Gage Eads e75bc77f98 mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler ... This commit adds support for lock-free (linked list based) stack mempool handler. In mempool_perf_autotest the lock-based stack outperforms the lock-free handler for certain lcore/alloc count/free count combinations*, however: - For applications with preemptible pthreads, a standard (lock-based) stack's worst-case performance (i.e. one thread being preempted while holding the spinlock) is much worse than the lock-free stack's. - Using per-thread mempool caches will largely mitigate the performance difference. *Test setup: x86_64 build with default config, dual-socket Xeon E5-2699 v4, running on isolcpus cores with a tickless scheduler. The lock-based stack's rate_persec was 0.6x-3.5x the lock-free stack's. Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>		2019-04-04 22:06:16 +02:00
..
Makefile	mempool/stack: use stack library	2019-04-04 22:06:16 +02:00
meson.build	mempool/stack: use stack library	2019-04-04 22:06:16 +02:00
rte_mempool_stack_version.map	mempool: move stack handler as a driver	2017-04-03 19:45:45 +02:00
rte_mempool_stack.c	mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler	2019-04-04 22:06:16 +02:00