre_encap:
.. table:: NVGRE_ENCAP
+----------------+-------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+================+=====================================+
| ``definition`` | NVGRE end-point overlay definition |
+----------------+-------------------------------------+
.. _table_rte_flow_action_nvgre_encap_example:
.. table:: IPv4 NVGRE flow pattern example.
+-------+----------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+==========+
| 0 | Ethernet |
+-------+----------+
| 1 | IPv4 |
+-------+----------+
| 2 | NVGRE |
+-------+----------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+----------+
Action: ``NVGRE_DECAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Performs a decapsulation action by stripping all headers of the NVGRE tunnel
network overlay from the matched flow.
The flow items pattern defined for the flow rule with which a ``NVGRE_DECAP``
action is specified, must define a valid NVGRE tunnel as per RFC7637. If the
flow pattern does not specify a valid NVGRE tunnel then a
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error should be returned.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows.
ethdev: add raw encapsulation action Currenlty the encap/decap actions only support encapsulation of VXLAN and NVGRE L2 packets (L2 encapsulation is where the inner packet has a valid Ethernet header, while L3 encapsulation is where the inner packet doesn't have the Ethernet header). In addtion the parameter to to the encap action is a list of rte items, this results in 2 extra translation, between the application to the actioni and from the action to the NIC. This results in negative impact on the insertion performance. Looking forward there are going to be a need to support many more tunnel encapsulations. For example MPLSoGRE, MPLSoUDP. Adding the new encapsulation will result in duplication of code. For example the code for handling NVGRE and VXLAN are exactly the same, and each new tunnel will have the same exact structure. This patch introduce a raw encapsulation that can support L2 tunnel types and L3 tunnel types. In addtion the new encapsulations commands are using raw buffer inorder to save the converstion time, both for the application and the PMD. In order to encapsulate L3 tunnel type there is a need to use both actions in the same rule: The decap to remove the L2 of the original packet, and then encap command to encapsulate the packet with the tunnel. For decap L3 there is also a need to use both commands in the same flow first the decap command to remove the outer tunnel header and then encap to add the L2 header. Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-10-22 17:38:09 +00:00
Action: ``RAW_ENCAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adds outer header whose template is provided in its data buffer,
as defined in the ``rte_flow_action_raw_encap`` definition.
This action modifies the payload of matched flows. The data supplied must
be a valid header, either holding layer 2 data in case of adding layer 2 after
decap layer 3 tunnel (for example MPLSoGRE) or complete tunnel definition
starting from layer 2 and moving to the tunnel item itself. When applied to
the original packet the resulting packet must be a valid packet.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_raw_encap:
.. table:: RAW_ENCAP
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+================+========================================+
| ``data`` | Encapsulation data |
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``preserve`` | Bit-mask of data to preserve on output |
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``size`` | Size of data and preserve |
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
Action: ``RAW_DECAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Remove outer header whose template is provided in its data buffer,
as defined in the ``rte_flow_action_raw_decap``
This action modifies the payload of matched flows. The data supplied must
be a valid header, either holding layer 2 data in case of removing layer 2
before encapsulation of layer 3 tunnel (for example MPLSoGRE) or complete
ethdev: add raw encapsulation action Currenlty the encap/decap actions only support encapsulation of VXLAN and NVGRE L2 packets (L2 encapsulation is where the inner packet has a valid Ethernet header, while L3 encapsulation is where the inner packet doesn't have the Ethernet header). In addtion the parameter to to the encap action is a list of rte items, this results in 2 extra translation, between the application to the actioni and from the action to the NIC. This results in negative impact on the insertion performance. Looking forward there are going to be a need to support many more tunnel encapsulations. For example MPLSoGRE, MPLSoUDP. Adding the new encapsulation will result in duplication of code. For example the code for handling NVGRE and VXLAN are exactly the same, and each new tunnel will have the same exact structure. This patch introduce a raw encapsulation that can support L2 tunnel types and L3 tunnel types. In addtion the new encapsulations commands are using raw buffer inorder to save the converstion time, both for the application and the PMD. In order to encapsulate L3 tunnel type there is a need to use both actions in the same rule: The decap to remove the L2 of the original packet, and then encap command to encapsulate the packet with the tunnel. For decap L3 there is also a need to use both commands in the same flow first the decap command to remove the outer tunnel header and then encap to add the L2 header. Signed-off-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
2018-10-22 17:38:09 +00:00
tunnel definition starting from layer 2 and moving to the tunnel item itself.
When applied to the original packet the resulting packet must be a
valid packet.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_raw_decap:
.. table:: RAW_DECAP
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+================+========================================+
| ``data`` | Decapsulation data |
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
| ``size`` | Size of data |
+----------------+----------------------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV4_SRC``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new IPv4 source address in the outermost IPv4 header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv4_src:
.. table:: SET_IPV4_SRC
+-----------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+=========================+
| ``ipv4_addr`` | new IPv4 source address |
+---------------+-------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV4_DST``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new IPv4 destination address in the outermost IPv4 header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv4_dst:
.. table:: SET_IPV4_DST
+---------------+------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+==============================+
| ``ipv4_addr`` | new IPv4 destination address |
+---------------+------------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV6_SRC``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new IPv6 source address in the outermost IPv6 header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6 flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv6_src:
.. table:: SET_IPV6_SRC
+---------------+-------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+=========================+
| ``ipv6_addr`` | new IPv6 source address |
+---------------+-------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV6_DST``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new IPv6 destination address in the outermost IPv6 header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6 flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv6_dst:
.. table:: SET_IPV6_DST
+---------------+------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+==============================+
| ``ipv6_addr`` | new IPv6 destination address |
+---------------+------------------------------+
Action: ``SET_TP_SRC``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new source port number in the outermost TCP/UDP header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP or RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP
flow pattern item. Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_tp_src:
.. table:: SET_TP_SRC
+----------+-------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+=========================+
| ``port`` | new TCP/UDP source port |
+---------------+--------------------+
Action: ``SET_TP_DST``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set a new destination port number in the outermost TCP/UDP header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_TCP or RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_UDP
flow pattern item. Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_tp_dst:
.. table:: SET_TP_DST
+----------+------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+==============================+
| ``port`` | new TCP/UDP destination port |
+---------------+-------------------------+
Action: ``MAC_SWAP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Swap the source and destination MAC addresses in the outermost Ethernet
header.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_mac_swap:
.. table:: MAC_SWAP
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``DEC_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Decrease TTL value.
If there is no valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 or RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6
in pattern, Some PMDs will reject rule because behavior will be undefined.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_dec_ttl:
.. table:: DEC_TTL
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
Action: ``SET_TTL``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Assigns a new TTL value.
If there is no valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 or RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6
in pattern, Some PMDs will reject rule because behavior will be undefined.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ttl:
.. table:: SET_TTL
+---------------+--------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===============+====================+
| ``ttl_value`` | new TTL value |
+---------------+--------------------+
Action: ``SET_MAC_SRC``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set source MAC address.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_mac_src:
.. table:: SET_MAC_SRC
+--------------+---------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+===============+
| ``mac_addr`` | MAC address |
+--------------+---------------+
Action: ``SET_MAC_DST``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set destination MAC address.
It must be used with a valid RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH flow pattern item.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_mac_dst:
.. table:: SET_MAC_DST
+--------------+---------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+===============+
| ``mac_addr`` | MAC address |
+--------------+---------------+
Action: ``INC_TCP_SEQ``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Increase sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
Value to increase TCP sequence number by is a big-endian 32 bit integer.
Using this action on non-matching traffic will result in undefined behavior.
Action: ``DEC_TCP_SEQ``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Decrease sequence number in the outermost TCP header.
Value to decrease TCP sequence number by is a big-endian 32 bit integer.
Using this action on non-matching traffic will result in undefined behavior.
Action: ``INC_TCP_ACK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Increase acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP header.
Value to increase TCP acknowledgment number by is a big-endian 32 bit integer.
Using this action on non-matching traffic will result in undefined behavior.
Action: ``DEC_TCP_ACK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Decrease acknowledgment number in the outermost TCP header.
Value to decrease TCP acknowledgment number by is a big-endian 32 bit integer.
Using this action on non-matching traffic will result in undefined behavior.
ethdev: add flow tag A tag is a transient data which can be used during flow match. This can be used to store match result from a previous table so that the same pattern need not be matched again on the next table. Even if outer header is decapsulated on the previous match, the match result can be kept. Some device expose internal registers of its flow processing pipeline and those registers are quite useful for stateful connection tracking as it keeps status of flow matching. Multiple tags are supported by specifying index. Example testpmd commands are: flow create 0 ingress pattern ... / end actions set_tag index 2 value 0xaa00bb mask 0xffff00ff / set_tag index 3 value 0x123456 mask 0xffffff / vxlan_decap / jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress pattern ... / end actions set_tag index 2 value 0xcc00 mask 0xff00 / set_tag index 3 value 0x123456 mask 0xffffff / vxlan_decap / jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern tag index is 2 value spec 0xaa00bb value mask 0xffff00ff / eth ... / end actions ... jump group 2 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern tag index is 2 value spec 0xcc00 value mask 0xff00 / tag index is 3 value spec 0x123456 value mask 0xffffff / eth ... / end actions ... / end flow create 0 ingress group 2 pattern tag index is 3 value spec 0x123456 value mask 0xffffff / eth ... / end actions ... / end Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-10-27 18:42:28 +00:00
Action: ``SET_TAG``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set Tag.
