distributor: use wait until scheme

Instead of polling for bufptr64 to be updated, use
wait until scheme for this case.

Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
This commit is contained in:
Feifei Wang 2021-11-01 14:00:07 +08:00 committed by David Marchand
parent 388bee69a5
commit 6b70c6b31f

View File

@ -33,9 +33,8 @@ rte_distributor_request_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
int64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
| RTE_DISTRIB_GET_BUF;
while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
& RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
rte_pause();
RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_MASKED(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
==, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
/* Sync with distributor on GET_BUF flag. */
__atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
@ -74,9 +73,8 @@ rte_distributor_return_pkt_single(struct rte_distributor_single *d,
union rte_distributor_buffer_single *buf = &d->bufs[worker_id];
uint64_t req = (((int64_t)(uintptr_t)oldpkt) << RTE_DISTRIB_FLAG_BITS)
| RTE_DISTRIB_RETURN_BUF;
while (unlikely(__atomic_load_n(&buf->bufptr64, __ATOMIC_RELAXED)
& RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK))
rte_pause();
RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_MASKED(&buf->bufptr64, RTE_DISTRIB_FLAGS_MASK,
==, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
/* Sync with distributor on RETURN_BUF flag. */
__atomic_store_n(&(buf->bufptr64), req, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);