We had some inconsistencies between functions prototypes and actual
definitions.
Let's avoid this by only adding the experimental tag to the prototypes.
Tests with gcc and clang show it is enough.
git grep -l __rte_experimental |grep \.c$ |while read file; do
sed -i -e '/^__rte_experimental$/d' $file;
sed -i -e 's/ *__rte_experimental//' $file;
sed -i -e 's/__rte_experimental *//' $file;
done
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
The doc examples are not aligned on the script following the
incriminated commit.
Fixes: c4a5fe3bf832 ("devtools: rework ABI checker script")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Define '__rte_deprecated' usage process.
Suggests keeping old API with '__rte_deprecated' marker including
next LTS, they will be removed just after the LTS release.
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Initial process requires oncoming changes described in deprecation
notice should be implemented in a RTE_NEXT_ABI gated way.
This has been discussed in technical board, and since this can cause a
multiple #ifdef blocks in multiple locations of the code, can be
confusing specially for the modifications that requires data structure
changes. Anyway this was not happening in practice.
Making RTE_NEXT_ABI usage more optional based on techboard decision:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-January/123519.html
The intention with using RTE_NEXT_ABI was to provide more information
to the user about planned changes, and force developer to think more in
coding level. Since RTE_NEXT_ABI become optional, now the preferred way
to do this is, if possible, sending changes, described in deprecation
notice, as a separate patch and reference it in deprecation notice.
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
The original document written from the point of ABI versioning but later
additions make document confusing, convert document into a ABI/API
policy documentation and organize the document in subsections:
- ABI/API Deprecation
- Experimental APIs
- Library versioning
- ABI versioning
Aim to clarify confusion between deprecation versioned ABI and overall
ABI/API deprecation, also ABI versioning and Library versioning by
organizing the sections.
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Rather than using linuxapp and bsdapp everywhere, we can change things to
use the, more readable, terms "linux" and "freebsd" in our build configs.
Rather than renaming the configs we can just duplicate the existing ones
with the new names using symlinks, and use the new names exclusively
internally. ["make showconfigs" also only shows the new names to keep the
list short] The result is that backward compatibility is kept fully but any
new builds or development can be done using the newer names, i.e. both
"make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc" and "T=x86_64-native-linux-gcc"
work.
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Since compat library is only a single header, we can easily move it into
the EAL common headers instead of tracking it separately. The downside of
this is that it becomes a little more difficult to have any libs that are
built before EAL depend on it. Thankfully, this is not a major problem as
the only library which uses rte_compat.h and is built before EAL (kvargs)
already has the path to the compat.h header file explicitly called out as
an include path.
However, to ensure that we don't hit problems later with this, we can add
EAL common headers folder to the global include list in the meson build
which means that all common headers can be safely used by all libraries, no
matter what their build order.
As a side-effect, this patch also fixes an issue with building on BSD using
meson, due to compat lib no longer needing to be listed as a dependency.
Fixes: a8499f65a1d1 ("log: add missing experimental tag")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Tested-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Experimental API text has been moved into a sub-section of ABI Policy.
A paragraph has been added to explain the process for removal of an
experimental tag.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Acked-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Document the need to add the __experimental tag to appropriate functions
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Following agreement at the DPDK Technical Board meeting of 2017-10-13 [1],
update the documentation with the ABI/API policy changes.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079961.html
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Acked-by: Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Following agreement at the DPDK Technical Board meeting [1], the policy
that hardware support deprecation should be treated as though it were an
ABI break needs to be documented in the contributors guide.
[1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/074613.html
Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Downstreams might want to provide different DPDK releases at the same
time to support multiple consumers of DPDK linked against older and newer
sonames.
Also due to the interdependencies that DPDK libraries can have applications
might end up with an executable space in which multiple versions of a
library are mapped by ld.so.
Think of LibA that got an ABI bump and LibB that did not get an ABI bump
but is depending on LibA.
Application
\-> LibA.old
\-> LibB.new -> LibA.new
That is a conflict which can be avoided by setting CONFIG_RTE_MAJOR_ABI.
If set CONFIG_RTE_MAJOR_ABI overwrites any LIBABIVER value.
An example might be ``CONFIG_RTE_MAJOR_ABI=16.11`` which will make all
libraries librte<?>.so.16.11 instead of librte<?>.so.<LIBABIVER>.
We need to cut arbitrary long stings after the .so now and this would work
for any ABI version in LIBABIVER:
$(Q)ln -s -f $< $(patsubst %.$(LIBABIVER),%,$@)
But using the following instead additionally allows to simplify the Make
File for the CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI case.
$(Q)ln -s -f $< $(shell echo $@ | sed 's/\.so.*/.so/')
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
The remaining scripts in the scripts/ directory are only useful
to developers. That's why devtools/ is a better name.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Tested-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Fix broken console directive in the ABI validator section of the
ABI versioning docs.
Fixes: f1ef9794f9bd ("doc: add ABI guidelines")
Signed-off-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
In addition to git tags, support validating abi between any legal
gitrevisions(7) syntaxes, such as "validate-abi.sh -1 . <target>"
"validate-abi.sh master mybranch <target>" etc in addition to
validating between tags. Makes it easier to run the validator
for in-development work.
Signed-off-by: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
The patch adds missing new line to "Managing ABI updates" section.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
The crypto API is in an early state.
It requires more discussions and experiments to declare it stable,
as discussed in http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-November/028634.html
A documentation section will be required in the guides.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Clarify target of guidelines by renaming the title and the directory.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>