Tag is a transient data used during flow matching. This is not delivered to
application. Multiple tags are supported by specifying index.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_tag:
.. table:: SET_TAG
+-----------+----------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+============================+
| ``data`` | 32 bit tag value |
+-----------+----------------------------+
| ``mask`` | bit-mask applies to "data" |
+-----------+----------------------------+
| ``index`` | index of tag to set |
+-----------+----------------------------+
ethdev: extend flow metadata Currently, metadata can be set on egress path via mbuf tx_metadata field with PKT_TX_METADATA flag and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META matches metadata. This patch extends the metadata feature usability. 1) RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META When supporting multiple tables, Tx metadata can also be set by a rule and matched by another rule. This new action allows metadata to be set as a result of flow match. 2) Metadata on ingress There's also need to support metadata on ingress. Metadata can be set by SET_META action and matched by META item like Tx. The final value set by the action will be delivered to application via metadata dynamic field of mbuf which can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior to use SET_META action. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. If application is going to engage the metadata feature it registers the metadata dynamic fields, then PMD checks the metadata field availability and handles the appropriate fields in datapath. For loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to the other path depending on hardware capability. MARK and METADATA look similar and might operate in similar way, but not interacting. Initially, there were proposed two metadata related actions: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK These actions set the special flag in the packet metadata, MARK action stores some specified value in the metadata storage, and, on the packet receiving PMD puts the flag and value to the mbuf and applications can see the packet was threated inside flow engine according to the appropriate RTE flow(s). MARK and FLAG are like some kind of gateway to transfer some per-packet information from the flow engine to the application via receiving datapath. Also, there is the item of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK provided. It allows us to extend the flow match pattern with the capability to match the metadata values set by MARK/FLAG actions on other flows. From the datapath point of view, the MARK and FLAG are related to the receiving side only. It would useful to have the same gateway on the transmitting side and there was the feature of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META was proposed. The application can fill the field in mbuf and this value will be transferred to some field in the packet metadata inside the flow engine. It did not matter whether these metadata fields are shared because of MARK and META items belonged to different domains (receiving and transmitting) and could be vendor-specific. So far, so good, DPDK proposes some entities to control metadata inside the flow engine and gateways to exchange these values on a per-packet basis via datapaths. As we can see, the MARK and META means are not symmetric, there is absent action which would allow us to set META value on the transmitting path. So, the action of type: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META was proposed. The next, applications raise the new requirements for packet metadata. The flow ngines are getting more complex, internal switches are introduced, multiple ports might be supported within the same flow engine namespace. From the DPDK points of view, it means the packets might be sent on one eth_dev port and received on the other one, and the packet path inside the flow engine entirely belongs to the same hardware device. The simplest example is SR-IOV with PF, VFs and the representors. And there is a brilliant opportunity to provide some out-of-band channel to transfer some extra data from one port to another one, besides the packet data itself. And applications would like to use this opportunity. It is supposed for application to use trials (with rte_flow_validate) to detect which metadata features (FLAG, MARK, META) actually supported by PMD and underlying hardware. It might depend on PMD configuration, system software, hardware settings, etc., and should be detected in run time. Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:30 +00:00
Action: ``SET_META``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set metadata. Item ``META`` matches metadata.
ethdev: move egress metadata to dynamic field The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is safe to share this dynamic field with ingress metadata. The shared dynamic field contains either egress (if application going to transmit mbuf with tx_burst) or ingress (if mbuf is received with rx_burst) metadata and can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_TX_DYNF_METADATA/PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior accessing the data. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MATCH_METADATA offload and configuration flag is removed. The metadata support in PMDs is engaged on dynamic field registration. Metadata feature is getting complex. We might have some set of actions and items that might be supported by PMDs in multiple combinations, the supported values and masks are the subjects to query by perfroming trials (with rte_flow_validate). [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/62040/ Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:31 +00:00
Metadata set by mbuf metadata field with PKT_TX_DYNF_METADATA flag on egress
will be overridden by this action. On ingress, the metadata will be carried by
ethdev: extend flow metadata Currently, metadata can be set on egress path via mbuf tx_metadata field with PKT_TX_METADATA flag and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META matches metadata. This patch extends the metadata feature usability. 1) RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META When supporting multiple tables, Tx metadata can also be set by a rule and matched by another rule. This new action allows metadata to be set as a result of flow match. 2) Metadata on ingress There's also need to support metadata on ingress. Metadata can be set by SET_META action and matched by META item like Tx. The final value set by the action will be delivered to application via metadata dynamic field of mbuf which can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior to use SET_META action. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. If application is going to engage the metadata feature it registers the metadata dynamic fields, then PMD checks the metadata field availability and handles the appropriate fields in datapath. For loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to the other path depending on hardware capability. MARK and METADATA look similar and might operate in similar way, but not interacting. Initially, there were proposed two metadata related actions: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK These actions set the special flag in the packet metadata, MARK action stores some specified value in the metadata storage, and, on the packet receiving PMD puts the flag and value to the mbuf and applications can see the packet was threated inside flow engine according to the appropriate RTE flow(s). MARK and FLAG are like some kind of gateway to transfer some per-packet information from the flow engine to the application via receiving datapath. Also, there is the item of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK provided. It allows us to extend the flow match pattern with the capability to match the metadata values set by MARK/FLAG actions on other flows. From the datapath point of view, the MARK and FLAG are related to the receiving side only. It would useful to have the same gateway on the transmitting side and there was the feature of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META was proposed. The application can fill the field in mbuf and this value will be transferred to some field in the packet metadata inside the flow engine. It did not matter whether these metadata fields are shared because of MARK and META items belonged to different domains (receiving and transmitting) and could be vendor-specific. So far, so good, DPDK proposes some entities to control metadata inside the flow engine and gateways to exchange these values on a per-packet basis via datapaths. As we can see, the MARK and META means are not symmetric, there is absent action which would allow us to set META value on the transmitting path. So, the action of type: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META was proposed. The next, applications raise the new requirements for packet metadata. The flow ngines are getting more complex, internal switches are introduced, multiple ports might be supported within the same flow engine namespace. From the DPDK points of view, it means the packets might be sent on one eth_dev port and received on the other one, and the packet path inside the flow engine entirely belongs to the same hardware device. The simplest example is SR-IOV with PF, VFs and the representors. And there is a brilliant opportunity to provide some out-of-band channel to transfer some extra data from one port to another one, besides the packet data itself. And applications would like to use this opportunity. It is supposed for application to use trials (with rte_flow_validate) to detect which metadata features (FLAG, MARK, META) actually supported by PMD and underlying hardware. It might depend on PMD configuration, system software, hardware settings, etc., and should be detected in run time. Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:30 +00:00
``metadata`` dynamic field of ``rte_mbuf`` which can be accessed by
``RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA()``. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along
with the data.
The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling
``rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register()`` prior to use ``SET_META`` action.
Altering partial bits is supported with ``mask``. For bits which have never been
set, unpredictable value will be seen depending on driver implementation. For
loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to
the other path depending on HW capability.
In hairpin case with Tx explicit flow mode, metadata could (not mandatory) be
used to connect the Rx and Tx flows if it can be propagated from Rx to Tx path.
