examples/packet_ordering: enhance getopt_long usage
Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to compare the input parameters with the struct option array. This patch get rid of all those strcmp by directly binding each longopt with an int enum. This is to improve readability and consistency in all examples. Bugzilla ID: 238 Reported-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ibtisam Tariq <ibtisam.tariq@emumba.com> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec4887414a
commit
3bb3ebb51b
@ -29,6 +29,13 @@
|
||||
/* Macros for printing using RTE_LOG */
|
||||
#define RTE_LOGTYPE_REORDERAPP RTE_LOGTYPE_USER1
|
||||
|
||||
enum {
|
||||
#define OPT_DISABLE_REORDER "disable-reorder"
|
||||
OPT_DISABLE_REORDER_NUM = 256,
|
||||
#define OPT_INSIGHT_WORKER "insight-worker"
|
||||
OPT_INSIGHT_WORKER_NUM,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned int portmask;
|
||||
unsigned int disable_reorder;
|
||||
unsigned int insight_worker;
|
||||
@ -157,8 +164,8 @@ parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
char **argvopt;
|
||||
char *prgname = argv[0];
|
||||
static struct option lgopts[] = {
|
||||
{"disable-reorder", 0, 0, 0},
|
||||
{"insight-worker", 0, 0, 0},
|
||||
{OPT_DISABLE_REORDER, 0, NULL, OPT_DISABLE_REORDER_NUM},
|
||||
{OPT_INSIGHT_WORKER, 0, NULL, OPT_INSIGHT_WORKER_NUM },
|
||||
{NULL, 0, 0, 0 }
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -176,18 +183,18 @@ parse_args(int argc, char **argv)
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* long options */
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
if (!strcmp(lgopts[option_index].name, "disable-reorder")) {
|
||||
case OPT_DISABLE_REORDER_NUM:
|
||||
printf("reorder disabled\n");
|
||||
disable_reorder = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!strcmp(lgopts[option_index].name,
|
||||
"insight-worker")) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case OPT_INSIGHT_WORKER_NUM:
|
||||
printf("print all worker statistics\n");
|
||||
insight_worker = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
default:
|
||||
print_usage(prgname);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user