ethdev layer introduced checks for application requested RSS hash
functions and returns error for ones unsupported by hardware
This check breaks some sample applications which blindly configures
RSS hash functions without checking underlying hardware support.
Updated examples to mask out unsupported RSS has functions during device
configuration.
Prints a log if configuration values updated by this check.
Fixes: aa1a6d87f15d ("ethdev: force RSS offload rules again")
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Tested-by: Meijuan Zhao <meijuanx.zhao@intel.com>
Tested-by: Yingya Han <yingyax.han@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
In DPDK 17.11, the ethdev offloads API has changed:
commit cba7f53b717d ("ethdev: introduce Tx queue offloads API")
commit ce17eddefc20 ("ethdev: introduce Rx queue offloads API")
The new API is documented in the programmer's guide:
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/poll_mode_drv.html#hardware-offload
For reminder, the main concepts in the new API were:
- All offloads are disabled by default
- Distinction between per port and per queue offloads.
The transition bits are now removed:
- Translation of the old API in ethdev
- rte_eth_conf.rxmode.ignore_offload_bitfield
- ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_IGNORE
The old API bits are now removed:
- Rx per-port rte_eth_conf.rxmode.[bit-fields]
- Tx per-queue rte_eth_txconf.txq_flags
- ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NO*
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Reviewed-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
Some DPDK applications wrongly assume these requirements:
- no hotplug, i.e. ports are never detached
- all allocated ports are available to the application
Such application iterates over ports by its own mean.
The most common pattern is to request the port count and
assume ports with index in the range [0..count[ can be used.
In order to fix this common mistake in all external applications,
the function rte_eth_dev_count is deprecated, while introducing
the new functions rte_eth_dev_count_avail and rte_eth_dev_count_total.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Some DPDK applications wrongly assume these requirements:
- no hotplug, i.e. ports are never detached
- all allocated ports are available to the application
Such application assume a valid port index is in the range [0..count[.
There are three consequences when using such wrong design:
- new ports having an index higher than the port count won't be valid
- old ports being detached (RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED) can be valid
Such mistake will be less common with growing hotplug awareness.
All applications and examples inside this repository - except testpmd -
must be fixed to use the function rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Some DPDK applications wrongly assume these requirements:
- no hotplug, i.e. ports are never detached
- all allocated ports are available to the application
Such application iterates over ports by its own mean.
The most common pattern is to request the port count and
assume ports with index in the range [0..count[ can be used.
There are three consequences when using such wrong design:
- new ports having an index higher than the port count won't be seen
- old ports being detached (RTE_ETH_DEV_UNUSED) can be seen as ghosts
- failsafe sub-devices (RTE_ETH_DEV_DEFERRED) will be seen by the application
Such mistake will be less common with growing hotplug awareness.
All applications and examples inside this repository - except testpmd -
must be fixed to use the iterator RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Rename eventdev_pipeline_sw_pmd to eventdev_pipeline as it is no longer
specific underlying event device.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>
Acked-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
