This reverts commit 6194cb2e15.
It's unclear whether we need to add a new API for the env layer
for upcoming work. Nothing currently uses it. When we have a clear
need, we can add this back in.
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Change-Id: I174276799d650a1365b37a737271a54a796cd455
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/3561
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Now that even DPDK 16.11 (LTS) reaches its end of life in
November 2018, we can surely drop support for DPDK
versions older than that.
The PCI code will go through a major refactor soon, so this
patch cleans it up first.
Since this is the very first SPDK patch that drops support
for older DPDK versions, it also introduces an #error
directive that'll directly fail the build if the used DPDK
lib is too old.
Change-Id: I9bae30c98826c75cc91cda498e47e46979a08ed1
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/433865
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
The underlying DPDK function we use reads an array
at the provided index without checking for any out
of bounds access. The array is RTE_MAX_LCORE elements
long, so always manually check against that to keep
our APIs safe.
This fixes potential crashes with lcore == SPDK_ENV_LCORE_ID_ANY
Change-Id: I3081b888275fbecba8ab95feb20d2074341e2fc7
Signed-off-by: Darek Stojaczyk <dariusz.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/425042
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Previously, the maximum core value was cached in a static variable, but
this isn't safe if multiple threads are calling at the same time.
Iterating over all core numbers is not very expensive, so just
recalculate the value for every call.
Change-Id: I4fab072f4a96ecc8801e1db293b3921a6f1534f9
Signed-off-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/399930
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Also use this function in iscsi/conn.c
Change-Id: I25f6da175eddb12c4ac2624d695c2c43c871d8e8
Signed-off-by: Ziye Yang <optimistyzy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/392713
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ied778fc41ddc5ff7563408eccafc0e0654287b19
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/363608
Reviewed-by: Daniel Verkamp <daniel.verkamp@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
