5630257fcc
Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
228 lines
13 KiB
ReStructuredText
228 lines
13 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
|
|
Copyright(c) 2010-2015 Intel Corporation.
|
|
|
|
.. _Hash_Library:
|
|
|
|
Hash Library
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
The DPDK provides a Hash Library for creating hash table for fast lookup.
|
|
The hash table is a data structure optimized for searching through a set of entries that are each identified by a unique key.
|
|
For increased performance the DPDK Hash requires that all the keys have the same number of bytes which is set at the hash creation time.
|
|
|
|
Hash API Overview
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
The main configuration parameters for the hash are:
|
|
|
|
* Total number of hash entries
|
|
|
|
* Size of the key in bytes
|
|
|
|
The hash also allows the configuration of some low-level implementation related parameters such as:
|
|
|
|
* Hash function to translate the key into a bucket index
|
|
|
|
The main methods exported by the hash are:
|
|
|
|
* Add entry with key: The key is provided as input. If a new entry is successfully added to the hash for the specified key,
|
|
or there is already an entry in the hash for the specified key, then the position of the entry is returned.
|
|
If the operation was not successful, for example due to lack of free entries in the hash, then a negative value is returned;
|
|
|
|
* Delete entry with key: The key is provided as input. If an entry with the specified key is found in the hash,
|
|
then the entry is removed from the hash and the position where the entry was found in the hash is returned.
|
|
If no entry with the specified key exists in the hash, then a negative value is returned
|
|
|
|
* Lookup for entry with key: The key is provided as input. If an entry with the specified key is found in the hash (lookup hit),
|
|
then the position of the entry is returned, otherwise (lookup miss) a negative value is returned.
|
|
|
|
Apart from these method explained above, the API allows the user three more options:
|
|
|
|
* Add / lookup / delete with key and precomputed hash: Both the key and its precomputed hash are provided as input. This allows
|
|
the user to perform these operations faster, as hash is already computed.
|
|
|
|
* Add / lookup with key and data: A pair of key-value is provided as input. This allows the user to store
|
|
not only the key, but also data which may be either a 8-byte integer or a pointer to external data (if data size is more than 8 bytes).
|
|
|
|
* Combination of the two options above: User can provide key, precomputed hash and data.
|
|
|
|
Also, the API contains a method to allow the user to look up entries in bursts, achieving higher performance
|
|
than looking up individual entries, as the function prefetches next entries at the time it is operating
|
|
with the first ones, which reduces significantly the impact of the necessary memory accesses.
|
|
Notice that this method uses a pipeline of 8 entries (4 stages of 2 entries), so it is highly recommended
|
|
to use at least 8 entries per burst.
|
|
|
|
The actual data associated with each key can be either managed by the user using a separate table that
|
|
mirrors the hash in terms of number of entries and position of each entry,
|
|
as shown in the Flow Classification use case describes in the following sections,
|
|
or stored in the hash table itself.
|
|
|
|
The example hash tables in the L2/L3 Forwarding sample applications defines which port to forward a packet to based on a packet flow identified by the five-tuple lookup.
|
|
However, this table could also be used for more sophisticated features and provide many other functions and actions that could be performed on the packets and flows.
|
|
|
|
Multi-process support
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
The hash library can be used in a multi-process environment, minding that only lookups are thread-safe.
|
|
The only function that can only be used in single-process mode is rte_hash_set_cmp_func(), which sets up
|
|
a custom compare function, which is assigned to a function pointer (therefore, it is not supported in
|
|
multi-process mode).
|
|
|
|
Implementation Details
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
The hash table has two main tables:
|
|
|
|
* First table is an array of entries which is further divided into buckets,
|
|
with the same number of consecutive array entries in each bucket. Each entry contains the computed primary
|
|
and secondary hashes of a given key (explained below), and an index to the second table.
|
|
|
|
* The second table is an array of all the keys stored in the hash table and its data associated to each key.
|
|
|
|
The hash library uses the cuckoo hash method to resolve collisions.
|
|
For any input key, there are two possible buckets (primary and secondary/alternative location)
|
|
where that key can be stored in the hash, therefore only the entries within those bucket need to be examined
|
|
when the key is looked up.
|
|
The lookup speed is achieved by reducing the number of entries to be scanned from the total
|
|
number of hash entries down to the number of entries in the two hash buckets,
|
|
as opposed to the basic method of linearly scanning all the entries in the array.
|
|
The hash uses a hash function (configurable) to translate the input key into a 4-byte key signature.
|
|
The bucket index is the key signature modulo the number of hash buckets.
|
|
|
|
Once the buckets are identified, the scope of the hash add,
|
|
delete and lookup operations is reduced to the entries in those buckets (it is very likely that entries are in the primary bucket).
|
|
|
|
To speed up the search logic within the bucket, each hash entry stores the 4-byte key signature together with the full key for each hash entry.
|
|
For large key sizes, comparing the input key against a key from the bucket can take significantly more time than
|
|
comparing the 4-byte signature of the input key against the signature of a key from the bucket.
|
|
Therefore, the signature comparison is done first and the full key comparison done only when the signatures matches.
|
|
The full key comparison is still necessary, as two input keys from the same bucket can still potentially have the same 4-byte hash signature,
|
|
although this event is relatively rare for hash functions providing good uniform distributions for the set of input keys.
|
|
|
|
Example of lookup:
|
|
|
|
First of all, the primary bucket is identified and entry is likely to be stored there.
