The bdevio tests will now work on RAID volumes, so enable
RAID testing there too.
It is probably safe now to just build RAID by default, and
not require --with-raid - but let's do some more testing
with vhost and NVMe-oF against it first before we do so.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I15697f035cb688574a7ecb8be24d0c84fc622d83
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423408
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Change the behavior of construct_raid_bdev RPC to be consistent with
other bdev modules.
Create a config of raid bdev first. Then create a raid bdev based
on the config.
If both succeed, the config and the raid bdev are not removed even if
any failure occur later in construct_raid_bdev RPC. Otherwise, both
are removed and return failure.
During iteration of adding base bdevs in construct_raid_bdev RPC,
- skip any nonexistent bdev and move to the next base bdev.
- if adding any base bdev fails, move to the next bdev.
- if adding base bdevs don't fail but any base bdev doesn't exist,
the raid bdev is in the configuring state and return success.
- if adding base bdev fails, the raid bdev is in the configuring state
and return failure.
- if all adding base bdevs succeed, configure the raid bdev. If configuring
the raid bdev fails, move the raid bdev to the offline state and return
failure. If configuring the raid bdev succeed, return success.
check_and_remove_raid_bdev() becomes unused in raid_bdev_rpc.c but
is still necessary in UT. Hence move this function to UT.
In UT, finding a raid bdev config by name becomes necessary. Hence
factor out the iteration to a function and use the function in UT.
Change-Id: Ifa36967bdc987d97030e3a4e36684cb37b329d4e
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423622
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
When construct_raid_bdev RPC is callled, even if all adding base bdevs
to it fail, a raid bdev with no base bdev should exist and be in
the configuring state.
Extract raid_bdev_create() from raid_bdev_add_base_bdev() and put it
before starting iteration of raid_bdev_add_base_bdev().
This change cam be applied to .INI config file too.
Change-Id: Ia71aca0bbdb33049fe5bd9b8fd8163c99c032401
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424148
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Cleverly, UT for raid bdev sets number of base bdevs by using
the random number generator.
When the random number generator outputs 1, test code especially
for single base bdev case failed.
When removing raid_bdev_send_passthru from library, the corresponding
test code was not removed.
This patch removes the test code.
Change-Id: I23be88358fe364bc757979a26398b80339e19910
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424159
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Currently in the function nvme_ctrlr_start() the initialization
process is executed as a whole, in the case there are many controllers
in one system, which means other controllers must call the function
one by one. While here, we add several states here, which can
help refactoring the initialization process.
Change-Id: I209cf964bbf6e151823a7ecdc6a3f6e6e69df297
Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424157
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
There is a race condition with the following sequence:
spdk_bdev_open()
spdk_bdev_unregister() <-- starts deferred message
spdk_bdev_close()
deferred message runs, crashes
Change-Id: I81fbced0849949cfb2dae5a7cc6f60c9685a8885
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424739
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Latest scan-build finds a legitimate issue here - although
it's not clear why it was only found when testing against
a seemingly unrelated patch...
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ic981f6f403c638b0b2d454c0be9f7fbe145171d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424887
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
spdk_bdev_close() must be called on the same thread as
spdk_bdev_open(). Further, the remove callback on the
descriptor will also be run on the same thread as
spdk_bdev_open().
Change-Id: I949d6dd67de1e63d39f06944d473e4aa7134111b
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424738
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: GangCao <gang.cao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ib5e977b0bad15af7a2a71000c1fc4861b5b5b0af
Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424465
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This was added a long time back for tracking an rte_mbuf
whose buffer was a different rte_mbuf - all related to
a userspace TCP stack that is no longer in development.
The concept isn't useful now, so remove it to reduce
the complexity of the tracing code.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I310e492eba7f55df242bb29d82fb19f6daee1f51
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424565
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This issue is related to Clang assuming that global variables can be
modified from their original value.
Change-Id: I576a4af7e379a951a9f971850391c7e17145df87
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424717
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This is a string name used for debugging only.
Change-Id: I9827f0e6c83be7bc13951c7b5f0951ce6c2a1ece
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424127
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
This is in response to a scan-build error introduced with clang 6.0
Change-Id: Iee5a2538ec9a6575e5b3087bf43b8ded5d099fe7
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424576
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
The type of malloc used in some of the NVMe functions changed and has
re-introduced some scan-build failures.
Change-Id: I2055260c256429a1a2c6404a6d87605807d4170e
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424573
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
This is a variant of spdk_trace_record which takes a tsc
parameter. This allows callers who already have the
current tsc to pass it in as a parameter, saving an extra
rdtsc in the trace library.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I074f4f9fdbe649ad6717f932982a574bc61f2997
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424277
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This reduces overhead of spdk_trace_record calls when
tracing is not enabled.
