Commit Graph

157 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alexander Leidinger
de5b19526b Add some FEATURE macros for various features (AUDIT/CAM/IPC/KTR/MAC/NFS/NTP/
PMC/SYSV/...).

No FreeBSD version bump, the userland application to query the features will
be committed last and can serve as an indication of the availablility if
needed.

Sponsored by:   Google Summer of Code 2010
Submitted by:   kibab
Reviewed by:    arch@ (parts by rwatson, trasz, jhb)
X-MFC after:    to be determined in last commit with code from this project
2011-02-25 10:11:01 +00:00
John Baldwin
58ccf5b41c Remove unneeded includes of <sys/linker_set.h>. Other headers that use
it internally contain nested includes.

Reviewed by:	bde
2011-01-11 13:59:06 +00:00
John Baldwin
3634d5b241 Add dedicated routines to toggle lockmgr flags such as LK_NOSHARE and
LK_CANRECURSE after a lock is created.  Use them to implement macros that
otherwise manipulated the flags directly.  Assert that the associated
lockmgr lock is exclusively locked by the current thread when manipulating
these flags to ensure the flag updates are safe.  This last change required
some minor shuffling in a few filesystems to exclusively lock a brand new
vnode slightly earlier.

Reviewed by:	kib
MFC after:	3 days
2010-08-20 19:46:50 +00:00
Attilio Rao
aab9c8c28d Fix typos. 2010-01-07 01:24:09 +00:00
Attilio Rao
c636ba831a Tweak comments. 2010-01-07 01:19:01 +00:00
Attilio Rao
9dbf7a62f4 Exclusive waiters sleeping with LK_SLEEPFAIL on and using interruptible
sleeps/timeout may have left spourious lk_exslpfail counts on, so clean
it up even when accessing a shared queue acquisition, giving to
lk_exslpfail the value of 'upper limit'.
In the worst case scenario, infact (mixed
interruptible sleep / LK_SLEEPFAIL waiters) what may happen is that both
queues are awaken even if that's not necessary, but still no harm.

Reported by:	Lucius Windschuh <lwindschuh at googlemail dot com>
Reviewed by:	kib
Tested by:	pho, Lucius Windschuh <lwindschuh at googlemail dot com>
2010-01-07 00:47:50 +00:00
Attilio Rao
2028867def In current code, threads performing an interruptible sleep (on both
sxlock, via the sx_{s, x}lock_sig() interface, or plain lockmgr), will
leave the waiters flag on forcing the owner to do a wakeup even when if
the waiter queue is empty.
That operation may lead to a deadlock in the case of doing a fake wakeup
on the "preferred" (based on the wakeup algorithm) queue while the other
queue has real waiters on it, because nobody is going to wakeup the 2nd
queue waiters and they will sleep indefinitively.

A similar bug, is present, for lockmgr in the case the waiters are
sleeping with LK_SLEEPFAIL on.  In this case, even if the waiters queue
is not empty, the waiters won't progress after being awake but they will
just fail, still not taking care of the 2nd queue waiters (as instead the
lock owned doing the wakeup would expect).

In order to fix this bug in a cheap way (without adding too much locking
and complicating too much the semantic) add a sleepqueue interface which
does report the actual number of waiters on a specified queue of a
waitchannel (sleepq_sleepcnt()) and use it in order to determine if the
exclusive waiters (or shared waiters) are actually present on the lockmgr
(or sx) before to give them precedence in the wakeup algorithm.
This fix alone, however doesn't solve the LK_SLEEPFAIL bug. In order to
cope with it, add the tracking of how many exclusive LK_SLEEPFAIL waiters
a lockmgr has and if all the waiters on the exclusive waiters queue are
LK_SLEEPFAIL just wake both queues.

The sleepq_sleepcnt() introduction and ABI breakage require
__FreeBSD_version bumping.

Reported by:	avg, kib, pho
Reviewed by:	kib
Tested by:	pho
2009-12-12 21:31:07 +00:00
Attilio Rao
337c5ff4fc Save the sack when doing a lockmgr_disown() call.
Requested by:	kib
MFC:		3 days
2009-11-06 22:33:03 +00:00
Attilio Rao
7f9f80ce03 When releasing a lockmgr held in shared way we need to use a write memory
barrier in order to avoid, on architectures which doesn't have strong
ordered writes, CPU instructions reordering.

