illumos/illumos-gate@add927f8c8
Reported on the ZFSonLinux https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/issues/4843,
fixed by https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/6339:
If we are in the middle of an incremental zfs receive, the child .../%recv
will exist. If you concurrently run zfs promote .../%recv, it will "work",
but then zfs gets confused. For example, there's no obvious way to destroy
the containing filesystem (because it is now a clone of its invisible child).
Attempting to do this promote should be an error. We could fix this by
having zfs_ioc_promote() check if zc_name contains a %, similar to
zfs_ioc_rename().
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@ac0215f4d6
When replacing a faulted device which was previously handled by a spare
multiple levels of nested interior VDEVs will be present in the pool
configuration: get_replication() needs to handle this situation gracefully
to let zpool add new devices to the pool
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@f4c1745bd6
Illumos 4080 allows "zpool clear" to work on readonly pools: i don't think
this is the intended behaviour, we shouldn't be allowed to clear readonly
pools. Probably.
A fix is already in the ZFS on Linux repository to addess this issue:
92e43c1718
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@85723e5eec
When iterating over the input nvlist in dsl_props_set_sync_impl() when we
don't preserve the nvpair name before looking up ZPROP_VALUE, so when we
later go to process it nvpair_name() is always "value" instead of the actual
property name.
This results in a couple of bugs in the recv code:
- received properties are not restored correctly when failing to receive
an incremental send stream
- received properties are not completely replaced by the new ones when
successfully receiving an incremental send stream
This was discovered on ZFS on Linux (fixed in
5f1346c299)
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@f02c28e434
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@46ac8fdfc5
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net>
Reviewed by: Andy Fiddaman <omnios@citrus-it.co.uk>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@e144c4e6c9
Currently `zdb` consistently fails to examine non-idle pools as it fails
during the `spa_load()` process. The main problem seems to be that
`spa_load_verify()` fails as can be seen below:
$ sudo zdb -d -G dcenter
zdb: can't open 'dcenter': I/O error
ZFS_DBGMSG(zdb):
spa_open_common: opening dcenter
spa_load(dcenter): LOADING
disk vdev '/dev/dsk/c4t11d0s0': best uberblock found for spa dcenter. txg 40824950
spa_load(dcenter): using uberblock with txg=40824950
spa_load(dcenter): UNLOADING
spa_load(dcenter): RELOADING
spa_load(dcenter): LOADING
disk vdev '/dev/dsk/c3t10d0s0': best uberblock found for spa dcenter. txg 40824952
spa_load(dcenter): using uberblock with txg=40824952
spa_load(dcenter): FAILED: spa_load_verify failed [error=5]
spa_load(dcenter): UNLOADING
This change makes `spa_load_verify()` a dryrun when ran from `zdb`. This is
done by creating a global flag in zfs and then setting it in `zdb`.
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@3ee8c80c74
When we fail to open or import a storage pool, we typically don't get any
additional diagnostic information, just "no pool found" or "can not import".
While there may be no additional user-consumable information, we should at
least make this situation easier to debug/diagnose for developers and support.
For example, we could start by using `zfs_dbgmsg()` to log each thing that we
try when importing, and which things failed. E.g. "tried uberblock of txg X
from label Y of device Z". Also, we could log each of the stages that we go
through in `spa_load_impl()`.
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@1fd3785ff6
spa_load_impl has grown out of proportions. It is currently over 700
lines long and makes it very hard to follow or debug the import process
even for experienced ZFS developers. The objective is to split it up
in a series of well commented functions.
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andrew Stormont <andyjstormont@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@36a64e6284
To prevent kmem_cache reaping from blocking other system resources, turn
kmem_cache_reap_now() (which blocks) into kmem_cache_reap_soon(). Callers
to kmem_cache_reap_soon() should use kmem_cache_reap_active(), which
exploits #9017's new taskq_empty().
