"the device doesn't support a dump routine"
Only print "dump succeeded" when 0 is returned, instead of when an unexpected
error number is returned, print that error number.
Reviewed by: Eivind
The linux syscalls translate the arguments first before invoking the
FreeBSD native syscalls.
PR: kern/9591
Originator: John Plevyak <jplevyak@inktomi.com>
Savings Time on cron(8). If we ever introduce some work-around code for
handling jobs scheduled for a time that "doesn't happen" due to DST,
the section should be renamed to IMPLEMENTATION NOTES.
PR: 10947
Reported by: Scott Drassinower <scottd@cloud9.net>
Submitted by: Seth Bromberger <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org>
Reviewed by: mpp
representation by generating the same format as tar-1.13 (use a single
space as the terminator for 7-digit octal numbers). This is POSIX.1
conformant (2-byte terminators are just a bug or historical wart in
old versions of gnu tar). All devices created by `MAKEDEV all' except
rsa0.ctl can now be handled by tar(1).
a module. Also modified the code to work on FreeBSD/alpha and added
device vr0 to the alpha GENERIC config.
While I was in the neighborhood, I noticed that I was still using
#define NFPX 1 in all of the Makefiles that I'd copied from the fxp
module. I don't really use #define Nfoo X so it didn't matter, but
I decided to customize this correctly anyway.
respectively logging and dropping ICMP REDIRECT packets.
Note that there is no rate limiting on the log messages, so log_redirect
should be used with caution (preferrably only for debugging purposes).
as PCI->HOST bridges on my (440BX) box.
My change is to remove the test at the beginning entirely, letting the
switch on the device ID happen first. If the device ID is unknown, then
(in the default case) check for the generic PCIS_BRIDGE_HOST tag. This
should allow wierd cases (eg: wpaul's IMS VL bridge) to work by using the
id override. This strategy is more in line with the other PCI match
methods we use elsewhere,
I only have a limited testbed, but having my USB etc devices detected as
PCI->HOST bridges doesn't look good.
1) Safty change from casper dik was added to OpenBSD's sources since I
grabbed them. milltert@openbsd.org
2) Split up strlcpy to improve efficiency of the common case.
milltert@openbsd.org
3) Cleanup of cross references for man page. {alex,aaron}@openbsd.org
Pointed out by: deraadt@openbsd.org
Now that behaviors are stored in the vm_map_entry rather than
the vm_object, it's no longer necessary to instantiate a vm_object
just to hold the behavior.
Reviewed by: dillon
correctly. It has the following code:
if (class != PCIC_BRIDGE || subclass != PCIS_BRIDGE_HOST)
return NULL;
My 486 has an Integrated Micro Solutions PCI bridge which identifies
itself as subclass PCIS_BRIDGE_OTHER, not PCIS_BRIDGE_HOST. Consequently,
it gets ignored. In my opinion, the correct test should be:
if ((class != PCIC_BRIDGE) && (subclass != PCIS_BRIDGE_HOST))
return NULL;
That way the test still succeeds because the chip's class is PCIC_BRIDGE.
Clearly it's not reasonable to expect all host to PCI bridges to always
have a subclass of PCIS_BRIDGE_HOST since I've got one that doesn't.
This way the sanity test should remain relatively sane while still allowing
some oddball yet correct hardware to work. If somebody has a better way
to do it, go ahead and tweak the test, but be aware that
class == PCIC_BRIDGE and subclass == PCIS_BRIDGE_OTHER is a valid case.
While I was here, I also added an explicit ID string for the IMS chipset.
I also dealt with a minor style nit: it's bad karma not to have a default
case for your switch statements, but the one in this routine doesn't have
one. The default string of "Host to PCI bridge" is now assigned in a
default case of the switch statement instead of initializing "s" with the
string before the switch and then not having any default case.
Isn't really that useful.
chip0: <PCI to Other bridge (vendor=10e0 device=8849)> at device 0.0 on pci0
is more in keeping with the spirit of the rest of the code.
Previous behavior with regard to truely unknown bridges unchanged.
"<Anti-Bill> Tell you what: you have commit privs now. You do it."
