net/mlx5: reject negative integrity item configuration
Negative integrity item refers to condition when the item value mask is set, but value spec is cleared: ... integrity value mask l4_ok value spec 0 ... ethdev library defines integrity bits `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` as accumulators for all hardware L3 and L4 integrity verifications respectfully. Hardware `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` integrity bits refer to L3 and L4 network headers only. Integrity bits `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` are not compatible between ethdev library and hardware. PMD translations for ethdev `l3_ok` are: IPv4: `l3_ok` and `l3_csum_ok` IPv6: `l3_ok` ethdev `l4_ok` is translated into PMD `l4_ok` and `l4_csum_ok` bits. Positive IPv4 `l3_ok` flow item configuration is translated into a single matcher that AND corresponding hardware bits. Negative IPv4 `l3_ok` is translated into 2 hardware conditions where each condition probes a single integrity bit: ethdev::l3_ok is 0 => MLX5::l3_ok is 0 OR MLX5:l3_csum_ok is 0 MLX5 hardware does not do OR condition in flow rule item. Negative IPv4 `l3_ok` must be translated into 2 flow rules. Similarly negative ethdev `l4_ok` condition is also translated into 2 hardware rules. Current PMD roadmap does not allow implicit flow rule split. Bugzilla ID: 948 Cc: stable@dpdk.org Suggested-by: Raja Zidane <rzidane@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e96d3d02d6
commit
5ddb903824
@ -479,14 +479,15 @@ Limitations
|
||||
- Integrity offload is enabled starting from **ConnectX-6 Dx**.
|
||||
- Verification bits provided by the hardware are ``l3_ok``, ``ipv4_csum_ok``, ``l4_ok``, ``l4_csum_ok``.
|
||||
- ``level`` value 0 references outer headers.
|
||||
- Negative integrity item verification is not supported.
|
||||
- Multiple integrity items not supported in a single flow rule.
|
||||
- Flow rule items supplied by application must explicitly specify network headers referred by integrity item.
|
||||
For example, if integrity item mask sets ``l4_ok`` or ``l4_csum_ok`` bits, reference to L4 network header,
|
||||
TCP or UDP, must be in the rule pattern as well::
|
||||
|
||||
flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l3_ok value spec l3_ok / eth / ipv6 / end …
|
||||
or
|
||||
flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l4_ok value spec 0 / eth / ipv4 proto is udp / end …
|
||||
|
||||
flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l4_ok value spec l4_ok / eth / ipv4 proto is udp / end …
|
||||
|
||||
- Connection tracking:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -6779,6 +6779,12 @@ flow_dv_validate_item_integrity(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
|
||||
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
|
||||
integrity_item,
|
||||
"unsupported integrity filter");
|
||||
if ((mask->l3_ok & !spec->l3_ok) || (mask->l4_ok & !spec->l4_ok) ||
|
||||
(mask->ipv4_csum_ok & !spec->ipv4_csum_ok) ||
|
||||
(mask->l4_csum_ok & !spec->l4_csum_ok))
|
||||
return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
|
||||
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
|
||||
NULL, "negative integrity flow is not supported");
|
||||
if (spec->level > 1) {
|
||||
if (pattern_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_INNER_INTEGRITY)
|
||||
return rte_flow_error_set
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user