ethdev: extend flow metadata Currently, metadata can be set on egress path via mbuf tx_metadata field with PKT_TX_METADATA flag and RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META matches metadata. This patch extends the metadata feature usability. 1) RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META When supporting multiple tables, Tx metadata can also be set by a rule and matched by another rule. This new action allows metadata to be set as a result of flow match. 2) Metadata on ingress There's also need to support metadata on ingress. Metadata can be set by SET_META action and matched by META item like Tx. The final value set by the action will be delivered to application via metadata dynamic field of mbuf which can be accessed by RTE_FLOW_DYNF_METADATA() macro or with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_set() and rte_flow_dynf_metadata_get() helper routines. PKT_RX_DYNF_METADATA flag will be set along with the data. The mbuf dynamic field must be registered by calling rte_flow_dynf_metadata_register() prior to use SET_META action. The availability of dynamic mbuf metadata field can be checked with rte_flow_dynf_metadata_avail() routine. If application is going to engage the metadata feature it registers the metadata dynamic fields, then PMD checks the metadata field availability and handles the appropriate fields in datapath. For loopback/hairpin packet, metadata set on Rx/Tx may or may not be propagated to the other path depending on hardware capability. MARK and METADATA look similar and might operate in similar way, but not interacting. Initially, there were proposed two metadata related actions: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_FLAG - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_MARK These actions set the special flag in the packet metadata, MARK action stores some specified value in the metadata storage, and, on the packet receiving PMD puts the flag and value to the mbuf and applications can see the packet was threated inside flow engine according to the appropriate RTE flow(s). MARK and FLAG are like some kind of gateway to transfer some per-packet information from the flow engine to the application via receiving datapath. Also, there is the item of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_MARK provided. It allows us to extend the flow match pattern with the capability to match the metadata values set by MARK/FLAG actions on other flows. From the datapath point of view, the MARK and FLAG are related to the receiving side only. It would useful to have the same gateway on the transmitting side and there was the feature of type RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_META was proposed. The application can fill the field in mbuf and this value will be transferred to some field in the packet metadata inside the flow engine. It did not matter whether these metadata fields are shared because of MARK and META items belonged to different domains (receiving and transmitting) and could be vendor-specific. So far, so good, DPDK proposes some entities to control metadata inside the flow engine and gateways to exchange these values on a per-packet basis via datapaths. As we can see, the MARK and META means are not symmetric, there is absent action which would allow us to set META value on the transmitting path. So, the action of type: - RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SET_META was proposed. The next, applications raise the new requirements for packet metadata. The flow ngines are getting more complex, internal switches are introduced, multiple ports might be supported within the same flow engine namespace. From the DPDK points of view, it means the packets might be sent on one eth_dev port and received on the other one, and the packet path inside the flow engine entirely belongs to the same hardware device. The simplest example is SR-IOV with PF, VFs and the representors. And there is a brilliant opportunity to provide some out-of-band channel to transfer some extra data from one port to another one, besides the packet data itself. And applications would like to use this opportunity. It is supposed for application to use trials (with rte_flow_validate) to detect which metadata features (FLAG, MARK, META) actually supported by PMD and underlying hardware. It might depend on PMD configuration, system software, hardware settings, etc., and should be detected in run time. Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@mellanox.com>
2019-11-05 14:19:30 +00:00
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_meta:
.. table:: SET_META
+----------+----------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==========+============================+
| ``data`` | 32 bit metadata value |
+----------+----------------------------+
| ``mask`` | bit-mask applies to "data" |
+----------+----------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV4_DSCP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set IPv4 DSCP.
Modify DSCP in IPv4 header.
It must be used with RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV4 in pattern.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv4_dscp:
.. table:: SET_IPV4_DSCP
+-----------+---------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+=================================+
| ``dscp`` | DSCP in low 6 bits, rest ignore |
+-----------+---------------------------------+
Action: ``SET_IPV6_DSCP``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set IPv6 DSCP.
Modify DSCP in IPv6 header.
It must be used with RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6 in pattern.
Otherwise, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION error will be returned.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_set_ipv6_dscp:
.. table:: SET_IPV6_DSCP
+-----------+---------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+===========+=================================+
| ``dscp`` | DSCP in low 6 bits, rest ignore |
+-----------+---------------------------------+
Action: ``AGE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Set ageing timeout configuration to a flow.
Event RTE_ETH_EVENT_FLOW_AGED will be reported if
timeout passed without any matching on the flow.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_age:
.. table:: AGE
+--------------+---------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+=================================+
| ``timeout`` | 24 bits timeout value |
+--------------+---------------------------------+
| ``reserved`` | 8 bits reserved, must be zero |
+--------------+---------------------------------+
| ``context`` | user input flow context |
+--------------+---------------------------------+
Query structure to retrieve ageing status information of a
shared AGE action, or a flow rule using the AGE action:
.. _table_rte_flow_query_age:
.. table:: AGE query
+------------------------------+-----+----------------------------------------+
| Field | I/O | Value |
+==============================+=====+========================================+
| ``aged`` | out | Aging timeout expired |
+------------------------------+-----+----------------------------------------+
| ``sec_since_last_hit_valid`` | out | ``sec_since_last_hit`` value is valid |
+------------------------------+-----+----------------------------------------+
| ``sec_since_last_hit`` | out | Seconds since last traffic hit |
+------------------------------+-----+----------------------------------------+
Action: ``SAMPLE``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Adds a sample action to a matched flow.
The matching packets will be duplicated with the specified ``ratio`` and
applied with own set of actions with a fate action, the packets sampled
equals is '1/ratio'. All the packets continue to the target destination.
When the ``ratio`` is set to 1 then the packets will be 100% mirrored.
``actions`` represent the different set of actions for the sampled or mirrored
packets, and must have a fate action.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_sample:
.. table:: SAMPLE
+--------------+---------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==============+=================================+
| ``ratio`` | 32 bits sample ratio value |
+--------------+---------------------------------+
| ``actions`` | sub-action list for sampling |
+--------------+---------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
Action: ``INDIRECT``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ethdev: add shared actions to flow API Introduce extension of flow action API enabling sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for PMDs, where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an essence/object affects all the rules using it. Motivation and example === Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires for each flow sharing cloned RSS action: - call `rte_flow_destroy()` - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits: - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across multiple flows Change description === Shared action === In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum rte_flow_action_type`). Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows. Shared action create/use/destroy === Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given moment, i.e. shared action resides outside of the context of any flow. Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading implementation. API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`): - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required for shared action implementation. - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to the action resources, configuration and state. API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`) should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared action implementation. In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section). If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is undefined. Shared action re-configuration === Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update operation should not depend on the number of flows sharing the related action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action. Shared action query === Provide separate API to query shared action state (see rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules sharing the counter. This API doesn't query shared action configuration since it is controlled by rte_flow_shared_action_create() and rte_flow_shared_action_update() APIs and no supposed to change by other means. example === struct rte_flow_action actions[2]; struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf conf; struct rte_flow_action action; /* skipped: initialize conf and action */ struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, &conf, &action, &error); actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED; actions[0].conf = handle; actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */ struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0, actions, error); /* create more rules reusing shared action */ struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1, actions, error); /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */ struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN, actions, error); /* update shared action */ struct rte_flow_action updated_action; /* * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action * configuration change */ rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error); /* * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of * updated_action */ /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */ rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error); Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-14 11:40:14 +00:00
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
Flow utilize indirect action by handle as returned from
``rte_flow_action_handle_create()``.
ethdev: add shared actions to flow API Introduce extension of flow action API enabling sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for PMDs, where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an essence/object affects all the rules using it. Motivation and example === Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires for each flow sharing cloned RSS action: - call `rte_flow_destroy()` - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits: - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across multiple flows Change description === Shared action === In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum rte_flow_action_type`). Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows. Shared action create/use/destroy === Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given moment, i.e. shared action resides outside of the context of any flow. Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading implementation. API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`): - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required for shared action implementation. - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to the action resources, configuration and state. API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`) should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared action implementation. In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section). If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is undefined. Shared action re-configuration === Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update operation should not depend on the number of flows sharing the related action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action. Shared action query === Provide separate API to query shared action state (see rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules sharing the counter. This API doesn't query shared action configuration since it is controlled by rte_flow_shared_action_create() and rte_flow_shared_action_update() APIs and no supposed to change by other means. example === struct rte_flow_action actions[2]; struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf conf; struct rte_flow_action action; /* skipped: initialize conf and action */ struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, &conf, &action, &error); actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED; actions[0].conf = handle; actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */ struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0, actions, error); /* create more rules reusing shared action */ struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1, actions, error); /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */ struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN, actions, error); /* update shared action */ struct rte_flow_action updated_action; /* * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action * configuration change */ rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error); /* * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of * updated_action */ /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */ rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error); Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-14 11:40:14 +00:00
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
The behaviour of the indirect action defined by ``action`` argument of type
``struct rte_flow_action`` passed to ``rte_flow_action_handle_create()``.
ethdev: add shared actions to flow API Introduce extension of flow action API enabling sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for PMDs, where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an essence/object affects all the rules using it. Motivation and example === Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires for each flow sharing cloned RSS action: - call `rte_flow_destroy()` - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits: - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across multiple flows Change description === Shared action === In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum rte_flow_action_type`). Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows. Shared action create/use/destroy === Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given moment, i.e. shared action resides outside of the context of any flow. Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading implementation. API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`): - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required for shared action implementation. - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to the action resources, configuration and state. API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`) should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared action implementation. In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section). If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is undefined. Shared action re-configuration === Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update operation should not depend on the number of flows sharing the related action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action. Shared action query === Provide separate API to query shared action state (see rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules sharing the counter. This API doesn't query shared action configuration since it is controlled by rte_flow_shared_action_create() and rte_flow_shared_action_update() APIs and no supposed to change by other means. example === struct rte_flow_action actions[2]; struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf conf; struct rte_flow_action action; /* skipped: initialize conf and action */ struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, &conf, &action, &error); actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED; actions[0].conf = handle; actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */ struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0, actions, error); /* create more rules reusing shared action */ struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1, actions, error); /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */ struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN, actions, error); /* update shared action */ struct rte_flow_action updated_action; /* * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action * configuration change */ rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error); /* * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of * updated_action */ /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */ rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error); Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-14 11:40:14 +00:00
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
The indirect action can be used by a single flow or shared among multiple flows.
