Split client out of the args object and pass it as the first parameter
to all RPC methods instead. This is a step toward decoupling the
rpc/*.py interface from the argparse front end.
Change-Id: Ib030862e0c79112e5c9acdde295d68983126a987
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/405502
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The modules in scripts/rpc/*.py should be a generic, reusable library;
the printing should be done by the command-line frontend (rpc.py)
instead of the library code.
Change-Id: Ibeb022a3591f0a140fc43104d8dcf17d7041e48b
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/404426
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Rather than requiring the 'verbose' flag as a parameter to
JSONRPCClient.call(), move it to the JSONRPCClient constructor so that
it can be set once.
This fixes the inconsistency between RPC method wrappers that passed
args.verbose and those that didn't; now, rpc.py -v works reliably for
all methods.
The JSONRPCClient.call() verbose parameter is maintained as well to
allow individual calls to be set to verbose if desired.
Change-Id: Iee385510cc9eb1d2984d3b9982055789dff188c6
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/398508
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
The top level client is unchanged. This is primarily just
moving code around. The client.py file is the only location
with new code, which converts the old jsonrpc_call function
into a class.
Change-Id: I5fb7cd48f77f6affa3d9439128009bf63148acda
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/364316
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