Diagnosed by:	fabio
2009-10-03 15:02:55 +00:00
Poul-Henning Kamp
6778431478 Revert previous commit and add myself to the list of people who should
know better than to commit with a cat in the area.
2009-09-08 13:19:05 +00:00
Poul-Henning Kamp
b34421bf9c Add necessary include. 2009-09-08 13:16:55 +00:00
Attilio Rao
8d3635c4db Fix some bugs related to adaptive spinning:
In the lockmgr support:
- GIANT_RESTORE() is just called when the sleep finishes, so the current
  code can ends up into a giant unlock problem.  Fix it by appropriately
  call GIANT_RESTORE() when needed.  Note that this is not exactly ideal
  because for any interation of the adaptive spinning we drop and restore
  Giant, but the overhead should be not a factor.
- In the lock held in exclusive mode case, after the adaptive spinning is
  brought to completition, we should just retry to acquire the lock
  instead to fallthrough. Fix that.
- Fix a style nit

In the sx support:
- Call GIANT_SAVE() before than looping. This saves some overhead because
  in the current code GIANT_SAVE() is called several times.

Tested by:	Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni dot trematerra at gmail dot com>
2009-09-02 17:33:51 +00:00
Attilio Rao
353998acc3 * Change the scope of the ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD() from a generic check to
a pointer-fetching specific operation check. Consequently, rename the
  operation ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD_PTR().
* Fix the implementation of ASSERT_ATOMIC_LOAD_PTR() by checking
  directly alignment on the word boundry, for all the given specific
  architectures. That's a bit too strict for some common case, but it
  assures safety.
* Add a comment explaining the scope of the macro
* Add a new stub in the lockmgr specific implementation

Tested by: marcel (initial version), marius
Reviewed by: rwatson, jhb (comment specific review)
Approved by: re (kib)
2009-08-17 16:17:21 +00:00
Attilio Rao
651175c9db Introduce support for adaptive spinning in lockmgr.
Actually, as it did receive few tuning, the support is disabled by
default, but it can opt-in with the option ADAPTIVE_LOCKMGRS.
Due to the nature of lockmgrs, adaptive spinning needs to be
selectively enabled for any interested lockmgr.
The support is bi-directional, or, in other ways, it will work in both
cases if the lock is held in read or write way.  In particular, the
read path is passible of further tunning using the sysctls
debug.lockmgr.retries and debug.lockmgr.loops .  Ideally, such sysctls
should be axed or compiled out before release.

Addictionally note that adaptive spinning doesn't cope well with
LK_SLEEPFAIL.  The reason is that many (and probabilly all) consumers
of LK_SLEEPFAIL are mainly interested in knowing if the interlock was
dropped or not in order to reacquire it and re-test initial conditions.
This directly interacts with adaptive spinning because lockmgr needs
to drop the interlock while spinning in order to avoid a deadlock
(further details in the comments inside the patch).

Final note: finding someone willing to help on tuning this with
relevant workloads would be either very important and appreciated.

Tested by:	jeff, pho
Requested by:	many
2009-06-17 01:55:42 +00:00
Attilio Rao
f083018223 Handle lock recursion differenty by always checking against LO_RECURSABLE
instead the lock own flag itself.

Tested by:	pho
2009-06-02 13:03:35 +00:00
Stacey Son
a5aedd68b4 Add the OpenSolaris dtrace lockstat provider. The lockstat provider
adds probes for mutexes, reader/writer and shared/exclusive locks to
gather contention statistics and other locking information for
dtrace scripts, the lockstat(1M) command and other potential
consumers.

Reviewed by:	attilio jhb jb
Approved by:	gnn (mentor)
2009-05-26 20:28:22 +00:00
Edward Tomasz Napierala
e5023dd9f6 Add missing 'break' statement.
Found with:	Coverity Prevent(tm)
CID:		3919
2009-05-12 17:05:40 +00:00
Jeff Roberson
1723a06485 - Wrap lock profiling state variables in #ifdef LOCK_PROFILING blocks. 2009-03-15 08:03:54 +00:00
Jeff Roberson
04a2868980 - Call lock_profile_release when we're transitioning a lock to be owned by
LK_KERNPROC.