The indirect action can be in-place updated by ``rte_flow_action_handle_update()``
without destroying flow and creating flow again. The fields that could be
updated depend on the type of the ``action`` and different for every type.
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
The indirect action specified data (e.g. counter) can be queried by
``rte_flow_action_handle_query()``.
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
.. _table_rte_flow_action_handle:
ethdev: add shared actions to flow API Introduce extension of flow action API enabling sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for PMDs, where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an essence/object affects all the rules using it. Motivation and example === Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires for each flow sharing cloned RSS action: - call `rte_flow_destroy()` - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits: - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across multiple flows Change description === Shared action === In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum rte_flow_action_type`). Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows. Shared action create/use/destroy === Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given moment, i.e. shared action resides outside of the context of any flow. Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading implementation. API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`): - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required for shared action implementation. - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to the action resources, configuration and state. API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`) should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared action implementation. In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section). If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is undefined. Shared action re-configuration === Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update operation should not depend on the number of flows sharing the related action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action. Shared action query === Provide separate API to query shared action state (see rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules sharing the counter. This API doesn't query shared action configuration since it is controlled by rte_flow_shared_action_create() and rte_flow_shared_action_update() APIs and no supposed to change by other means. example === struct rte_flow_action actions[2]; struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf conf; struct rte_flow_action action; /* skipped: initialize conf and action */ struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, &conf, &action, &error); actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED; actions[0].conf = handle; actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */ struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0, actions, error); /* create more rules reusing shared action */ struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1, actions, error); /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */ struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN, actions, error); /* update shared action */ struct rte_flow_action updated_action; /* * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action * configuration change */ rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error); /* * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of * updated_action */ /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */ rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error); Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-14 11:40:14 +00:00
ethdev: introduce indirect flow action Right now, rte_flow_shared_action_* APIs are used for some shared actions, like RSS, count. The shared action should be created before using it inside a flow. These shared actions sometimes are not really shared but just some indirect actions decoupled from a flow. The new functions rte_flow_action_handle_* are added to replace the current shared functions rte_flow_shared_action_*. There are two types of flow actions: 1. the direct (normal) actions that could be created and stored within a flow rule. Such action is tied to its flow rule and cannot be reused. 2. the indirect action, in the past, named shared_action. It is created from a direct actioni, like count or rss, and then used in the flow rules with an object handle. The PMD will take care of the retrieve from indirect action to the direct action when it is referenced. The indirect action is accessed (update / query) w/o any flow rule, just via the action object handle. For example, when querying or resetting a counter, it could be done out of any flow using this counter, but only the handle of the counter action object is required. The indirect action object could be shared by different flows or used by a single flow, depending on the direct action type and the real-life requirements. The handle of an indirect action object is opaque and defined in each driver and possibly different per direct action type. The old name "shared" is improper in a sense and should be replaced. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*", the testpmd application code and command line interfaces also need to be updated to do the adaption. The testpmd application user guide is also updated. All the "shared action" related parts are replaced with "indirect action" to have a correct explanation. The parameter of "update" interface is also changed. A general pointer will replace the rte_flow_action struct pointer due to the facts: 1. Some action may not support fields updating. In the example of a counter, the only "update" supported should be the reset. So passing a rte_flow_action struct pointer is meaningless and there is even no such corresponding action struct. What's more, if more than one operations should be supported, for some other action, such pointer parameter may not meet the need. 2. Some action may need conditional or partial update, the current parameter will not provide the ability to indicate which part(s) to update. For different types of indirect action objects, the pointer could either be the same of rte_flow_action* struct - in order not to break the current driver implementation, or some wrapper structures with bits as masks to indicate which part to be updated, depending on real needs of the corresponding direct action. For different direct actions, the structures of indirect action objects updating will be different. All the underlayer PMD callbacks will be moved to these new APIs. The RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is kept for now in order not to break the ABI. All the implementations are changed by using RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_INDIRECT. Since the APIs are changed from "rte_flow_shared_action*" to the new "rte_flow_action_handle*" and the "update" interface's 3rd input parameter is changed to generic pointer, the mlx5 PMD that uses these APIs needs to do the adaption to the new APIs as well. Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 14:38:29 +00:00
.. table:: INDIRECT
ethdev: add shared actions to flow API Introduce extension of flow action API enabling sharing of single rte_flow_action in multiple flows. The API intended for PMDs, where multiple HW offloaded flows can reuse the same HW essence/object representing flow action and modification of such an essence/object affects all the rules using it. Motivation and example === Adding or removing one or more queues to RSS used by multiple flow rules imposes per rule toll for current DPDK flow API; the scenario requires for each flow sharing cloned RSS action: - call `rte_flow_destroy()` - call `rte_flow_create()` with modified RSS action API for sharing action and its in-place update benefits: - reduce the overhead of multiple RSS flow rules reconfiguration - optimize resource utilization by sharing action across multiple flows Change description === Shared action === In order to represent flow action shared by multiple flows new action type RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED is introduced (see `enum rte_flow_action_type`). Actually the introduced API decouples action from any specific flow and enables sharing of single action by its handle across multiple flows. Shared action create/use/destroy === Shared action may be reused by some or none flow rules at any given moment, i.e. shared action resides outside of the context of any flow. Shared action represent HW resources/objects used for action offloading implementation. API for shared action create (see `rte_flow_shared_action_create()`): - should allocate HW resources and make related initializations required for shared action implementation. - make necessary preparations to maintain shared access to the action resources, configuration and state. API for shared action destroy (see `rte_flow_shared_action_destroy()`) should release HW resources and make related cleanups required for shared action implementation. In order to share some flow action reuse the handle of type `struct rte_flow_shared_action` returned by rte_flow_shared_action_create() as a `conf` field of `struct rte_flow_action` (see "example" section). If some shared action not used by any flow rule all resources allocated by the shared action can be released by rte_flow_shared_action_destroy() (see "example" section). The shared action handle passed as argument to destroy API should not be used any further i.e. result of the usage is undefined. Shared action re-configuration === Shared action behavior defined by its configuration can be updated via rte_flow_shared_action_update() (see "example" section). The shared action update operation modifies HW related resources/objects allocated on the action creation. The number of operations performed by the update operation should not depend on the number of flows sharing the related action. On return of shared action update API action behavior should be according to updated configuration for all flows sharing the action. Shared action query === Provide separate API to query shared action state (see rte_flow_shared_action_update()). Taking a counter as an example: query returns value aggregating all counter increments across all flow rules sharing the counter. This API doesn't query shared action configuration since it is controlled by rte_flow_shared_action_create() and rte_flow_shared_action_update() APIs and no supposed to change by other means. example === struct rte_flow_action actions[2]; struct rte_flow_shared_action_conf conf; struct rte_flow_action action; /* skipped: initialize conf and action */ struct rte_flow_shared_action *handle = rte_flow_shared_action_create(port_id, &conf, &action, &error); actions[0].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_SHARED; actions[0].conf = handle; actions[1].type = RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_END; /* skipped: init attr0 & pattern0 args */ struct rte_flow *flow0 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr0, pattern0, actions, error); /* create more rules reusing shared action */ struct rte_flow *flow1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr1, pattern1, actions, error); /* skipped: for flows 2 till N */ struct rte_flow *flowN = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attrN, patternN, actions, error); /* update shared action */ struct rte_flow_action updated_action; /* * skipped: initialize updated_action according to desired action * configuration change */ rte_flow_shared_action_update(port_id, handle, &updated_action, error); /* * from now on all flows 1 till N will act according to configuration of * updated_action */ /* skipped: destroy all flows 1 till N */ rte_flow_shared_action_destroy(port_id, handle, error); Signed-off-by: Andrey Vesnovaty <andreyv@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-14 11:40:14 +00:00
+---------------+
| Field |
+===============+
| no properties |
+---------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
Action: ``MODIFY_FIELD``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Modify ``dst`` field according to ``op`` selected (set, addition,
subtraction) with ``width`` bits of data from ``src`` field.
Any arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag values)
can be used as both source and destination fields as set by ``field``.
The immediate value ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE`` (or a pointer to it
``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER``) is allowed as a source only.
``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_START`` is used to point to the beginning of a packet.
See ``enum rte_flow_field_id`` for the list of supported fields.
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
``op`` selects the operation to perform on a destination field.
- ``set`` copies the data from ``src`` field to ``dst`` field.
- ``add`` adds together ``dst`` and ``src`` and stores the result into ``dst``.
- ``sub`` subtracts ``src`` from ``dst`` and stores the result into ``dst``
``width`` defines a number of bits to use from ``src`` field.
``level`` is used to access any packet field on any encapsulation level
as well as any tag element in the tag array.
- ``0`` means the default behaviour. Depending on the packet type, it can
mean outermost, innermost or anything in between.
- ``1`` requests access to the outermost packet encapsulation level.
- ``2`` and subsequent values requests access to the specified packet
encapsulation level, from outermost to innermost (lower to higher values).
For the tag array (in case of multiple tags are supported and present)
``level`` translates directly into the array index.
``offset`` specifies the number of bits to skip from a field's start.