While here, remove a couple of unit test stubs for
spdk_trace_record that weren't needed anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2cbb91e7d3311d95444d663f466d846676d2dcce
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424276
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This makes it easier to debug failures.
Change-Id: Ic1099ec08308d5e50dd9fe03798dc0873579f2cc
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423961
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
I had to make small modifications to one test in the dev_ut.c file to
prevent a memory leak error. However, changing the index in this test
from -1 to 0 has no effect on the coverage.
Change-Id: Ia8a475aaa41118f072a5d9006bab9d9c84b4a10a
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424126
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
thread_ut.c: ensure that the channel context is non-null
util: get rid of a couple of uninitialized value errors.
Change-Id: Idbaad4efea14acd7ae8f98b60aa514e45213a134
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424124
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Set the bdev->optimal_io_boundary to the strip size, and
set split_on_optimal_io_boundary = true. This will ensure
that all I/O submitted to the raid module do not cross
a strip boundary, meaning it does not need to be split
across multiple member disks.
This is a step towards removing the iovcnt == 1
limitation. Further improvements and simplifications
will be made in future patches before removing this
restriction.
Unit tests need to be adjusted here to not span
boundaries either.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I08943805def673288f552a1b7662a4fbe16f25eb
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423323
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Splitting a 1TB unmap into individual 64KB unmap commands
(for a RAID volume with 64KB strip size) would be awful -
the RAID module can be much smarter about this.
So back out the changes for splitting I/O without payload.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I24fe6d911f4e3c9db4b2cb5d66c7236a5596e0d9
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424103
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Valgrind found this on my system. The unit test itself
was passing correctly (we wrote uninitialized data and then
successfully read back the same uninitialized data) - but
Valgrind doesn't like code that makes any decisions based
on reading uninitialized memory.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: I762f5dd0cb368328bd5eba9cecf7db404b457fad
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424109
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
One was an API issue, another was a dereference of a null pointer that
resulted from a possible call to a stubbed function in the unittest
common code, and the last was an erroneous use-after-free due to
scan-build apparently not understanding TAILQ_REMOVE.
Change-Id: I9111817e9e990ff6e388351c08f34c2e945df62d
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423959
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Fixes a use after free error in bdev/bdev_ut
Fixes an uninitialized argument value error in mt/bdev/bdev_ut
Adds extra checks in the spdk_bdev_part_construct code
Fixes a dereference of null pointer error in bdev/vbdev_lvol_ut
Change-Id: I1eaa6ebfec0a36a0d910504c70b16ccc651de22a
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423923
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This removes assumptions about hte lifecycle of these variables relative
to the parent bdev and allows us to avoid ambiguity about who
is responsible for freeing these buffers.
Change-Id: Ia996653562d532fa1501faf21d3fdff85033ab33
Signed-off-by: Seth Howell <seth.howell@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/424105
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
When a raid bdev is constructed by JSON-RPC construct_raid_bdev,
information about config and slot can be passed to
raid_bdev_add_base_device() and raid_bdev_can_claim() doesn't have
to be called.
Hence extract raid_bdev_can_claim_bdev() from raid_bdev_add_base_device()
and put it to raid_bdev_examine().
Change-Id: I92e02bf3661cb97b691246f32198ba946810d96c
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423618
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_config is suffciently descriptive as name and so
"name" can be used as the name of the base bdev.
Other structs have used "name" as the name of bdev.
Change-Id: I090ef541a84fd14d9ec3bfebbdc96ae649709551
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423614
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
This patch adds UT for IOV split operation.
Next patch will refactor split of vectored read/write a little.
Change-Id: I77fbaf042fd894b23ad5ae846f54c28498e8e62b
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422768
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
For secure iSCSI targets, dynamic reconfiguration of CHAP secrets is
must to have.
Currently CHAP secrets are loaded for every CHAP authentication
operation. The current implementation will not work correctly
when CHAP secrets in the file are changed dynamically.
If SPDK loads CHAP secrets from the file only at boot and they can be
configured by RPCs, user can change CHAP secrets safely during run time.
Even if there are any users who expect dynamic reconfiguration of
CHAP secrets based on the current implementation, if we provide
this better alternative based on RPCs, they will be able to continue to
satisfy their requirement.
This patch change the current implementation so that SPDK loads
CHAP secrets from the file once at boot and uses them in memory
hereafter.
Besides, use fixed size buffers to hold CHAP secrets.