|
|
If signature was stored there, we compare its key against the one provided and return the position
|
|
where it was stored and/or the data associated to that key if there is a match.
|
|
If signature is not in the primary bucket, the secondary bucket is looked up, where same procedure
|
|
is carried out. If there is no match there either, key is considered not to be in the table.
|
|
|
|
Example of addition:
|
|
|
|
Like lookup, the primary and secondary buckets are identified. If there is an empty slot in
|
|
the primary bucket, primary and secondary signatures are stored in that slot, key and data (if any) are added to
|
|
the second table and an index to the position in the second table is stored in the slot of the first table.
|
|
If there is no space in the primary bucket, one of the entries on that bucket is pushed to its alternative location,
|
|
and the key to be added is inserted in its position.
|
|
To know where the alternative bucket of the evicted entry is, the secondary signature is looked up and alternative bucket index
|
|
is calculated from doing the modulo, as seen above. If there is room in the alternative bucket, the evicted entry
|
|
is stored in it. If not, same process is repeated (one of the entries gets pushed) until a non full bucket is found.
|
|
Notice that despite all the entry movement in the first table, the second table is not touched, which would impact
|
|
greatly in performance.
|
|
|
|
In the very unlikely event that table enters in a loop where same entries are being evicted indefinitely,
|
|
key is considered not able to be stored.
|
|
With random keys, this method allows the user to get around 90% of the table utilization, without
|
|
having to drop any stored entry (LRU) or allocate more memory (extended buckets).
|
|
|
|
Entry distribution in hash table
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
As mentioned above, Cuckoo hash implementation pushes elements out of their bucket,
|
|
if there is a new entry to be added which primary location coincides with their current bucket,
|
|
being pushed to their alternative location.
|
|
Therefore, as user adds more entries to the hash table, distribution of the hash values
|
|
in the buckets will change, being most of them in their primary location and a few in
|
|
their secondary location, which the later will increase, as table gets busier.
|
|
This information is quite useful, as performance may be lower as more entries
|
|
are evicted to their secondary location.
|
|
|
|
See the tables below showing example entry distribution as table utilization increases.
|
|
|
|
.. _table_hash_lib_1:
|
|
|
|
.. table:: Entry distribution measured with an example table with 1024 random entries using jhash algorithm
|
|
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| % Table used | % In Primary location | % In Secondary location |
|
|
+==============+=======================+=========================+
|
|
| 25 | 100 | 0 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 50 | 96.1 | 3.9 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 75 | 88.2 | 11.8 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 80 | 86.3 | 13.7 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 85 | 83.1 | 16.9 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 90 | 77.3 | 22.7 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 95.8 | 64.5 | 35.5 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _table_hash_lib_2:
|
|
|
|
.. table:: Entry distribution measured with an example table with 1 million random entries using jhash algorithm
|
|
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| % Table used | % In Primary location | % In Secondary location |
|
|
+==============+=======================+=========================+
|
|
| 50 | 96 | 4 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 75 | 86.9 | 13.1 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 80 | 83.9 | 16.1 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 85 | 80.1 | 19.9 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 90 | 74.8 | 25.2 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
| 94.5 | 67.4 | 32.6 |
|
|
+--------------+-----------------------+-------------------------+
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Last values on the tables above are the average maximum table
|
|
utilization with random keys and using Jenkins hash function.
|
|
|
|
Use Case: Flow Classification
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Flow classification is used to map each input packet to the connection/flow it belongs to.
|
|
This operation is necessary as the processing of each input packet is usually done in the context of their connection,
|
|
so the same set of operations is applied to all the packets from the same flow.
|
|
|
|
Applications using flow classification typically have a flow table to manage, with each separate flow having an entry associated with it in this table.
|
|
The size of the flow table entry is application specific, with typical values of 4, 16, 32 or 64 bytes.
|
|
|
|
Each application using flow classification typically has a mechanism defined to uniquely identify a flow based on
|
|
a number of fields read from the input packet that make up the flow key.
|
|
One example is to use the DiffServ 5-tuple made up of the following fields of the IP and transport layer packet headers:
|
|
Source IP Address, Destination IP Address, Protocol, Source Port, Destination Port.
|
|
|
|
The DPDK hash provides a generic method to implement an application specific flow classification mechanism.
|
|
Given a flow table implemented as an array, the application should create a hash object with the same number of entries as the flow table and
|
|
with the hash key size set to the number of bytes in the selected flow key.
|
|
|
|
The flow table operations on the application side are described below:
|
|
|
|
* Add flow: Add the flow key to hash.
|
|
If the returned position is valid, use it to access the flow entry in the flow table for adding a new flow or
|
|
updating the information associated with an existing flow.
|
|
Otherwise, the flow addition failed, for example due to lack of free entries for storing new flows.
|
|
|
|
* Delete flow: Delete the flow key from the hash. If the returned position is valid,
|
|
use it to access the flow entry in the flow table to invalidate the information associated with the flow.
|
|
|
|
* Lookup flow: Lookup for the flow key in the hash.
|
|
If the returned position is valid (flow lookup hit), use the returned position to access the flow entry in the flow table.
|
|
Otherwise (flow lookup miss) there is no flow registered for the current packet.
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
----------
|
|
|
|
* Donald E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming, Volume 3: Sorting and Searching (2nd Edition), 1998, Addison-Wesley Professional
|