This part was duplicated but was not removed during refactoring caressly.
Additionally, the variable iter was not changed to the single character
variable i too.
Fix them in this patch.
Change-Id: I1e026434ce48e9e8d492a3aa772c3be6df0b1d37
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/425528
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pawel Wodkowski <pawelx.wodkowski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Use helper function raid_bdev_config_find_by_name() in destroy_raid_bdev
RPC.
Besides, unify two iterator variables in construct_raid_bdev RPC.
This is too small to add in a separate patch.
Change-Id: If0bbae8993af4e402a82299db378e89245b8966e
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424150
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
raid_bdev_config_destroy_check_raid_bdev_exists() and
raid_bdev_config_destroy() do almost same operation and can be
unified to raid_bdev_config_destroy().
Comment in spdk_rpc_destroy_raid_bdev() about raid_bdev_config_destroy()
are duplicated with the one on top of the raid_bdev_config_destroy().
Hence remove the former in this patch too.
Change-Id: I4a323bf24d2266e2da7f030c52771013d075eb31
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424149
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Initialization of bdev modules don't have fixed ordering.
Hence both cases should succeed to create configured raid bdev
for .INI config file.
1. create raid bdev and then create base bdevs of it.
2. before creating raid bdev, create base bdevs of it.
To do this, factor out adding base bdevs to raid bdev
to a helper function raid_bdev_add_base_devices() first
and then apply it to construct_raid_bdev RPC and parse .INI
config file.
Change-Id: I4389fd4e7bd41296dfa9210bbe8b60348ee5bc9d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423769
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change the behavior of construct_raid_bdev RPC to be consistent with
other bdev modules.
Create a config of raid bdev first. Then create a raid bdev based
on the config.
If both succeed, the config and the raid bdev are not removed even if
any failure occur later in construct_raid_bdev RPC. Otherwise, both
are removed and return failure.
During iteration of adding base bdevs in construct_raid_bdev RPC,
- skip any nonexistent bdev and move to the next base bdev.
- if adding any base bdev fails, move to the next bdev.
- if adding base bdevs don't fail but any base bdev doesn't exist,
the raid bdev is in the configuring state and return success.
- if adding base bdev fails, the raid bdev is in the configuring state
and return failure.
- if all adding base bdevs succeed, configure the raid bdev. If configuring
the raid bdev fails, move the raid bdev to the offline state and return
failure. If configuring the raid bdev succeed, return success.
check_and_remove_raid_bdev() becomes unused in raid_bdev_rpc.c but
is still necessary in UT. Hence move this function to UT.
In UT, finding a raid bdev config by name becomes necessary. Hence
factor out the iteration to a function and use the function in UT.
Change-Id: Ifa36967bdc987d97030e3a4e36684cb37b329d4e
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423622
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
When construct_raid_bdev RPC is callled, even if all adding base bdevs
to it fail, a raid bdev with no base bdev should exist and be in
the configuring state.
Extract raid_bdev_create() from raid_bdev_add_base_bdev() and put it
before starting iteration of raid_bdev_add_base_bdev().
This change cam be applied to .INI config file too.
Change-Id: Ia71aca0bbdb33049fe5bd9b8fd8163c99c032401
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424148
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
When check_and_remove_raid_bdev(raid_cfg) is called, raid_bdev
must be in configuring state. However, offline state will be
probable as well. Besides similar and more comprehensive state
check is done in raid_bdev_cleanup(). Hence remove this check.
Change-Id: I8526da51828f18a8393afbd3d81c0a52f2d33261
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423620
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
When the name of raid bdev is already used by any existing bdev,
spdk_bdev_register() will fail. Hence checking if bdev is duplicated
can be left with spdk_bdev_register().
Change-Id: I22f0c75b0e87c5bd71ece383d146ec61cfaf2627
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423617
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Other helper functions raid_bdev_free_base_bdev_resource() and
raid_bdev_cleanup() can be used in check_and_remove_raid_bdev().
Change-Id: I24ce02371f5bb29c3b6111da4475a9ad08e65c21
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422794
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
RAID parameter check operation of JSON RPC and config file are
duplicated now. This refactoring is one of small preparation to
extend RAID bdev to other RAID levels.
Change-Id: I88527bc9bd0b3a3392aba7d0008a53d518027bfa
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422797
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
In bdev_raid.c and bdev_raid_rpc.c, to hold a pointer to
raid_bdev_config, some have used raid_cfg and other have used
raid_bdev_config.
raid_bdev_config is the name of the struct and using the name of
the struct as a pointer to it may cause any confusion.
Change-Id: Ic87ff04d58ea46c30081aaae8d9cda5a53135be9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422922
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Locating spdk_bdev structure to the beginning of raid_bdev structure
will simplify the hierarchy and match other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I1bfbf773bc96a4f144e6bff772ade05bb42762e9
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420818
Reviewed-by: Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Use strdup for all strings allocated by JSON decoder and free them on
all paths.
Change-Id: Ia30d32c2fd6bd79f62588ca19bd3bb093d38a502
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/420325
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Use free() instead of realloc() to free allocated memory.
Currently realloc() is used to free memory unintentionally. Hence
the pointer is not nullified and it has caused double free.
realloc(g_spdk_raid_config.raid_bdev_config, 0)
is equivalent to free(g_spdk_raid_config.raid_bdev_config).
Use Shuhei's patch https://review.gerrithub.io/#/c/spdk/spdk/+/420224/
as a reference.
Fixes GitHub issue #372.
Change-Id: If3b761e3ac10844f734dab9b10d202db9ddc79c0
Signed-off-by: Chen Wang <chenx.wang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/419975
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Raid module:
============
- SPDK raid bdev module is a new bdev module which is
responsible for striping various NVMe devices and expose the raid bdev
to bdev layer which would enhance the performance and capacity.
- It can support theoretically 256 base devices (currently it is being
tested max upto 8 base devices)
- Multiple strip sizes like 32KB, 64KB, 128KB, 256KB, 512KB etc is
supported. Most of the current testing is focused on 64KB strip size.
- New RPC commands like "create raid bdev", "destroy raid bdev" and "get raid bdevs"
are introduced to configure raid bdev dynamically in a running
SPDK system.
- Currently raid bdev configuration parameters are persisted in the
current SPDK configuration file for across reboot support. DDF will be
introduced later.
High level testing done:
=======================
- Raid bdev is created with 8 base NVMe devices via configuration
file and is exposed to initiator via existing methods. Initiator is
able to see a single NVMe namespace with capacity equal to sum of the
minimum capacities of 8 devices. Initiator was able to run raw
read/write workload, file system workload etc (tested with XFS file
system workload).
- Multiple raid bdevs are also created and exposed to initiator and
tested with file system and other workloads for read/write IO.
- LVS / LVOL are created over raid bdev and exposed to initiator.
Testing was done for raw read/write workloads and XFS file system
workloads.
- RPC testing is done where on the running SPDK system raid bdevs
are created out of NVMe base devices. These raid bdevs (and LVOLs
over raid bdevs) are then exposed to initiator and IO workload was
tested for raw read/write and XFS file system workload.
- RPC testing is done for delete raid bdevs where all raid bdevs
are deleted in running SPDK system.
- RPC testing is done for get raid bdevs where existing list of
raid bdev names is printed (it can be all raid bdevs or only
online or only configuring or only offline).
- RPC testing is done where raid bdevs and underlying NVMe devices
relationship was returned in JSON RPC commands
Change-Id: I10ae1266f8f2cca3c106e4df8c1c0993ddf435d8
Signed-off-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/410484
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
