rman_resource_resournce_bound wrt end parameter. The end parameter
here was the same as the start. However, it should be start + count -
1, so make it that instead.
fedisableexcept(), and fegetexcept(). These two sets of routines
provide the same functionality. I implemented the former as an
undocumented internal interface to make the regression test easier to
write. However, fe(enable|disable|get)except() is already part of
glibc, and I would like to avoid gratuitous differences. The only
major flaw in the glibc API is that there's no good way to report
errors on processors that don't support all the unmasked exceptions.
it to get better hashing in vfs_hash.
In case of an insert collision in vfs_hash_insert(), put the loosing vnode
on a special list so that vfs_hash_remove() can just assume that it is on
a list.
Drop the VI_HASHED flag.
where having this disabled was actually hurting us, since so many
BIOSes include legacy USB emulation that takes control of all usb
ports and only the ehci driver knows how to disable it.
is the highest acceptable value for the ending of the resource being
allocated. One could also believe that it is the highest starting
value of the resource. The code definitely expects the former, but I
could find no documentation of this apart from TFSC.
instead of failing.
When looking for a region to allocate, we used to check to see if the
start address was < end. In the case where A..B is allocated already,
and one wants to allocate A..C (B < C), then this test would
improperly fail (which means we'd examine that region as a possible
one), and we'd return the region B+1..C+(B-A+1) rather than NULL.
Since C+(B-A+1) is necessarily larger than C (end argument), this is
incorrect behavior for rman_reserve_resource_bound().
The fix is to exclude those regions where r->r_start + count - 1 > end
rather than r->r_start > end. This bug has been in this code for a
very long time. I believe that all other tests against end are
correctly done.
This is why sio0 generated a message about interrupts not being
enabled properly for the device. When fdc had a bug that allocated
from 0x3f7 to 0x3fb, sio0 was then given 0x3fc-0x404 rather than the
0x3f8-0x3ff that it wanted. Now when fdc has the same bug, sio0 fails
to allocate its ports, which is the proper behavior. Since the probe
failed, we never saw the messed up resources reported.
I suspect that there are other places in the tree that have weird
looping or other odd work arounds to try to cope with the observed
weirdness this bug can introduce. These workarounds should be located
and eliminated.
Minor debug write fix to match the above test done as well.
'nice' by: mdodd
Sponsored by: timing solutions (http://www.timing.com/)
I think all we really need is -fno-sse2.
I really don't like cluttering up the compiler invocation,
but this bigger hammer will fix reported problems for now.
to mistakes from day 1, it has always had semantics inconsistent with
SVR4 and its successors. In particular, given argument M:
- On Solaris and FreeBSD/{alpha,sparc64}, it clobbers the old flags
and *sets* the new flag word to M. (NetBSD, too?)
- On FreeBSD/{amd64,i386}, it *clears* the flags that are specified in M
and leaves the remaining flags unchanged (modulo a small bug on amd64.)
- On FreeBSD/ia64, it is not implemented.
There is no way to fix fpsetsticky() to DTRT for both old FreeBSD apps
and apps ported from other operating systems, so the best approach
seems to be to kill the function and fix any apps that break. I
couldn't find any ports that use it, and any such ports would already
be broken on FreeBSD/ia64 and Linux anyway.
By the way, the routine has always been undocumented in FreeBSD,
except for an MLINK to a manpage that doesn't describe it. This
manpage has stated since 5.3-RELEASE that the functions it describes
are deprecated, so that must mean that functions that it is *supposed*
to describe but doesn't are even *more* deprecated. ;-)
Note that fpresetsticky() has been retained on FreeBSD/i386. As far
as I can tell, no other operating systems or ports of FreeBSD
implement it, so there's nothing for it to be inconsistent with.
PR: 75862
Suggested by: bde