That allows performing a partial copy of the needed part or to divide a big
packet field into multiple smaller fields. Alternatively, ``offset`` allows
going past the specified packet field boundary to copy a field to an
arbitrary place in a packet, essentially providing a way to copy any part of
a packet to any other part of it.
``value`` sets an immediate value to be used as a source or points to a
location of the value in memory. It is used instead of ``level`` and ``offset``
for ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_VALUE`` and ``RTE_FLOW_FIELD_POINTER`` respectively.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_modify_field:
.. table:: MODIFY_FIELD
+---------------+-------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| Field | Value |
+===============+=========================+
| ``op`` | operation to perform |
+---------------+-------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``dst`` | destination field |
+---------------+-------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``src`` | source field |
+---------------+-------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``width`` | number of bits to use |
+---------------+-------------------------+
.. _table_rte_flow_action_modify_data:
.. table:: destination/source field definition
+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| Field | Value |
+===============+==========================================================+
| ``field`` | ID: packet field, mark, meta, tag, immediate, pointer |
+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``level`` | encapsulation level of a packet field or tag array index |
+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``offset`` | number of bits to skip at the beginning |
+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce generic modify flow action Implement the generic modify flow API to allow manipulations on an arbitrary header field (as well as mark, metadata or tag) using data from another field or a user-specified value. This generic modify mechanism removes the necessity to implement a separate RTE Flow action every time we need to modify a new packet field in the future. Supported operation are: - set: copy data from source to destination. - add: integer addition, stores the result in destination. - sub: integer subtraction, stores the result in destination. The field ID is used to specify the desired source/destination packet field in order to simplify the API for various encapsulation models. Specifying the packet field ID with the needed encapsulation level is able to quickly get a packet field for any inner packet header. Alternatively, the special ID (ITEM_START) can be used to point to the very beginning of a packet. This ID in conjunction with the offset parameter provides great flexibility to copy/modify any part of a packet as needed. The number of bits to use from a source as well as the offset can be be specified to allow a partial copy or dividing a big packet field into multiple small fields (e.g. copying 128 bits of IPv6 to 4 tags). An immediate value (or a pointer to it) can be specified instead of the level and the offset for the special FIELD_VALUE ID (or FIELD_POINTER). Can be used as a source only. Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-01-18 21:40:25 +00:00
| ``value`` | immediate value or a pointer to this value |
+---------------+----------------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: introduce conntrack flow action and item This commit introduces the conntrack action and item. Usually the HW offloading is stateless. For some stateful offloading like a TCP connection, HW module will help provide the ability of a full offloading w/o SW participation after the connection was established. The basic usage is that in the first flow rule the application should add the conntrack action and jump to the next flow table. In the following flow rule(s) of the next table, the application should use the conntrack item to match on the result. A TCP connection has two directions traffic. To set a conntrack action context correctly, the information of packets from both directions are required. The conntrack action should be created on one ethdev port and supply the peer ethdev port as a parameter to the action. After context created, it could only be used between these two ethdev ports (dual-port mode) or a single port. The application should modify the action via the API "rte_action_handle_update" only when before using it to create a flow rule with conntrack for the opposite direction. This will help the driver to recognize the direction of the flow to be created, especially in the single-port mode, in which case the traffic from both directions will go through the same ethdev port if the application works as an "forwarding engine" but not an end point. There is no need to call the update interface if the subsequent flow rules have nothing to be changed. Query will be supported via "rte_action_handle_query" interface, about the current packets information and connection status. The fields query capabilities depends on the HW. For the packets received during the conntrack setup, it is suggested to re-inject the packets in order to make sure the conntrack module works correctly without missing any packet. Only the valid packets should pass the conntrack, packets with invalid TCP information, like out of window, or with invalid header, like malformed, should not pass. Naming and definition: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/uapi/linux/ netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/net/netfilter/ nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c Other reference: https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/sec01/invitedtalks/rooij.pdf Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
2021-04-19 17:51:30 +00:00
Action: ``CONNTRACK``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create a conntrack (connection tracking) context with the provided information.
In stateful session like TCP, the conntrack action provides the ability to
examine every packet of this connection and associate the state to every
packet. It will help to realize the stateful offload of connections with little
software participation. For example, the packets with invalid state may be
handled by the software. The control packets could be handled in the hardware.
The software just need to query the state of a connection when needed, and then
decide how to handle the flow rules and conntrack context.
A conntrack context should be created via ``rte_flow_action_handle_create()``
before using. Then the handle with ``INDIRECT`` type is used for a flow rule
creation. If a flow rule with an opposite direction needs to be created, the
``rte_flow_action_handle_update()`` should be used to modify the direction.
Not all the fields of the ``struct rte_flow_action_conntrack`` will be used
for a conntrack context creating, depending on the HW, and they should be
in host byte order. PMD should convert them into network byte order when
needed by the HW.
The ``struct rte_flow_modify_conntrack`` should be used for an updating.
The current conntrack context information could be queried via the
``rte_flow_action_handle_query()`` interface.
.. _table_rte_flow_action_conntrack:
.. table:: CONNTRACK
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+==========================+=============================================================+
| ``peer_port`` | peer port number |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``is_original_dir`` | direction of this connection for creating flow rule |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``enable`` | enable the conntrack context |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``live_connection`` | one ack was seen for this connection |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``selective_ack`` | SACK enabled |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``challenge_ack_passed`` | a challenge ack has passed |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_direction`` | direction of the last passed packet |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``liberal_mode`` | only report state change |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``state`` | current state |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``max_ack_window`` | maximal window scaling factor |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``retransmission_limit`` | maximal retransmission times |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``original_dir`` | TCP parameters of the original direction |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``reply_dir`` | TCP parameters of the reply direction |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_window`` | window size of the last passed packet |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_seq`` | sequence number of the last passed packet |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_ack`` | acknowledgment number the last passed packet |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_end`` | sum of ack number and length of the last passed packet |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------+
.. _table_rte_flow_tcp_dir_param:
.. table:: configuration parameters for each direction
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+=====================+=========================================================+
| ``scale`` | TCP window scaling factor |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``close_initiated`` | FIN sent from this direction |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``last_ack_seen`` | an ACK packet received |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``data_unacked`` | unacknowledged data for packets from this direction |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``sent_end`` | max{seq + len} seen in sent packets |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``reply_end`` | max{sack + max{win, 1}} seen in reply packets |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``max_win`` | max{max{win, 1}} + {sack - ack} seen in sent packets |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
| ``max_ack`` | max{ack} + seen in sent packets |
+---------------------+---------------------------------------------------------+
.. _table_rte_flow_modify_conntrack:
.. table:: update a conntrack context
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+================+=================================================+
| ``new_ct`` | new conntrack information |
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| ``direction`` | direction will be updated |
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| ``state`` | other fields except direction will be updated |
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------+
| ``reserved`` | reserved bits |
+----------------+-------------------------------------------------+
ethdev: add pre-defined meter policy API Currently, the flow meter policy does not support multiple actions per color; also the allowed action types per color are very limited. In addition, the policy cannot be pre-defined. Due to the growing in flow actions offload abilities there is a potential for the user to use variety of actions per color differently. This new meter policy API comes to allow this potential in the most ethdev common way using rte_flow action definition. A list of rte_flow actions will be provided by the user per color in order to create a meter policy. In addition, the API forces to pre-define the policy before the meters creation in order to allow sharing of single policy with multiple meters efficiently. meter_policy_id is added into struct rte_mtr_params. So that it can get the policy during the meters creation. Allow coloring the packet using a new rte_flow_action_color as could be done by the old policy API. Add two common policy template as macros in the head file. The next API function were added: - rte_mtr_meter_policy_add - rte_mtr_meter_policy_delete - rte_mtr_meter_policy_update - rte_mtr_meter_policy_validate The next struct was changed: - rte_mtr_params - rte_mtr_capabilities The next API was deleted: - rte_mtr_policer_actions_update To support this API the following app were changed: app/test-flow-perf: clean meter policer app/testpmd: clean meter policer To support this API the following drivers were changed: net/softnic: support meter policy API 1. Cleans meter rte_mtr_policer_action. 2. Supports policy API to get color action as policer action did. The color action will be mapped into rte_table_action_policer. net/mlx5: clean meter creation management Cleans and breaks part of the current meter management in order to allow better design with policy API. Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <lizh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Haifei Luo <haifeil@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Jiawei Wang <jiaweiw@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ray Kinsella <mdr@ashroe.eu> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Jasvinder Singh <jasvinder.singh@intel.com> Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2021-04-20 14:04:49 +00:00
Action: ``METER_COLOR``
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Color the packet to reflect the meter color result.
The meter action must be configured before meter color action.
Meter color action is set to a color to reflect the meter color result.
Set the meter color in the mbuf to the selected color.
The meter color action output color is the output color of the packet,
which is set in the packet meta-data (i.e. struct ``rte_mbuf::sched::color``)
.. _table_rte_flow_action_meter_color:
.. table:: METER_COLOR
+-----------------+--------------+
| Field | Value |
+=================+==============+
| ``meter_color`` | Packet color |
+-----------------+--------------+
Negative types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
All specified pattern items (``enum rte_flow_item_type``) and actions
(``enum rte_flow_action_type``) use positive identifiers.
