And release IDT vector before releasing ISR resources on interrupt
teardown path. We still have some work to do on the interrupt tearing
down path.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6519
Though it is highly unlikely this function would fail w/ BUS_DMA_WAITOK,
we had better to check its return value; better safe then sorry here.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6518
And
- Move message and event flags to vmbus_softc per-cpu data.
- Get rid of hv_setup_arg, which serves no purpose now.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6502
It does not belong to the vmbus.
While I'm here rework the Hypercall setup, e.g. use busdma(9)
and avoid bit fields.
Discussed with: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6445
Use vmbus softc to save vmbus per-cpu data. More stuffs will be moved
into vmbus softc.
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D6403
Currently, Application Processors (non-boot CPUs) are started by
MD code at SI_SUB_CPU, but they are kept waiting in a "pen" until
SI_SUB_SMP at which point they are released to run kernel threads.
SI_SUB_SMP is one of the last SYSINIT levels, so APs don't enter
the scheduler and start running threads until fairly late in the
boot.
This change moves SI_SUB_SMP up to just before software interrupt
threads are created allowing the APs to start executing kernel
threads much sooner (before any devices are probed). This allows
several initialization routines that need to perform initialization
on all CPUs to now perform that initialization in one step rather
than having to defer the AP initialization to a second SYSINIT run
at SI_SUB_SMP. It also permits all CPUs to be available for
handling interrupts before any devices are probed.
This last feature fixes a problem on with interrupt vector exhaustion.
Specifically, in the old model all device interrupts were routed
onto the boot CPU during boot. Later after the APs were released at
SI_SUB_SMP, interrupts were redistributed across all CPUs.
However, several drivers for multiqueue hardware allocate N interrupts
per CPU in the system. In a system with many CPUs, just a few drivers
doing this could exhaust the available pool of interrupt vectors on
the boot CPU as each driver was allocating N * mp_ncpu vectors on the
boot CPU. Now, drivers will allocate interrupts on their desired CPUs
during boot meaning that only N interrupts are allocated from the boot
CPU instead of N * mp_ncpu.
Some other bits of code can also be simplified as smp_started is
now true much earlier and will now always be true for these bits of
code. This removes the need to treat the single-CPU boot environment
as a special case.
As a transition aid, the new behavior is available under a new kernel
option (EARLY_AP_STARTUP). This will allow the option to be turned off
if need be during initial testing. I plan to enable this on x86 by
default in a followup commit in the next few days and to have all
platforms moved over before 11.0. Once the transition is complete,
the option will be removed along with the !EARLY_AP_STARTUP code.
These changes have only been tested on x86. Other platform maintainers
are encouraged to port their architectures over as well. The main
things to check for are any uses of smp_started in MD code that can be
simplified and SI_SUB_SMP SYSINITs in MD code that can be removed in
the EARLY_AP_STARTUP case (e.g. the interrupt shuffling).
PR: kern/199321
Reviewed by: markj, gnn, kib
Sponsored by: Netflix
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: sephe, Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5957
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: jhb, kib, sephe
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5910
Suggested by: jhb
Reviewed by: Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>, Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5850
Since atomic_thread_fence_seq_cst() will become compiler fence on UP kernel.
Reviewed by: kib, Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5852
Using one taskqueue does not work, since the EOM MSR must be written
on the msg's owner CPU.
Noticed by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Discussed with: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>, Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>, sephe
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5215
This gets rid of the per-cpu SWIs.
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>, sephe
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5215
Using the same message slot as the other types of the messages has
the side effect that the event timer message could be deferred to
the swi threads to run (lacking of trapframe and the original code
didn't even handle that, so the event timer was actually broken).
As of this commit we use an independent message slot for event timer,
so that we could handle all of event timer messages in the interrupt
handler directly. Note, the message slot for event timer is still
bind to the same interrupt vector as the other types of messages.
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: sephe
Discussed with: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>, Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5696
Submitted by: Ju Sun <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>, sephe
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5651
sfence only makes sure about the store-store order, which is not
sufficient here. Use atomic_thread_fence_seq_cst() as suggested
jhb and kib (a locked op in the nutshell, which should have the
Reviewed by: jhb, kib, Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5436
And convert rndis non-hot path spinlock to mutex.
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: adrian, sephe
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5081
HyperV code was ported from Linux. There is an implementation of
work queue called hv_work_queue. In FreeBSD, taskqueue could be
used for the same purpose. Convert all the consumer of hv_work_queue
to use taskqueue, and remove work queue implementation.
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: adrian, Hongjiang Zhang <honzhan microsoft com>
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
MFC after: 1 week
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4963
- Use taskqueue instead of swi for event handling.
- Scan the interrupt flags in filter
- Disable ringbuffer interrupt mask in filter to ensure no unnecessary
interrupts.
Submitted by: Jun Su <junsu microsoft com>
Reviewed by: adrian, sephe, Dexuan <decui microsoft com>
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
MFC after: 2 weeks
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4920
Submitted by: Howard Su <howard0su gmail com>
Reviewed by: royger, Dexuan Cui <decui microsoft com>, adrian
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4693
Submitted by: Howard Su <howard0su@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: delphij, royger, adrian
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4676
This is first step to move the generic part of HV code into kernel instead
of module, so that it is possible to use hypercall to implement some other
paravirtualization code in the kernel.
Submitted by: Howard Su <howard0su@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: royger, delphij, adrian
Approved by: adrian (mentor)
Sponsored by: Microsoft OSTC
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D3072