Reviewed by: Bryan Cantrill <bryan@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@yuripv.net>
Author: Tim Kordas <tim.kordas@joyent.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@f06dce2c1f
Reviewed by: Sebastien Roy <sebastien.roy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Gordon Ross <gordon.w.ross@gmail.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Andrew Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@0fb055e81f
At present it is possible to boot from a root pool that is on RAIDZ but not
one that is on RAIDZ2 or RAIDZ3. This is because, at the time the pool
version is checked to ensure support for dual/triple parity, the uberblock
has not yet been loaded into the SPA and therefore the code determines that
the pool version is too old and returns ENOTSUP.
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Andy Fiddaman <omnios@citrus-it.co.uk>
illumos/illumos-gate@95643f75d295643f75d2https://www.illumos.org/issues/8520
lzc_rollback_to() should support rolling back to a clone's origin.
The current checks in zfs_ioc_rollback() would not allow that because the
origin snapshot belongs to a different filesystem.
The overly restrictive check was introduced in 7600, but it was not a
regression as none of the existing tools provided a way to rollback to the
origin.
https://www.illumos.org/issues/7198
EINVAL is returned when a dataset does not have any snapshots, so there is
nothing to roll back to.
Although the code in zfs_do_rollback checks for that condition in advance, it's
still possible that the snapshot(s) gets removed after the check and before the
rollback sync task is executed.
At the moment zfs command would crash when that happens.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
illumos/illumos-gate@f864f99efef864f99efehttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8997
When dmu_tx_assign is called from zil_lwb_write_issue, it's possible
for either ERESTART or EIO to be returned.
If ERESTART is returned, this will cause an assertion to fail directly
in zil_lwb_write_issue, where the code assumes the return value is
EIO if dmu_tx_assign returns a non-zero value. This can occur if the
SPA is suspended when dmu_tx_assign is called, and most often occurs
when running zloop.
If EIO is returned, this can cause assertions to fail elsewhere in the
ZIL code. For example, zil_commit_waiter_timeout contains the
following logic:
lwb_t *nlwb = zil_lwb_write_issue(zilog, lwb);
ASSERT3S(lwb->lwb_state, !=, LWB_STATE_OPENED);
In this case, if dmu_tx_assign returned EIO from within
zil_lwb_write_issue, the lwb variable passed in will not be issued
to disk. Thus, it's lwb_state field will remain LWB_STATE_OPENED and
this assertion will fail. zil_commit_waiter_timeout assumes that after
it calls zil_lwb_write_issue, the lwb will be issued to disk, and
doesn't handle the case where this is not true; i.e. it doesn't handle
the case where dmu_tx_assign returns EIO.
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@a6c1eb3c08a6c1eb3c08https://www.illumos.org/issues/8731
annotate_ecksum() asserts that nui64s, calculated as nui64s = size / sizeof
(uint64_t), is not greater than UINT16_MAX.
This restriction is needed because histograms of incorrectly set and cleared
bits have 16 bit counters and if the buffer consists of too many 64-bit words,
then a counter can potentially overflow producing an incorrect result.
When the largest buffer size was 128KB the greatest value of nui64s was 16K,
well within the limit.
But now we have support for large buffers and for buffer sizes of 512KB and
above the restriction is violated.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
illumos/illumos-gate@5cabbc6b49https://www.illumos.org/issues/7614:
This project allows top-level vdevs to be removed from the storage pool with
“zpool remove”, reducing the total amount of storage in the pool. This
operation copies all allocated regions of the device to be removed onto other
devices, recording the mapping from old to new location. After the removal is
complete, read and free operations to the removed (now “indirect”) vdev must
be remapped and performed at the new location on disk. The indirect mapping
table is kept in memory whenever the pool is loaded, so there is minimal
performance overhead when doing operations on the indirect vdev.