Discussed with:		attilio
2009-03-14 11:43:02 +00:00
John Baldwin
8941aad19b Tweak the output of VOP_PRINT/vn_printf() some.
- Align the fifo output in fifo_print() with other vn_printf() output.
- Remove the leading space from lockmgr_printinfo() so its output lines up
  in vn_printf().
- lockmgr_printinfo() now ends with a newline, so remove an extra newline
  from vn_printf().
2009-02-06 20:06:48 +00:00
John Baldwin
413134305e Teach WITNESS about the interlocks used with lockmgr. This removes a bunch
of spurious witness warnings since lockmgr grew witness support.  Before
this, every time you passed an interlock to a lockmgr lock WITNESS treated
it as a LOR.

Reviewed by:	attilio
2008-09-10 19:13:30 +00:00
John Baldwin
814f26da8a Use |= rather than += when aggregrating requests to wakeup the swapper.
What we really want is an inclusive or of all the requests, and += can
in theory roll over to 0.
2008-08-22 16:14:23 +00:00
John Baldwin
da7bbd2c08 If a thread that is swapped out is made runnable, then the setrunnable()
routine wakes up proc0 so that proc0 can swap the thread back in.
Historically, this has been done by waking up proc0 directly from
setrunnable() itself via a wakeup().  When waking up a sleeping thread
that was swapped out (the usual case when waking proc0 since only sleeping
threads are eligible to be swapped out), this resulted in a bit of
recursion (e.g. wakeup() -> setrunnable() -> wakeup()).

With sleep queues having separate locks in 6.x and later, this caused a
spin lock LOR (sleepq lock -> sched_lock/thread lock -> sleepq lock).
An attempt was made to fix this in 7.0 by making the proc0 wakeup use
the ithread mechanism for doing the wakeup.  However, this required
grabbing proc0's thread lock to perform the wakeup.  If proc0 was asleep
elsewhere in the kernel (e.g. waiting for disk I/O), then this degenerated
into the same LOR since the thread lock would be some other sleepq lock.

Fix this by deferring the wakeup of the swapper until after the sleepq
lock held by the upper layer has been locked.  The setrunnable() routine
now returns a boolean value to indicate whether or not proc0 needs to be
woken up.  The end result is that consumers of the sleepq API such as
*sleep/wakeup, condition variables, sx locks, and lockmgr, have to wakeup
proc0 if they get a non-zero return value from sleepq_abort(),
sleepq_broadcast(), or sleepq_signal().

Discussed with:	jeff
Glanced at by:	sam
Tested by:	Jurgen Weber  jurgen - ish com au
MFC after:	2 weeks
2008-08-05 20:02:31 +00:00
Konstantin Belousov
96f1567fa7 s/alredy/already/ in the comments and the log message. 2008-07-25 11:22:25 +00:00
Attilio Rao
5047a8fd88 The "if" semantic is not needed, just fix this. 2008-05-25 16:11:27 +00:00
Attilio Rao
22dd228d5d Use a "rel" memory barrier for disowning the lock as it cames from an
exclusive locking operation.
2008-04-13 01:21:56 +00:00
Attilio Rao
e5f94314ad - Re-introduce WITNESS support for lockmgr. About the old implementation
the only one difference is that lockmgr*() functions now accept
  LK_NOWITNESS flag which skips ordering for the instanced calling.
- Remove an unuseful stub in witness_checkorder() (because the above check
  doesn't allow ever happening) and allow witness_upgrade() to accept
  non-try operation too.
2008-04-12 19:57:30 +00:00
Attilio Rao
872b7289fd - Remove a stale comment.
- Add an extra assertion in order to catch malformed requested operations.
2008-04-12 13:56:17 +00:00
Attilio Rao
e0f62984c1 - Use a different encoding for lockmgr options: make them encoded by
bit in order to allow per-bit checks on the options flag, in particular
  in the consumers code [1]
- Re-enable the check against TDP_DEADLKTREAT as the anti-waiters
  starvation patch allows exclusive waiters to override new shared
  requests.

[1] Requested by:	pjd, jeff
2008-04-07 14:46:38 +00:00
Attilio Rao
047dd67e96 Optimize lockmgr in order to get rid of the pool mutex interlock, of the
state transitioning flags and of msleep(9) callings.
Use, instead, an algorithm very similar to what sx(9) and rwlock(9)
alredy do and direct accesses to the sleepqueue(9) primitive.

In order to avoid writer starvation a mechanism very similar to what
rwlock(9) uses now is implemented, with the correspective per-thread
shared lockmgrs counter.