The negative space is reserved for dynamic types generated by PMDs during
run-time. PMDs may encounter them as a result but must not accept negative
identifiers they are not aware of.
A method to generate them remains to be defined.
Application may use PMD dynamic items or actions in flow rules. In that case
size of configuration object in dynamic element must be a pointer size.
Planned types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pattern item types will be added as new protocols are implemented.
Variable headers support through dedicated pattern items, for example in
order to match specific IPv4 options and IPv6 extension headers would be
stacked after IPv4/IPv6 items.
Other action types are planned but are not defined yet. These include the
ability to alter packet data in several ways, such as performing
encapsulation/decapsulation of tunnel headers.
Rules management
----------------
A rather simple API with few functions is provided to fully manage flow
rules.
Each created flow rule is associated with an opaque, PMD-specific handle
pointer. The application is responsible for keeping it until the rule is
destroyed.
Flows rules are represented by ``struct rte_flow`` objects.
Validation
~~~~~~~~~~
Given that expressing a definite set of device capabilities is not
practical, a dedicated function is provided to check if a flow rule is
supported and can be created.
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_validate(uint16_t port_id,
const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
const struct rte_flow_action actions[],
struct rte_flow_error *error);
The flow rule is validated for correctness and whether it could be accepted
by the device given sufficient resources. The rule is checked against the
current device mode and queue configuration. The flow rule may also
optionally be validated against existing flow rules and device resources.
This function has no effect on the target device.
The returned value is guaranteed to remain valid only as long as no
successful calls to ``rte_flow_create()`` or ``rte_flow_destroy()`` are made
in the meantime and no device parameter affecting flow rules in any way are
modified, due to possible collisions or resource limitations (although in
such cases ``EINVAL`` should not be returned).
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``attr``: flow rule attributes.
- ``pattern``: pattern specification (list terminated by the END pattern
item).
- ``actions``: associated actions (list terminated by the END action).
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
- 0 if flow rule is valid and can be created. A negative errno value
otherwise (``rte_errno`` is also set), the following errors are defined.
- ``-ENOSYS``: underlying device does not support this functionality.
- ``-EINVAL``: unknown or invalid rule specification.
- ``-ENOTSUP``: valid but unsupported rule specification (e.g. partial
bit-masks are unsupported).
- ``EEXIST``: collision with an existing rule. Only returned if device
supports flow rule collision checking and there was a flow rule
collision. Not receiving this return code is no guarantee that creating
the rule will not fail due to a collision.
- ``ENOMEM``: not enough memory to execute the function, or if the device
supports resource validation, resource limitation on the device.
- ``-EBUSY``: action cannot be performed due to busy device resources, may
succeed if the affected queues or even the entire port are in a stopped
state (see ``rte_eth_dev_rx_queue_stop()`` and ``rte_eth_dev_stop()``).
Creation
~~~~~~~~
Creating a flow rule is similar to validating one, except the rule is
actually created and a handle returned.
.. code-block:: c
struct rte_flow *
rte_flow_create(uint16_t port_id,
const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
const struct rte_flow_item pattern[],
const struct rte_flow_action *actions[],
struct rte_flow_error *error);
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``attr``: flow rule attributes.
- ``pattern``: pattern specification (list terminated by the END pattern
item).
- ``actions``: associated actions (list terminated by the END action).
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
A valid handle in case of success, NULL otherwise and ``rte_errno`` is set
to the positive version of one of the error codes defined for
``rte_flow_validate()``.
Destruction
~~~~~~~~~~~
Flow rules destruction is not automatic, and a queue or a port should not be
released if any are still attached to them. Applications must take care of
performing this step before releasing resources.
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_destroy(uint16_t port_id,
struct rte_flow *flow,
struct rte_flow_error *error);
Failure to destroy a flow rule handle may occur when other flow rules depend
on it, and destroying it would result in an inconsistent state.
This function is only guaranteed to succeed if handles are destroyed in
reverse order of their creation.
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``flow``: flow rule handle to destroy.
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
- 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and ``rte_errno`` is set.
Flush
~~~~~
Convenience function to destroy all flow rule handles associated with a
port. They are released as with successive calls to ``rte_flow_destroy()``.
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_flush(uint16_t port_id,
struct rte_flow_error *error);
In the unlikely event of failure, handles are still considered destroyed and
no longer valid but the port must be assumed to be in an inconsistent state.
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
- 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and ``rte_errno`` is set.
Query
~~~~~
Query an existing flow rule.
This function allows retrieving flow-specific data such as counters. Data
is gathered by special actions which must be present in the flow rule
definition.
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_query(uint16_t port_id,
struct rte_flow *flow,
const struct rte_flow_action *action,
void *data,
struct rte_flow_error *error);
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``flow``: flow rule handle to query.
- ``action``: action to query, this must match prototype from flow rule.
- ``data``: pointer to storage for the associated query data type.
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
- 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and ``rte_errno`` is set.
.. _flow_isolated_mode:
Flow isolated mode
------------------
The general expectation for ingress traffic is that flow rules process it
first; the remaining unmatched or pass-through traffic usually ends up in a
queue (with or without RSS, locally or in some sub-device instance)
depending on the global configuration settings of a port.
While fine from a compatibility standpoint, this approach makes drivers more
complex as they have to check for possible side effects outside of this API
when creating or destroying flow rules. It results in a more limited set of
available rule types due to the way device resources are assigned (e.g. no
support for the RSS action even on capable hardware).
Given that nonspecific traffic can be handled by flow rules as well,
isolated mode is a means for applications to tell a driver that ingress on
the underlying port must be injected from the defined flow rules only; that
no default traffic is expected outside those rules.
This has the following benefits:
- Applications get finer-grained control over the kind of traffic they want
to receive (no traffic by default).
- More importantly they control at what point nonspecific traffic is handled
relative to other flow rules, by adjusting priority levels.
- Drivers can assign more hardware resources to flow rules and expand the
set of supported rule types.
Because toggling isolated mode may cause profound changes to the ingress
processing path of a driver, it may not be possible to leave it once
entered. Likewise, existing flow rules or global configuration settings may
prevent a driver from entering isolated mode.
Applications relying on this mode are therefore encouraged to toggle it as
soon as possible after device initialization, ideally before the first call
to ``rte_eth_dev_configure()`` to avoid possible failures due to conflicting
settings.
Once effective, the following functionality has no effect on the underlying
port and may return errors such as ``ENOTSUP`` ("not supported"):
- Toggling promiscuous mode.
- Toggling allmulticast mode.
- Configuring MAC addresses.
- Configuring multicast addresses.
- Configuring VLAN filters.
- Configuring global RSS settings.
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_isolate(uint16_t port_id, int set, struct rte_flow_error *error);
Arguments:
- ``port_id``: port identifier of Ethernet device.
- ``set``: nonzero to enter isolated mode, attempt to leave it otherwise.
- ``error``: perform verbose error reporting if not NULL. PMDs initialize
this structure in case of error only.
Return values:
- 0 on success, a negative errno value otherwise and ``rte_errno`` is set.
Verbose error reporting
-----------------------
The defined *errno* values may not be accurate enough for users or
application developers who want to investigate issues related to flow rules
management. A dedicated error object is defined for this purpose:
.. code-block:: c
enum rte_flow_error_type {
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_NONE, /**< No error. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, /**< Cause unspecified. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_HANDLE, /**< Flow rule (handle). */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_GROUP, /**< Group field. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_PRIORITY, /**< Priority field. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_INGRESS, /**< Ingress field. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR_EGRESS, /**< Egress field. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ATTR, /**< Attributes structure. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_NUM, /**< Pattern length. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM, /**< Specific pattern item. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION_NUM, /**< Number of actions. */
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION, /**< Specific action. */
};
struct rte_flow_error {
enum rte_flow_error_type type; /**< Cause field and error types. */
const void *cause; /**< Object responsible for the error. */
const char *message; /**< Human-readable error message. */
};
Error type ``RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_NONE`` stands for no error, in which case
remaining fields can be ignored. Other error types describe the type of the
object pointed by ``cause``.
If non-NULL, ``cause`` points to the object responsible for the error. For a
flow rule, this may be a pattern item or an individual action.
If non-NULL, ``message`` provides a human-readable error message.
This object is normally allocated by applications and set by PMDs in case of
error, the message points to a constant string which does not need to be
freed by the application, however its pointer can be considered valid only
as long as its associated DPDK port remains configured. Closing the
underlying device or unloading the PMD invalidates it.
Helpers
-------
Error initializer
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. code-block:: c
static inline int
rte_flow_error_set(struct rte_flow_error *error,
int code,
enum rte_flow_error_type type,
const void *cause,
const char *message);
This function initializes ``error`` (if non-NULL) with the provided
parameters and sets ``rte_errno`` to ``code``. A negative error ``code`` is
then returned.
