Rewriting test cases:
- tasting_positive
- tasting_lvol_store_positive
- tasting_positive_with_different_lvol_store_cluster_size
These three python test cases were merged into one test,
as there was a lot of similarity between them.
Change-Id: Ie68568e2b6b9e574917b6b350e96b0f42c999c95
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Berger <michalx.berger@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/683
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
This is a duplicate of test_hotremove_lvol_store_base,
previously known as test case 301.
Change-Id: I2e49652a0d94fc32f8193f724a254a50484844cc
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/682
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Again, smuggle it into one of the existing test case
to create more opportunities for this test to fail.
We'll now trying to remove an inexistent lvolstore
when there's a valid lvolstore present.
Change-Id: I64a72a8ffe38ba6939d0818d2c6c81e49748a33c
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462468
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
This test case is about hotremoving a malloc with
an empty lvolstore on top. We rewrite it to bash,
but also introduce one more similar test case but
with a single lvol in the lvs.
Change-Id: Iea9666080fe5e73befd97ec5e0b2898d8b30ecd6
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462467
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Those test cases were basically testing hotremove, so
that's how we're going to name them now.
Change-Id: Ib79ab7e50e3022df981f7092436b0a0991d5c9b9
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462189
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The test case covers destroying the lvolstore using its
human-friendly name instead of uuid. We destroy lvolstores
all over the basic construct tests, so we just smuggle
one removal by name into one of those existing test cases.
Change-Id: I5027382f727be226f601573367bfcd214baf474a
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462190
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
We didn't really test it so far.
Change-Id: I58e57a47465e3c4bc409d497706a56c7aa5cdaa1
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462465
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
We already perform the same steps as a part of different
test case in basic.sh.
Change-Id: I0e1931307b3de69df95b2a2994b87147028677e1
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462464
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
We did not test it so far.
Change-Id: I0769c31691535b5d8f9c49e07899f035208efebb
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462188
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Resize tests were extremely basic so far, extend them
with a test case that actually tries to do some I/O
before and after the resize.
I would like to keep it as a separate test case,
because it uses NBD which used to be quite buggy at
some point. If the resize tests fail on this new test
case, it means the previous very basic resize tests
have passed and the lvol resize functionality itself
doesn't show any failures - this might potentially
simplify some root causing later on.
Change-Id: I7ee45243ee4fc025fc71f6eee4c946211c07a78a
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462187
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Added resize.sh. There won't be too many test cases
in there just yet, but eventually we'd like to lift
some restrictions on lvol resizes and there will be
a fair amount of extra cases to cover.
Change-Id: I3d9db16003ac806241678cfd8441281d557c214c
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/462185
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Instead of using "!" use rpc_cmd && false to check
that command should fail but succeded
Change-Id: Ied564c13b96ea6d4a45aab1460b3323edd1d9554
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/478328
Community-CI: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
We will be able to distinguish case and suite in the post process
scripts based on if they have any internal tests.
Change-Id: Iff2aa5caa251924d8a842085d87eb2a17aca45d4
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/478522
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Community-CI: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
This will allow us to use timing_enter and timing_exit directly
inside the run_test function. That function already lends itself well to
nesting the way we do our timing.
This patch series is aimed at combining the timing_*, run_test, and
report_test_completions calls all into a single place. This will greatly
reduce the number of lines of code in our bash scripts devoted to
tracking timing, formatting, and test completion. It will also enable us
to expand on the reporting of test completions. Further down the line,
this will also allow us to unify test case documentation.
Change-Id: I8e1f4bcea86b2c3b88cc6e42339c57dfce4d58f2
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/476799
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom SPDK FC-NVMe CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Make it a part of existing test_construct_lvol_basic
test case. It's the same test, but the lvol is created
using lvs alias rather than uuid.
Change-Id: I909ded489eb441aa9fa212b11b2cbb91b5db5bbe
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/459672
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
There are multiple things wrong with current python tests:
* they don't stop the execution on error
* the output makes it difficult to understand what really
happened inside the test
* there is no easy way to reproduce a failure if there
is one (besides running the same test script again)
* they currently suffer from intermittent failures and
there's no-one there to fix them
* they stand out from the rest of spdk tests, which are
written in bash
So we rewrite those tests to bash. They will use rpc.py
daemon to send RPC commands, so they won't take any more
time to run than python tests.
The tests are going to be split them into a few different
categories:
* clones
* snapshots
* thin provisioning
* tasting
* renaming
* resizing
* all the dumb ones - construct, destruct, etc
Each file is a standalone test script, with common utility
functions located in test/lvol/common.sh. Each file tests
a single, specific feature, but under multiple conditions.
Each test case is implemented as a separate function, so
if you touch only one lvol feature, you can run only one
test script, and if e.g. only a later test case notoriously
breaks, you can comment out all the previous test case
invocations (up to ~10 lines) and focus only on that
failing one.
The new tests don't correspond 1:1 to the old python ones
- they now cover more. Whenever there was a negative test
to check if creating lvs on inexistent bdev failed, we'll
now also create a dummy bdev beforehand, so that lvs will
have more opportunity to do something it should not.
Some other test cases were squashed. A few negative tests
required a lot of setup just to try doing something
illegal and see if spdk crashed. We'll now do those illegal
operations in a single test case, giving lvol lib more
opportunity to break. Even if illegal operation did not
cause any segfault, is the lvolstore/lvol still usable?
E.g. if we try to create an lvol on an lvs that doesn't
have enough free clusters and it fails as expected, will
it be still possible to create a valid lvol afterwards?
Besides sending various RPC commands and checking their
return code, we'll also parse and compare various fields
in JSON RPC output from get_lvol_stores or get_bdevs RPC.
We'll use inline jq calls for that. Whenever something's
off, it will be clear which RPC returned invalid values
and what were the expected values even without having
detailed error prints.
The tests are designed to be as easy as possible to debug
whenever something goes wrong.
This patch removes one test case from python tests and
adds a corresponding test into the new test/lvol/lvol2.sh
file. The script will be renamed to just lvol.sh after
the existing lvol.sh (which starts all python tests) is
finally removed.
As for the bash script itself - each test case is run
through a run_test() function which verifies there were
no lvolstores, lvols, or bdevs left after the test case
has finished. Inside the particular tests we will still
check if the lvolstore removal at the end was successful,
but that's because we want to make sure it's gone e.g even
before we remove the underlying lvs' base bdev.
Change-Id: Iaa2bb656233e1c9f0c35093f190ac26c39e78623
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pawel Kaminski <pawelx.kaminski@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/459517
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Karol Latecki <karol.latecki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom SPDK FC-NVMe CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
