ethdev: fix comments of packet integrity flow item
The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
but the markers were /**< instead of /**
The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
because there was no general comment for the struct.
Fixes: b10a421a1f
("ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
78dafb4bb5
commit
0d025f019c
@ -1707,8 +1707,16 @@ rte_flow_item_geneve_opt_mask = {
|
|||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
#endif
|
#endif
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* @warning
|
||||||
|
* @b EXPERIMENTAL: this structure may change without prior notice
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_INTEGRITY
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Match on packet integrity check result.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
struct rte_flow_item_integrity {
|
struct rte_flow_item_integrity {
|
||||||
/**< Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to.
|
/** Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to.
|
||||||
* @see rte_flow_action_rss
|
* @see rte_flow_action_rss
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
uint32_t level;
|
uint32_t level;
|
||||||
@ -1716,21 +1724,21 @@ struct rte_flow_item_integrity {
|
|||||||
union {
|
union {
|
||||||
__extension__
|
__extension__
|
||||||
struct {
|
struct {
|
||||||
/**< The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
/** The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
||||||
uint64_t packet_ok:1;
|
uint64_t packet_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
/** L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l2_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l2_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
/** L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l3_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l3_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
/** L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l4_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l4_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< L2 layer CRC is valid. */
|
/** L2 layer CRC is valid. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l2_crc_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l2_crc_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */
|
/** IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */
|
||||||
uint64_t ipv4_csum_ok:1;
|
uint64_t ipv4_csum_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< L4 layer checksum is valid. */
|
/** L4 layer checksum is valid. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l4_csum_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l4_csum_ok:1;
|
||||||
/**< The l3 length is smaller than the frame length. */
|
/** L3 length is smaller than frame length. */
|
||||||
uint64_t l3_len_ok:1;
|
uint64_t l3_len_ok:1;
|
||||||
uint64_t reserved:56;
|
uint64_t reserved:56;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user