This reduces overhead of spdk_trace_record calls when
tracing is not enabled.
While here, remove a couple of unit test stubs for
spdk_trace_record that weren't needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2cbb91e7d3311d95444d663f466d846676d2dcce
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424276
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This makes it easier to debug failures.
Change-Id: Ic1099ec08308d5e50dd9fe03798dc0873579f2cc
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423961
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
These don't do anything yet.
Change-Id: I718c6fb19c059a39bc5cb360c3da47ec05bfa416
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423767
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
There could be cases (especially in virtualized and/or test
environments) where we could accumulate significant skew in
the timeslice frequency. Rather than depend on the application
framework to try to guarantee the rate of timeslice poller
callbacks, keep track internally of the last time the poller
was invoked. If/when we accumulate and detect skew equivalent
to one or more timeslices, increase the allowed IO and bandwidth
of the next timeslice to accomodate.
Since bdev poller now calls spdk_get_ticks() to do accounting,
this patch also fixes up the increment_time() unit test function
and the test env layer to properly increment the fake TSC.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iba301ddc0fb3d02042106a8bf6e4a6a9a84dc263
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423580
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
buf is no longer needed, now that RAID I/O will never
span a strip boundary.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icc03b985f540797597c238005bf9883f6f8ad010
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423406
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is in response to a Scan-build error with Clang 6.0 but is a real
bug. If we don't match up our IOVs properly with the lenght we provide,
we could jump over the iov list into invalid memory in
_spdk_rw_iov_split_next.
Change-Id: I472a7aa53027af0a18ebeee8226e0b008447cce4
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424248
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
To be consistent with nvmf, use underscore.
Change-Id: I5f2ae60518367ab439db9b893ab8ba975e82bed9
Signed-off-by: Liang Yan <liang.z.yan@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424179
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This has been reduced to just a call to
spdk_bdev_io_complete(), so it is no longer needed.
While here, call spdk_bdev_io_complete() directly
in the strip-crossing error case as well.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ia949e3fd55b52e5c873bd591e541ecf6c0c086b1
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423327
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Now that I/O never span a strip boundary, we don't
need to count splits.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iea5df5ca055fe4b338fb5cb0828a45502c239458
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This is in response to a Scan-build issue reported on Clang 6.
Change-Id: I2edc853145762998db818cbbe0e9ca0d9b8c123d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424139
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Set the bdev->optimal_io_boundary to the strip size, and
set split_on_optimal_io_boundary = true. This will ensure
that all I/O submitted to the raid module do not cross
a strip boundary, meaning it does not need to be split
across multiple member disks.
This is a step towards removing the iovcnt == 1
limitation. Further improvements and simplifications
will be made in future patches before removing this
restriction.
Unit tests need to be adjusted here to not span
boundaries either.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I08943805def673288f552a1b7662a4fbe16f25eb
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423323
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Splitting a 1TB unmap into individual 64KB unmap commands
(for a RAID volume with 64KB strip size) would be awful -
the RAID module can be much smarter about this.
So back out the changes for splitting I/O without payload.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I24fe6d911f4e3c9db4b2cb5d66c7236a5596e0d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424103
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
This no longer requires special handling - the event can be
acknowledged like all of the others.
Change-Id: Ib30cf35ec7aff45734ca6fe729e15d8fe41e3838
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423935
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Keep the code together. This is only code movement.
Change-Id: Ie52f1ab09e197192025f2b664df410ba6e1f06aa
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423934
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously, this would release resources for requests if there
was an RDMA error on the qpair. Expand this case to include
scenarios where the qpair is in the process of intentionally
shutting down.
Change-Id: Ib018f190389ee2df20eba3dddcc7dcffdbb4909d
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423745
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This guarantees that the qpair memory still exists.
Change-Id: I759197b90513f30488aa46bd26535c663e64dae6
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423744
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Don't abort commands in states indicating an RDMA operation
is outstanding until an event indicates that all of the
work items have completed.
Change-Id: Ie2b83604bee142e383ffbcae088f4da0fd0fa658
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423413
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
One was an API issue, another was a dereference of a null pointer that
resulted from a possible call to a stubbed function in the unittest
common code, and the last was an erroneous use-after-free due to
scan-build apparently not understanding TAILQ_REMOVE.
Change-Id: I9111817e9e990ff6e388351c08f34c2e945df62d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423959
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This removes assumptions about hte lifecycle of these variables relative
to the parent bdev and allows us to avoid ambiguity about who
is responsible for freeing these buffers.
Change-Id: Ia996653562d532fa1501faf21d3fdff85033ab33
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424105
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Next patch will keep RAID bdev without removal when adding any base
bdev to the RAID bdev fails for some reason for construct_raid_bdev
RPC.
The half-baked RAID bdev will become unnamed and this should be avoided.
