There is io error when running NVMe over TCP fio test with uring
socket. It's easy to reproduce the bug with the following
configuration:
target 1 core, 16NVMe SSD, 2 initiators each connects to 8 NVMe
namespaces, each runs fio with numjobs=3.
For if in each round, we inset the sock to the head of the
pending_recv list, and then get max_events socks from head of the
list to process, there is possibility that some socks are always
not processed.
Although there was a strategy to cycle the pending_recv list to make
sure we poll things not in the same order. Such as a list: A B C D E F,
if max_events is 3, then this strategy makes the list is rearranged to
D E F A B C. But it will make this strategy not effective if using
TAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&group->pending_recv, sock...).
Using TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&group->pending_recv, sock...) can fix it.
Signed-off-by: Richael Zhuang <richael.zhuang@arm.com>
Change-Id: I8429b8eee29a9f9f820ad291d1b65ce2c2be22ea
Reviewed-on: https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/11154
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Marchuk <alexeymar@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
Community-CI: Broadcom CI <spdk-ci.pdl@broadcom.com>
Community-CI: Mellanox Build Bot
f36c033c71