The size of the in-memory mapping table will be reduced when its entries
become “obsolete” because they are no longer used by any block pointers in
the pool. An entry becomes obsolete when all the blocks that use it are
freed. An entry can also become obsolete when all the snapshots that
reference it are deleted, and the block pointers that reference it have been
“remapped” in all filesystems/zvols (and clones). Whenever an indirect block
is written, all the block pointers in it will be “remapped” to their new
(concrete) locations if possible. This process can be accelerated by using
the “zfs remap” command to proactively rewrite all indirect blocks that
reference indirect (removed) vdevs.
Note that when a device is removed, we do not verify the checksum of the data
that is copied. This makes the process much faster, but if it were used on
redundant vdevs (i.e. mirror or raidz vdevs), it would be possible to copy
the wrong data, when we have the correct data on e.g. the other side of the
mirror. Therefore, mirror and raidz devices can not be removed.
Reviewed by: Alex Reece <alex@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Richard Laager <rlaager@wiktel.com>
Reviewed by: Tim Chase <tim@chase2k.com>
Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>
Author: Prashanth Sreenivasa <pks@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@d6e1c446d7d6e1c446d7https://www.illumos.org/issues/8857
I had an OS panic on one of our servers:
ffffff01809128c0 vpanic()
ffffff01809128e0 mutex_panic+0x58(fffffffffb94c904, ffffff597dde7f80)
ffffff0180912950 mutex_vector_enter+0x347(ffffff597dde7f80)
ffffff01809129b0 zio_remove_child+0x50(ffffff597dde7c58, ffffff32bd901ac0,
ffffff3373370908)
ffffff0180912a40 zio_done+0x390(ffffff32bd901ac0)
ffffff0180912a70 zio_execute+0x78(ffffff32bd901ac0)
ffffff0180912b30 taskq_thread+0x2d0(ffffff33bae44140)
ffffff0180912b40 thread_start+8()
It panicked here:
http://src.illumos.org/source/xref/illumos-gate/usr/src/uts/common/fs/zfs/
zio.c#430
pio->io_lock is DEAD, thus a panic. Further analysis shows the "pio"
(parent zio of "cio") has already been destroyed.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Youzhong Yang <youzhong@gmail.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
Author: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@e9b7d6e7f7https://www.illumos.org/issues/8972:
'zfs holds -H' does not properly output content in scripted mode. It uses a
tab instead of two spaces, but it still pads column widths with spaces when
it should not.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
illumos/illumos-gate@5cb8d943bchttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8835:
Sequential reads not aligned to block size are not detected by ZFS
prefetcher as sequential, killing prefetch and severely hurting
performance. It is caused by dmu_zfetch() in case of misaligned
sequential accesses being called with overlap of one block.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
illumos/illumos-gate@4ae5f5f06chttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8652:
Clang and GCC prefer to use unsigned ints to store enums. With Clang, that
causes tautological comparison warnings when comparing a zfs_prop_t or
zpool_prop_t variable to the macro ZPROP_INVAL. It's likely that error
handling code is being silently removed as a result.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@2ba5f978a4https://www.illumos.org/issues/8641:
"zpool clear" and "zinject -d" can both operate on specific vdevs, either
leaf or interior. However, due to an oversight, neither works on a "spare"
or "replacing" vdev. For example:
sudo zpool create foo raidz1 c1t5000CCA000081D61d0 c1t5000CCA000186235d0 spare c1t5000CCA000094115d0
sudo zpool replace foo c1t5000CCA000186235d0 c1t5000CCA000094115d0
$ zpool status foo pool: foo
state: ONLINE
scan: resilvered 81.5K in 0h0m with 0 errors on Fri Sep 8 10:53:03 2017
config:
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
foo ONLINE 0 0 0
raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5000CCA000081D61d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spare-1 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5000CCA000186235d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
c1t5000CCA000094115d0 ONLINE 0 0 0
spares
c1t5000CCA000094115d0 INUSE currently in use
$ sudo zinject -d spare-1 -A degrade foo
cannot find device 'spare-1' in pool 'foo'
$ sudo zpool clear foo spare-1
cannot clear errors for spare-1: no such device in pool
Even though there was nothing to clear, those commands shouldn't have
reported an error. by contrast, trying to clear "raidz1-0" works just fine:
$ sudo zpool clear foo raidz1-0
illumos/illumos-gate@301fd1d6f2
Reviewed by: Alek Pinchuk <pinchuk.alek@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@ixsystems.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@01a059ee0chttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8856:
arc_cksum_is_equal() calls zio_push_transform() that requires abd_t*
(second arg), but a void* is passed.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Roman Strashkin <roman.strashkin@nexenta.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@9a551dd645https://www.illumos.org/issues/8897:
# zpool online -e test mirror-1
Assertion failed: nvlist_lookup_string(tgt, "path", &pathname) == 0, file ../common/libzfs_pool.c, line 2558, function zpool_vdev_online
Abort (core dumped)
Not a big deal per se, but should be handled gracefully, same way as 'offline' and 'online' without '-e'.