Previously dynamically allocated buffers by strdup() had been used,
but it required many nomem checks and should be avoided.
Other iSCSI targets/initiators have used fixed size buffers and SPDK
follows others.
Set the size of buffers for both user names and secrets to 256 (the
last byte is for NULL termination). 256 is sufficiently large
compared with others.
CHANGELOG will be updated in the separate patch because new RPCs will
be added instead.
Change-Id: I499e792817c2ed01c3d970bbd3d34a6b1fccf65b
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/421463
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
- Move most of the target opts from nvmf_tgt to nvmf_transport.
- Update transport create functions to pass in transport opts.
- When transport opts are NULL in transport create function, use
target opts. (for backward compatiblity)
- Part 1 of 2 patches. Part 2 (to follow after part 1 accepted)
will allow independent creation of transport with specific opts
while maintaining backward compatibility with current apps and
rpc configuration that still use the add listener method to
create a transport.
Change-Id: I0e27447c4a98e0b6a6c590541404b4e4be879b47
Signed-off-by: John Barnard <john.barnard@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423329
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
These tests don't currently require the env mockup,
but they will in a future patch.
Change-Id: Ibf311f198a291f825a83e7b89708cd2442f35f7a
Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423183
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
According to the purpose of the lists, state_link and global_link
will be enough to understand the purpose well.
Besides, in raid_bdev_remove_base_bdev(), if any entry is not removed
during iteration, TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE() is not necessary. Hence
change TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE to TAILQ_FOREACH for this case.
Change-Id: I3022c58faf96721df9241e07dbb5a06d7de89e70
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423056
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
struct raid_bdev has a pointer raid_bdev_config to its configuration,
but raid_bdev is duplicated between raid_bdev and raid_bdev_config
and just config may be enough as a name.
Change-Id: I77f6a69b913cd540c22f05803c486a4caf103f24
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422923
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
base_bdevs_io_channel is good but base_channel may be enough and
fit other bdev modules.
Change-Id: I67a1d224f1ef4ca1fc048b4325333f2552a37150
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422921
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
raid_base_bdev_info is sufficiently descriptive as name and so
names of member variables in raid_base_bdev_info can be simplified.
Change-Id: I759a758ec0f3ac21de767ad379a902f1b04cc66d
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422919
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kunal Sablok <kunal.sablok@intel.com>
A number of modules (RAID, logical volumes) have logical
"stripes" that require splitting an I/O into several
child I/O. For example, on a RAID-0 with 128KB strip size,
an I/O that spans a 128KB boundary will require sending
one I/O for the portion that comes before the boundary to
one member disk, and another I/O for the portion that comes
after the boundary to another member disk. Logical volumes
are similar - data is allocated in clusters, so an I/O that
spans a cluster boundary may need to be split since the
clusters may not be contiguous on disk.
Putting the splitting logic in the common bdev layer ensures
bdev module authors don't have to always do this themselves.
This is especially helpful for cases like splitting an I/O
described by many iovs - we can simplify this a lot by
handling it in the common bdev layer.
Note that currently we will only submit one child I/O
at a time. This could be improved later to submit multiple
child I/O in parallel, but the complexity in the iov splitting
code also increases a lot.
Note: Some Intel NVMe SSDs have a similar characteristic.
We will not use this bdev stripe feature for NVMe though -
we want to primarily use the splitting functionality inside
of the NVMe driver itself to ensure it remains fully
functional. Many SPDK users use the NVMe driver without
the bdev layer.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ife804ecc56f6b2b55345a0d0ae9fda9e68632b3b
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423024
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Luse <paul.e.luse@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
This patch series will refactor/improve CHAP authentication and consolidate
it into iscsi_subsystem.c.
To get better reviews, this patch just moves spdk_iscsi_chap_get_authinfo()
from iscsi.c to iscsi_subsystem.c.
Change-Id: I953f5c851bfe67dc02f6f82966132b4216e79228
Signed-off-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/422764
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
A new unit test in an upcoming patch will initialize the bdev
layer separately, so modify the existing tests now so that
they properly cleanup the bdev layer after the unit test
that initialized it is complete.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie00837a90391ca4d0dd578e978fb26483fe5c0cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/423023
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
New function was added in bdev layer to allow
handling spdk_bdev_io buffer exhaustion.
This patch adds that functionality to nvmf bdev.
Change-Id: I5b915abcccec930c3eb684d95bc64482e7887af5
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/418937
Chandler-Test-Pool: SPDK Automated Test System <sys_sgsw@intel.com>
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Szwed <maciej.szwed@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
