test/bpf: fix few small issues
Address for few small issues: - unreachable return statement - failed test-case can finish with 'success' status Also use unified cmp_res() function to check return value. Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c91717eb75
commit
83633ba230
@ -1797,13 +1797,6 @@ test_call1_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
|
||||
dummy_func1(arg, &v32, &v64);
|
||||
v64 += v32;
|
||||
|
||||
if (v64 != rc) {
|
||||
printf("%s@%d: invalid return value "
|
||||
"expected=0x%" PRIx64 ", actual=0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
|
||||
__func__, __LINE__, v64, rc);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return cmp_res(__func__, v64, rc, dv, dv, sizeof(*dv));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1934,13 +1927,7 @@ test_call2_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
|
||||
dummy_func2(&a, &b);
|
||||
v = a.u64 + a.u32 + b.u16 + b.u8;
|
||||
|
||||
if (v != rc) {
|
||||
printf("%s@%d: invalid return value "
|
||||
"expected=0x%" PRIx64 ", actual=0x%" PRIx64 "\n",
|
||||
__func__, __LINE__, v, rc);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
return cmp_res(__func__, v, rc, arg, arg, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct rte_bpf_xsym test_call2_xsym[] = {
|
||||
@ -2429,7 +2416,6 @@ test_call5_check(uint64_t rc, const void *arg)
|
||||
v = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
fail:
|
||||
|
||||
return cmp_res(__func__, v, rc, &v, &rc, sizeof(v));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2458,6 +2444,7 @@ static const struct rte_bpf_xsym test_call5_xsym[] = {
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* all bpf test cases */
|
||||
static const struct bpf_test tests[] = {
|
||||
{
|
||||
.name = "test_store1",
|
||||
@ -2738,7 +2725,6 @@ run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
tst->prepare(tbuf);
|
||||
|
||||
rc = rte_bpf_exec(bpf, tbuf);
|
||||
ret = tst->check_result(rc, tbuf);
|
||||
if (ret != 0) {
|
||||
@ -2746,17 +2732,20 @@ run_test(const struct bpf_test *tst)
|
||||
__func__, __LINE__, tst->name, ret, strerror(ret));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* repeat the same test with jit, when possible */
|
||||
rte_bpf_get_jit(bpf, &jit);
|
||||
if (jit.func == NULL)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (jit.func != NULL) {
|
||||
|
||||
tst->prepare(tbuf);
|
||||
rc = jit.func(tbuf);
|
||||
rv = tst->check_result(rc, tbuf);
|
||||
ret |= rv;
|
||||
if (rv != 0) {
|
||||
printf("%s@%d: check_result(%s) failed, error: %d(%s);\n",
|
||||
__func__, __LINE__, tst->name, rv, strerror(ret));
|
||||
tst->prepare(tbuf);
|
||||
rc = jit.func(tbuf);
|
||||
rv = tst->check_result(rc, tbuf);
|
||||
ret |= rv;
|
||||
if (rv != 0) {
|
||||
printf("%s@%d: check_result(%s) failed, "
|
||||
"error: %d(%s);\n",
|
||||
__func__, __LINE__, tst->name,
|
||||
rv, strerror(ret));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rte_bpf_destroy(bpf);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user