Also reported as: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221408
Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@93c618e0f4https://www.illumos.org/issues/8930:
We normally remove an unlinked node when its last user goes away and the
node becomes inactive. However, we should not do that if the filesystem
is mounted read-only including the case where it has its readonly
property set. The node will remain on the unlinked queue, so it will
not be leaked.
One particular scenario is when we receive an incremental stream into a
mounted read-only filesystem and that stream contains an unlinked file
(still on the unlinked queue). If that file is opened before the
receive and some time later after the receive it becomes inactive we
would remove it and, thus, modify the read-only filesystem. As a
result, the filesystem would diverge from its source and further
incremental receives would not be possible (without forcing a rollback).
Another related scenario, that may or may not be possible depending on an
OS / VFS policy, is when an open file is unlinked, then the filesystem is
remounted read-only, and then the file is closed.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Gordon Ross <gwr@nexenta.com>
Author: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
illumos/illumos-gate@94ddd0900ahttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8909:
There's a race condition that exists if `zil_free_lwb` races with either
`zil_commit_waiter_timeout` and/or `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`.
Here's an example panic due to this bug:
> ::status
debugging crash dump vmcore.0 (64-bit) from ip-10-110-205-40
operating system: 5.11 dlpx-5.2.2.0_2017-12-04-17-28-32b6ba51fb (i86pc)
image uuid: 4af0edfb-e58e-6ed8-cafc-d3e9167c7513
panic message:
BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ffffff0010555970 addr=60 occurred in module "zfs" due to a NULL pointer dereference
dump content: kernel pages only
> $c
zio_shrink+0x12()
zil_lwb_write_issue+0x30d(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03e0730e20)
zil_commit_waiter_timeout+0xa2(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8)
zil_commit_waiter+0xf3(ffffff03dcd15cc0, ffffff03d97ffcf8)
zil_commit+0x80(ffffff03dcd15cc0, 9a9)
zfs_write+0xc34(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0)
fop_write+0x5b(ffffff03dc38b140, ffffff0010555e60, 40, ffffff03e00fb758, 0)
write+0x250(42, fffffd7ff4832000, 2000)
sys_syscall+0x177()
If there's an outstanding lwb that's in `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`
waiting to timeout, waiting on it's waiter's CV, we must be sure not to
call `zil_free_lwb`. If we end up calling `zil_free_lwb`, then that LWB
may be freed and can result in a use-after-free situation where the
stale lwb pointer stored in the `zil_commit_waiter_t` structure of the
thread waiting on the waiter's CV is used.
A similar situation can occur if an lwb is issued to disk, and thus in
the `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` state, and `zil_free_lwb` is called while the
disk is servicing that lwb. In this situation, the lwb will be freed by
`zil_free_lwb`, which will result in a use-after-free situation when the
lwb's zio completes, and `zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done` is called.