This patch also adds 2 new functions to lockmgr KPI: lockmgr_rw() and
lockmgr_args_rw().  These two are like the 2 "normal" versions, but they
both accept a rwlock as interlock.  In order to realize this, the general
lockmgr manager function "__lockmgr_args()" has been implemented through
the generic lock layer. It supports all the blocking primitives, but
currently only these 2 mappers live.

The patch drops the support for WITNESS atm, but it will be probabilly
added soon. Also, there is a little race in the draining code which is
also present in the current CVS stock implementation: if some sharers,
once they wakeup, are in the runqueue they can contend the lock with
the exclusive drainer.  This is hard to be fixed but the now committed
code mitigate this issue a lot better than the (past) CVS version.
In addition assertive KA_HELD and KA_UNHELD have been made mute
assertions because they are dangerous and they will be nomore supported
soon.

In order to avoid namespace pollution, stack.h is splitted into two
parts: one which includes only the "struct stack" definition (_stack.h)
and one defining the KPI.  In this way, newly added _lockmgr.h can
just include _stack.h.

Kernel ABI results heavilly changed by this commit (the now committed
version of "struct lock" is a lot smaller than the previous one) and
KPI results broken by lockmgr_rw() / lockmgr_args_rw() introduction,
so manpages and __FreeBSD_version will be updated accordingly.

Tested by:      kris, pho, jeff, danger
Reviewed by:    jeff
Sponsored by:   Google, Summer of Code program 2007
2008-04-06 20:08:51 +00:00
Attilio Rao
7fbfba7bf8 - Handle buffer lock waiters count directly in the buffer cache instead
than rely on the lockmgr support [1]:
  * bump the waiters only if the interlock is held
  * let brelvp() return the waiters count
  * rely on brelvp() instead than BUF_LOCKWAITERS() in order to check
    for the waiters number
- Remove a namespace pollution introduced recently with lockmgr.h
  including lock.h by including lock.h directly in the consumers and
  making it mandatory for using lockmgr.
- Modify flags accepted by lockinit():
  * introduce LK_NOPROFILE which disables lock profiling for the
    specified lockmgr
  * introduce LK_QUIET which disables ktr tracing for the specified
    lockmgr [2]
  * disallow LK_SLEEPFAIL and LK_NOWAIT to be passed there so that it
    can only be used on a per-instance basis
- Remove BUF_LOCKWAITERS() and lockwaiters() as they are no longer
  used

This patch breaks KPI so __FreBSD_version will be bumped and manpages
updated by further commits. Additively, 'struct buf' changes results in
a disturbed ABI also.

[2] Really, currently there is no ktr tracing in the lockmgr, but it
will be added soon.

[1] Submitted by:	kib
Tested by:	pho, Andrea Barberio <insomniac at slackware dot it>
2008-03-01 19:47:50 +00:00
Attilio Rao
81c794f998 Axe the 'thread' argument from VOP_ISLOCKED() and lockstatus() as it is
always curthread.

As KPI gets broken by this patch, manpages and __FreeBSD_version will be
updated by further commits.

Tested by:	Andrea Barberio <insomniac at slackware dot it>
2008-02-25 18:45:57 +00:00
Attilio Rao
24463dbbee - Introduce lockmgr_args() in the lockmgr space. This function performs
the same operation of lockmgr() but accepting a custom wmesg, prio and
  timo for the particular lock instance, overriding default values
  lkp->lk_wmesg, lkp->lk_prio and lkp->lk_timo.
- Use lockmgr_args() in order to implement BUF_TIMELOCK()
- Cleanup BUF_LOCK()
- Remove LK_INTERNAL as it is nomore used in the lockmgr namespace

Tested by:	Andrea Barberio <insomniac at slackware dot it>
2008-02-15 21:04:36 +00:00
Attilio Rao
84887fa362 - Add real assertions to lockmgr locking primitives.
A couple of notes for this:
  * WITNESS support, when enabled, is only used for shared locks in order
    to avoid problems with the "disowned" locks
  * KA_HELD and KA_UNHELD only exists in the lockmgr namespace in order
    to assert for a generic thread (not curthread) owning or not the
    lock.  Really, this kind of check is bogus but it seems very
    widespread in the consumers code.  So, for the moment, we cater this
    untrusted behaviour, until the consumers are not fixed and the
    options could be removed (hopefully during 8.0-CURRENT lifecycle)
  * Implementing KA_HELD and KA_UNHELD (not surported natively by
    WITNESS) made necessary the introduction of LA_MASKASSERT which
    specifies the range for default lock assertion flags
  * About other aspects, lockmgr_assert() follows exactly what other
    locking primitives offer about this operation.