Object conversion
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. code-block:: c
int
rte_flow_conv(enum rte_flow_conv_op op,
void *dst,
size_t size,
const void *src,
struct rte_flow_error *error);
Convert ``src`` to ``dst`` according to operation ``op``. Possible
operations include:
- Attributes, pattern item or action duplication.
- Duplication of an entire pattern or list of actions.
- Duplication of a complete flow rule description.
- Pattern item or action name retrieval.
ethdev: add tunnel offload model rte_flow API provides the building blocks for vendor-agnostic flow classification offloads. The rte_flow "patterns" and "actions" primitives are fine-grained, thus enabling DPDK applications the flexibility to offload network stacks and complex pipelines. Applications wishing to offload tunneled traffic are required to use the rte_flow primitives, such as group, meta, mark, tag, and others to model their high-level objects. The hardware model design for high-level software objects is not trivial. Furthermore, an optimal design is often vendor-specific. When hardware offloads tunneled traffic in multi-group logic, partially offloaded packets may arrive to the application after they were modified in hardware. In this case, the application may need to restore the original packet headers. Consider the following sequence: The application decaps a packet in one group and jumps to a second group where it tries to match on a 5-tuple, that will miss and send the packet to the application. In this case, the application does not receive the original packet but a modified one. Also, in this case, the application cannot match on the outer header fields, such as VXLAN vni and 5-tuple. There are several possible ways to use rte_flow "patterns" and "actions" to resolve the issues above. For example: 1 Mapping headers to a hardware registers using the rte_flow_action_mark/rte_flow_action_tag/rte_flow_set_meta objects. 2 Apply the decap only at the last offload stage after all the "patterns" were matched and the packet will be fully offloaded. Every approach has its pros and cons and is highly dependent on the hardware vendor. For example, some hardware may have a limited number of registers while other hardware could not support inner actions and must decap before accessing inner headers. The tunnel offload model resolves these issues. The model goals are: 1 Provide a unified application API to offload tunneled traffic that is capable to match on outer headers after decap. 2 Allow the application to restore the outer header of partially offloaded packets. The tunnel offload model does not introduce new elements to the existing RTE flow model and is implemented as a set of helper functions. For the application to work with the tunnel offload API it has to adjust flow rules in multi-table tunnel offload in the following way: 1 Remove explicit call to decap action and replace it with PMD actions obtained from rte_flow_tunnel_decap_and_set() helper. 2 Add PMD items obtained from rte_flow_tunnel_match() helper to all other rules in the tunnel offload sequence. VXLAN Code example: Assume application needs to do inner NAT on the VXLAN packet. The first rule in group 0: flow create <port id> ingress group 0 pattern eth / ipv4 / udp dst is 4789 / vxlan / end actions {pmd actions} / jump group 3 / end The first VXLAN packet that arrives matches the rule in group 0 and jumps to group 3. In group 3 the packet will miss since there is no flow to match and will be sent to the application. Application will call rte_flow_get_restore_info() to get the packet outer header. Application will insert a new rule in group 3 to match outer and inner headers: flow create <port id> ingress group 3 pattern {pmd items} / eth / ipv4 dst is 172.10.10.1 / udp dst 4789 / vxlan vni is 10 / ipv4 dst is 184.1.2.3 / end actions set_ipv4_dst 186.1.1.1 / queue index 3 / end Resulting of the rules will be that VXLAN packet with vni=10, outer IPv4 dst=172.10.10.1 and inner IPv4 dst=184.1.2.3 will be received decapped on queue 3 with IPv4 dst=186.1.1.1 Note: The packet in group 3 is considered decapped. All actions in that group will be done on the header that was inner before decap. The application may specify an outer header to be matched on. It's PMD responsibility to translate these items to outer metadata. API usage: /** * 1. Initiate RTE flow tunnel object */ const struct rte_flow_tunnel tunnel = { .type = RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_VXLAN, .tun_id = 10, } /** * 2. Obtain PMD tunnel actions * * pmd_actions is an intermediate variable application uses to * compile actions array */ struct rte_flow_action **pmd_actions; rte_flow_tunnel_decap_and_set(&tunnel, &pmd_actions, &num_pmd_actions, &error); /** * 3. offload the first rule * matching on VXLAN traffic and jumps to group 3 * (implicitly decaps packet) */ app_actions = jump group 3 rule_items = app_items; /** eth / ipv4 / udp / vxlan */ rule_actions = { pmd_actions, app_actions }; attr.group = 0; flow_1 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr, rule_items, rule_actions, &error); /** * 4. after flow creation application does not need to keep the * tunnel action resources. */ rte_flow_tunnel_action_release(port_id, pmd_actions, num_pmd_actions); /** * 5. After partially offloaded packet miss because there was no * matching rule handle miss on group 3 */ struct rte_flow_restore_info info; rte_flow_get_restore_info(port_id, mbuf, &info, &error); /** * 6. Offload NAT rule: */ app_items = { eth / ipv4 dst is 172.10.10.1 / udp dst 4789 / vxlan vni is 10 / ipv4 dst is 184.1.2.3 } app_actions = { set_ipv4_dst 186.1.1.1 / queue index 3 } rte_flow_tunnel_match(&info.tunnel, &pmd_items, &num_pmd_items, &error); rule_items = {pmd_items, app_items}; rule_actions = app_actions; attr.group = info.group_id; flow_2 = rte_flow_create(port_id, &attr, rule_items, rule_actions, &error); /** * 7. Release PMD items after rule creation */ rte_flow_tunnel_item_release(port_id, pmd_items, num_pmd_items); References 1. https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-June/index.html Signed-off-by: Eli Britstein <elibr@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
2020-10-16 12:51:06 +00:00
Tunneled traffic offload
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
rte_flow API provides the building blocks for vendor-agnostic flow
classification offloads. The rte_flow "patterns" and "actions"
primitives are fine-grained, thus enabling DPDK applications the
flexibility to offload network stacks and complex pipelines.
Applications wishing to offload tunneled traffic are required to use
the rte_flow primitives, such as group, meta, mark, tag, and others to
model their high-level objects. The hardware model design for
high-level software objects is not trivial. Furthermore, an optimal
design is often vendor-specific.
When hardware offloads tunneled traffic in multi-group logic,
partially offloaded packets may arrive to the application after they
were modified in hardware. In this case, the application may need to
restore the original packet headers. Consider the following sequence:
The application decaps a packet in one group and jumps to a second
group where it tries to match on a 5-tuple, that will miss and send
the packet to the application. In this case, the application does not
receive the original packet but a modified one. Also, in this case,
the application cannot match on the outer header fields, such as VXLAN
vni and 5-tuple.
There are several possible ways to use rte_flow "patterns" and
"actions" to resolve the issues above. For example:
1 Mapping headers to a hardware registers using the
rte_flow_action_mark/rte_flow_action_tag/rte_flow_set_meta objects.
2 Apply the decap only at the last offload stage after all the
"patterns" were matched and the packet will be fully offloaded.
Every approach has its pros and cons and is highly dependent on the
hardware vendor. For example, some hardware may have a limited number
of registers while other hardware could not support inner actions and
must decap before accessing inner headers.
The tunnel offload model resolves these issues. The model goals are:
1 Provide a unified application API to offload tunneled traffic that
is capable to match on outer headers after decap.
2 Allow the application to restore the outer header of partially
offloaded packets.
The tunnel offload model does not introduce new elements to the
existing RTE flow model and is implemented as a set of helper
functions.
For the application to work with the tunnel offload API it
has to adjust flow rules in multi-table tunnel offload in the
following way:
1 Remove explicit call to decap action and replace it with PMD actions
obtained from rte_flow_tunnel_decap_and_set() helper.
2 Add PMD items obtained from rte_flow_tunnel_match() helper to all
other rules in the tunnel offload sequence.
The model requirements:
Software application must initialize
rte_tunnel object with tunnel parameters before calling
rte_flow_tunnel_decap_set() & rte_flow_tunnel_match().
PMD actions array obtained in rte_flow_tunnel_decap_set() must be
released by application with rte_flow_action_release() call.
PMD items array obtained with rte_flow_tunnel_match() must be released
by application with rte_flow_item_release() call. Application can
release PMD items and actions after rule was created. However, if the
application needs to create additional rule for the same tunnel it
will need to obtain PMD items again.
Application cannot destroy rte_tunnel object before it releases all
PMD actions & PMD items referencing that tunnel.
Caveats
-------
- DPDK does not keep track of flow rules definitions or flow rule objects
automatically. Applications may keep track of the former and must keep
track of the latter. PMDs may also do it for internal needs, however this
must not be relied on by applications.
- Flow rules are not maintained between successive port initializations. An
application exiting without releasing them and restarting must re-create
them from scratch.
- API operations are synchronous and blocking (``EAGAIN`` cannot be
returned).