This race condition is prevented in `zil_close` by calling `zil_commit`
before `zil_free_lwb` is called, which will ensure all outstanding (i.e.
all lwb's in the `LWB_STATE_OPEN` and/or `LWB_STATE_ISSUED` states)
reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before the lwb's are freed
(`zil_commit` will not return untill all the lwb's are
`LWB_STATE_DONE`).
Further, this race condition is prevented in `zil_sync` by only calling
`zil_free_lwb` for lwb's that do not have their `lwb_buf` pointer set.
All lwb's not in the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state will have a non-null value
for this pointer; the pointer is only cleared in
`zil_lwb_flush_vdevs_done`, at which point the lwb's state will be
changed to `LWB_STATE_DONE`.
This race is present in `zil_suspend`, leading to this bug.
At first glance, it would appear as though this would not be true
because `zil_suspend` will call `zil_commit`, just like `zil_close`, but
the problem is that `zil_suspend` will set the zilog's `zl_suspend`
field prior to calling `zil_commit`. Further, in `zil_commit`, if
`zl_suspend` is set, `zil_commit` will take a special branch of logic
and use `txg_wait_synced` instead of performing the normal `zil_commit`
logic.
This call to `txg_wait_synced` might be good enough for the data to
reach disk safely before it returns, but it does not ensure that all
outstanding lwb's reach the `LWB_STATE_DONE` state before it returns.
This is because, if there's an lwb "stuck" in
`zil_commit_waiter_timeout`, waiting for it's lwb to timeout, it will
maintain a non-null value for it's `lwb_buf` field and thus `zil_sync`
will not free that lwb. Thus, even though the lwb's data is already on
disk, the lwb will be left lingering, waiting on the CV, and will
eventually timeout and be issued to disk even though the write is
unnesseary.
So, after `zil_commit` is called from `zil_suspend`, we incorrectly
assume that there are not outstanding lwb's, and proceed to free all
lwb's found on the zilog's lwb list. As a result, we free the lwb that
will later be used `zil_commit_waiter_timeout`.
Reviewed by: John Kennedy <jwk404@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@a3b2868063https://www.illumos.org/issues/8677
We want to be able to run channel programs outside of synching context.
This would greatly improve performance of channel program that just gather
information, as we won't have to wait for synching context anymore.
This feature should introduce the following:
- A new command line flag in "zfs program" to specify our intention to
run in open context.
- A new flag/option within the channel program ioctl which selects the
context.
- Appropriate error handling whenever we try a channel program in
open-context that contains zfs.sync* expressions.
- Documentation for the new feature in the manual pages.
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@27295216542729521654https://www.illumos.org/issues/7531
I found that some buffers that could be L2ARC eligible are not flagged
such, leading to some performance impact. As a test I ran the same IO
workload 10 times in a raw. It is a metadata only workload (files
listing). l2arc_noprefetch=0.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: benrubson <ben.rubson@gmail.com>
MFC after: 8 days
illumos/illumos-gate@f37ae9a714f37ae9a714https://www.illumos.org/issues/8713
If we're creating a pool with version >= SPA_VERSION_DSL_SCRUB (v11) we need to
account for additional space needed by the origin dataset which will also be
snapshotted: "poolname"+"/"+"$ORIGIN"+"@"+"$ORIGIN".
Enforce this limit in pool_namecheck().
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@0a0551200e0a0551200ehttps://www.illumos.org/issues/640
du(1), df(1m), ls(1), and swap(1m) all include a copy (it appears literally
copied) of the 'number_to_scaled_string' function in their source. This should
be moved to a shared library and all 4 commands should use this instead.
