from stopping another thread from completing a syscall, and this allows it to
release its resources etc. Probably more related commits to follow (at least
one I know of)
Initial concept by: julian, dillon
Submitted by: davidxu
if they are not going to cross over themselves. Also change how the list of
completed user threads is tracked and passed to the KSE. This is not
a change in design but rather the implementation of what was originally
envisionned.
- Use ucontext_t's to store KSE thread state.
- Synthesize state for the UTS upon each upcall, rather than
saving and copying a trapframe.
- Deliver signals to KSE-aware processes via upcall.
- Rename kse mailbox structure fields to be more BSD-like.
- Store the UTS's stack in struct proc in a stack_t.
Reviewed by: bde, deischen, julian
Approved by: -arch
next step is to allow > 1 to be allocated per process. This would give
multi-processor threads. (when the rest of the infrastructure is
in place)
While doing this I noticed libkvm and sys/kern/kern_proc.c:fill_kinfo_proc
are diverging more than they should.. corrective action needed soon.
The process allocator now caches and hands out complete process structures
*including substructures* .
i.e. it get's the process structure with the first thread (and soon KSE)
already allocated and attached, all in one hit.
For the average non threaded program (non KSE that is) the allocated thread and its stack remain attached to the process, even when the process is
unused and in the process cache. This saves having to allocate and attach it
later, effectively bringing us (hopefully) close to the efficiency
of pre-KSE systems where these were a single structure.
Reviewed by: davidxu@freebsd.org, peter@freebsd.org
s/SNGL/SINGLE/
s/SNGLE/SINGLE/
Fix abbreviation for P_STOPPED_* etc flags, in original code they were
inconsistent and difficult to distinguish between them.
Approved by: julian (mentor)
PCATCH means 'if we get a signal, interrupt me!" and tsleep returns
either EINTR or ERESTART depending on the circumstances. ERESTART is
"special" because it causes the system call to fail, but right as it
returns back to userland it tells the trap handler to move %eip back a
bit so that userland will immediately re-run the syscall.
This is a syscall restart. It only works for things like read() etc where
nothing has changed yet. Note that *userland* is tricked into restarting
the syscall by the kernel. The kernel doesn't actually do the restart. It
is deadly for things like select, poll, nanosleep etc where it might cause
the elapsed time to be reset and start again from scratch. So those
syscalls do this to prevent userland rerunning the syscall:
if (error == ERESTART) error = EINTR;
Fake "signals" like SIGTSTP from ^Z etc do not normally invoke userland
signal handlers. But, in -current, the PCATCH *is* being triggered and
tsleep is returning ERESTART, and the syscall is aborted even though no
userland signal handler was run.
That is the fault here. We're triggering the PCATCH in cases that we
shouldn't. ie: it is being triggered on *any* signal processing, rather
than the case where the signal is posted to userland.
--- Peter
The work of psignal() is a patchwork of special case required by the process
debugging and job-control facilities...
--- Kirk McKusick
"The design and impelementation of the 4.4BSD Operating system"
Page 105
in STABLE source, when psignal is posting a STOP signal to sleeping
process and the signal action of the process is SIG_DFL, system will
directly change the process state from SSLEEP to SSTOP, and when
SIGCONT is posted to the stopped process, if it finds that the process
is still on sleep queue, the process state will be restored to SSLEEP,
and won't wakeup the process.
this commit mimics the behaviour in STABLE source tree.
Reviewed by: Jon Mini, Tim Robbins, Peter Wemm
Approved by: julian@freebsd.org (mentor)
- If either of proc or kse are NULL during thread_exit(), then
the kernel is going to fault because parts of the function
assume they aren't NULL. Instead, just assert they aren't NULL
(as well as the kse group) and assume they are in all of the
code. It doesn't make sense for them to be NULL here anyways.
- Move the PROC_UNLOCK(p) up above clearing td_proc, etc. since
otherwise we will panic if the proc's lock is contested.
Submitted by: jhb@freebsd.org
We need to rethink a bit of this and it doesn't matter if
we break the KSE test program for now as long
as non-KSE programs act as expected.
Submitted by: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com>
(this guy's just asking to get hit with a commit bit..)
'single threading thread' when the last other thread suspends.
I had this code in there before but it seems to have been
accidentally deleted somewhere along the way. This would only affect
multithreaded processes.
Reviewed by: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com>
so it needs an explicit #include <machine/frame.h> to get 'struct
trapframe'. The fact that it needs this at this level is rather bogus
but it will not compile without it.
formulated. The correct states should be:
IDLE: On the idle KSE list for that KSEG
RUNQ: Linked onto the system run queue.
THREAD: Attached to a thread and slaved to whatever state the thread is in.
This means that most places where we were adjusting kse state can go away
as it is just moving around because the thread is..
The only places we need to adjust the KSE state is in transition to and from
the idle and run queues.
Reviewed by: jhb@freebsd.org
pmap_swapin_proc/pmap_swapout_proc functions from the MD pmap code
and use a single equivalent MI version. There are other cleanups
needed still.
While here, use the UMA zone hooks to keep a cache of preinitialized
proc structures handy, just like the thread system does. This eliminates
one dependency on 'struct proc' being persistent even after being freed.
There are some comments about things that can be factored out into
ctor/dtor functions if it is worth it. For now they are mostly just
doing statistics to get a feel of how it is working.