- Stopping the data path (TX/RX) should not be necessary when managing flow
rules. If this cannot be achieved naturally or with workarounds (such as
temporarily replacing the burst function pointers), an appropriate error
code must be returned (``EBUSY``).
doc: update flow API guide for rule removal on stop There is a discrepancy between ethdev API and flow rules guide regarding flow rules maintenance after port stop. librte_ethdev.h declares that flow rules will not be stored in PMD after port stop: >>>>> Quote start Please note that some configuration is not stored between calls to rte_eth_dev_stop()/rte_eth_dev_start(). The following configuration will be retained: - MTU - flow control settings - receive mode configuration (promiscuous mode, all-multicast mode, hardware checksum mode, RSS/VMDQ settings etc.) - VLAN filtering configuration - default MAC address - MAC addresses supplied to MAC address array - flow director filtering mode (but not filtering rules) - NIC queue statistics mappings <<<< Quote end PMD cannot always correctly restore flow rules after port stop / port start because application may alter port configuration after port stop without PMD knowledge about undergoing changes. Consider the following scenario: application configures 2 queues 0 and 1 and creates a flow rule with 'queue index 1' action. After that application stops the port and removes queue 1. Although PMD can implement flow rule shadow copy to be used for restore after port start, attempt to restore flow rule from shadow will fail in example above and PMD could not notify application about that failure. As the result, flow rules map in HW will differ from what application expects. In addition, flow rules shadow copy used for port start restore consumes considerable amount of system memory, especially in systems with millions of flow rules. Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
2020-11-18 16:15:20 +00:00
- Applications, not PMDs, are responsible for maintaining flow rules
configuration when closing, stopping or restarting a port or performing other
actions which may affect them.
Applications must assume that after port close, stop or restart all flows
related to that port are not valid, hardware rules are destroyed and relevant
PMD resources are released.
For devices exposing multiple ports sharing global settings affected by flow
rules:
- All ports under DPDK control must behave consistently, PMDs are
responsible for making sure that existing flow rules on a port are not
affected by other ports.
- Ports not under DPDK control (unaffected or handled by other applications)
are user's responsibility. They may affect existing flow rules and cause
undefined behavior. PMDs aware of this may prevent flow rules creation
altogether in such cases.
PMD interface
-------------
The PMD interface is defined in ``rte_flow_driver.h``. It is not subject to
API/ABI versioning constraints as it is not exposed to applications and may
evolve independently.
The PMD interface is based on callbacks pointed by the ``struct rte_flow_ops``.
- PMD callbacks implement exactly the interface described in `Rules
management`_, except for the port ID argument which has already been
converted to a pointer to the underlying ``struct rte_eth_dev``.
- Public API functions do not process flow rules definitions at all before
calling PMD functions (no basic error checking, no validation
whatsoever). They only make sure these callbacks are non-NULL or return
the ``ENOSYS`` (function not supported) error.
This interface additionally defines the following helper function:
- ``rte_flow_ops_get()``: get generic flow operations structure from a
port.
ethdev: make flow API thread safe Currently, the rte_flow functions are not defined as thread safe. DPDK applications either call the functions in single thread or protect any concurrent calling for the rte_flow operations using a lock. For PMDs support the flow operations thread safe natively, the redundant protection in application hurts the performance of the rte_flow operation functions. And the restriction of thread safe is not guaranteed for the rte_flow functions also limits the applications' expectation. This feature is going to change the rte_flow functions to be thread safe. As different PMDs have different flow operations, some may support thread safe already and others may not. For PMDs don't support flow thread safe operation, a new lock is defined in ethdev in order to protects thread unsafe PMDs from rte_flow level. A new RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE device flag is added to determine whether the PMD supports thread safe flow operation or not. For PMDs support thread safe flow operations, set the RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE flag, rte_flow level functions will skip the thread safe helper lock for these PMDs. Again the rte_flow level thread safe lock only works when PMD operation functions are not thread safe. For the PMDs which don't want the default mutex lock, just set the flag in the PMD, and add the prefer type of lock in the PMD. Then the default mutex lock is easily replaced by the PMD level lock. The change has no effect on the current DPDK applications. No change is required for the current DPDK applications. For the standard posix pthread_mutex, if no lock contention with the added rte_flow level mutex, the mutex only does the atomic increasing in pthread_mutex_lock() and decreasing in pthread_mutex_unlock(). No futex() syscall will be involved. Signed-off-by: Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
2020-10-15 01:07:47 +00:00
If PMD interfaces don't support re-entrancy/multi-thread safety,
the rte_flow API functions will protect threads by mutex per port.
The application can check whether ``RTE_ETH_DEV_FLOW_OPS_THREAD_SAFE``
is set in ``dev_flags``, meaning the PMD is thread-safe regarding rte_flow,
so the API level protection is disabled.
Please note that this API-level mutex protects only rte_flow functions,
other control path functions are not in scope.
More will be added over time.
Device compatibility
--------------------
No known implementation supports all the described features.
Unsupported features or combinations are not expected to be fully emulated
in software by PMDs for performance reasons. Partially supported features
may be completed in software as long as hardware performs most of the work
(such as queue redirection and packet recognition).
However PMDs are expected to do their best to satisfy application requests
by working around hardware limitations as long as doing so does not affect
the behavior of existing flow rules.
The following sections provide a few examples of such cases and describe how
PMDs should handle them, they are based on limitations built into the
previous APIs.
Global bit-masks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Each flow rule comes with its own, per-layer bit-masks, while hardware may
support only a single, device-wide bit-mask for a given layer type, so that
two IPv4 rules cannot use different bit-masks.
The expected behavior in this case is that PMDs automatically configure
global bit-masks according to the needs of the first flow rule created.
Subsequent rules are allowed only if their bit-masks match those, the
``EEXIST`` error code should be returned otherwise.
Unsupported layer types
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Many protocols can be simulated by crafting patterns with the `Item: RAW`_
type.
PMDs can rely on this capability to simulate support for protocols with
headers not directly recognized by hardware.
``ANY`` pattern item
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This pattern item stands for anything, which can be difficult to translate
to something hardware would understand, particularly if followed by more
specific types.
Consider the following pattern:
.. _table_rte_flow_unsupported_any:
.. table:: Pattern with ANY as L3
+-------+-----------------------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+=======================+
| 0 | ETHER |
+-------+-----+---------+-------+
| 1 | ANY | ``num`` | ``1`` |
+-------+-----+---------+-------+
| 2 | TCP |
+-------+-----------------------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+-----------------------+
Knowing that TCP does not make sense with something other than IPv4 and IPv6
as L3, such a pattern may be translated to two flow rules instead:
.. _table_rte_flow_unsupported_any_ipv4:
.. table:: ANY replaced with IPV4
+-------+--------------------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+====================+
| 0 | ETHER |
+-------+--------------------+
| 1 | IPV4 (zeroed mask) |
+-------+--------------------+
| 2 | TCP |
+-------+--------------------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+--------------------+
|
.. _table_rte_flow_unsupported_any_ipv6:
.. table:: ANY replaced with IPV6
+-------+--------------------+
| Index | Item |
+=======+====================+
| 0 | ETHER |
+-------+--------------------+
| 1 | IPV6 (zeroed mask) |
+-------+--------------------+
| 2 | TCP |
+-------+--------------------+
| 3 | END |
+-------+--------------------+
Note that as soon as a ANY rule covers several layers, this approach may
yield a large number of hidden flow rules. It is thus suggested to only
support the most common scenarios (anything as L2 and/or L3).
Unsupported actions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- When combined with `Action: QUEUE`_, packet counting (`Action: COUNT`_)
and tagging (`Action: MARK`_ or `Action: FLAG`_) may be implemented in
software as long as the target queue is used by a single rule.
- When a single target queue is provided, `Action: RSS`_ can also be
implemented through `Action: QUEUE`_.
Flow rules priority
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
While it would naturally make sense, flow rules cannot be assumed to be
processed by hardware in the same order as their creation for several
reasons:
- They may be managed internally as a tree or a hash table instead of a
list.
- Removing a flow rule before adding another one can either put the new rule
at the end of the list or reuse a freed entry.
- Duplication may occur when packets are matched by several rules.
For overlapping rules (particularly in order to use `Action: PASSTHRU`_)
predictable behavior is only guaranteed by using different priority levels.
Priority levels are not necessarily implemented in hardware, or may be
severely limited (e.g. a single priority bit).
For these reasons, priority levels may be implemented purely in software by
PMDs.
- For devices expecting flow rules to be added in the correct order, PMDs
may destroy and re-create existing rules after adding a new one with
a higher priority.
- A configurable number of dummy or empty rules can be created at
initialization time to save high priority slots for later.
- In order to save priority levels, PMDs may evaluate whether rules are
likely to collide and adjust their priority accordingly.
Future evolutions
-----------------
- A device profile selection function which could be used to force a
permanent profile instead of relying on its automatic configuration based
on existing flow rules.
- A method to optimize *rte_flow* rules with specific pattern items and
action types generated on the fly by PMDs. DPDK should assign negative
numbers to these in order to not collide with the existing types. See
`Negative types`_.
- Adding specific egress pattern items and actions as described in
`Attribute: Traffic direction`_.
- Optional software fallback when PMDs are unable to handle requested flow
rules so applications do not have to implement their own.
.. _OpenFlow Switch Specification: https://www.opennetworking.org/software-defined-standards/specifications/