The following issue was observed.
The first thread returned the last IO channel and the second thread
then removed the first base device, but raid_bdev_cleanup() was
called before raid_bdev_destroy_cb() was called.
raid_bdev_destroy_cb() was accessed to the raid bdev already freed
by raid_bdev_cleanup() and caused segmentation fault.
The call sequence was as follows:
The first thread:
spdk_put_io_channel() -> ch->destroy_cb -> raid_bdev_destroy_cb
-> access raid bdev
The second thread:
raid_bdev_remove_base_devices() -> raid_bdev_deconfigure() ->
spdk_bdev_unregister() -> spdk_io_device_unregister() ->
spdk_bdev_destroy_cb() -> raid_bdev_destruct() -> raid_bdev_cleanup()
-> free raid bdev
The fix is to hold number of created channels in struct
raid_bdev_io_channel and use it in raid_bdev_destroy_cb().
Bdev layer, IO device/channel layer, and NVMe-oF layer already
process this case correctly.
Fixes#884.
Reported-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yidong0635 <dongx.yi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/463249 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 284aca9e36)
Change-Id: Ie9d61bdddca479ce7f491ff9a08db45e71f16a8d
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/467130
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
The OCF build was broken by some of the recent changes
to the Makefiles. This change aims to fix that by separating out the ocf
environment from the ocf bdev.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/465808 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 407e88fd2a)
Change-Id: Id445340033898e9ae70a4bcfc799951110762d55
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/467293
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
The SPDK application framework defines a list of event subsystem
dependencies. When linking against individual shared libraries, it is
useful for this dependency structure to be codified in the shared
libraries themselves.
For example, when linking a bdev based application against
libspdk_bdev.so, one might wish to only specify this shared object at
link time. However, when you actually run the application, it will fail
to start because it is not linked to the copy and vmd subsystems.
However, once thesedependencies are added, one can effectively link
against only the exact subsystems they need and any dependent subsystems
will be linked in automatically.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466081 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 5c62618f26)
Change-Id: Ic986281a162ac20b523486e9f8cccf4a0787afd7
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466983
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
This will allow us to link individually against dpdk module libraries
without having to define those libraries dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/465704 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 7e1881cef9)
Change-Id: Ief2140ec0fadd970aba990dab333d603dfb46317
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466982
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
These directories fit in with the module concept we are forming inside
of SPDK. Essentially modules are derivative or specialized libraries that
rely on a general or core library.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/465455 (master)
(cherry picked from commit f34fa35a52)
Change-Id: Ib40f05422f144ff8fd579f47a3867ef4412b3372
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466976
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This is more accurate to what they are, and will make defining library
dependencies much simpler. This change in directory does not affect the
final placement of naming of libraries at the end of time.
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
reviewed on https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466975 (master)
(cherry picked from commit 07fe6a43d6)
Change-Id: Ic48a9233dff564e39ce357a9ea0a111ea2b6414b
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/466975
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