Reviewed by: Sebastian Wiedenroth <wiedi@frubar.net>
Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@gmx.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Jason King <jason.brian.king@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@3f7978d02b3f7978d02bhttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8081
zdb(8) is full of minor problems that generate compiler warnings. On FreeBSD,
which uses -WError, the only way to build it is to disable all compiler
warnings. This makes it much harder to detect newly introduced bugs. We should
cleanup all the warnings.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@42b141117242b1411172https://www.illumos.org/issues/8648
I'm opening this bug to track integration of the following ZFS on Linux
commit into illumos:
commit f763c3d1df
Author: LOLi <loli10K@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon Aug 21 17:59:48 2017 +0200
Fix range locking in ZIL commit codepath
Since OpenZFS 7578 (1b7c1e5) if we have a ZVOL with logbias=throughput
we will force WR_INDIRECT itxs in zvol_log_write() setting itx->itx_lr
offset and length to the offset and length of the BIO from
zvol_write()->zvol_log_write(): these offset and length are later used
to take a range lock in zillog->zl_get_data function: zvol_get_data().
Now suppose we have a ZVOL with blocksize=8K and push 4K writes to
offset 0: we will only be range-locking 0-4096. This means the
ASSERTion we make in dbuf_unoverride() is no longer valid because now
dmu_sync() is called from zilog's get_data functions holding a partial
lock on the dbuf.
Fix this by taking a range lock on the whole block in zvol_get_data().
Reviewed-by: Chunwei Chen <tuxoko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <behlendorf1@llnl.gov>
Signed-off-by: loli10K <ezomori.nozomu@gmail.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Reviewed by: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: LOLi <loli10K@users.noreply.github.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@bd9d3f9046bd9d3f9046https://www.illumos.org/issues/8661
The "zil-cw1" dtrace probe was previously removed in 8558, and the "zil-cw2"
probe should have been removed in that patch as well. Unfortunately, the "zil-
cw2" was not removed in 8558, so this bug is to track it's removal.
Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@2840dce1a02840dce1a0https://www.illumos.org/issues/8600
ZFS channel programs should be able to create snapshots.
In addition to the base snapshot functionality, this will likely entail adding
extra logic to handle edge cases which were formerly not possible, such as
creating then destroying a snapshot in the same transaction sync.
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: John Kennedy <john.kennedy@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@000cce6b6f000cce6b6fhttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8592
ZFS channel programs should be able to perform a rollback. This logic will
probably look pretty similar to zfs.sync.destroy().
Reviewed by: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@1c18e8fbd81c18e8fbd8https://www.illumos.org/issues/8502
The code in lib/libzfs/common/libzfs_mount.c already basically handles
the case when libshare is not installed. We just need to not fail in
zfs_init_libshare_impl. I tested this in lx and things work as
expected. I also tested there trying to set sharenfs and sharesmb on
the delegated dataset. Neither is allowed from within a zone. The
spew of msgs from a native zone is not ZFS specific. I see the same
spew simply running the share command.
Reviewed by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@gmx.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Jerry Jelinek <jerry.jelinek@joyent.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@ed992b0aaced992b0aachttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8604
Every time we want to unmount a snapshot (happens during snapshot deletion or
renaming) we unnecessarily iterate through all the mountpoints in the VFS layer
(see zfs_get_vfs).
Ideally we would just put a hold on the snapshot and access its respective VFS
resource directly.
gwilson_snap_unmount.svg - Flamegraph indicating the issue discussed (138 KB)
Serapheim Dimitropoulos, 2017-09-14 06:36 PM
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@5f39f884e25f39f884e2https://www.illumos.org/issues/8605
zfs.exists() in channel programs doesn't return any result, and should have a
man page entry.
Reviewed by: Paul Dagnelie <pcd@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Dan Kimmel <dan.kimmel@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Chris Williamson <chris.williamson@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@2bcb5458542bcb545854https://www.illumos.org/issues/8602
When I landed the fix for 8558, I incorrectly added the "dp_early_sync_tasks"
field to the "dsl_pool" structure. This field is used in DelphixOS, but not in
illumos. It was incorrectly pulled into illumos, so this bug is to remove it
from the structure.