Change-Id: I3ad0d58a04a7638b9b286babe0e56e057e7f5d0d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423621
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When check_and_remove_raid_bdev(raid_cfg) is called, raid_bdev
must be in configuring state. However, offline state will be
probable as well. Besides similar and more comprehensive state
check is done in raid_bdev_cleanup(). Hence remove this check.
Change-Id: I8526da51828f18a8393afbd3d81c0a52f2d33261
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423620
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When the name of raid bdev is already used by any existing bdev,
spdk_bdev_register() will fail. Hence checking if bdev is duplicated
can be left with spdk_bdev_register().
Change-Id: I22f0c75b0e87c5bd71ece383d146ec61cfaf2627
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423617
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When raid_bdev_alloc_base_bdev_resource() is called through raid_bdev_examine(),
if raid_bdev_alloc_base_bdev_resource() fails, raid_bdev_cleanup() is called
without freeing base bdev resource.
There is no way to free base bdev resource in this case.
Hence remove cleanup call.
Change-Id: I93494502bfe653293825e11872de5883702e495a
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423616
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
This is not used anywhere, and is not something we can
set over RPC. So make this a command-line only option
(as it should be).
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2df862cdce2f17992d2324312d5c0e98b38a8acd
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423930
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Without this fix, large writes would report underflow. Linux
initiator seems to ignore the underflow condition, but ESXi
initiator would properly detect it.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icab28531c44f61a8e5529bcee989d0c2bf41d043
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423906
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Adding CHAP authentication group configuration to JSON config dump.
This addition is done unconditionally because the path to the CHAP secret file
have to be specified explicitly now.
Change-Id: Ibd4085222a6767dae3a74023f1d6bc270ef4abac
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421469
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Add an new RPC to get current authentication group configuration.
This patch is utilized in the next patch to support JSON config dump
for authentication group configuration.
Change-Id: I34be9e196f8e7a484bcd316da54f05d0f6ee0300
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421468
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previous patches enabled users to configure CHAP secrets dynamically
by RPCs. Subsequent patches will enable users to load CHAP secrets
from JSON config file.
Loading CHAP secret file is done by default and this will conflict to
JSON config file.
Hence the path to CHAP secret file is required to specify in the config
file or JSON RPC set_iscsi_options explicitly after this patch.
Users who have used CHAP secret file are expected to specify it explicitly
and this will be no harm for them.
Besides, CHAP secret file is not oly for discovery sessions but also for
login to iSCSI targets. However there were wrong description to make user
misunderstand. Hence remove these wrong description in this patch too.
Change-Id: Ic4093cabc0c14b87e26baef4bba6b0d292e40c06
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421467
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Now that we split on I/O boundaries, that code needs to
be able to use the bdev_io split* members to track
what is left to submit. This means that the write_zeroes
code cannot submit the parent bdev_io as the child bdev_io,
since the I/O boundary code will overwrite the write_zeroes
split accounting.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I9316b59267508f60799766fc4f1ea05a4b3e5d9e
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423404
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This function was meant to handle case when a RAID
volume only had one member disk. This is not a
common case, so just go through the
raid_bdev_submit_children() path in this case. This
will simplify some upcoming patches to use
split_on_optimal_io_boundary to enable vectored
I/O.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic7c7f7987d54ffd836deabb98530f7c339094809
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423322
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
This will simplify some future patches which will
account for missed timeslice timers by allowing
additional IO/BW in the following timeslice.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I9dd46a768c98ce267c733a9f9719a2d3d2c3c915
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423579
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Also fix the code to match the documentation.
--limit-coredump is the better name for this option.
Also add a very brief description of --tpoint-group-mask.
A lot more documentation is needed on this, and John
Kariuki has some in progress.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I6eef15a713c0dfc950d748b0275b3f1d60d303b3
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423751
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Change-Id: I066085a0606d64a0d95ab2d28340aa35d83efdf7
Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423504
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
To use virtual address IOVAs, DPDK has to ensure there
are absolutely no predispositions to require physical
addresses neither now, nor in future. All available buses,
including PCI, report whether they require physical
addresses. For PCI, the registered drivers may report
RTE_PCI_DRV_IOVA_AS_VA to mark a driver as RTE_IOVA_VA
compliant. However, this model assumes that all (PCI)
drivers are registered on DPDK init, which is not the case
in SPDK. With no devices attached, most buses will report
RTE_IOVA_DC (don't care) and EAL will default to
RTE_IOVA_PA.
SPDK needs a hook to report whether it supports RTE_IOVA_VA,
and the fake rte_bus provides it.
Change-Id: Iba2d904200d1b70140d81943a57b98fd290783f9
Signed-off-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423491
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Due to polling order, a request may have completed its previous
operation successfully, but the queue pair may be in an error
state. In this case, move the request directly to the
completed state to release resources.
Change-Id: Ic0a5ba036af246b1b6155169cf9682e943b73120
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423412
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell5141@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
