distributor: use wait until scheme
Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use wait until scheme for this case. Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
388bee69a5
commit
6b70c6b31f
@ -33,9 +33,8 @@ rte_distributor_request_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
|
||||
union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
|
||||
int64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
|
||||
| RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;
|
||||
while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
|
||||
& RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
|
||||
rte_pause();
|
||||
RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_MASKED(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
|
||||
==, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sync with distributor on GET_BUF flag. */
|
||||
__atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
|
||||
@ -74,9 +73,8 @@ rte_distributor_return_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
|
||||
union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
|
||||
uint64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
|
||||
| RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF;
|
||||
while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
|
||||
& RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
|
||||
rte_pause();
|
||||
RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_MASKED(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
|
||||
==, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Sync with distributor on RETURN_BUF flag. */
|
||||
__atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user