Reviewed by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@c861bfbd77c861bfbd77https://www.illumos.org/issues/8567
If fstat64 fails, pread64 fails, or the label is unintelligible,
zpool_read_label will return 0. But if malloc fails, it will return -1. For
consistency, it should always return -1 on failure or 0 on success.
Reviewed by: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Author: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@554675eee7554675eee7https://www.illumos.org/issues/8473
Scrubbing is supposed to detect and repair all errors in the pool. However, it
wrongly ignores active spare devices. The problem can easily be reproduced in
OpenZFS at git rev 0ef125d with these commands:
truncate -s 64m /tmp/a /tmp/b /tmp/c
sudo zpool create testpool mirror /tmp/a /tmp/b spare /tmp/c
sudo zpool replace testpool /tmp/a /tmp/c
/bin/dd if=/dev/zero bs=1024k count=63 oseek=1 conv=notrunc of=/tmp/c
sync
sudo zpool scrub testpool
zpool status testpool # Will show 0 errors, which is wrong
sudo zpool offline testpool /tmp/a
sudo zpool scrub testpool
zpool status testpool # Will show errors on /tmp/c, which should've already been fixed
FreeBSD head is partially affected: the first scrub will detect some errors,
but the second scrub will detect more.
Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Richard Lowe <richlowe@richlowe.net>
Author: Alan Somers <asomers@gmail.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@1271e4b10d1271e4b10dhttps://www.illumos.org/issues/8585
The current implementation of zil_commit() can introduce significant
latency, beyond what is inherent due to the latency of the underlying
storage. The additional latency comes from two main problems:
1. When there's outstanding ZIL blocks being written (i.e. there's
already a "writer thread" in progress), then any new calls to
zil_commit() will block waiting for the currently oustanding ZIL
blocks to complete. The blocks written for each "writer thread" is
coined a "batch", and there can only ever be a single "batch" being
written at a time. When a batch is being written, any new ZIL
transactions will have to wait for the next batch to be written,
which won't occur until the current batch finishes.
As a result, the underlying storage may not be used as efficiently
as possible. While "new" threads enter zil_commit() and are blocked
waiting for the next batch, it's possible that the underlying
storage isn't fully utilized by the current batch of ZIL blocks. In
that case, it'd be better to allow these new threads to generate
(and issue) a new ZIL block, such that it could be serviced by the
underlying storage concurrently with the other ZIL blocks that are
being serviced.
2. Any call to zil_commit() must wait for all ZIL blocks in its "batch"
to complete, prior to zil_commit() returning. The size of any given
batch is proportional to the number of ZIL transaction in the queue
at the time that the batch starts processing the queue; which
doesn't occur until the previous batch completes. Thus, if there's a
lot of transactions in the queue, the batch could be composed of
many ZIL blocks, and each call to zil_commit() will have to wait for
all of these writes to complete (even if the thread calling
zil_commit() only cared about one of the transactions in the batch).
Reviewed by: Brad Lewis <brad.lewis@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Matt Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Prakash Surya <prakash.surya@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@e6ab4525d1e6ab4525d1https://www.illumos.org/issues/8590
In dsl_destroy_snapshots_nvl(), "snaps_normalized" is not freed after it is
added to "arg".
Reviewed by: Pavel Zakharov <pavel.zakharov@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: Steve Gonczi <steve.gonczi@delphix.com>
Reviewed by: George Wilson <george.wilson@delphix.com>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
illumos/illumos-gate@916c8d8811916c8d8811https://www.illumos.org/issues/8552
In the LUA interpreter used by "zfs program", the lua format() function
accidentally includes support for '%f' and friends, which can cause compilation
problems when building on platforms that don't support floating-point math in
the kernel (e.g. sparc). Support for '%f' friends (%f %e %E %g %G) should be
removed, since there's no way to supply a floating-point value anyway (all
numbers in ZFS LUA are int64_t's).
Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuripv@gmx.com>
Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <igor@dilos.org>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Author: Matthew Ahrens <mahrens@delphix.com>
