o Incorporate some of Tatsumi's bug fixes.
o Remove the xperimnt and commerce distribution items; they haven't
been actual distributions for awhile.
o Try to sanitize the device checking code a little more.
o Cosmetic work on the network code.
the system with these (and the mh port doesn't install there either).
Comment out /usr/X386/bin in MANPATH_MAP, it is already commented out
in MANDATORY_MANPATH.
2.2 candidate, I guess. I can't even imagine why these stuff were
still there!
ACTUALLY_LKM_NOT_KERNEL until the real fix comes through. Whatever
flag that is used to indicate building LKMs will have be be substituted
in the future. This allows proper selection of the usage of the
efficient, single instruction in the kernel, but alas, doesn't allow
for use in userland or LKMs :-(. Them's the breaks!!!
with one of the following (I486_CPU,I586_CPU,I686_CPU) so it can take
advantage of the very quick bswap insn. This keeps LKMs from being
built to take advantage of the insn, but also makes sure that the LKMs
can be run on all CPUs. (The LKMs don't pick up the CPU options :-( ).
Webmaster list since I'm not doing that anymore, remove "system administration"
category entirely since it's now a responsibility shared among multiple
individuals and, finally, add FAQ category and stick Peter da Silva's name on
it.
Reminded-By: max
that map entries are coalesced when appropriate. Also, conditionalize
some code that is currently not used in vm_map_insert. This mod
has been added to eliminate unnecessary map entries in buffer map.
Additionally, there were some cases where map coalescing could be done
when it shouldn't. That problem has been resolved.
better than using the "FAQ" alias as people have either ignored or
misused the alias in the past, and this gives the feeling that there's
an actual person behind it now (which will be a nice change in any case :-).
modules sort of works now. Their devswitch entries aren't cleaned
up, so accessing them after they have been unloaded causes a panic
in spec_open().
Submitted by: durian@plutotech.com (Mike Durian), IIRC
and he said:
The 3rd agrument is new; looks like it was part of the upgrade to
a new BIND with some IPv6 support. The third argument here should be
AF_INET. In order for it to be anything else, I'd have to add new
NIS functions to support IPv6 lookups. I don't even know what those
look like yet.
So there ya go, add AF_INET as the 3rd argument to the call.
Submitted-by: wpaul
copy of insure++, too bad the runtime only works for BSD/OS. :-(
Maybe they'll be so impressed by my initial 15 entry bug report for it
that they'll take the FreeBSD version more seriously. :-) :-)
