Putting a '__attribute__((deprecated))' in the middle of a function
prototype does not result in the expected result with gcc (while clang
is fine with this syntax).
$ cat deprecated.c
void * __attribute__((deprecated)) incorrect() { return 0; }
__attribute__((deprecated)) void *correct(void) { return 0; }
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { incorrect(); correct(); return 0; }
$ gcc -o deprecated.o -c deprecated.c
deprecated.c: In function ‘main’:
deprecated.c:3:1: warning: ‘correct’ is deprecated (declared at
deprecated.c:2) [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { incorrect(); correct(); return 0; }
^
Move the tag on a separate line and make it the first thing of function
prototypes.
This is not perfect but we will trust reviewers to catch the other not
so easy to detect patterns.
sed -i \
-e '/^\([^#].*\)\?__rte_experimental */{' \
-e 's//\1/; s/ *$//; i\' \
-e __rte_experimental \
-e '/^$/d}' \
$(git grep -l __rte_experimental -- '*.h')
Special mention for rte_mbuf_data_addr_default():
There is either a bug or a (not yet understood) issue with gcc.
gcc won't drop this inline when unused and rte_mbuf_data_addr_default()
calls rte_mbuf_buf_addr() which itself is experimental.
This results in a build warning when not accepting experimental apis
from sources just including rte_mbuf.h.
For this specific case, we hide the call to rte_mbuf_buf_addr() under
the ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API flag.
Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
The rte_stack library provides an API for configuration and use of a
bounded stack of pointers. Push and pop operations are MT-safe, allowing
concurrent access, and the interface supports pushing and popping multiple
pointers at a time.
The library's interface is modeled after another DPDK data structure,
rte_ring, and its lock-based implementation is derived from the stack
mempool handler. An upcoming commit will migrate the stack mempool handler
to rte_stack.
Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
