Replace the BSD license header with the SPDX tag for files
with only an Intel copyright on them.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
This patch adds an union in VhostUserMsg to distinguish between
master and slave initiated requests, instead of casting slave
requests as master request.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Vhost-user device IOTLB protocol extension introduces
VHOST_USER_IOTLB message type. The associated payload is the
vhost_iotlb_msg struct defined in Kernel, which in this was can
be either an IOTLB update or invalidate message.
On IOTLB update, the virtqueues get notified of a new entry.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Currently, only QEMU sends requests, the backend sends
replies. In some cases, the backend may need to send
requests to QEMU, like IOTLB miss events when IOMMU is
supported.
This patch introduces a new channel for such requests.
QEMU sends a file descriptor of a new socket using
VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
This reverts commit 04d8122796 ("vhost: workaround MQ fails to
startup").
As agreed when this workaround was introduced, it can be reverted
as Qemu v2.10 that fixes the issue is now out.
The reply-ack feature is required for vhost-user IOMMU support.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
vhost since dpdk17.02 + qemu2.7 and above will cause failures of
new connection when negotiating to set MQ. (one queue pair works
well).
Because there exist some bugs in qemu code when introducing
VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK to qemu. when dealing with the vhost
message VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE for the second time, qemu indeed
doesn't send the messge (The message needs to be sent only once)but
still will be waiting for dpdk's reply ack, then, qemu is always
freezing. DPDK code indeed works in the right way.
The feature VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK has to be disabled
by default at the dpdk side in order to avoid the feature support of
DPDK + qemu at the same time. if doing like that, MQ can works well.
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Reported-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Yang <zhiyong.yang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Rename "rte_virtio_net.h" to "rte_vhost.h", to not let it be virtio
net specific.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
This patch implements the vhost-user MTU protocol feature support.
When VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is negotiated, QEMU notifies the vhost-user
backend with the configured MTU if dedicated protocol feature is
supported.
The value can be used by the application to ensure consistency with
value set by the user.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
REPLY_ACK features provide a generic way for QEMU to ensure both
completion and success of a request.
As described in vhost-user spec in QEMU repository, QEMU sets
VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY flag (bit 3) when expecting a reply_ack from
the backend. Backend must reply with 0 for success or non-zero
otherwise when flag is set.
Currently, only VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE request implements reply_ack,
in order to synchronize mapping updates.
This patch enables REPLY_ACK feature generally, but only checks error
code for VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
The code structure is a bit messy now. For example, vhost-user message
handling is spread to three different files:
vhost-net-user.c virtio-net.c virtio-net-user.c
Where, vhost-net-user.c is the entrance to handle all those messages
and then invoke the right method for a specific message. Some of them
are stored at virtio-net.c, while others are stored at virtio-net-user.c.
The truth is all of them should be in one file, vhost_user.c.
So this patch refactors the source code structure: mainly on renaming
files and moving code from one file to another file that is more suitable
for storing it. Thus, no functional changes are made.
After the refactor, the code structure becomes to:
- socket.c handles all vhost-user socket file related stuff, such
as, socket file creation for server mode, reconnection
for client mode.
- vhost.c mainly on stuff like vhost device creation/destroy/reset.
Most of the vhost API implementation are there, too.
- vhost_user.c all stuff about vhost-user messages handling goes there.
- virtio_net.c all stuff about virtio-net should go there. It has virtio
net Rx/Tx implementation only so far: it's just a rename
from vhost_rxtx.c
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
