This at least allows the caller to know there was a
problem, and that the messages wasn't actually sent.
SPDK by default creates huge rings so this problem
should never occur, but out-of-tree use cases may
send messages much more often and require at least
a notification when it fails.
While here, change the thread check to an assert.
There's no need to work around someone calling
this function with a null thread parameter.
Fixes issue #811.
Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ie6d432d616be45c7a4232aff1548cef198702bc0
Reviewed-on: https://review.gerrithub.io/c/spdk/spdk/+/472438
Tested-by: SPDK CI Jenkins <sys_sgci@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Shuhei Matsumoto <shuhei.matsumoto.xt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Zawadzki <tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com>
4036f95bf8