net/ice/base: fix resource leak

We don't free s_rule if ice_aq_sw_rules() returns a non-zero status. If
it returned a zero status, s_rule would be freed right after, so this
implies it should be freed within the scope of the function regardless.

Fixes: c7dd15931183 ("net/ice/base: add virtual switch code")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer <jeb.j.cramer@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul M Stillwell Jr <paul.m.stillwell.jr@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Qi Zhang 2019-07-23 11:51:11 +08:00 committed by Ferruh Yigit
parent b83a0c2903
commit 04221f0b3e

View File

@ -2787,12 +2787,13 @@ ice_remove_rule_internal(struct ice_hw *hw, u8 recp_id,
status = ice_aq_sw_rules(hw, s_rule,
ICE_SW_RULE_RX_TX_NO_HDR_SIZE, 1,
ice_aqc_opc_remove_sw_rules, NULL);
if (status)
goto exit;
/* Remove a book keeping from the list */
ice_free(hw, s_rule);
if (status)
goto exit;
LIST_DEL(&list_elem->list_entry);
ice_free(hw, list_elem);
}