the data sheets leads me to believe these will just work. Those parts
with the various media readers on them may not have the required
FreeBSD drivers that will attach to the subdevices that will be seen
on some of these parts.
PCI 1515, 1530, 1620, 4520, 6411, 6420, 7410, 7510, 7610
Prompted by: Havard Eidnes
These are from the datasheets downloaded from TI's web site.
They describe the PCI[67]x[12]1 and PCI[67]x20 parts, with and without
the smartcard enabled.
o O2Micro OZ711e1 is now recognized (note: I don't have one, and the current
owner of the Dell laptop is reporting problems).
o minor nits wrt copyright date.
CB710, CB720, CB1211, CB1225, CB1410 and CB1420
These are likely licensed designed from TI, and the Linux PCMCIA code
treats them as TI chips.
Add comment, but no ID for the 711E1 from O2Micro.
o Rename the insanely long PCIC bridge ids.
o Add my copyright to pccbb.c
o Add support for the TI-1510, TI-1520 and TI-4510 series of upcoming
bridges.
o Init MFUNC if it is zero and the TI part has a MFUNC register
at offset 0x8c (1030, 1130 and 1131 don't have anything there, the
1250,1251,1251B and 1450 have a different thing there. The rest
have it. TI is likely to only do MFUNC from now on. The IRQMUX
in the 1250 series of chips needs no tweaks.
o Adjust to new exca interface.
o Add comments about TI chips that I learned in talking to an
engineer at TI.
o Add register definitions for MFUNC.
o Create CB_TI125X chipset type.
off chip that was on one prototype board. However, this appears to be
a design that many chipsets are compatible with its PPEC register set
(eg the Omega 82c094). Through the kindness of the Red Hat developer
David Woodhouse, I now have this datasheet.
I may take the advise of one of the bsd-nomads (whose name
unfortunately escapes me at the moment) and split out all these 16-bit
I/O mapped PCI devices into a separate driver...
that it has one BAR that's mapped to 0x3e0 and is I/O only. It does
not conform to the Yenta spec, like other PCI PCMICA bridges do (eg
the TI 1031, which is mostly a 1131 w/o 32bit card support). It
appears that this chip may also need to not route PCI interrupts
as well.
This chip is used in the NEC Versa 2430CD (and it appears that
sometimes it works, while other times it doesn't) and others in the
2400 series. While the NEC website claims Cardbus support, I can't figure
out how that is possible.
Submitted by: Ben Timby <ben@webexc.com>
Cirrus Logic PD6834
O2micro OZ6836
O2micro OZ6912/6972
O2micro OZ6922
O2micro OZ6933
TI1260 Note: These two aren't on TI's site, but are in
TI1260B http://www.yourvote.com/pci/vendors.txt
Plus comments for other chips found in Windows INF files, and also
referenced in various spots on the net:
* Intel 82092AA 0x12218086 16bit
* smc/Databook DB87144 0x310610b3
* SMC/databook smc34c90 0xb10610b3
* Omega/Trident 82c094 0x00940123?
* Omega/Trident 82c194 0x01941023
* Omega/Trident 82c722 0x07221023?
* Opti 82c814 0xc8141045
* Opti 82c824 0xc8241045
* NEC uPD66369 0x003e1033
This is the first part of a two-part update to NEWCARD. Changes in this
commit are non-functional, and includes the following:
* indentation and other changes to meet style(9).
* other minor style consistancy changes
* addition of comments
* renaming of device_t variables to be consistant across all of NEWCARD.
(note that not all style violations are fixed in this commit -- those that
aren't will be clobbered by the next commit.)
by both OLDCARD and NEWCARD.
# didn't make the tables the same because oldcard supports more devices than
# newcard and newcard's 16-bit stuff needs some work.