- Build real assertions for buffer cache locks on the top of
  lockmgr_assert().  They can be used with the BUF_ASSERT_*(bp)
  paradigm.

- Add checks at lock destruction time and use a cookie for verifying
  lock integrity at any operation.

- Redefine BUF_LOCKFREE() in order to not use a direct assert but
  let it rely on the aforementioned destruction time check.

KPI results evidently broken, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and
manpage update result necessary and will be committed soon.

Side note: lockmgr_assert() will be used soon in order to implement
real assertions in the vnode namespace replacing the legacy and still
bogus "VOP_ISLOCKED()" way.

Tested by:      kris (earlier version)
Reviewed by:    jhb
2008-02-13 20:44:19 +00:00
Attilio Rao
2433c4883e Conver all explicit instances to VOP_ISLOCKED(arg, NULL) into
VOP_ISLOCKED(arg, curthread). Now, VOP_ISLOCKED() and lockstatus() should
only acquire curthread as argument; this will lead in axing the additional
argument from both functions, making the code cleaner.

Reviewed by: jeff, kib
2008-02-08 21:45:47 +00:00
Attilio Rao
9032b51ef3 td cannot be NULL in that place, so just axe out the check. 2008-02-06 13:26:01 +00:00
Attilio Rao
6efc8a169c Add WITNESS support to lockmgr locking primitive.
This support tries to be as parallel as possible with other locking
primitives, but there are differences; more specifically:
- The base witness support is alredy equipped for allowing lock
  duplication acquisition as lockmgr rely on this.
- In the case of lockmgr_disown() the lock result unlocked by witness
  even if it is still held by the "kernel context"
- In the case of upgrading we can have 3 different situations:
  * Total unlocking of the shared lock and nothing else
  * Real witness upgrade if the owner is the first upgrader
  * Shared unlocking and exclusive locking if the owner is not the first
    upgrade but it is still allowed to upgrade
- LK_DRAIN is basically handled like an exclusive acquisition

Additively new options LK_NODUP and LK_NOWITNESS can now be used with
lockinit(): LK_NOWITNESS disables WITNESS for the specified lock while
LK_NODUP enable duplicated locks tracking. This will require manpages
update and a __FreeBSD_version bumping (addressed by further commits).

This patch also fixes a problem occurring if a lockmgr is held in
exclusive mode and the same owner try to acquire it in shared mode:
currently there is a spourious shared locking acquisition while what
we really want is a lock downgrade. Probabilly, this situation can be
better served with a EDEADLK failing errno return.

Side note: first testing on this patch alredy reveleated several LORs
reported, so please expect LORs cascades until resolved. NTFS also is
reported broken by WITNESS introduction. BTW, NTFS is exposing a lock
leak which needs to be fixed, and this patch can help it out if
rightly tweaked.

Tested by: kris, yar, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel at gmail dot com>
2008-02-06 00:37:14 +00:00
Attilio Rao
0e9eb108f0 Cleanup lockmgr interface and exported KPI:
- Remove the "thread" argument from the lockmgr() function as it is
  always curthread now
- Axe lockcount() function as it is no longer used
- Axe LOCKMGR_ASSERT() as it is bogus really and no currently used.
  Hopefully this will be soonly replaced by something suitable for it.
- Remove the prototype for dumplockinfo() as the function is no longer
  present

Addictionally:
- Introduce a KASSERT() in lockstatus() in order to let it accept only
  curthread or NULL as they should only be passed
- Do a little bit of style(9) cleanup on lockmgr.h

KPI results heavilly broken by this change, so manpages and
FreeBSD_version will be modified accordingly by further commits.

Tested by: matteo
2008-01-24 12:34:30 +00:00
Attilio Rao
d1127e669c lockmgr() function will return successfully when trying to work under
panic but it won't actually lock anything.
This can lead some paths to reach lockmgr_disown() with inconsistent
lock which will let trigger the relative assertions.

Fix those in order to recognize panic situation and to not trigger.

