I was not sure whether the fs_id fields should be printed in the clear
in case of sniffing over a network login etc. It might be an idea
to have somebody with spare time go through and find any other missing
fields that should be reported.
Definate 2.2.x/2.1.x candidate since it breaks the build.
functions if DDB is available. The remaining occurences are usually
only inlined and thus not available in DDB.
I'm sure Bruce will have 23 additions to these 30 lines of code, but
at least it's a starting point. ;-)
change typematic rate, or the X server (XFree86 or Accelerated X)
starts up.
So far, there have been two independent reports from Dell Latitude XPi
notebook/laptop owners. The Latitude seems to be the only system which
suffers from this problem. (I don't know the problem is with the
entire Latitude line or with only some Latitude models) No problem
report has been heard about other systems (I certainly cannot
reproduce the problem in my -current and 2.2 systems).
In 3.0-CURRENT, 2.2-RELEASE and 2.2-GAMMA-970310, when programming the
keyboard LED/repeat-rate, `set_keyboard()' in `syscons' tells the
keyboard controller not to generate keyboard interrupt (IRQ1) and then
enable tty interrupts, expecting the keyboard interrupt doesn't occur.
It appears that somehow Latitude's keyboard controller still generates
the keyboard interrupt thereafter, and `set_keyboard()' doesn't see
the return code from the keyboard because it is consumed by the
keyboard interrupt handler.
The patch entirely disables tty interrupts while setting LED and
typematic rate in `set_keyboard()', making the routine behave more
like the previous versions of `syscons' (versions in 2.1.X and
2.2-ALPHA, -BETA, and some -GAMMAs). The reporter said this patch
eliminated the problem.
(I also found another typo/bug, but the reporter and I found that it
wasn't the cause of the problem...)
This should go into RELENG_2_2.
non-standard and not used. "port auto" is equal to "port?" or missing "port"
keyword now. "port none" is really probe routine task (return -1 for
no ports).
address outside of the process's address space.
Now it matches its man page :-). Closes PR# 2682.
Discussed with: bde
Submitted by: Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@americantv.com>
The sa_mask field specified in act is not allowed to block SIGKILL or
SIGSTOP. Any attempt to do so will be silently ignored.
Now where did I leave that pointy hat...
