d/numam-spdk
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

test/blob: add some SPDK_CU_ASSERT_FATAL checks

Browse Source 
I have no idea why - but scan-build starts complaining about
some missing SPDK_CU_ASSERT_FATAL checks when analyzing the
next patch - even though that patch has nothing whatsoever
to do with the scan-build error reports.

scan-build is really weird sometimes.

Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3d426384fa4f846abf2eb98fd29ee308d08c1943

Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/391875
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jim Harris 2017-12-14 14:54:55 -07:00
parent feba13bbba
commit e3f54f321a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
test/unit/lib/blob/blob.c/blob_ut.c
View File

@ -2012,17 +2012,17 @@ blob_flags(void)
spdk_bs_open_blob(g_bs, blobid_invalid, blob_op_with_handle_complete, NULL);
CU_ASSERT(g_bserrno == 0);
CU_ASSERT(g_blob != NULL);
SPDK_CU_ASSERT_FATAL(g_blob != NULL);
blob_invalid = g_blob;
spdk_bs_open_blob(g_bs, blobid_data_ro, blob_op_with_handle_complete, NULL);
CU_ASSERT(g_bserrno == 0);
CU_ASSERT(g_blob != NULL);
SPDK_CU_ASSERT_FATAL(g_blob != NULL);
blob_data_ro = g_blob;
spdk_bs_open_blob(g_bs, blobid_md_ro, blob_op_with_handle_complete, NULL);
CU_ASSERT(g_bserrno == 0);
CU_ASSERT(g_blob != NULL);
SPDK_CU_ASSERT_FATAL(g_blob != NULL);
blob_md_ro = g_blob;
__blob_to_data(blob_invalid)->invalid_flags = (1ULL << 63);