test/common: fix log2 check
We recently started to get random failures on the common_autotest ut with
clang on Ubuntu 16.04.6.
Example: https://travis-ci.com/DPDK/dpdk/jobs/263177424
Wrong rte_log2_u64(0) val 0, expected ffffffff
Test Failed
The ut passes 0 to log2() to get an expected value.
Quoting log2 / log(3) manual:
If x is zero, then a pole error occurs, and the functions return
-HUGE_VAL, -HUGE_VALF, or -HUGE_VALL, respectively.
rte_log2_uXX helpers handle 0 as a special value and return 0.
Let's have dedicated tests for this case.
Fixes: 05c4345ef5
("test: add unit test for integer log2 function")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f26c2b39b2
commit
30a0df64aa
@ -216,7 +216,19 @@ test_log2(void)
|
||||
const uint32_t max = 0x10000;
|
||||
const uint32_t step = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < max; i = i + step) {
|
||||
compare = rte_log2_u32(0);
|
||||
if (compare != 0) {
|
||||
printf("Wrong rte_log2_u32(0) val %x, expected 0\n", compare);
|
||||
return TEST_FAILED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
compare = rte_log2_u64(0);
|
||||
if (compare != 0) {
|
||||
printf("Wrong rte_log2_u64(0) val %x, expected 0\n", compare);
|
||||
return TEST_FAILED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 1; i < max; i = i + step) {
|
||||
uint64_t i64;
|
||||
|
||||
/* extend range for 64-bit */
|
||||
|
@ -538,6 +538,9 @@ rte_bsf32_safe(uint64_t v, uint32_t *pos)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Return the rounded-up log2 of a integer.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @note Contrary to the logarithm mathematical operation,
|
||||
* rte_log2_u32(0) == 0 and not -inf.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param v
|
||||
* The input parameter.
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
@ -632,6 +635,9 @@ rte_fls_u64(uint64_t x)
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Return the rounded-up log2 of a 64-bit integer.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @note Contrary to the logarithm mathematical operation,
|
||||
* rte_log2_u64(0) == 0 and not -inf.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param v
|
||||
* The input parameter.
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user