net/mlx5: refuse empty VLAN flow specification
Verbs specification doesn't help to distinguish between packets having an VLAN and those which do not have, this ends by having flow rule which does not react as the user expects e.g. flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / vlan / end action queue index 0 / end flow create 0 ingress pattern eth / end action queue index 1 / end are colliding in Verbs definition as in both rule are matching packets with or without VLAN. For this reason, the VLAN specification must not be empty, otherwise the PMD has to refuse it. Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fca1301768
commit
0b1edd21cd
@ -1305,9 +1305,18 @@ mlx5_flow_create_vlan(const struct rte_flow_item *item,
|
||||
eth->val.vlan_tag = spec->tci;
|
||||
eth->mask.vlan_tag = mask->tci;
|
||||
eth->val.vlan_tag &= eth->mask.vlan_tag;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* From verbs perspective an empty VLAN is equivalent
|
||||
* to a packet without VLAN layer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!eth->mask.vlan_tag)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
error:
|
||||
return rte_flow_error_set(data->error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
|
||||
item, "VLAN cannot be empty");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user