Reported by: pho
Submitted by: kib
2008-01-11 16:38:12 +00:00
Attilio Rao
6edbb3ee9e Fix a last second typo about recent lockmgr_disown() introduction. 2008-01-09 00:02:43 +00:00
Attilio Rao
d7a7e17968 Remove explicit calling of lockmgr() with the NULL argument.
Now, lockmgr() function can only be called passing curthread and the
KASSERT() is upgraded according with this.

In order to support on-the-fly owner switching, the new function
lockmgr_disown() has been introduced and gets used in BUF_KERNPROC().
KPI, so, results changed and FreeBSD version will be bumped soon.
Differently from previous code, we assume idle thread cannot try to
acquire the lockmgr as it cannot sleep, so loose the relative check[1]
in BUF_KERNPROC().

Tested by: kris

[1] kib asked for a KASSERT in the lockmgr_disown() about this
condition, but after thinking at it, as this is a well known general
rule, I found it not really necessary.
2008-01-08 23:48:31 +00:00
Attilio Rao
100f241571 Trimm out now unused option LK_EXCLUPGRADE from the lockmgr namespace.
This option just adds complexity and the new implementation no longer
will support it, so axing it now that it is unused is probabilly the
better idea.

FreeBSD version is bumped in order to reflect the KPI breakage introduced
by this patch.

In the ports tree, kris found that only old OSKit code uses it, but as
it is thought to work only on 2.x kernels serie, version bumping will
solve any problem.
2007-12-28 00:38:13 +00:00
Attilio Rao
7a1d78fa3f In order to avoid a huge class of deadlocks (in particular in interactions
with the interlock), owner of the lock should be only curthread or at
least, for its limited usage, NULL which identifies LK_KERNPROC.

The thread "extra argument" for the lockmgr interface is going to be
removed in the near future, but for the moment, just let kernel run for
some days with this check on in order to find potential deadlocking
places around the kernel and fix them.
2007-12-27 22:56:57 +00:00
Robert Watson
9ccca7d1b1 Modify stack(9) stack_print() and stack_sbuf_print() routines to use new
linker interfaces for looking up function names and offsets from
instruction pointers.  Create two variants of each call: one that is
"DDB-safe" and avoids locking in the linker, and one that is safe for
use in live kernels, by virtue of observing locking, and in particular
safe when kernel modules are being loaded and unloaded simultaneous to
their use.  This will allow them to be used outside of debugging
contexts.

Modify two of three current stack(9) consumers to use the DDB-safe
interfaces, as they run in low-level debugging contexts, such as inside
lockmgr(9) and the kernel memory allocator.

Update man page.
2007-12-01 22:04:16 +00:00
Attilio Rao
2c2bebfcb3 transferlockers() is a very dangerous and hack-ish function as waiters
should never be moved by one lock to another.
As, luckily, nothing in our tree is using it, axe the function.

This breaks lockmgr KPI, so interested, third-party modules should update
their source code with appropriate replacement.

Ok'ed by: ups, rwatson
MFC after: 3 days
2007-11-24 04:22:28 +00:00
Attilio Rao
f9721b43ed Expand lock class with the "virtual" function lc_assert which will offer
an unified way for all the lock primitives to express lock assertions.
Currenty, lockmgrs and rmlocks don't have assertions, so just panic in
that case.
This will be a base for more callout improvements.

Ok'ed by: jhb, jeff
2007-11-18 14:43:53 +00:00
Julian Elischer
431f890614 generally we are interested in what thread did something as
opposed to what process. Since threads by default have teh name of the
process unless over-written with more useful information, just print the
thread name instead.
2007-11-14 06:21:24 +00:00
John Baldwin
c91fcee75d Move lock_profile_object_{init,destroy}() into lock_{init,destroy}(). 2007-05-18 15:04:59 +00:00
John Baldwin
ab2dab1680 - Use lock_init/lock_destroy() to setup the lock_object inside of lockmgr.
We can now use LOCK_CLASS() as a stronger check in lockmgr_chain() as a
  result.  This required putting back lk_flags as lockmgr's use of flags
  conflicted with other flags in lo_flags otherwise.
- Tweak 'show lock' output for lockmgr to match sx, rw, and mtx.
2007-03-30 18:07:24 +00:00
John Baldwin
aa89d8cd52 Rename the 'mtx_object', 'rw_object', and 'sx_object' members of mutexes,
rwlocks, and sx locks to 'lock_object'.
2007-03-21 21:20:51 +00:00